·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- I've been gone a lot, so....
I've been gone a lot, so....Follow
So what's your point?
I think Tacosid is saying that he is an original something or other, and we all suck. Also, I think he is saying that Skeet's brilliance reminds him of himself. Oh oh oh and he is a bona-fide ****-kicker!
But as they say, self-praise is no praise at all.
Taco, here's some straw. Start grasping.
yay, I suck.
Pleh.
Pleh.
Lady Rhaiynebow wrote:
Ummmm...I *suck* quite often.
At least if you don't kiss us straight after
Quote:
I am still the bona-fide sh*t kicker that I have always been.
*snicker*
Edited, Tue May 11 16:16:00 2004 by GitSlayer
Since you brought up what I had previously chosen to let be a sleeping dog ...
That should read I told Moe I could make him look stupid, and he took me up on it. Totem's bet was ancillary.
If you read closer, ito, you will see that you were the one doing the clamming. Nice try though.
You're right, Taco. You weren't the recipient of a labotomy. There was no need for one. You proved true to form and simply gave up. Nice to see your follow through is predictable.
Quote:
A couple of months ago I made a loose claim, totem bet me on it, and then I lacked the energy to follow through.
Quote:
Nothing Moe did (except clamming up) helped his cause.
Quote:
Now if you are of the opinion (as many of my detractors are) that I apparently was the recipient of a frontal labotomy and have lost my ability to be snide and demeaning then so be it. The truth however, based in reality, is not quite as previously written.
Kids really are expensive.
Moe can't aford the Moe in the Hat anymore.
Moe can't aford the Moe in the Hat anymore.
You are of course right there moe. You posted non-stop every day and answered everything I said. Right? Hell I am abashed that you are actually gloating that I failed to make you look as unintelligent as Katie.
I went back and read the final post you created last night about this topic (the first time I had read it) and most people simply said either "no he failed to make you look as stupid as katielynn" or "He made you look like a jackass, but not as stupid as katielynn." You created the thread and a whopping 10 people answered. Everyone was apparently riveted by this topic.
It was indeed a tall order. I admit that it is impossible for me to do to you in three weeks what it took me around a year to do to Katie. You were right and I was wrong. Good for you.
Of course now you are reknown as the genius of this forum whose light outshines all who post here. Your legend has been increased ten fold by your victory in not being able to be made to look less intelligent than Katielynn! All hail Moebius!
Hell, with all of this striking going on, I am thinking about going on strike until you get a custom title!
Moebiuslord
Moderately more intelligent than Katielynn
Tacosid
I went back and read the final post you created last night about this topic (the first time I had read it) and most people simply said either "no he failed to make you look as stupid as katielynn" or "He made you look like a jackass, but not as stupid as katielynn." You created the thread and a whopping 10 people answered. Everyone was apparently riveted by this topic.
It was indeed a tall order. I admit that it is impossible for me to do to you in three weeks what it took me around a year to do to Katie. You were right and I was wrong. Good for you.
Of course now you are reknown as the genius of this forum whose light outshines all who post here. Your legend has been increased ten fold by your victory in not being able to be made to look less intelligent than Katielynn! All hail Moebius!
Hell, with all of this striking going on, I am thinking about going on strike until you get a custom title!
Moebiuslord
Moderately more intelligent than Katielynn
Tacosid
I voted for the other guy.
Tacosid wrote:
You were right and I was wrong. Good for you.
Oh now, you have to give him credit there. Who the hell ever admits that on this board??
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Quote:
Oh now, you have to give him credit there. Who the hell ever admits that on this board??
Nobody does!
Wait, some people do.
You were right and I was wrong. Good for you.
Say what you like Taco. There is only one line of your entire post that is not complete, unadulterated bull ****. You were wrong. I don't have anything against you. I never attempted to gloat. I damn sure don't care what you think of me. The bottom line is what it is. You posted in typical over-compensating fashion and failed in the same manner. Typically.
You may be a great guy in the real world, Taco. Someone I might genuinely enjoy meeting. But here, where we do interact, you're just not worth the effort of caring.
You may be a great guy in the real world, Taco. Someone I might genuinely enjoy meeting. But here, where we do interact, you're just not worth the effort of caring.
Quote:
there are tons of new posters to add to the suck list, but I'll just sum it all up by saying "all ffxi posters".
Damn Skeet and his FFXI hating ways, damn hippy.
Wow, so you do know how to type something other than [insert crap here].
Basically the same though if you ask me.
Basically the same though if you ask me.
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
I voted for the other guy.
LOL
********** Vulgar Slang
n.
1. Foolish, deceitful, or boastful language.
2. Something worthless, deceptive, or insincere.
3. Insolent talk or behavior.
********** Vulgar Slang
n.
1. Foolish, deceitful, or boastful language.
2. Something worthless, deceptive, or insincere.
3. Insolent talk or behavior.
Okay lets take that post apart this way then. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and attempt to disect my post using every possible definition of the word *********
1. (a)Foolish, (b)deceitful, or (c)boastful language.
2. (a)Something worthless, (b)deceptive, or (c)insincere.
3. (a)Insolent talk or (b) behavior.
Well shucks. Now my U.B.S rating is soaring high at 67 percent. Curse you Moebius!
Tacosid
Edited, Wed May 12 02:01:06 2004 by Tacosid
1. (a)Foolish, (b)deceitful, or (c)boastful language.
2. (a)Something worthless, (b)deceptive, or (c)insincere.
3. (a)Insolent talk or (b) behavior.
Quote:
You are of course right there moe.This falls under 2c as It could be concluded that I was probably being insincere. You posted non-stop every day and answered everything I said, Right? This could also be considered insincere or 2c, but I would rather list this line under the heading of 3a, insolent talk.Hell I am abashed that you are actually gloating that I failed to make you look as unintelligent as Katie. If I were to stretch it, we could call this insolent talk, but that does not really fit...as I was just stating facts. It is not foolish, deceitful or boastful. It has worth seeing as how it proves a point...and it cerainly is not insincere. Thus this line could not possible be construed as ********* unadulterated or otherwise.
I went back and read the final post you created last night about this topic (the first time I had read it)This line simply states a fact. It does not fit with any of the above definitions. Thus that makes two. and most people simply said either "no he failed to make you look as stupid as katielynn" or "He made you look like a jackass, but not as stupid as katielynn." This was insolent, possibly even deceptive. Thus I suppose could be construed as ************* You created the thread and a whopping 10 people answered.[i]sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you really did create the thread, and ten people answered. Thus this does not conform to the above definitions of ************* Everyone was apparently riveted by this topic.This was insincere, but then again it was meant to be.
was indeed a tall order.We have both agreed that this was a tall order, and believe it or not I was not really being insincere here. That makes four lines! I admit that it is impossible for me to do to you in three weeks what it took me around a year to do to Katie.This may be insolent talk, or even boastful language...really what I was implying here is that given time, I could accomplish what I originally claimed, but only that it would take more time. You were right and I was wrong. You even admitted this one, thus the tally is five lines. Good for you. Ok, I admit this was meant to be insolent. Moreover it was foolish and insincere.
Of course now you are reknown as the genius of this forum whose light outshines all who post here.This surely was insincere. Your legend has been increased ten fold by your victory in not being able to be made to look less intelligent than Katielynn!Perhaps this is true, but I can not prove it, thus it is deceptive, insolent, insincere, and foolish. All hail Moebius! Once again, insolent talk.
Hell, with all of this striking going on, I am thinking about going on strike until you get a custom title! This is deceptive and insincere...I never really planned to go on strike.
Moebiuslord
Moderately more intelligent than Katielynn Well darn it, you got me again..this too was meant as insolent and insincere!
Tacosid
I went back and read the final post you created last night about this topic (the first time I had read it)This line simply states a fact. It does not fit with any of the above definitions. Thus that makes two. and most people simply said either "no he failed to make you look as stupid as katielynn" or "He made you look like a jackass, but not as stupid as katielynn." This was insolent, possibly even deceptive. Thus I suppose could be construed as ************* You created the thread and a whopping 10 people answered.[i]sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you really did create the thread, and ten people answered. Thus this does not conform to the above definitions of ************* Everyone was apparently riveted by this topic.This was insincere, but then again it was meant to be.
was indeed a tall order.We have both agreed that this was a tall order, and believe it or not I was not really being insincere here. That makes four lines! I admit that it is impossible for me to do to you in three weeks what it took me around a year to do to Katie.This may be insolent talk, or even boastful language...really what I was implying here is that given time, I could accomplish what I originally claimed, but only that it would take more time. You were right and I was wrong. You even admitted this one, thus the tally is five lines. Good for you. Ok, I admit this was meant to be insolent. Moreover it was foolish and insincere.
