Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow

The problem is that educating the public is against the interesting of politicians. If the public was really educated we'd have an American Bastille Day and public executions on the National Mall.. instead of a bunch of hippies camping in parks..
...but the country would would have to shatter like a mirror before that ever happened. Those will be exiting times.



You have a better chance waiting for Jesus to return than waiting for someone in government to put his neck(career) on the line.

Well, maybe I'd understand it if you used it correctly?

Edited, Dec 30th 2011 9:48am by Allegory

You mean the same government that just passed into law the ability for the state to confine any american citizen without disclosing reason, or attaining verdict of a jury. Ya lets rely on the most corrupt facet of america to determine what is and isn't corrupt.

Also Banging guys in the *** or laying some rug is not murder, or theft. Generally it is an act of expression consented to between 2 or more willing persons. If it isn't consented you have laws in place for that too. I suppose you have never hear of rape, or sexual abuse/harrassment issues before.

Topside.

Then I must question your understanding of English.

The first definition keys on being obstinately or intolerant. Those are the key words. In other words, no matter what you say, s/he will not change their opinion.

Having the belief that there doesn't exist a single scenario where it's ok to discriminate against homosexuality or sexuality for that matter, would fall in that category.

The second definition does not contain the words obstinately or intolerant anywhere.

As I said, my former McDonalds boss at one time didn't hire any black people because of their skin color. She racially discriminated, but that didn't make her a bigot, because as soon as there were more white people, she hired black people as well.

Discriminating doesn't make you a bigot. I'm sorry if you fail to understand that concept.

All may be true, but it doesn't contradict my claim.



Why don't you tell me how it was used incorrectly?



Why would I make any flash cards?

Edited, Dec 30th 2011 6:59pm by Almalieque

Ah, his old fail-safe. When cornered on an obvious mistake, pretend not to understand it and kick the can a little further down the road. He's hoping that when you provide the exposition, there'll be an ancillary point that he can seize on to distract from the mistake.

Edited, Dec 30th 2011 12:28pm by Eske

I hate all of you.

Sketty monster loves us too.

Especially Varus, as he needs it most.

URDOINITRONG.

It's true, he srsly haets those guys.

So, in other words, you have nothing? Ok, that's what I thought. Just want to make sure. You come off all tough like you know something, then you coward away in more irrelevant words. If you can't provide a definition and explain how those words were used incorrectly, then obviously you're full of ish. Especially if you're using the same amount of effort NOT doing it.





Your failure to comprehend that sentence only supports my above argument.

1. This had nothing to do with anyone agreeing with me. People have stated (i.e. OmegaVegeta) that there are no logical reasons in any scenario to EVER discriminate against homosexuality EVER. Yet, supports discrimination against every other human trait. That, by definition makes him bigoted in favor of homosexuals.

2. No where in that sentence did I allude to being bigoted against. That's purely something that you made up.