Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Reply To Thread

Ex-gay?Follow

#1 Jun 20 2011 at 12:01 PM Rating: Good
My husband sent me an article on the NY Times website about social security (which is interesting, by the way, here's the link). On the side bar was this story, which interested me far more. It's an interview with a guy who is vehemently "ex-gay," and who now writes some pretty derogatory things about gay people.

It's pretty long, but it's a good read, if you're interested in that sort of thing. It's interesting because, when he "was gay," he argued strongly for a society where there were no labels like "gay" or "straight." That "sexual and gender identities are culturally constructed rather than biologically fixed."

It's an interesting way to look at things, but I just can't get on board with that. Not because it gives me or anyone else who believes in "gay rights" an edge over anything, but mostly because of my own attractions. I don't feel physically ill seeing two men or two women together, but I have never felt that pull when looking at a woman that I have felt with men. I have loved other women outside of my family, felt close to them and cared very much for them, but there was never a physical aspect to it. Whereas, with some men, it was near impossible to separate both types of love, so I either had to be in a relationship with them, or I couldn't be around them.

Anyway. TLDR: Interesting story about a supposedly ex-gay dude.

Edited, Jun 20th 2011 1:02pm by Belkira
#2 Jun 20 2011 at 12:20 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Looks to be an interesting read, though I just gave it a quick skimming for now.

I saw some skepticism on the part of the author about the guy's return to heterosexuality. In college, I remember a conversation with an acquaintance who said that he had recently become gay. That he wasn't before, but now was. I saw no reason to disbelieve that, nor do I see any reason that it'd illegitimize homosexuality. There's no reason that homosexuality's "rightness" should be based on whether or not it's innate, IMO. So hypothetically speaking, I'd probably accept someone's claim that they'd become heterosexual at face value.

Of course, that's just hypothetically speaking. The guy seems like a bit of a nut.
#3 Jun 20 2011 at 12:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Eske Esquire wrote:
Looks to be an interesting read, though I just gave it a quick skimming for now.

I saw some skepticism on the part of the author about the guy's return to heterosexuality. In college, I remember a conversation with an acquaintance who said that he had recently become gay. That he wasn't before, but now was. I saw no reason to disbelieve that, nor do I see any reason that it'd illegitimize homosexuality. There's no reason that homosexuality's "rightness" should be based on whether or not it's innate, IMO. So hypothetically speaking, I'd probably accept someone's claim that they'd become heterosexual at face value.

Of course, that's just hypothetically speaking. The guy seems like a bit of a nut.


It sort of put me in mind of Shador (sorry, Shador) and his, "I'm a devout JW, the earth is 6,000 years old, no wait, I'm a devout follower of Dawkins and all religious people are stupid," type stuff.
#4 Jun 20 2011 at 1:40 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Speaking of weird gay science.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#5 Jun 20 2011 at 2:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts


That's not too surprising. I've always felt like most homophobes are just bi-curious (or either full blown) and in denial.
#6 Jun 20 2011 at 2:13 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Nadenu wrote:


That's not too surprising. I've always felt like most homophobes are just bi-curious (or either full blown) and in denial.
Olde news is olde, surely?
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#7 Jun 20 2011 at 2:26 PM Rating: Excellent
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
Belkira wrote:
It's an interview with a guy who is vehemently "ex-gay," and who now writes some pretty derogatory things about gay people.


When people do a full 180 like this, I often wonder who they're trying to convince.
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#8 Jun 20 2011 at 2:32 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Well, if he's happy now that's great. I hope he has found peace, but I agree, if someone goes complete 180 there's usually more than meets the eye. In the end its his own decision. I found the comment from his former boss interesting:
Quote:
I told Michael about a recent conversation I had with our former boss at XY, Peter Ian Cummings, who surprised me by wondering aloud if Michael was ever truly gay. “In retrospect, more than you or me or anyone else who worked at the magazine, his sexuality almost felt more theoretical than real to me,” Peter told me. “At a very young age, he had all these very well thought out theories about identity and sexuality. Maybe this gay or ***** identity that fascinated him, and that he had taken on, wasn’t really true for him. It doesn’t explain why he says such ridiculous things about gay people now, but maybe, just maybe, he’s not in denial about his own sexuality.”
#9 Jun 20 2011 at 4:05 PM Rating: Good
Nadenu wrote:


That's not too surprising. I've always felt like most homophobes are just bi-curious (or either full blown) and in denial.
They are also really good in bed. I know this because of my learnings.
#10 Jun 20 2011 at 4:11 PM Rating: Decent
Nothing like a confused idiot making it worse for the people that do know and have no problems being who they are.
#11 Jun 20 2011 at 4:27 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
To anyone contesting it, I'd say say sexual orientation is pretty much set. I'd say this in the same way I'd say water is not poisonous to drink, even though it technically is if consumed in great enough quantities.

More accurately, I do believe there is a flexibility in sexual preferences. I say "preferences," because I include fetishism alongside orientation. However I believe it is something very difficult to direct intentionally and that most people experience it only very miniscule shifts.
#12 Jun 20 2011 at 7:48 PM Rating: Default
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
Belkira wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Looks to be an interesting read, though I just gave it a quick skimming for now.

I saw some skepticism on the part of the author about the guy's return to heterosexuality. In college, I remember a conversation with an acquaintance who said that he had recently become gay. That he wasn't before, but now was. I saw no reason to disbelieve that, nor do I see any reason that it'd illegitimize homosexuality. There's no reason that homosexuality's "rightness" should be based on whether or not it's innate, IMO. So hypothetically speaking, I'd probably accept someone's claim that they'd become heterosexual at face value.

Of course, that's just hypothetically speaking. The guy seems like a bit of a nut.


It sort of put me in mind of Shador (sorry, Shador) and his, "I'm a devout JW, the earth humanity is 6,000 years old, no wait, I'm a devout follower of Dawkins and all religious people creationists are stupid," type stuff.


Minor corrections. Also, the thing with that is, one of those two polar opposites was never true to begin with. Smiley: tongue I suspect much the same with this guy. Either he never was gay, or he still is and is just in serious denial.
#13 Jun 20 2011 at 9:02 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Allegory wrote:
To anyone contesting it, I'd say say sexual orientation is pretty much set.


I tend to agree with this. In my opinion, there are many people who struggle with trying to be straight when they are really gay. But the reverse is also true, right? Some people adopt the "gay" label when they aren't really gay, and they're just as miserable, but often with a much harder road to travel to find their own comfortable spot in life. I suspect that the guy in that article is one of the latter group.


Quote:
More accurately, I do believe there is a flexibility in sexual preferences. I say "preferences," because I include fetishism alongside orientation. However I believe it is something very difficult to direct intentionally and that most people experience it only very miniscule shifts.


It's also problematic because our society tends to want to paint us (especially men) as exclusively one or the other. And let's be honest, that's a social pressure that comes just as strongly from the gay side as the straight one. There are enormous pressures within the gay community to continue to "be gay", and far more to be actively gay than there are among straight people. To be fair, that's to be expected when one is a smaller group, but it doesn't make the pressure any less real.


Also, in my experience, by far the strongest and most vehement exhortations against sexual activity with someone not aligned with your own sexual identity tend to come from gay men. I've never in my life told a gay man to his face that his sexual activities are disgusting, much less gone out of my way to describe in detail to him my sexual activities with women. Nearly ever gay man I've known has done the reverse though. I suspect part of it is shock value, but there seems to be a strong current, almost a need among the gay male community to constantly verbalize just how bad heterosexual sex is.


I also wonder how many of them are really trying to convince themselves of this?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#14 Jun 20 2011 at 10:27 PM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
gbaji wrote:
to constantly verbalize just how bad heterosexual sex is.


I enjoy having sex with men, but a ****** is much better overall.
#15 Jun 20 2011 at 11:44 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
gbaji wrote:
I tend to agree with this. In my opinion, there are many people who struggle with trying to be straight when they are really gay. But the reverse is also true, right? Some people adopt the "gay" label when they aren't really gay, and they're just as miserable, but often with a much harder road to travel to find their own comfortable spot in life. I suspect that the guy in that article is one of the latter group.

That's comparing a sea to a puddle. There are zero external pressures forcing a straight person into a gay lifestyle, and loads flowing the opposite direction.

I can't think of a single man hiding in the closet where that closet happens to be filled with naked ladies.
gbaji wrote:
There are enormous pressures within the gay community to continue to "be gay", and far more to be actively gay than there are among straight people. To be fair, that's to be expected when one is a smaller group, but it doesn't make the pressure any less real.

I can't even begin to imagine how you would have any significant insight into the gay community. It's called the LGBT alliance for a reason.
#16 Jun 21 2011 at 12:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Allegory wrote:
gbaji wrote:
There are enormous pressures within the gay community to continue to "be gay", and far more to be actively gay than there are among straight people. To be fair, that's to be expected when one is a smaller group, but it doesn't make the pressure any less real.

I can't even begin to imagine how you would have any significant insight into the gay community. It's called the LGBT alliance for a reason.
There really are pressures, though. Not that I'm trying to agree with gbaji, but jesus christ do the supergays need to lay the hell off.

"Come to pride!"
"No. I don't like stuff like that."
"But it's gay!"
"Yeah?"
"You have to!"


"Really? You're wearing that? You can't be gay and wear that."


"Come to [insert any gay themed/gay related/event, club, or mass meeting with a target audience of homos here]!!!!!!!"




Then, if you decline, you're not gay enough for your gay peers because you don't go to all their gay events to gay it up with all the gay gays, they stop talking to you because you're just not that gay.
There's also the fact that as a gay male you're expected to be so stick thin that you're able to wear cheerios for bracelets and have 12" ***** with a six pack and wear jeans that you can't move in with bright colored tops and leather for sex. You also need to style and highlight your hair. Otherwise you're simply just not attractive and no one will ever love you. You should probably also own a mac and study graphic design, fashion, or hotel and restaurant management. You've also got to listen to Lady Gaga and have Ke$ha ringtones. It's also mandatory that you spell Ke$ha with a dollar sign.