Of course now you are reknown as the genius of this forum whose light outshines all who post here.This surely was insincere. Your legend has been increased ten fold by your victory in not being able to be made to look less intelligent than Katielynn!Perhaps this is true, but I can not prove it, thus it is deceptive, insolent, insincere, and foolish. All hail Moebius! Once again, insolent talk.
Hell, with all of this striking going on, I am thinking about going on strike until you get a custom title! This is deceptive and insincere...I never really planned to go on strike.
Moebiuslord
Moderately more intelligent than Katielynn Well darn it, you got me again..this too was meant as insolent and insincere!
Tacosid
Well shucks. Now my U.B.S rating is soaring high at 67 percent. Curse you Moebius!
Tacosid
Edited, Wed May 12 02:01:06 2004 by Tacosid
I voted for the other guy.
Quote:
Well shucks. Now my U.B.S rating is soaring high at 67 percent. Curse you Moebius!
Actually, since the entire thing falls under 2.(a), it's a bit higher.
Its worth it not in question. At the very least it is entertaining, which has worth. If not that, then it is informative as anyone who reads that post will learn something that they probably did not know before.
Thus you are wrong again.
Tacosid
Thus you are wrong again.
Tacosid
I voted for the other guy.
This is the stupidest thing I have ever read, at this point, you are both making yourselves look like idiots, and the real winner here is going to be Katie! Mark my words!
Yes, I went back and read the original thread, that this post is based on. As could be seen then, this whole rivalry was boring the hell out of everyone, and it will continue to do so as long as you are both willing.
Yes, I went back and read the original thread, that this post is based on. As could be seen then, this whole rivalry was boring the hell out of everyone, and it will continue to do so as long as you are both willing.
It wasn't entertaining to the reader. And little you write is enlightening. That wasn't among the smattering.
Thus, I am right, as usual.
Thus, I am right, as usual.
To be worthless means to have worth to nobody. I am sure that if you were to poll every person who posts here that you would finds at least one person to step up and say that it was either entertaining or informative. Thus it was not worthless.
You can say you are right, but that does not make it so. Please refute the above paragraph before saying it again.
I will not comment at length on what Reinman said. For there is nothing as common as a virtual nobody sticking there nose into a thread and making of pronouncement about how both parties suck. Good for you, both I and moebius have noticed you. Now unless you come back to compliment me, then please be quiet.
Tacosid
You can say you are right, but that does not make it so. Please refute the above paragraph before saying it again.
I will not comment at length on what Reinman said. For there is nothing as common as a virtual nobody sticking there nose into a thread and making of pronouncement about how both parties suck. Good for you, both I and moebius have noticed you. Now unless you come back to compliment me, then please be quiet.
Tacosid
I voted for the other guy.
Lol, currently this is the only thing entertaining me on this forum.
That, and being rude and crude for no reason.
Must be because Katie struck a nerve.
This is by far better than watching Empyre's poor attempts at defending himself.
Both of you have a vocabulary vastly greater than "that's ghey".
Plus, at least you're not debating about religion or iraq.
Carry on, I like the nuances the most, like Taco's new posting from location.
That, and being rude and crude for no reason.
Must be because Katie struck a nerve.
This is by far better than watching Empyre's poor attempts at defending himself.
Both of you have a vocabulary vastly greater than "that's ghey".
Plus, at least you're not debating about religion or iraq.
Carry on, I like the nuances the most, like Taco's new posting from location.
Quote:
I will not comment at length on what Reinman said. For there is nothing as common as a virtual nobody sticking there nose into a thread and making of pronouncement about how both parties suck. Good for you, both I and moebius have noticed you. Now unless you come back to compliment me, then please be quiet.
Virtual nobody??? I assure you, I am somebody, even virtually. I don't really care if you noticed me, if you knew the reasons behind why someone would come on and insult both of you, then surely you would also realize that my intended audience, was everyone except the two of you. ie Standing beside you too arguing and saying, "Hey everybody, look at what these two are doing, arguing semantics to prove who is more intelligent". Well you are both wayyyyyy ahead of Empyre, so don't sweat it. Taco, Please!!! Speak when spoken to, in the future.
Anyway, back to the show!
By the way, I will be leaving these boards on Monday, so if you time it right, you can say you drove me off too. In fact, I am 28/28 work rotation you could potentially drive me off 7 times a year.
100
Recent Visitors: 222
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (222)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- I've been gone a lot, so....
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC