Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Morons with Animated GIFsFollow

#1 Mar 26 2007 at 4:51 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
FFXI Main does not enjoy these.

From most to least recent:

OP in this thread.

OP in this thread, already locked, who also posted the same damn link in this thread as well.

Same image every time.

Is it the same person?

Edited, Mar 28th 2007 1:34pm by ImperialNinja
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#2 Mar 26 2007 at 4:54 PM Rating: Good
Same person in this thread as well. Given the title and the fact it was in the Fenrir forum, it wouldn't surprise me if it was our infamous Fenrir troll back under another moniker.
#3 Mar 26 2007 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
And another post here.

However, they're well on the way to sub-default.
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#4 Mar 26 2007 at 5:01 PM Rating: Good
*
239 posts
Well thats an odd way to troll. And nothing happens in the gifs, just three clones doing animations...
#5 Mar 26 2007 at 5:05 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
Cactusmongler wrote:
Well thats an odd way to troll. And nothing happens in the gifs, just three clones doing animations...
The issue is more that these people are not actually contributing anything in their posts, just linking the same image over and over again.

I'm slightly worried that it may be a "poisoned" image.
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#6 Mar 26 2007 at 5:19 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
Third account with this.

Post here.

WTF is so special about this image?
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#7 Mar 26 2007 at 5:22 PM Rating: Good
*
239 posts
Didn't appear to be a "poisoned" image as you put it, at least it didn't end with things that would give it away as a keylogger. Maybe hes a little too proud of his work?
#8 Mar 26 2007 at 5:25 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
Cactusmongler wrote:
Didn't appear to be a "poisoned" image as you put it, at least it didn't end with things that would give it away as a keylogger. Maybe hes a little too proud of his work?
That's entirely possible, but it's still spam at this point.

FFS, Hellboy is more original.
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#9 Mar 26 2007 at 5:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
looks like the same guy on a dynamic IP. E-mail address is fairly unique and very similar between the two.

Let me know if he comes back.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#10 Mar 26 2007 at 6:52 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
Newest ones: vandysagina (here) and ThugTaru (here).
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#11 Mar 26 2007 at 6:58 PM Rating: Decent
Lol, he made a sock to insult his sock about a picture he put in his post about bashing the sock? Classic.
#12 Mar 26 2007 at 7:06 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
Overburn wrote:
Lol, he made a sock to insult his sock about a picture he put in his post about bashing the sock? Classic.
I'm thinking it's Matjlav now. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#13 Mar 26 2007 at 7:12 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Can't cannotlinkto, and similar shortcut url "hiding" (doesn't really hide it...) sites be badworded?

With URL Tags there is no real use for them. If you wanna shorten a link just use a URL Tag. Idiots like this guy just use them to try to hide, unsucessfully of course, the real url.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#14 Mar 26 2007 at 7:18 PM Rating: Decent
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=40;mid=1174963744157672482;num=0;page=1

Nother here
#15 Mar 27 2007 at 1:31 AM Rating: Excellent
****
9,835 posts
It was a BG idiot.
#16 Mar 27 2007 at 6:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
oh they are NOT trying that **** again are they?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#17 Mar 27 2007 at 4:11 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
oh they are NOT trying that sh*t again are they?
Would you like for OOT to mobilize the invasion force?
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#18 Mar 28 2007 at 7:41 AM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Who's BG and what are they trying to do again?
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#19 Mar 28 2007 at 8:13 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
Avatar
****
8,187 posts
ME!!!! Ive actually had a conversation with Bbott considering not using an animated avatar and we both came to the conclusion that some people are just trying to make thier posts look aestetically pleasing (such as myself)...but that posting too large or complex of animations should be against forum policies especially in sigs...but chill out people thats sort of the whole point to having Sigs/Avs...if you think things like my Av are bad...check out the forums for http://boardsus.playstation.com/ then come to me with a more valid argument
____________________________
Things I sometimes play...

"What do you want to be when you grow up?"
"I want to be a unicorn!"
"Awww, why's that?"........
"So I can stab people with my face."
#20 Mar 28 2007 at 9:33 AM Rating: Excellent
****
9,835 posts
The picture in question was a 4Mb sig someone used on their forums. It was so bad many of the BG members decide to spam it everywhere that they could to try and exceed the persons bandwidth for the hosting site he used.

Obviously our site was one of them they used to spam it.

Anyway it's over now.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 16 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (16)