Mazra wrote:
They should do a reboot with Chris Columbus directing ALL of them.
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- Whose Ready To Watch The Hobbit Part 2?
Whose Ready To Watch The Hobbit Part 2?Follow
That'd be pretty impressive since he's been dead for like 600 years.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Mazra wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
There are no Harry Potter movies.
They should do a reboot with Chris Columbus directing ALL of them. The first two movies are the best ones, but they could do with a new Harry Potter and Hermione. Can't act to save their lives.
lolgaxe wrote:
Mazra wrote:
They should do a reboot with Chris Columbus directing ALL of them.
The other Chris Columbus.
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
First movie was pretty faithful to the book, from what I remember. I personally think they should have made the trolls part feel like they stalled for a longer amount of time. What did you find unfaithful?
Dear people I don't like: 凸(â—´―｀â—)凸
Deadgye wrote:
First movie was pretty faithful to the book, from what I remember. I personally think they should have made the trolls part feel like they stalled for a longer amount of time. What did you find unfaithful?
This and this. I've watched the movies to waste a lazy Sunday here and there, but they could have been a lot better.
Sandinmygum the Stupendous wrote:
Deadgye wrote:
First movie was pretty faithful to the book, from what I remember. I personally think they should have made the trolls part feel like they stalled for a longer amount of time. What did you find unfaithful?
This and this. I've watched the movies to waste a lazy Sunday here and there, but they could have been a lot better.
I've watched so many Family Channel "Harry Potter Weekends" I've lost count. But as a whole, the things listed on those sites would have had very little effect on the entire movie experience.
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Sandinmygum the Stupendous wrote:
Deadgye wrote:
First movie was pretty faithful to the book, from what I remember. I personally think they should have made the trolls part feel like they stalled for a longer amount of time. What did you find unfaithful?
This and this. I've watched the movies to waste a lazy Sunday here and there, but they could have been a lot better.
I'm reasonably certain he was talking about the first Hobbit film. Unless there's a scene in the first Potter book where they're captured by Trolls and stalling for time.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.
Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
I'm still reasonably certain he was talking about the first Hobbit film.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
I give it a thumbsup.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
The movie was great (saw it last Friday), although very long. Damn you, 50 oz soft drinks! Anyway, Desolation of Smaug is definitely better than the first movie. I missed some of the singing... well, I missed The Misty Mountains Cold... but the fact that there aren't 40 minutes of running around was a relief.
Interesting with Legolas in the mix. I liked the references to The Lord of the Rings.
Interesting with Legolas in the mix. I liked the references to The Lord of the Rings.
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
Recent Visitors: 244
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (244)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- Whose Ready To Watch The Hobbit Part 2?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC