Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

I wonder if they're about to whack Arafat.Follow

#1 May 03 2004 at 6:56 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Or are just messing with his head.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#2 May 03 2004 at 7:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Coming after Sharon's defeat within his own party on that gaza pullout vote? Wouldn't suprise me, but i'd think they would at least wait until the next suicide bombing.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#3 May 03 2004 at 8:22 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
I wonder if they're about to whack Arafat



God willing.


#4 May 03 2004 at 8:28 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Depends on how it goes in the Knesset. If it loses there, you'll likely either see the party lose power (which could be good or bad), or Sharon replaced with someone even more hardlined then he is (which is hard to imagine really).

Um... That may result in Arafat getting whacked. There are just way too many variables in place.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#5 May 03 2004 at 8:30 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
No, I mean right now, not in general. They've surrounded his compound with tanks.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#6 May 03 2004 at 8:36 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Time to turn on TV. CNN?
#7 May 03 2004 at 9:08 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,571 posts
Some stuff in passing about it on c-span
#8 May 03 2004 at 10:17 PM Rating: Decent
if sharon could have his way without others (the US) getting in the way Arafat would of been gone years ago.
#9 May 04 2004 at 7:03 PM Rating: Good
**
466 posts
Yeah they've got to keep up some semblance of stability and even-handedness so as not to embarass the US. And the States of course have to keep some semblance of face for the int'l community. Then again Bush seems to only care about that because of Coli.

Anyway, Israel wouldn't want to stop getting all that nice military aid and equipment and all, now would they? What was it at now, a billion a year?

But maybe Sharon's had enough and doesn't give a **** anymore. They've been routinely assassinating Hamas leaders lately..
#10 May 04 2004 at 9:48 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
But maybe Sharon's had enough and doesn't give a sh*t anymore. They've been routinely assassinating Hamas leaders lately..


yes and i say more power to him for that move too, sadly it has ruined any chance at a semblance of peace, but on the other hand, the hamas has choosen to ignore any and all peace offerings and or truces signed by either side, so what does it really matter.

hamas = evil IMHO and as much as i dont condone genocide, with them and any other terrorist group i am leaning more and more in that direction.
#11 May 04 2004 at 9:51 PM Rating: Decent
There really aren't that many people who will miss Arafat. He's been a useless figurehead for the Palestinian people. They really deserve someone that can at least pretend to be effective.
#12 May 04 2004 at 10:10 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,553 posts
They might deserve better, but they elected him. I can think of at least one other country that deserves better than the *** they elected.

I do not believe that Israel has any right to exist.
nor do I believe that any palestinean state has any right to exist.

Religion is no reason to make a country hold a war, much less kill anyone over, indeed I think most of the religions in question all kinda start with the whole "thou shalt not kill" thing.

Anyhow, the more I read on the subject (currently reading "Six days of War - June 1967 and the making of the modern Middle East" by Michael B. Oren), the more I realize I'm not qualified to hold an opinion on the matter.

Hence my lack of beliefs.
____________________________
--Illia
Fumus, draco magus incoluit mare.
Myrx - 70 Holy Priest, Myr - 70 Resto Shaman, Gryd - 70 Prot Warrior
#13 May 05 2004 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
If you want to know what made the modern middle east, look no further than Jimmy Carter. His abandonment of the Shah in Iran, a *STAUNCH* US ally, lead to the overthrow of the Shah by an extremist anti-american government. Because of this, the US went to the nutbar Hussein in Iraq and we supported him because he was an enemy of Iran. Things progressively turned worse from there.

Iran was the strongest force in the middle east and supported the US. Jimmy "The Appeaser" Carter screwed it, and the entire middle east, up.
#14 May 05 2004 at 11:18 AM Rating: Default
hey, wow someone else knows a bit o history. nice retort Bongo and so sadly true at that.

why also do you think the US was then shortly after targeted by terrorist groups. because Carter was weak and the world knew it. that is also why when Regan won the election the captive were scheduled to be released AFTER he took office. because the world knew, guessed, Reagan was nuts and would blow ppl up.

as for isreal, they have far more claim to that part of the world then the palastines ever will/did/do.

Jews were around long before Muslim, by close to 1000 years or so. the muslim releigion did not come around until AFTER christ. at that point the jewiesh ppl had been around for a few thousands years.
#15 May 05 2004 at 11:32 AM Rating: Good
Carter was short sighted. He's a nice guy, don't get me wrong. He truely believes that deep inside everyone, there's a person waiting to build homes for the poor. But the sad truth is that there *IS* evil out in the world and it can't always be reasoned with.

Even now, Carter is still calling for appeasment. Him, and those like him, will never be able to see that sometimes, evil is just that. Evil.

Some things in the world *are* black and white - not shades of grey.
#16 May 05 2004 at 12:13 PM Rating: Default
yup have to agree 100% there, but then im also rather blunt in the way i see things.

id get shot if i were to take office. id **** to many ppl off by doing whats right no matter that situation.
#17 May 05 2004 at 12:21 PM Rating: Decent
No doubt, if I were president, I'd end up getting the world headed for armageddon.
#18 May 05 2004 at 12:30 PM Rating: Good
Bongo, fyi you have to post a few things, be made fun of, perhaps insulted by Thundra, then you can become a regular poster.

Right now you just seem like some guy who married my mother and is trying to get me to call you Dad.

Ask Darkflame, she knows the process.


Unless you give me a title, then you can do what ever in the hell you want.
#19 May 05 2004 at 12:42 PM Rating: Good
Jimmy Carter sure can throw a horseshoe!

Eb
#20 May 05 2004 at 1:03 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
that is also why when Regan won the election the captive were scheduled to be released AFTER he took office. because the world knew, guessed, Reagan was nuts and would blow ppl up
Or because they were bought off with illegal weapons sales. Whichever.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#21 May 05 2004 at 2:01 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

If you want to know what made the modern middle east, look no further than Jimmy Carter. His abandonment of the Shah in Iran, a *STAUNCH* US ally, lead to the overthrow of the Shah by an extremist anti-american government. Because of this, the US went to the nutbar Hussein in Iraq and we supported him because he was an enemy of Iran. Things progressively turned worse from there.

Iran was the strongest force in the middle east and supported the US. Jimmy "The Appeaser" Carter screwed it, and the entire middle east, up.

Yeah I guess that's why he won the fuc[/b]king Nobel Prize, because he was foolish about middle east policy. I guess the Camp David accords were a huge mistake.

Carter has done more to futher the mid east peace process than any man alive. Trying to somehow blame him for the fuc[b]
ked up mess Bush and Regan made is pathetic and moronic in the extreme. Take thirty seconds to learn some history before you post your chile-like oppinion on matters clearly too complex for you to comprehend.

Stick to wathcing the WWE.

Edited, Wed May 5 15:02:19 2004 by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#22 May 05 2004 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Carter has done more to futher the mid east peace process than any man alive. Trying to somehow blame him for the ****** up mess Bush and Regan made is pathetic and moronic in the extreme. Take thirty seconds to learn some history before you post your chile-like oppinion on matters clearly too complex for you to comprehend.


Believe it or not he's an old family friend. Good man.

Eb

Did I mention he can throw a mean horseshoe?
#23 May 05 2004 at 2:15 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,553 posts
why there was an anti-americain sentiment in iran..
____________________________
--Illia
Fumus, draco magus incoluit mare.
Myrx - 70 Holy Priest, Myr - 70 Resto Shaman, Gryd - 70 Prot Warrior
#24 May 05 2004 at 3:45 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I don't think it was so much that Carter was short sighted. I've actually heard the reverse. The guy was a bit too long sighted perhaps for the situation. He knew that the Shah was a problem, and would devolve the Iraq situation. I don't think he expected the level of retaliation in Iran, but he knew that we couldn't keep supporting that guy and hope to maintain any sort of relations in the middle east.

Carter's plan for the middle east was actually a pretty good one. The problem was that he didn't have as much pull as he really needed to pull it off, and the over-focus on the Cold War caused us to make decisions in the middle east (like supporting an essentially fascist party purely because they were also anti-communist) that we are now regretting. You can argue back and forth about whether Carter was right or not, but Reagan beat him on a cold war ticket essentially, so that was clearly where the *people* of the US were at then. Blaming any particular president for focusing his foreign policy on what the people wanted him to focus on is a bit silly (especially when we elect the presidents).
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#25 May 05 2004 at 9:03 PM Rating: Default
Smasharoo wrote:
Quote:

If you want to know what made the modern middle east, look no further than Jimmy Carter. His abandonment of the Shah in Iran, a *STAUNCH* US ally, lead to the overthrow of the Shah by an extremist anti-american government. Because of this, the US went to the nutbar Hussein in Iraq and we supported him because he was an enemy of Iran. Things progressively turned worse from there.

Iran was the strongest force in the middle east and supported the US. Jimmy "The Appeaser" Carter screwed it, and the entire middle east, up.

Yeah I guess that's why he won the fuc[/b]king Nobel Prize, because he was foolish about middle east policy. I guess the Camp David accords were a huge mistake.

Carter has done more to futher the mid east peace process than any man alive. Trying to somehow blame him for the fuc[b]
ked up mess Bush and Regan made is pathetic and moronic in the extreme. Take thirty seconds to learn some history before you post your chile-like oppinion on matters clearly too complex for you to comprehend.

Stick to wathcing the WWE.

Edited, Wed May 5 15:02:19 2004 by Smasharoo


Carter has done more since he got out of office, then he ever did in office. there is no denigning the fact that he is a good man, but there is also no need to agrue that he was a good president.

he and ford stand on about the same level of competence when it came to leading the USA. not saying DW bush is doing much better, but he is doing.

the camp david accord was a good idea, but so was the 'roadmap to peace' that bush started and look were both got us. no place good.

IMHO there is nothing good that can come out of the ME until it grows up as i mentioned in an other thread. the entire ME is much like the world was 1 thousand years ago or so and has not grown up since. they are still basicaly a trible community with tribale ways.

if you are that old thinking, you will never be able to relate to the rest of the world that has grown up past that.

its like trying to get a 6yr old class to understand highschool chemistry. you just cant do it. or to get that same 6yr old class to read and comprehend McBeth(sp?) its just not going to happen until that class of 6yr old children grow up. then and only then with time will they understand those things.

the whole of the ME is like that group of 6yr old children, but they are about one thousand years behind that 12th grade class, sadly they are playing with the 12th graders toys and lives.
#26 May 06 2004 at 11:39 AM Rating: Decent
**
540 posts
Good posting, all. When any region is in a war fare like state for decades, even hundreds of years, it stunts the growth of nearly every social institution, that is, except for the military. The collective intellect of the area suffers as well.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 605 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (605)