Are Lesbians as Promiscuous as Gays?Follow

trunks, you are the worst post count buffer I've seen in a good long while. The only person better was Invisible, when he posted on the Lasttm thread.

Keep it up though. Once you get 4 stars, you get free premium membership for life!


Think he bought it?

if you had the opportunity to view yours from 3rd person, a whole new element could be added to that statement.

and (so as not to hijack the thread further), your a gay ****.

like that hasn't been done before. i think i've actually seen that exact post..and as always, your a day late and a dollar short. if your gonna jump on a trend, at least try to jump on while its still a trend.

Most men are not 'nurturing' by nature. As a result, they don't quite know how to maintain relationships usually - even with women - but, when you add in that they are attracted to a man, they are even more baffled. They tend to go for one night stands and they tend to hate themselves for being gay (society does NOT sanction it, or understand it) so they also tend to do a lot of alcohol and drugs to bolster themselves for that sort of thing. It is an unstable way to live. :(

And, as someone earlier pointed out, in a less delicate way than I would have, all men are sluts. (Actually, I don't think 'all' is true, but 'many' are.) Raging hormones during adolescence stimulate constant thoughts about sex for most guys.

Most women, by nature, have a nurturing instinct. Two women together tend to nurture each other. Hence they often can maintain more stable relationships. And, to be honest, society is much less critical of women who like women. Maybe because they are quieter and more 'relationship' oriented for the most part (with the exception of in places where the more liberal gay community is quite outspoken.)

Hormonal changes in women don't stimulate the same level of sexual drives, they primarily just make a girl interested in the opposite sex. Girls usually have sexual urges (at young ages at least) only when they are 'attracted' to a particular young man, especially if he treats them right. Even then, girls are not subject to obvious signs of sexual arousal, and many don't know what that feels like even. They understand 'attraction' only.

(An aside: In later years, though most guys don't understand this even then, what is sexy to a woman is usually not the flowers and expensive gifts, it is the little things like saying I love you and taking out the trash without being asked.)

Ahh, ********* There's a reason that guys that look like Johnny Depp get more *** than guys who look like Louie Anderson regardless if they're ******** or not. Girls get wet for guys that they're physically atrracted to, period. This whole "it's not all about the physical thing for women" **** is largely a myth. I've never ended up sleeping with a woman who wasn't physically attracted to me but was aroused latter because of my sparkling personality.

All ya gotta do to understand the different sexual mores of men and women is watch a few National Geographic specials about animals.

Its all about passing your genes on to the next generation. Even if you don't plan on doing so, THAT is the fundamental drive behind sex.

Males insure that their genes are passed on by banging everything in sight. By spreading it around as much as possible, the male increases the chances of his genes surviving.

Females can't do it that way, so they try to insure their genetic survival by selecting a mate that has demonstrated survival skills, and hope that those genes help her offspring survive as well.

So even in a homosexual relationship (or lack thereof) these traits are still very pronounced despite the impossibility of direct progeny. Men spread it around, women are more selective.