Buffyisagoddess wrote:
It's all an elaborate Republican setup. Honest. 
Buffy get back in your cage this instant!
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Cold Hard Cash
Cold Hard CashFollow
Buffy get back in your cage this instant!
It's all an elaborate Republican setup. Honest
Probably not, but if it were, it'd look identical.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
It's all an elaborate Republican setup. Honest
Probably not, but if it were, it'd look identical.
Would your response to all this be identical if it had been a Pubbie congressman who was "singled out"?
Jawbox wrote:
Would your response to all this be identical if it had been a Pubbie congressman who was "singled out"?
Smasharoo wrote:
The concern is really more that there were probably 40 other congresspeple who could have been targeted in the same, but apparently weren't.
Someone had to be first. Again, I understand the point but hardly conclusive evidence of someone's rights being violated.
Quote:
It sets the perception that administration is doing something about the rampant corruption in congress, driven at the moment, largely by their own supporters by stinging a marginal figure in the opposition party.
Quote:
Yes, congresspeople shouldn't take bribes, but offering a token example of enforcing that law isn't the same as actually doing anything about it.
Of course he should be prosecuted, but if the executive branch is going to prosecute this type of operation it better be extensive and equally targeted.
Of course he should be prosecuted, but if the executive branch is going to prosecute this type of operation it better be extensive and equally targeted.
Get informants to volunteer to bury as many Pubbies as they do Dems, and problem solved. I'm not saying this couldn't be an instance where someone is being unfairly used to make a point, but he's still set himself up as a pretty decent target.
Edited, Tue May 23 22:00:03 2006 by Atomicflea
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Jawbox wrote:
Would your response to all this be identical if it had been a Pubbie congressman who was "singled out"?
I'm not talking about whether everyone agrees it's immoral regardless of party. I'm talking about the fact that the very next quote in your post would've been ridiculed mercilessly if a Pubbie had gotten busted and the quote came from gbaji.
Smasharoo wrote:
The concern is really more that there were probably 40 other congresspeple who could have been targeted in the same, but apparently weren't.
Well I think it's about time that they caught one of these f*cks. I am sure this goes on all over the place, everyone else just isn't as stupid.
Recent Visitors: 200
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (200)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Cold Hard Cash
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC