·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Site and Forum Feedback
- I approve. (was forum=21)
I approve. (was forum=21)Follow
Of the new background for the wow skin.
Looks nice. Might be scrolling a bit slower atm though, a bit choppy ish on a long thread. Could be IE8 though. And before you scream at me for not using FireFox I do just not for Zam becuase I could never get the font to look right. Minor thing drove me batty though and thats another story!
An old silent pond...
A frog jumps into the pond,
splash! Silence again.
~ Matsuo Basho
A frog jumps into the pond,
splash! Silence again.
~ Matsuo Basho
I approve too. (I love change.)
I love the background, but the interface at the top will take a bit of getting used to. I have my muscle memory setup for scrolling down for the mage forums/gen discussion/my posts.
/agree
luv it
luv it
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
So do I. It looks sharp and clean.
It's annoying and takes away room from the forum.
Aside from that the image is fine, but I want my full screen forums
I feel the old menu's were nicer, but I knew this was coming based on the zam skin update a while ago.
Edited, Apr 14th 2010 2:41pm by Xsarus
Aside from that the image is fine, but I want my full screen forums
I feel the old menu's were nicer, but I knew this was coming based on the zam skin update a while ago.
Edited, Apr 14th 2010 2:41pm by Xsarus
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
I think it's ironic that more and more people get widescreen monitors and in return web-designers do the 'everything in the middle' layout, which leaves completely useless space on both sides for no apparent reason other than some phallic symbolism.
Edited, Apr 14th 2010 9:49pm by Mazra
Edited, Apr 14th 2010 9:49pm by Mazra
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
Mazra wrote:
I think it's ironic that more and more people get widescreen monitors and in return web-designers do the 'everything in the middle' layout, which leaves completely useless space on both sides for no apparent reason other than some phallic symbolism.
I've had issues in the past viewing forums on a widescreen monitor when I've changed font size or otherwise adjusted the "default" viewing settings. My guess is that forcing a particular width will provide a more consistent general layout regardless of a lot of tweaks a person might make.
Yeah, it's easier to manage, but it sure as hell looks dumb on a 24" widescreen.
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
You don't have to have your web browser window in fullscreen mode. I rarely do.
digitalcraft, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
You don't have to have your web browser window in fullscreen mode. I rarely do.
Well for those that do you no longer have the option.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
digitalcraft, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
You don't have to have your web browser window in fullscreen mode. I rarely do.
So I can look at my desktop while browsing? What's the difference? What's the purpose?
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
bsphil wrote:
digitalcraft, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
You don't have to have your web browser window in fullscreen mode. I rarely do.
Well for those that do you no longer have the option.
I rarely only have one website tab open. I like to have my browser in fullscreen mode for those sites that are properly set out.
It's an awesome background setup but I also agree that it's funny having a widescreen monitor only to use the middle portion for the forum layout. Still, it's not really bad at all. Just different so far.
Mazra wrote:
Yeah, it's easier to manage, but it sure as hell looks dumb on a 24" widescreen.
I bet the new look is *amazing* on the monitor I bought back in 2001. No, wait, that monitor goes to 2560x1536.
What exactly is the problem that you guys are having? I have a monitor in 1920 x 1200 resolution (I usually have to do Ctrl + several times to read the websites, since I'm nearsighted) and I'm not having any issues with Alla's new design.
Mazra wrote:
I looked out the window and saw a big fireball in the sky. I'm not going outside until it's gone.
Sir Xsarus wrote:
It's annoying and takes away room from the forum.
Aside from that the image is fine, but I want my full screen forums
I feel the old menu's were nicer, but I knew this was coming based on the zam skin update a while ago.
Aside from that the image is fine, but I want my full screen forums
I feel the old menu's were nicer, but I knew this was coming based on the zam skin update a while ago.
I agree with this.
Alla now takes up 3/5s of my screen instead of all of it.
The new nav bar is less intuitive and more annoying.
I do not approve.
Hellbanned
idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
The new look is okay.
I'm not sure whether the resolution that my netbook is set at is making it look different but even though it's a wide screen, I'm not seeing the blank areas on either side like some have mentioned.
My internet explorer does not like it though. The loading is extremely slow and the scrolling remains choppy even after given time to let the page fully load. I get some odd text over background issues up near the top as well. It sometimes seem to hang and give me 'not responding' messages when refreshing or navigating too.
It looks better on Firefox although it still feels a bit slow to load.
I'm not sure whether the resolution that my netbook is set at is making it look different but even though it's a wide screen, I'm not seeing the blank areas on either side like some have mentioned.
My internet explorer does not like it though. The loading is extremely slow and the scrolling remains choppy even after given time to let the page fully load. I get some odd text over background issues up near the top as well. It sometimes seem to hang and give me 'not responding' messages when refreshing or navigating too.
It looks better on Firefox although it still feels a bit slow to load.
Recent Visitors: 278
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (278)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Site and Forum Feedback
- I approve. (was forum=21)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC