Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

democracyFollow

#27 Mar 21 2006 at 12:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
As per the routine, I was asked if I wanted to vote in the Republican or Democratic primary. I had a brief flash of saying Republican and tossing my vote in with Oberweis just for giggles but proper civic duty got the better of me and I went Democrat Smiley: frown
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#28 Mar 21 2006 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
***
1,863 posts
While the odds of us returning to a popular democracy are nil, I would still love to see some kind of internet-ready voting system -- or better, something tied to one's television. Even our welfare recipients seem to have those. I surely would not want them disenfranchised.

I'm all for any technology that can up our turnout rates. If America is full of people who just can't haul themselves to the ballot box, let's bring the box to them.

I'd hope that increasing turnout would dilute the effects of vote tampering, something that happens all too frequently in our happy bastion of freedom.
#29 Mar 21 2006 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent
Wingchild wrote:
I'm all for any technology that can up our turnout rates. If America is full of people who just can't haul themselves to the ballot box, let's bring the box to them.


I'd bet that if they can't make themselves go vote, then they surely can't be bothered to educate themselves about the choices, even if the ballot box is delivered to them. I don't think it would help matters at all to have a bunch of uninformed people choosing at random. Not that everyone who votes now is completely informed, but this would just make it worse.
#30 Mar 21 2006 at 12:27 PM Rating: Good
***
1,863 posts
I'd argue that most people who do go vote still aren't educated about their choices. Maybe my experiences have been bad, but I've met plenty of folks who only know what's shown in attack ads.
#31 Mar 21 2006 at 12:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Be that as it may, I don't think the answer is to unbalance the ratio further Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Mar 21 2006 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Again, instead of focusing on making it easier for ignorant people to cast a cyber-vote, I wish we could focus on getting the pool of potential voters more educated first.
#33 Mar 21 2006 at 12:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If you're a potential voter you are, by definition, an adult.

Stop waiting for someone to hold your hand and drop the $4.50 on a copy of US News & World Report or something.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Mar 21 2006 at 12:53 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Jophiel wrote:
If you're a potential voter you are, by definition, an adult.

Stop waiting for someone to hold your hand and drop the $4.50 on a copy of US News & World Report or something.

Not sure if that was directed at me, but if it was, I was thinking a little more long-term than that -- as in, educating children better so that they become better-educated adults...
#35 Mar 21 2006 at 1:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I don't know. Unless things have changed, you're required to take (and pass) an American Government & Contitution class and test before you graduate from Junior High, High School and college (at least all the colleges I've been to had a mandatory US Gov requirement though they were all public schools).

You can force the kids to learn enough about US government to pass a test and a class but you can't really force them to care.

What -- and you and I have been debating a lot lately but trust me when I say I ask this of curiousity and not to score points -- but what in particular do you think is lacking from the education system that would make people more responsible and enthusiastic voters?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Mar 21 2006 at 1:46 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
Jophiel wrote:
What -- and you and I have been debating a lot lately but trust me when I say I ask this of curiousity and not to score points -- but what in particular do you think is lacking from the education system that would make people more responsible and enthusiastic voters?

I assure you the recent debating is tied more to shared interests in the particular topics in question rather than me trying to pick a fight with the big guy. Smiley: bowdown

As for what's lacking in the education system? I don't know, perhaps focusing less on children's self-esteem, postitive self-regard, and achievement of symbols of excellence and focus more on the actual excellence; a curriculum with higher standards and actual rigor in areas such as science, mathematics, logic/critical thinking, world culture, world history, and American history; higher standards and higher pay for teachers, etc., etc.


I never would've thought a liberal would be in disagreement with that...


Edited, Tue Mar 21 13:51:46 2006 by Jawbox
#37 Mar 21 2006 at 1:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jawbox wrote:
I assure you the recent debating is tied more to shared interests in the particular topics in question rather than me trying to pick a fight with the big guy.
Hehe... I meant I wasn't trying to pick fights with you.
Jawbox the Furtive wrote:
As for what's lacking in the education system? I don't know, perhaps focusing less on children's self-esteem, postitive self-regard, and achievement of symbols of excellence rather than the actual excellence; a curriculum with higher standards and actual rigor in areas such as science, mathematics, logic/critical thinking, world culture, world history, and American history; higher standards and higher pay for teachers, etc., etc.
I agree with all that for the sheer sake of education but I'm not convinced it'll necessarily translate to "better" voters.

I guess I just view it as a personal sort of thing and either you give enough of a rat's *** to take charge or you don't. I went through the exact same educational system as many of my friends and I absolutely promise you I'm the only one who voted today. Why? I'm not sure, to be honest. I don't think it's because the system "failed" them and I don't think I'm all that exceptional a guy (but feel free to stroke my ego). But when I see people give excuses for blowing off an election like "I just didn't know", it really means "I didn't care enough to find out". Bust open a couple newspapers to see who they endorse and why. Read some articles. Listen to a debate. Flip the radio to the AM band. But by the time you can vote, the educational system is largely done with you and it becomes a personal responsibility.

Edited, Tue Mar 21 14:01:33 2006 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#38 Mar 22 2006 at 2:03 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Jophiel wrote:
But by the time you can vote, the educational system is largely done with you and it becomes a personal responsibility.

I think that's all the answer you need. This country has a critical shortage of personal responsibility.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#39 Mar 22 2006 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Debalic wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
But by the time you can vote, the educational system is largely done with you and it becomes a personal responsibility.

I think that's all the answer you need. This country has a critical shortage of personal responsibility.



It is because out lazy public is complacent wehn it comes to politics these days. We give our leaders the benefit of the doubt and we allow media and and biased ads to do our thinking for us. As ineffficient as this is it seems to be how the system is designed.

Of course, this system was designed during a time wehn it took weeks for news to reach the nations cities.. before such things as radios and TVs and internets.

Face it, we are working off of an obsolete system. It's 2006, not 1806. We are 200 years out of date.
Personally I think the reason that noone has bothered to try to change any of this is how well that this outmoded system works to transform politics into a full blown entrepreneurial extraveganza, where the only one with any chance of making an impact are those with the money, power, and connections to utilize and EXPLOIT the media driven and miseducated public with over-funded ad campaigns; all the while lining the pockets of their parties with "donations" from the lobbbiest who is the highest bidder.

Our government apparently is a glorified national auction block.. where the policies are determined by the highest bidder... rather than determined by the actual common public.

The only thing that John Q has to go off of is whoever puts on the most expensive show, the brighter lights, and the most creative propaganda..
and the whole time our education system deteriorates further.. thus further driving home the notion that the public should keep their ignorant noses out of politics and just leave it to the big guys up in the penthhouse.

It is a totally self-preserving enterprise that is only going to worsen until at some point.. the house of cards falls.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#40 Mar 22 2006 at 6:42 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Kelvyquayo, Eater of Souls wrote:
Face it, we are working off of an obsolete system. It's 2006, not 1806. We are 200 years out of date. Personally I think the reason that noone has bothered to try to change any of this is how well that this outmoded system works to transform politics into a full blown entrepreneurial extraveganza, where the only one with any chance of making an impact are those with the money, power, and connections to utilize and EXPLOIT the media driven and miseducated public with over-funded ad campaigns; all the while lining the pockets of their parties with "donations" from the lobbbiest who is the highest bidder.


Are you seriously of the opinion that holding some sort of mass "internet voting" system, where the public votes as a whole on every issue constantly, would alleviate any of this?

It would be *worse*. Advertising is about getting people to do something based on minimal information, and before they have time to think about it completely. If you think that's a problem today when we hold elections at set times and you have a couple *years* for people to at least have a chance to be exposed to enough information to make a reasonably informed choice, what do you think will happen when it's "on demand"?


We use the system we use, not because it's perfect, but because it's better then every other system that's been tried.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#41 Mar 22 2006 at 6:52 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
We use the system we use, not because it's perfect, but because it's better then every other system that's been tried.



exactly. Time to "try" somthing else.

Waht is that somthing else? I don't know, I'm just an IT manager, but no matter waht it is, I bet it won't be an easy transition.... which is why we'll prolly keep on the outdated track until we are FORCED to change it. Good times that will be, unfortuantly not in our lifetimes.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#42 Mar 22 2006 at 7:08 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
5,677 posts
We can play around with the Iraqi government until we find a better way...

#43 Mar 23 2006 at 5:43 AM Rating: Default

this seems like a very incestuous forum...


#44 Mar 24 2006 at 9:31 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Jenifa wrote:

this seems like a very incestuous forum...





j00 keep using that word. I do not think it means, what j00 think it means
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#45 Mar 24 2006 at 10:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jenifa wrote:
this seems like a very incestuous forum...
You haven't seen Lunatics guild chat Smiley: eek
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#46 Mar 24 2006 at 10:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
gbaji wrote:
It would be *worse*. Advertising is about getting people to do something based on minimal information, and before they have time to think about it completely. If you think that's a problem today when we hold elections at set times and you have a couple *years* for people to at least have a chance to be exposed to enough information to make a reasonably informed choice, what do you think will happen when it's "on demand"?


Vote for Resolution 4791B! If you don't, clowns will come to your house and eat you!

Resolution 4791B, keeping you clown-safe.

resolution also states that all babies with silly names (defined by Resolution 4762C) will be eaten by lions. this notice required by law
____________________________
Do what now?
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 195 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (195)