Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

So I saw 'Passion' (NWS)Follow

#1 Feb 26 2004 at 2:32 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,019 posts
Warning: Post contains blasphemy and racist commentary. Actually, this post possesses absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

I had debated seeing it on opening day, but my fear of the relgious fanatics setting the theatre on fire wasn't enough to keep my curiousity in check.

I live in North Hollywood. I'm no expert on demographics, but I'd wager that 40% of the people in NoHo are White, 30% are Hispanic, 20% are African American, and the remaining 10% would fall under the 'Other' category (actually, most of the remaining 10% would be Armenian, Lithuanian, Czech, Russian... ya know, dirty Eastern Europeans). I'd say there were about 400 people in the auditorium, 2 of which were caucasian, and 1 of which was African American. The rest were of Hispanic decent. If this movie accomplishes nothing else, Mel Gibson can sleep well knowing that yet another generation of ******** will name all of their children Jesus and Maria.

Anyway, my impressions...

It was bloody. By the time the crucifixion comes, Jesus' flesh is so tattered and torn you can actually see his ribs sticking out of his flesh. It's ironic in a way, up until now the bloodiest movie I'd ever seen was Hellraiser. It was almost as if Jesus had been swallowed by the whale, and not Jonah- but instead of being released without harm, Jesus had been squirted out the whale's razor-lined baby-hole.

Move over bacon, here comes something Jesusier!

It was actually a pretty emotional movie. I had to scratch my eye with a tissue once or twice. It was pretty well acted, with the exception of 'The Bad Guys'. They didn't strike me so much as actors portraying bad characters, but rather, absurd caricatures played by bad actors.

Jim Caviezel, in the lead role of Jesus, gave a pretty good performance. My only real criticism is that Jesus seemed a little too rigid, a little too stern. Obviously, I didn't expect him to break out in a song-and-dance number, fart once or twice, and then tell some Skeeteresque jokes, but I would have liked to have seen some more of the kindness and love for which he's reknowned. In all seriousness, I think it would have strengthened the message of the movie.

Do I think the Jews have reason to be upset? Were they portrayed as evil hate mongers with a mob mentality?

When I went to the movie, I was expecting that the Jewish community was being too sensitive. And then I saw the first hour of the movie, and I started to suspect that my expectations had been wrong. The Jews were portrayed in a pretty bad light. They all had the stereotypical large, hooked Jewish nose, spoke in that cliche'd annoyingly nasally voice, and came off as cruel, vindictive, hateful, and really really bad dressers.

But then I started to notice that the Jews weren't alone; they weren't the only pricks in the movie. Jesus' followers were all pretty much bastards too, but not quite to the extent in which the Hook-Nosed Semites were.

And then the Roman Soldiers came along. And, that pretty much forced me to change my mind about changing my mind. The Jews weren't portrayed any better or worse than anybody else in the movie. Really.

The only people in the movie who always behaved kindly and nobly were females: Mary, Mary Magdelene, Claudia, and whoever that ugly chick with the Shroud of Turin was.

Basically, if your name is not Mary or Jesus, you're pretty much an as[i][/i]shole. At least I think that's the message Mr. Gibson was trying to get across.

But the aspect of the movie which struck me as the most compelling, the most fascinating, and the most moving was...












Monica Belluci. Hot damn that woman knows how to jiggle. Chunks of flesh were getting strewn about the screen, people were dying and screaming all over the place, crows were pecking out eyeballs, there were a bunch of spooky Satan sequences, our Lord and Saviour was dying for our sins, and all I could think of was, "Damn, I'd like a piece of that ***!"


#2 Feb 26 2004 at 2:34 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,019 posts
Quote:
Move over bacon, here comes something Jesusier!


THAT is the most brilliant thing I've ever heard!

RACK the hell outta me!

I'm gonna **** myself, I swear to God, I think I might actually **** myself.

#3 Feb 26 2004 at 12:53 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Quote:
but I would have liked to have seen some more of the kindness and love for which he's reknowned. In all seriousness, I think it would have strengthened the message of the movie.
I won't suspect you know this since I'm not sure what religious beliefs (if any) you suscribe to, but passion plays typically don't deal with anything other than the passion, i.e. mostly the suffering of the Christ which lead to his death. By that time, Jesus is just as scared and doubtful as anyone that thinks God has abandoned him, and as pissed off and stern as anyone who is being judged incorrectly yet knows he can do nothing about it.

The resurrection, at the end, is meant as the moral of the story so to speak, to give a sense of that kindness and love. That he would willingly endure this on behalf of all mankind, which is the sole central belief of all christians.
#4 Feb 26 2004 at 1:36 PM Rating: Decent
My respect meter for you Thundra has just crept up a little bit. Having not seen the movie yet myself, but having many people talk about it and have stated much of what you state just not as "artistically" makes me appreciate your open opinion. You keep this up and I just might actually start to appreciate your opinions more.
#5 Feb 26 2004 at 8:22 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I thought it was a little much when the Halley Jo Osmond character and the puppy rescued Christ at the end, but that's hollywood for ya I guess.

I'm also a little fuzzy on the sharp toothed Satan-babies who convince Judas to hang himself. I must have missed that part in Matthew.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#6 Feb 26 2004 at 8:39 PM Rating: Decent

what happened at the end of the movie, how did it end? Jesus dying?
#7 Feb 26 2004 at 8:58 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,019 posts
Quote:
Stoke wrote:
My respect meter for you Thundra has just crept up a little bit. Having not seen the movie yet myself, but having many people talk about it and have stated much of what you state just not as "artistically" makes me appreciate your open opinion. You keep this up and I just might actually start to appreciate your opinions more.


I'm totally confused. I would have assumed you to be the type of person to think my post was in very poor taste. Actually, let me rephrase that; Everybody knows my post was in poor taste, but I thought that would have prevented you from having anything positive to say about the ideas and opinions I expressed therein.

As hesitant as I am to admit it, I think my respect meter has gone up for you a bit as well. First, you were a pretty good sport about the 'Coffee Flame' thing, you had the good sense to enjoy my post about Angua's boobies, and now I see that you're capable of enjoying a person's brand of humor despite your desire to castrate that person, and despite not agreeing with that person's perspective.

Flea, you're probably completely right. To be honest, I didn't even realize that 'Passion Plays' were a particular genre of plays.

#8 Feb 26 2004 at 11:23 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,135 posts
OMG Thundra!

Quote:
Move over bacon, here comes something Jesusier!


Smiley: lol

Quote:
Roses are red and ready for plucking,
You're sixteen and ready for high school.


Smiley: laugh

Funney Sh*t...

RACK U



#9 Feb 27 2004 at 12:01 AM Rating: Excellent
I thought carefully about what you wrote and looked past your bravado and insults to see the ideas and opinions that you had.

Quote:
It was actually a pretty emotional movie. I had to scratch my eye with a tissue once or twice...


You saw a story about an historical event that was not sugar coated. A vivid event in which changed the world forever and you got emotional about it.

Quote:
My only real criticism is that Jesus seemed a little too rigid, a little too stern. Obviously, I didn't expect him to break out in a song-and-dance number, fart once or twice, and then tell some Skeeteresque jokes, but I would have liked to have seen some more of the kindness and love for which he's reknowned. In all seriousness, I think it would have strengthened the message of the movie.


To be kind and loving sometimes one has to be stern and rigid, because the people that you are being kind to often take your kind gentle approach for granted. Heck, at the point of crucifiction I believe Jesus was even having doubt about what and why he was going through with everything. Remember Jesus was here as a man, his rigidity and sterness was probably from the nature of man.

Quote:
Basically, if your name is not Mary or Jesus, you're pretty much an *******. At least I think that's the message Mr. Gibson was trying to get across.


Pretty much that is the truth. All of us are sinners, even Christians that have accepted Christ as our Saviour are still ********. We still have committed sin and will continue to commit sin, but we know that what Jesus did that day, our sins where washed away by his blood. Thank God for that.

Quote:
...there were a bunch of spooky Satan sequences, our Lord and Saviour was dying for our sins, and all I could think of was, "Damn, I'd like a piece of that ***!"


This is a tough thought process to try and decipher, yet the most telling about you, and what you saw. You comprehend what the story is about and the significance of the events that took place those last few hours that Jesus was on earth, yet you still do not believe the truth, but you see there is more to what happened than you had before.

Did you know that the answer to the questions that may have been going through your head after seeing the movie... "Did Jesus truly die for ME..." can be answered positively by you talking to God with an open heart and accepting his existence and the fact that Jesus died for YOU. By accepting these facts and asking God for forgiveness you can know the truth. This does not need to be done with anyone else. This is a private matter between you and God. This does not need to be done in a church. All you have to do is talk "pray" to God and with all your heart and knowing in your heart it true profess that he is real and you are a sinner and Jesus is your Lord and Saviour and the Son of God.

If you have any questions or still need guidance, I suggest that you find a member of a church or a friend that you know is a Christian and talk with them. If you do not have access to either one then I recommend that you find a bible and you will be guided to the passages that you need to see.

I realize some of this may sound corny but if you truly want to understand please, in all honesty try.

I provide this response as a friend.
#10 Feb 27 2004 at 12:35 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,553 posts
Thanks for the review. I've been holding off seeing this movie for a variety of reasons, and in the end the reason I think that I'm going to deliberately not see this movie, is the same reason I regretted seeing the movie Hannibal.

There is some imagery I don't want in my head. Once it's there you can't ever get it out.

I'm a little disturbed by the mass marketing of faith thing, but I suppose that's not really new. Were I not an athiest, I'd probably avoid seeing it since I consider matters of faith to be rather personal.

Unless you're an evangelical christian, then your faith is fair game for destruction
____________________________
--Illia
Fumus, draco magus incoluit mare.
Myrx - 70 Holy Priest, Myr - 70 Resto Shaman, Gryd - 70 Prot Warrior
#11 Feb 27 2004 at 3:18 AM Rating: Decent
*
188 posts
As an agnostic I would be open to a movie about Jesus's life from 30 to 33, but I am avoiding this flick because of the gore. I had planned to see this one until I read 3 or four reviews, all of which described a cat o nine tails and ribboned flesh.

I have read the gospels and generally agree with most of the ideas expressed by Jesus about how we treat each other as individuals and a society as a whole. I think it would be a nice fresh breeze for this country if we all really stopped and considered his words, not about heaven or god but rather about how we treat each other, especially the powerless. Jesus never addressed efficiency or accountability, but spoke of treating the least of men with respect and rejecting material greed.

A bloodbath is not holy, it is stomach turning. I have been hearing rumors that we are finally going to catch Osama. How we treat this enemy, powerless in our grasp, will have heavy implications in the future. I dare not make a stand on what we should do to him, but I think we should debate long and hard about it lest we create a martyr out of a madman.
#12 Feb 27 2004 at 4:20 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
Did you know that the answer to the questions that may have been going through your head after seeing the movie... "Did Jesus truly die for ME..."


Err Stok, I could have sworn that the main question going through Thundra's head was how much he would like to get some prime time action with Monica Belluci's jiggling ***. Just sayin'
#13 Feb 27 2004 at 7:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Err Stok, I could have sworn that the main question going through Thundra's head was how much he would like to get some prime time action with Monica Belluci's jiggling ***. Just sayin'


You are correct that is what Thundra stated... however have you ever had more than one train of thought going on? I know I have had especially when my wife is talking. :)
#14 Feb 27 2004 at 7:50 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
You are correct that is what Thundra stated... however have you ever had more than one train of thought going on? I know I have had especially when my wife is talking. :)


Just seemed bizaare that you gave Thundra the "how to be saved" speech, since he was effectively dismissing Christ's sacrifice as less interesting than Monica's jiggling flesh is all.
#15 Feb 27 2004 at 8:16 AM Rating: Excellent
k
#16 Feb 27 2004 at 1:18 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
I've changed my mind and decided I won't see it. Partly because I don't take gore very well (I walked out of "Kill Bill" close to the beginning). And partly because after really thinking about it, I don't need a movie or any other "image created in the likeness" of him in my life. Even for entertainment, I'd rather retain the gospel..its graphic enough to serve its purpose, and although I respect Mel Gibson and don't deny it was probably a great movie..I just don't think the bible belongs on the big screen as anyones interpretation.
#17 Feb 27 2004 at 1:33 PM Rating: Good
Gotta love how Jesus is *still* being portrayed as a tall white guy.

--DK
#18 Feb 28 2004 at 2:05 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Yeah, DK, but Cheech Marin was already booked for Up In Smoke 3, so Mel went with his second choice...

Totem
#19 Feb 28 2004 at 10:38 AM Rating: Decent
I heard Brenden Frasier was the 3rd pick for the role of Jesus.
#20 Feb 28 2004 at 6:15 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Well if they wanted to be historically accurate, Christ would have looked pretty much just like Osamma bin Laden.

I imagine that would have hurt ticket sales in the bible belt. It is amazing how many northern European's were living in Judea though...
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#21 Feb 29 2004 at 10:08 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,473 posts
Living in the Bible Belt, I have to say a couple of things about this movie. I went to go get tickets for a Sunday mantinee of this movie (when people are in church) and found out that most of the churches in my areas are SKIPPING SERVICES to see this movie. The big church in my area, Sherwood Baptist, rented the ENTIRE theater for one day. No one could see anything else, they had the whole damn place. Anyways, so me and my friends ended up getting tickets for the next available showing, which is Wednesday night.

Now for the disturbing news. Reading today's paper, the big local chuches (Sherwood Baptist, Byne [Six Flags Over Jesus] Baptist, and one other that I can't remember it's name) have teamed up and are pressuring the movie theater owners to let the have minister's at the beginnning and end of each movie ask if anyone wants to repent, blah blah blah. Let's just say I am kinda hoping this happens, because my paintball gun hasn't been used in awhile.
#22 Feb 29 2004 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Or you could wait for it to come out on video so you don't end up getting arrested, how 'bout that? The funny thing is the reaction of people who this movie wasn't made for, particularly when those who it was made for react in the manner Gibson hoped for-- much to the chagrin of those who, like you, apparently just wanted to go eat popcorn and take in a flick. You do know that Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen is showing at the same time, right? Or you could just go to the mall and eat popcorn. I hardly expect any of the local churches to rent out the entirety of Sears in the near future...

Totem
#23 Feb 29 2004 at 4:58 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,473 posts
Yes I wanted to take in a movie, but I don't want people breathing religous rhetoric down my neck while I take in a movie, and yes there are other things playing, but i've either seen them already or have no interest in seeing them. TO be honest, the only reason I want to see this movie is to see why everyone is saying it's so bloody, etc.
#24 Mar 01 2004 at 10:03 AM Rating: Decent
I find it very interresting how much controversy is coming from this movie. First everyone was saying that it was going to flop. Now, its made the 2nd highest 5-day behind LOTR: Return of the King. What does this say about God?.....nothing.

I did think it was a good movie and will probaby see it again while still in the theaters.
#25 Mar 01 2004 at 10:13 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,372 posts
Quote:
I find it very interresting how much controversy is coming from this movie. First everyone was saying that it was going to flop. Now, its made the 2nd highest 5-day behind LOTR: Return of the King. What does this say about God?.....nothing


Were people really thinking it was going to flop? I know I say this with the benefit of hindsight, but it seems pretty obvious to me that it would be a huge hit since it is a must see for both film and religious enthusiasts.
#26 Mar 01 2004 at 10:17 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Were people really thinking it was going to flop?


Yeah, all week I listen to NPR on my way to and from work and they were occationally playing different commentaries. People either loved it or hated it.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 401 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (401)