Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Are you ******* kidding me?Follow

#477 May 07 2004 at 2:08 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

One thing that is common however, is the faith its believers have in it. If someone posted on here they had a purple dog in their backyard, both of us are going to be skeptical. If you applied example to our beliefs, one of the main differences is that you would want tests and pictures for you to believe it and I would apply my life experiences and religious faith to it before I believed it.


The main diffrence is that you'd have a good chance of beliving in the purple dog without any evidence.

Thats the rub for anyone not suckered into a religion.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#478 May 07 2004 at 2:18 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Empyre all you arguemant does is show in crystal quality the difference between a Scientific view <Theory> and a Religious View <Theology>

A scientist does his best with the infomation that he can glean using the best scientific methods of the day and leaves it to his students and other scientists to discuss and if necessary disprove his Theory.

A scientific view will never say this is the Absolute correct answer, only stating that is the best answer so far

A religious view on the other had say i am right and no other posibilities exsist.

to Quote Smasharoo: What is wrong with saying I DON'T KNOW.

As an Atheist, i long to discover the history of the human race out of curiousity not for justification.

If you choose to beleive in the story's that are found in the Bible then my friend you are Gullible, they do not stand up to any reasonable investigation or scientific scrutany.

If you choose to believe in God thats fine with me.
If you choose to follow the base code of conduct depicted in the bible thats fine with me.
But don't tell me that some carpenter 2000 years ago rose from the dead, sorry i am not buying that it's just plain foolish.
#479 May 07 2004 at 2:29 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
Quote:
The main diffrence is that you'd have a good chance of beliving in the purple dog without any evidence.

Thats the rub for anyone not suckered into a religion.


and that (among countless other factors) is where what defines your ability to converse with any sort of worth and your ability to churn stomachs with fodder turns from a line in the sand to line of runway beacons.
#480 May 07 2004 at 2:31 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Yeah...runaway bacon, right. Make sure to let your robots know to protect you from the purple dogs now, k?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#481 May 07 2004 at 2:35 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,291 posts
What exactly makes what Smash said "stomach-churning fodder", Empyre? Isn't it true that if you have faith that purple dogs exist that you would be more apt to believe there was one kicking around? Why do you think it's called "blind faith"?

Smash's comment basically summed up the difference between the two camps.



____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#482 May 07 2004 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Smiley: confused

I'll say it. I DON'T KNOW what Empyre is saying here.
#483 May 07 2004 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
tarv wrote:
Empyre all you arguemant does is show in crystal quality the difference between a Scientific view <Theory> and a Religious View <Theology>

A scientist does his best with the infomation that he can glean using the best scientific methods of the day and leaves it to his students and other scientists to discuss and if necessary disprove his Theory.

A scientific view will never say this is the Absolute correct answer, only stating that is the best answer so far


but is not a fact an Absolute correct answer by definition? That is what I'm arguing, your statements that:

tarv wrote:
Myself i think that Religious people that argue Science vs Religion are amoungst the dumbest people alive, not because they are religious, but becasue they are willing to argue Myth against Proven fact.


I'm not arguing my beliefs here...as much as I regret that expressing some of them prematurely on this board haunts me every day.

tarv wrote:
A religious view on the other had say i am right and no other posibilities exsist.

to Quote Smasharoo: What is wrong with saying I DON'T KNOW.


the two have very little to do with each other, but your stereotyping religious views with the expressed views of organized religion. why so many will classify anyone with religious views into the same category as organized religion boggles my mind. I understand its easy to do, but its a huge stereotype that cannot be justified beyond the fact that it's easy.

Sure, some of my beliefs are the same as some christian beliefs..some of them also are supported by buudhism, catholism, etc. I just happen to think of the christian image and definition of God to satisfy that human desire to put image to everything. It doesn't mean that I believe the same thing as every bible thumper you've ever been inconvenienced by.

Quote:
As an Atheist, i long to discover the history of the human race out of curiousity not for justification.


Well then there are also some things we can see eye-to-eye on then.

tarv wrote:
If you choose to beleive in the story's that are found in the Bible then my friend you are Gullible, they do not stand up to any reasonable investigation or scientific scrutany.


Tell me you've never believed in something you've read and it turned out to be wrong, disproven, unproven, or tale? Are those stories true? I don't know..i'd like to believe they are. Outside of the bible they are bound in, they are letter and poems written by men and women throughout history.

Was the spiritual experience that viewed the things outlined in revelation an actual spiritual experience in which a man was lifted to heaven and showed the end of times or was it a hallucination due to the fact he was stranded on an island with no food or water? None of us will ever know unless it actually happens, but if it gives me faith in the idea that there is something better after this life, then i'm going to believe it...and maybe that makes me gullible by your definition, but in a world that is sometimes unbearable..its a much appreciated relief.

Quote:
If you choose to believe in God thats fine with me.
If you choose to follow the base code of conduct depicted in the bible thats fine with me.
But don't tell me that some carpenter 2000 years ago rose from the dead, sorry i am not buying that it's just plain foolish.


Now with this statement your going against much of what you said. We don't have proof he rose from the dead. We have record that he lived (the accuracy of these records can be disputed, but people deny the hollucaust ever happened as well) and personal accounts of the things he did.

We didn't have tape recorders and cameras back then...it would be difficult to make any record other than what we have. And anything that could be used to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt has been contaminated by study so much that its hopeless to think it could be useful. But to us that believe in it, we don't need proof. And to those like you who don't care to believe it, you don't have proof.

So why can't we both be satisfied without cutting at the other for what they believe? I think if we had that answer, the fighting in the middle east would stop.
#484 May 07 2004 at 2:59 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
tare wrote:
What exactly makes what Smash said "stomach-churning fodder", Empyre? Isn't it true that if you have faith that purple dogs exist that you would be more apt to believe there was one kicking around? Why do you think it's called "blind faith"?


what is blind faith to you then? if you are using this example as a means to prove I have blind faith, then you must apply the same to you and most everyone else as well. by example, someone said they had the purple dog..we then had to determine within ourselves whether that was true or not with the statement made by the person. isn't this same thing done in the media every day? you've never read a newspaper article or magazine and wondered or assumed it real?

how do you know there isn't really a purple dog in his backyard? your just assuming because you have never seen one or heard of any existing that it can't be true. if there is an opposite of blind faith, then THAT would be it.

blind faith would be if I made up something in my head then believed in it. but until we can prove whether or not that purple dog was in his backyard or not, neither one of us has any business publishing that it does or does not exist as fact.
#485 May 07 2004 at 6:02 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
"Sofa King we todd did" = "so ******* retarded".

Thanks Skeet, I get it now. I can always rely on you.
#486 May 07 2004 at 6:12 PM Rating: Good
No problem Pat. Don't feel bad about not getting it, it takes one to know one.
#487 May 07 2004 at 11:01 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,571 posts
You know, he stole that from Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Can't even make his own material.
#488 May 07 2004 at 11:06 PM Rating: Good
Sh[b][/b]it, I guess I better cancel the construction of that shrine I was going to have erected in honor of his creativity.

edit: Grr, damn swear filter made it look like I started the sentence with a small letter.

Edited, Sat May 8 00:12:47 2004 by Skeeter
#489 May 07 2004 at 11:08 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,571 posts
You can make one for me, though
#490 May 08 2004 at 5:12 PM Rating: Decent
TheDave wrote:
Believing in god is like betting on red or black on a roulette wheel. 50/50 chance but low return if you win.


Actually, you have a slightly lower than 50% chance of 'hitting' on a red/black (or an odd/even, for that matter). Don't forget about the green 0 an 00 on the wheel. The payout is even money, not quite a low return. If you want low return, bet on the favorite to place at a horse track.
#491 May 08 2004 at 5:27 PM Rating: Decent
wow ty for that! im so enlightened Smiley: rolleyesSmiley: rolleyesSmiley: rolleyes
#492 May 09 2004 at 12:12 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Chtulhu the Quick wrote:
You know, he stole that from Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Can't even make his own material.


What, Sofa King? I've heard Sofa King commercials on the radio for years now. When did ATHF come out?

Our prices are Sofa King low you won't believe it!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#493 May 09 2004 at 1:19 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

blind faith would be if I made up something in my head then believed in it. but until we can prove whether or not that purple dog was in his backyard or not, neither one of us has any business publishing that it does or does not exist as fact.

The important part is that it's not a 50/50 thing thate one of us will be right. There's a 1 in 10 to the 100000000000000000th power chance that any sort of god exists. That's probably overly optimistic. The chances that YOUR PARTICULAR version exists are almost non existant. It's more likely that everyone who doesn't believe as you do will get hit by metors every day for a year.

If you like those kinds of odds, I have lots of bets you can spend your money on.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#494 May 09 2004 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
Ok I see a lot of people talking about this expidition, to me it is a waste on money, but no biggy doesnt affect me.

But I will say that the few people saying that if it is the ark that it will prove non christians wrong, they are complete idiots. Noah wasnt even christian he was jewish which would make him non christian, it could also prove greek mythology to be correct and certian native american mytholgies to be right. Christianity is actually one of the few mythologies that dont have their own version of the ark they instead use anothers version. But by doing that it makes it where no matter what evidence is found if any no one can prove it support christianity, only mythologies that have their own versions of the flooding and arks.

I appologize if any one else covered this, but I dont care to read more then one page of religious vs. non religious people spouting off. I can waste my time else where.

Edited, Sun May 9 12:31:08 2004 by dirges
#495 May 09 2004 at 11:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Three cheers for God!

Hip Hip Horay!
Hip Hip Horay!
Hip Hip Horay!

This thread is the best, I am never letting it drop off of the page. Having a bad day? Just come here and bash the christians/or infidels depending on your take on things. Yay ignorance!


Three cheers for Ignorance!

Hip Hip Horay!
Hip Hip Horay!
Hip Hip Horay!
#496 May 09 2004 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
This thread is Sofa King OLD!!!!!!
#497 May 09 2004 at 11:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Skeeter, you're funny!
#498 May 09 2004 at 10:37 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,701 posts
It's all most a LAST tm thread.
____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#499 May 09 2004 at 11:10 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
smash wrote:
The important part is that it's not a 50/50 thing thate one of us will be right. There's a 1 in 10 to the 100000000000000000th power chance that any sort of god exists. That's probably overly optimistic. The chances that YOUR PARTICULAR version exists are almost non existant. It's more likely that everyone who doesn't believe as you do will get hit by metors every day for a year.


lmao. its quite amusing how you come up with some of this crap. i'm sure you pulled those stats from a technical doc..prolly the same one that talks about 99.9% of statistics being made up on the spot.

here's a statistic for you. there is a 99 in 100 chance that the stuff that comes out of your mouth is exaggerated, desensitized or just plain bullsh[b][/b]it.
#500 May 10 2004 at 5:08 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
I have already argued successfully that there is an infintessimal chance of your version of God being correct Empyre, I really don't think we need to go over it again.

Edited, Mon May 10 06:08:39 2004 by Patrician
#501 May 10 2004 at 5:09 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Last!

Totem
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 214 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (214)