Racist, funny or who cares?Follow

Good to know I touched a nerve :)

Trademarkâ„¢ infringement.

Alma is about as opaque as cellophane

Awww, he's picking up the gbaji ellipsis! It's like watching a fledgling leave the nest.

Still. He's got a long way to go...

Color me surprised that you wouldn't get it and need an explanation.

I'm not sure why posters here think someone should understand every single post in regards to them. I may come off as all knowing, but that doesn't mean I can't misunderstand something.... sheesh.



You really have a serious case of denial if you think I'm "flipping" anything. The best thing about these threads is that you or anyone can simply go back and reread it. So, if you or anyone believes your current claim, then they are in denial, plain and simple.

You clearly brought up and a claim and then contradicted yourself. That's why you dropped the conversation and tried to get me to ignore the fact that you contradicted yourself.

I'm sorry, but since I have the capability to read, there is nothing you can say to get me to believe that I'm "flipping" anything. But, if you want to ride off of your "popularity" as "accuracy", then so be it. Your "popularity" doesn't interfere with my ability to read.

Its like Gbaji and VArus had a love child that is finally coming of age. Congratulations Gbaji and Varus!

The problem would be that you misunderstand everything, but only admit it on the simple stuff that even a child would have understood. On more complex issues, you just stagger awkwardly forward with your arguments and make a massive blunder of the entire conversation.

Nah, people try once or twice, see that you're more interested in defending yourself than seeing anything new and give up. Sometimes they just make fun of you for a while after that for the lulz.

I know you'll insist that this isn't what's happening but so it goes. Being on the winning side of that equation, I don't have any real incentive to bang my head trying to convince you otherwise. If it makes you feel any better, Gbaji is the same way and is, like you, convinced that the only reason he gets so much **** (far more than other conservatives) is because he's some special little martyr-flower who no one else understands and not because of any particular character traits on his part.

Maybe you and he can get together some day for a little pity tea party.

The number one misconception with posters on this forum is the belief that opposing opinions equal stupidity. Do you honestly believe that I don't realize the truth in your statement? The fact that you are implying that I don't understand that concept makes it even more ironic when you refuse to accept that I'm equally "toying" with you.

I've said numerous times over, I love to debate and it becomes blatantly obvious when the poster doesn't make any effort in explaining their position IN A DEBATE, then they have no position. I'm not talking about two or more attempts of an explanation, I'm talking about ONE attempt.

Nadenu (Samira? I forget) made a comment about "where does it stop?". I responded and their response to my comment was "You don't understand and I"m not going to explain" which really meant "I was wrong but I'm not going to admit to it".

I knew I hit the nail on the head, so that's why I said "oh, ok explain it to me". I realized that it was a possibility that I did misunderstand it, but not likely. Their lack of explanation supported my claim.



Winning side? Well, if you argue both sides, you are technically "correct" in at least one way.



Whether you admit it or not, we are "special", not in the sense that you are implying, but in the sense that we are the minority in most views. That isn't an opinion but a fact. The more we disagree on topics, the more that builds against our overall "image".

As I pointed out in this thread and many others, when posters only focus on countering my arguments when other posters equally disagree, you can't deny the obvious. In this thread, someone made this absurd statement that Europeans came to the "U.S" and called it "America" so because it was called "America" first, then they deserve the right to be called "American". Not only is that obviously wrong, no one else believes that, yet no one made any countering statement to it. At the same time, posters spent 2-3 pages arguing with me on the usage of "America/n".

So, you can live in delusion all you want, but it's blatantly obvious what's going on.




That's because you fail at trolling, Mr. "I'm ignoring you".

The number one misconception with stupid people is the rigid belief that they're just misunderstood. Jus' sayin' is all.
...so it goes. *Shrug*

Moe is a minority in most views. Totem is a minority in most views. Neither of them inspire ten page spreads of inane debating. There has been other conservative posters on the forum who didn't leave everyone with the impression that they were morons. There's been liberal posters like Shadowrelm whose politics aligned towards the majority yet, due to their inability to understand a basic point, were constantly derided by the majority of posters.

I know that "But... but... it's only because I don't think just like you!" is the easy cop-out to keep yourself feeling like a special misunderstood flower but maybe you should look beyond the easy answers.

Edited, Apr 10th 2011 1:08pm by Jophiel

If that were true, then you wouldn't even bother stating anything in the first place. Besides, at the end of the day, it's not about what you are saying, but the amount of effort placed in saying it. If you're placing the equivalent or more amount of effort not saying something as you would just saying it, then it's not about "cutting your losses". If it were, what exactly are you "cutting"?



Who's claiming any misunderstanding? Jus' sayin' is all..







Actions speak louder than words. When there are posters on a thread who disagree with each other, but are not debating each other, only me, then what do you call that? You can label it a "cop-out" all you want, but I call it how I see it.

Posters were arguing against me about what other posters said instead of directly at them. If you want to label that something else, then be my guest.


If you feel so confident about your belief of me being "stupid", then give me examples. All you or anyone else have said is "You fail to comprehend a basic point", which is a whole lot like saying "You're misunderstanding me". Yet, somehow me saying that makes me stupid, but when you say it, it makes you right. You haven't provided anything that I haven't already provided to the discussion. As a result, this is nothing more than a "You don't agree with me, therefore you are stupid". I can just as equally say "you don't understand the most basic point". Does that some how now make me right and you wrong?

Get real.