Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

XmenFollow

#1 Mar 21 2006 at 10:02 AM Rating: Good
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I just watched the new trailer five times in a row. I know that makes me wicked geeky, but I'm so looking forward to it. Also, the new Davinci Code trailer is creepy and good looking but it appears that I may have to lose my crush on Paul Bettany after watching it.

How can one person have a crush on Hugh Jackman, Paul Bettany, and Alan Rickman? That's just not right.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Mar 21 2006 at 10:03 AM Rating: Good
Mrs. Frakkor and I are looking forward to it as well. End of May, correct?
#3 Mar 21 2006 at 10:04 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I love the X-men. Looking forward to this new movie.

I wanna be Storm when I grow up!
#4 Mar 21 2006 at 10:04 AM Rating: Good
**
937 posts
Looking forward to the next xmen movie.

Got a good laugh at how they almost hammered Phoenix Saga into your head in X2.
#5 Mar 21 2006 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Both are coming out at the end of May...one the 19th, one the 26th, but I can't remember which is which. We're going to try to see BOTH in the theater because my inlaws will be visiting at that time and can watch the baby! *does a little touchdown dance*

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#6 Mar 21 2006 at 10:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Christmen, please.



Dirty liberals
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#7 Mar 21 2006 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,291 posts
Looks cool. Probably be another 750 years before I get a chance to see it though. Damn dirty kids.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#8 Mar 21 2006 at 10:52 AM Rating: Excellent
They casted Fraiser as Beast.


nifty.
#9 Mar 21 2006 at 10:59 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Tare wrote:
Looks cool. Probably be another 750 years before I get a chance to see it though. Damn dirty kids.


On Demand FTW!
#10 Mar 21 2006 at 10:59 AM Rating: Good
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
They casted Fraiser as Beast.


nifty.


Yeah, I'm pleased with that. His voice lends and air of legitimacy to the professor character I think.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#11 Mar 21 2006 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
I dunno, looks pretty cool. Looks like they might be doing too many story lines at once.
#12 Mar 21 2006 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
I dunno, looks pretty cool. Looks like they might be doing too many story lines at once.


I'm assuming by your swank avatar your familiar with comic books. Too many story lines is a most common occurence.

I saw both X-Men and Superman: Returns trailers (using Marlon Brando's voice is genius) at V for Vendetta and they looked amazing.
#13 Mar 21 2006 at 11:42 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,735 posts
Nexa wrote:
Soracloud, King of Bards wrote:
They casted Fraiser as Beast.


nifty.


Yeah, I'm pleased with that. His voice lends and air of legitimacy to the professor character I think.

Nexa


Yup. I wouldn't have it any other way. I'm all giddy with this movie! Smiley: yippee
#14 Mar 21 2006 at 12:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Just watched both trailers. My only complaint is that it's not May yet.
#15 Mar 21 2006 at 12:20 PM Rating: Default
I want to see this movie but I'm still not happy about the choice of director...
#16 Mar 21 2006 at 1:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Nexa wrote:
How can one person have a crush on Hugh Jackman, Paul Bettany, and Alan Rickman? That's just not right.


Same way that I'm willing to take on Colin Farrell, Jude Law and Heath Ledger. Smiley: inlove
#17 Mar 21 2006 at 1:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Thumbelyna the Hand wrote:
Nexa wrote:
How can one person have a crush on Hugh Jackman, Paul Bettany, and Alan Rickman? That's just not right.


Same way that I'm willing to take on Colin Farrell, Jude Law and Heath Ledger. Smiley: inlove


Yeah but those are all guys in the same general age range and have similar builds and whatnot, you know?

I guess it's just the voice thing.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#18 Mar 21 2006 at 1:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Nexa wrote:
I guess it's just the voice thing.


I love sexy voices, for some good phone pron, I'd take on Michael Douglas, Matthew McConaughey and Clive Owen.
#19 Mar 21 2006 at 6:06 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Thumbelyna the Hand wrote:
Nexa wrote:
How can one person have a crush on Hugh Jackman, Paul Bettany, and Alan Rickman? That's just not right.


Same way that I'm willing to take on Colin Farrell, Jude Law and Heath Ledger. Smiley: inlove

I only like Hugh Jackman when he talks in the Wolverine voice. His real voice kills it, and especially when I hear it singing show tunes.

Paul Bettany is too pale, and Alan Rickman looks a bit too much like Anjelica Houston. I do heart me some Anthony Hopkins, though.

/sigh
#20 Mar 21 2006 at 6:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Nexa wrote:
Yeah but those are all guys in the same general age range and have similar builds and whatnot, you know?

I guess it's just the voice thing.
See you in Boston Smiley: sly
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#21 Mar 21 2006 at 6:22 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Nobby wrote:
Nexa wrote:
Yeah but those are all guys in the same general age range and have similar builds and whatnot, you know?

I guess it's just the voice thing.
See you in Boston Smiley: sly

Will you be wearing latex?
#22 Mar 21 2006 at 6:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Nobby wrote:
Nexa wrote:
Yeah but those are all guys in the same general age range and have similar builds and whatnot, you know?

I guess it's just the voice thing.
See you in Boston Smiley: sly

Will you be wearing latex?
Silk baby. Silk.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#23 Mar 21 2006 at 7:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Nobby wrote:
See you in BostonSmiley: sly


/swoon Smiley: inlove
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#24 Mar 21 2006 at 8:56 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Sir Sassythief wrote:
I dunno, looks pretty cool. Looks like they might be doing too many story lines at once.


I'm a bit concerned about this as well. Not only too many storylines, but maybe too many characters. Let's see. They ended with a lead in to the Phoenix saga, so we're presumably going to see that in some form. They've already got a large cast. Prof X, Cyclops, Wolvie, Storm, Rogue, and Iceman are all back as mains, plus a number of backdrop characters like Kitty, Piotr, Jubilee and such that they tend to toss in. To this, they're adding the whole Muir Island cast (Madrox, Roark, and Mactaggart), and Angel and Beast. But that's not enough. Let's toss in Juggernaught. And toss in Magneto as well. And hey! Let's toss the Morlocks in for iceing on the cake...


When are they going to have time between introducing characters to actually tell the Phoenix story *and* whatever other story is going on (gotta have magneto, the morlocks, and juggs in there for a reason). And btw. Where is the Hellfire club in all of this? Aren't they a significant part of the whole Phoenix thing anyway? Where's Sebastian Shaw? Where's Emma Frost? Are they maybe planning on stretching the saga out over a couple films instead of resolving it here?

Interesting bit I noticed in the credits of X2. The scene in the backround in the bar where the Beast (McCoy) is debating the issue of mutants on TV? Guess who he's debating with? Yup. Sebastian Shaw. The Black King of the Hellfire club. Just seemed interesting that they tossed that in. And strange that they're not going in that direction, since it's an obvious and historically accurate way to advance the story. This one *should* have been about a new attempt to "get" mutants. It should have been about Sentinels and secret organizations (and mutants like Shaw, who've infiltrated them). But at least from everything I've seen so far, they went in a totally different direction.

EDIT: Although interstingly enough, it does seem to have Bolivar Trask, who IIRC, was the guy in the comics who started the whole sentinel project in the first place (oddly enough, when he was killed, it was continued by Henry Gyrich, but he was the Senator's aid who was killed off in the *first* X-men film and replaced by Mystique, so they've already kinda changed things a bit).

Not that different isn't good. I'm hoping for a kick butt movie. I've just got some concerns as a long time X-men fan about where they're going with all of this. I know they intend for this to be the last X-men film, so I can kinda understand the changes. But it just seems "odd" to add more characters and story ideas if your purpose is to wrap everything in the series up. Why introduce new major characters in the 3rd film of a trilogy? I just have fears that you've got too many creative influences going on behind this film that aren't totally in sync.



Hehe. Still going to watch it of course though... :)

Edited, Tue Mar 21 22:09:29 2006 by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#25 Mar 21 2006 at 9:20 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,735 posts
gbaji paraphrased wrote:
Sir Sassythief wrote:
I dunno, looks pretty cool. Looks like they might be doing too many story lines at once.


I think they are gunna jam alot of things into this movie all at once.


The jamming might cut off some really important stuff, too.

I noticed that in X2, Beast was in the TV newscast in the bar scene debating with the dude from Hellfire. THAT would be kick *** if they go into it, and they should cause it's important and stuff.

EDIT: Bolivar Trash is in it, though...this should be interesting.

I like the idea of a new plot, but if they are ending the series with this, they might be adding too many big shots to full grasp onto them.



Hehe. Still going to watch it of course though... :)

Edited, Tue Mar 21 21:04:39 2006 by gbaji



#26 Mar 21 2006 at 9:29 PM Rating: Excellent
I've been pleased with the first two X-Men movies, but I'm agreeing completely with Gbaji. I'm worried that they are going to cram so much into this movie that the entire plot will never truly develop. I'm interested in seeing all of the backdrop characters don't get me wrong, but if they are sacrificing the plot for a 30 second cameo of Gambit, then it's not going to be a very good movie. But like Gbaji, I'll still be there to see it most likely, how can you not lol it's the X-Men.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 298 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (298)