Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

wtf??Follow

QuoteReply
#1 Apr 14 2004 at 10:39 PM Rating: Default
__DEL__1593362601198
View User Forum
Scholar
*****
13,594 posts
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20030923/5523798s.htm
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#2 Apr 14 2004 at 10:42 PM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1593363043099
Sage
***
1,656 posts
What I want to know is, who the hell thought to measure?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#3 Apr 14 2004 at 10:43 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1695601009560
Guru
*****
18,463 posts
More proof that breasts are dangerous, and yet men just can't keep off them.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#4 Apr 14 2004 at 10:52 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1593362601198
View User Forum
Scholar
*****
13,594 posts
Amazement... wow.......
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#5 Apr 14 2004 at 10:53 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1593362601198
View User Forum
Scholar
*****
13,594 posts
better yet, try this one...

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_767062.html
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#6 Apr 15 2004 at 8:36 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1592261023928
View User Forum
***
1,694 posts
ok katie now that last one is wtf? i didnt wanna know that
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#7 Apr 15 2004 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good
Nadenu
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
So does this mean my son is flame retardant?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#8 Apr 15 2004 at 12:43 PM Rating: Good
Tare
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,291 posts
Flame retardent breasts, huh? How about ****** retardent breasts? I could use me some of them.

(aww...just kiddin', honeybunny!)
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#9 Apr 15 2004 at 1:18 PM Rating: Good
__DEL__1640564318700
****
7,070 posts
Didn't I say something similar a while ago?

Ah yes, I remember. Flaming retarded suit. Lol, I believe Katie was the bearer. (No Katie, not the big, hairy, roaring kind that likes picnic baskets, that's a different word)
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#10 Apr 17 2004 at 3:03 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1591805087720
Scholar
16 posts
well... does that mean that they can stop manufactoring the flame retardant and start recycling it from breast milk? Hell... just spray the milk eh?
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#11 Apr 17 2004 at 8:46 AM Rating: Decent
__DEL__1670199487804
Scholar
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
does that mean that they can stop manufactoring the flame retardant and start recycling it from breast milk? Hell... just spray the milk eh?
Not really posible my wife is breast feeding at the moment and i doubt she could muster a full pint in a day, so thats a whole lotta women milking to take up the amount of fire retardant used every day.
▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#12 Apr 17 2004 at 9:08 AM Rating: Good
__DEL__1593362708669
Scholar
***
1,907 posts
Quote:
Not really posible my wife is breast feeding at the moment and i doubt she could muster a full pint in a day, so thats a whole lotta women milking to take up the amount of fire retardant used every day.


Unless she started yesterday I can guarantee she is producing WAY more than that (unless she is mostly formula feeding). If she started yesterday, then the amount is supposed to be small, because the first days of milk (colustrum, not sure of spelling)is very watery, it's to give the baby immunities and clear it's digestive track from being inside the womb.

And you will find she can shoot a smart mouthed husband like she has a water gun, armed and dangerous at all times. Smiley: lol

I never liked flame retardent stuff for my kids, figured the stuff was dangerous, because it caused rashes on them. Now it's on everything. Probably causes cancer too.

▲ Page top
QuoteReply
#13 Apr 17 2004 at 10:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Samira
View User Forum
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
One study found them in house dust.


I'm doomed.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

▲ Page top
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 369 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (369)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC