Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

return of the German cannibalFollow

#1 Apr 19 2006 at 8:28 AM Rating: Decent


Quote:
FRANKFURT (Reuters) - A sex expert at the retrial of a German cannibal jailed for killing a man and feeding on his flesh said Tuesday the defendant had not been motivated by a desire to kill but by his victim's wish to be eaten.

Armin Meiwes, who was jailed two years ago for killing a computer engineer who had begged to be eaten, is standing trial for the second time after Germany's top criminal court ruled that his eight-year sentence for manslaughter was too lenient.

Prosecutors, hoping to secure a murder conviction, need to show that Meiwes killed his victim to fulfill his own sexual desire or that he planned to distribute for profit part of the videotape he made of the crime.


Meiwes's defense hinges on his victim's request to be eaten and that he was simply fulfilling this desire, a view backed up by a sex psychologist who addressed the court in Frankfurt.

"He (Meiwes) was convinced that he wanted it and that he would live on within him," Klaus Beier told the court. "His motivation was not to kill."

Beier described Meiwes as an affable, self-confident and positive man, who apart from his crime would have done little to attract attention.

He told the crowded court how Meiwes had searched the Internet for a suitable partner, trawling through advertisements including one from a 26-year-old who was looking for "a likeable, older gentleman to read me my death sentence."

His search had been fruitless, however, until he met Bernd-Juergen Brandes, who had advertised for someone to "obliterate his life and leave no trace."

VIDEOTAPED KILLING

Of the handful of men he met, Meiwes had said, only Brandes had been a truly willing victim. "He never had to doubt Brandes's willingness," Beier told the court Tuesday.

Beier said that Meiwes's fantasy had its roots in his father's departure from the family home and a domineering and embittered mother. His desire to eat someone stemmed from his wish to find a partner who would not abandon him.

At an earlier hearing in January, Meiwes told judges how he had severed Brandes's ***** and that both had tried to eat it, without success, although Meiwes later ate flesh from the body.


After heavy bleeding, Brandes finally fell unconscious. Believing his victim to be dead Meiwes laid his victim out on a bench and plunged a knife into his neck.

He said that only when he later saw his videotape of killing did he realize that Brandes had still been faintly breathing.

Germany's top criminal court said the first trial court had ignored the fact that Meiwes had filmed the slaying for later sexual gratification.

Meiwes's lawyers, however, have said that he had released four potential victims who had changed their minds at the last minute and initially driven Brandes homeward after he appeared to lose his nerve.


WTF is wrong with the German judicial system? 8 years for killing and EATING a man? I don't care if the meal was willing, it takes a screwed up guy to be able to cut off another man's **** and then try to eat with him.

And how the fUck is video taping the damn thing "leaving no trace?"


edit 1 - fucking swear filter...
edit 2 - spelling > me
Edited, Wed Apr 19 09:34:04 2006 by ArrogantT

Edited, Wed Apr 19 09:54:03 2006 by ArrogantT
#2 Apr 19 2006 at 8:41 AM Rating: Decent
ArrogantT wrote:
WTF is wrong with the German judicial system? 8 hyears for killing and EATING a man?


If you can eat him in less than 2 hours, you get a lighter sentence. They just don't tell you that includes a biscuit and a potato.
#3 Apr 19 2006 at 4:06 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
WTF is wrong with the German judicial system?

More like WTF is wrong with German people. This guy sounds like a descendant of Josef Mengele or something.


#4 Apr 19 2006 at 4:09 PM Rating: Good
***
1,863 posts
If the victim is willing, what is the crime?
#5 Apr 19 2006 at 4:13 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
ArrogantT wrote:
I don't care if the meal was willing, it takes a screwed up guy to be able to cut off another man's **** and then try to eat with him.


Is he more fuc[black][/black]ked up then the person who let him cut off his richard? Who eats their own Richard?



Edited, Wed Apr 19 17:15:03 2006 by fenderputy
#6 Apr 19 2006 at 4:19 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,101 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Quote:
WTF is wrong with the German judicial system?

More like WTF is wrong with German people. This guy sounds like a descendant of Josef Mengele or something.


/nod

It's been generations since Nazism and ze Germans still can't break from being associated with it.
#7 Apr 19 2006 at 4:24 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Wingchild wrote:
If the victim is willing, what is the crime?

The crime exists because it's a violation of the law, á la statutory rape.
#8 Apr 19 2006 at 9:00 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,717 posts
To me thats wrong on SO many levels

All most worse than the kid holding a knife
#9 Apr 19 2006 at 9:52 PM Rating: Good
***
1,863 posts
hmm.. The crime of murder exists because the state is able to prosecute in lieu of the victim's request, as it's in the interest of the state to prevent killings in general.

I wonder if the law would be applicable in a place where Right to Die laws existed (like Oregon - I think they still have one). Even if not, there are probably provisions against cannibalism of some form or another.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 280 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (280)