Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

First they protest, now they take take drugs (legally)!!Follow

#1 May 03 2006 at 5:55 AM Rating: Good
Well, there you go. Those that haven't left to invade your country, are now free to take drugs

Quote:
Mexican President Vicente Fox will sign into law a measure that decriminalizes the possession of small amounts of marijuana, cocaine, heroin and other drugs for personal use, his spokesman said Tuesday.

Spokesman Ruben Aguilar defended the law, which was approved Friday by Mexico's Senate, despite criticism in the United States that it could increase casual drug use.

"The president is going to sign this law," said Aguilar, who called the legislation "a better tool ... that allows better action and better coordination in the fight against drug dealing."

"The government believes that this law represents progress, because it established the minimum quantities that a citizen can carry for personal use," Aguilar said.

Under current Mexican law, judges can drop charges against people caught with drugs if they can prove they are addicts and if an expert certifies they were caught with "the quantity necessary for personal use."

The new bill makes the decriminalization automatic and drops the addict requirement - automatically letting any "consumers" have drugs.

While police will still be able to detain people for public consumption or possession of drugs, it appears that those caught could only be referred to a treatment program - of which Mexico has few - or have their names added to a registry of addicts.

On Friday, Mayor Jerry Sanders of San Diego, said he was "appalled" by the bill. The city of 1.3 million people is a short drive from the Mexican border town of Tijuana.

"I certainly think we are going to see more drugs available in the United States," Sanders said. "We need to register every protest the American government can muster."

Under the new law, consumers may possess up to 25 milligrams of heroin, five grams of marijuana (about one-fifth of an ounce, or about four joints), or 0.5 grams of cocaine - the equivalent of about four "lines," or half the standard street-sale quantity.

The law also establishes allowable quantities for other drugs, including LSD, ecstasy - about two pills' worth - and amphetamines.

However, the bill stiffens penalties for trafficking and possession of drugs - even small quantities - by government employees or near schools, and it maintains criminal penalties for drug sales.

It also gives local police more power to go after small-scale dealing



Found here

Edited, Wed May 3 07:02:05 2006 by RedPhoenixxxxxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#2 May 03 2006 at 6:16 AM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Well, they're trying, at least...a little too hard, though.

Coke, heroin, etc. are too powerful and dangerous for casual, uncontrolled use. Marijuana is somewhat moderate in comparison, more along the lines of alcohol and tobacco. Classifying "hard" drugs and "soft" drugs together is problematic, displayed by past American policies banning them altogether as well as this new Mexican policy of blanket tolerance.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#3 May 03 2006 at 6:19 AM Rating: Decent
Yeah I heard about this a few days ago. Pot being legalized is fine with me. Everything else though needs to stay illegal.
#4 May 03 2006 at 6:53 AM Rating: Good
TO be honest, the only people that will really suffer from this will be Mexican cops, who wont be able to racket petty criminals for drugs anymore. Their salary will be cut in half.

other than that, I think drugs are really a health problem, not a criminal law one. Taking drugs, like doing self-harm, is your problem. it is your health, and the government should help you with rehab. But not put you in jail. That's just the worst possible solution.

Stealing stuff or killing people to fund this habit is another problem altogether. But some people steal to fund their gambling habits, or alcohol addiction, and people dont want to criminalise those activities.

I also think making drugs illegal plyas into the hands of gangs, since we're basically giving them a billion dollar industry to run as they wish. People will take drugs whatever happens. The only question is who should prescribe it? Doctors/pharmacists, or criminal gangs?

Not only that, but legalising all drugs would cut off billions of dollars from criminals, would help solve many problems around the world (Columbia, Afghanistant, Morocco, etc...), and would make the drugs themselves much cleaner. And it would make the state much richer.

The "War on Drugs" is almost as stupid a concept as the "War on Terror". it is doomed to failure, and costs billions of dollars each year for very little result.

The only problem is that such a solution is not politically acceptable.

But it is surely better than the current one.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#5 May 03 2006 at 8:48 AM Rating: Decent
I say legallize it all if people do the (as Debalic put it) "hard" drugs and ***** themselves up one less person in the world. And I'm wondering if this will affect the immigration issues now, we may have a bunch of people go to Mexico for drugs now.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 498 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (498)