Maybe I just need new gay friends. But these are the only ones I can find. /meltdown.
#17 Jun 21 2011 at 6:35 AM Rating: Decent
My lesbian friend came out as bi recently. She grew up in an environment that was rather spiteful toward "breeders", so I think it was a pretty big step for her.

That being said, it sounds to me like this guy opened his mind too much and his brain fell out.
It comes across like he's always been someone who strongly identified with a group/subculture, while still being open minded, and then slipping into another subculture that closed him off to other views.



I think sexual orientation is kind of 'meh', anyway. If I'm interested in men, does that mean I'm interested in people who have a *****? Does being attracted to someone who's genderqueer make me less straight because of the way they see themselves, or am I still straight because they have a *****? I mean, I know where I stand, but I sometimes find it hard to imagine where other people's boundaries are. I've stopped thinking about people in terms of gender half the time because sometimes stuff happens like you don't see someone for half a year, and then their gender has changed, and where does that leave me? I'd rather not think about that too hard.

(ITT: Kali hangs out with too many LGBTQ people and has issues keeping her brain from falling out.)
#18 Jun 21 2011 at 6:48 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Allegory wrote:
There are zero external pressures forcing a straight person into a gay lifestyle, and loads flowing the opposite direction.
I disagree. It's rare, but not zero.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#19 Jun 21 2011 at 9:42 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
I find it funny that when I was arguing that this was possible, no one agreed. The response was "the person was just confused".
#20 Jun 21 2011 at 9:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I don't recall you ever arguing this. Maybe attempting to, but not actually arguing this.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#21 Jun 21 2011 at 9:55 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Back when someone told the story of a woman who was married with 4 children and then "realized" that she was a lesbian. I argued that she was probably straight (since I don't know her) and then became interested in women.

The counter was that you don't change, you just realize your real sexuality. I countered that to say, if you were just "confused" before you "realized" your real sexuality, then how does anyone know that you're just not "confused" now?

The bottom line is that it was a 20 pager about how that can't happen and when Belkira posts an article on a person who claims that he has done the same thing, everyone is like, "eh, I guess it can happen".
#22 Jun 21 2011 at 10:36 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Back when someone told the story of a woman who was married with 4 children and then "realized" that she was a lesbian. I argued that she was probably straight (since I don't know her) and then became interested in women.

The counter was that you don't change, you just realize your real sexuality. I countered that to say, if you were just "confused" before you "realized" your real sexuality, then how does anyone know that you're just not "confused" now?

The bottom line is that it was a 20 pager about how that can't happen and when Belkira posts an article on a person who claims that he has done the same thing, everyone is like, "eh, I guess it can happen".


You haven't yet realized that your perpetually obstinate attitude inspires obstinance in return? People read the douchey way that you advocate your points and are compelled to go at you.

At any rate, do you even know if its the same people between the two threads? Personally, I've always felt the way that I responded above. I know that I've never said otherwise.
#23 Jun 21 2011 at 10:45 AM Rating: Good
Almalieque wrote:
Back when someone told the story of a woman who was married with 4 children and then "realized" that she was a lesbian. I argued that she was probably straight (since I don't know her) and then became interested in women.

The counter was that you don't change, you just realize your real sexuality. I countered that to say, if you were just "confused" before you "realized" your real sexuality, then how does anyone know that you're just not "confused" now?

The bottom line is that it was a 20 pager about how that can't happen and when Belkira posts an article on a person who claims that he has done the same thing, everyone is like, "eh, I guess it can happen".


In this thread there has been pretty hefty skepticism. I, personally, think the guy might be bi. I don't think he's magically no longer attracted to men in any way.
#24 Jun 21 2011 at 10:56 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Back when someone told the story of a woman who was married with 4 children and then "realized" that she was a lesbian. I argued that she was probably straight (since I don't know her) and then became interested in women.

The counter was that you don't change, you just realize your real sexuality. I countered that to say, if you were just "confused" before you "realized" your real sexuality, then how does anyone know that you're just not "confused" now?

The bottom line is that it was a 20 pager about how that can't happen and when Belkira posts an article on a person who claims that he has done the same thing, everyone is like, "eh, I guess it can happen".


You haven't yet realized that your perpetually obstinate attitude inspires obstinance in return? People read the douchey way that you advocate your points and are compelled to go at you.

At any rate, do you even know if its the same people between the two threads? Personally, I've always felt the way that I responded above. I know that I've never said otherwise.


I just took a glance at the 37 page thread (3 pages) and these were the ones making that argument: Deadgye, Coddy, CBD,Lady, Kalivha and Belkira.

As much as you like to believe otherwise, your claim about my attitude and approach is false.
#25 Jun 21 2011 at 11:17 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Back when someone told the story of a woman who was married with 4 children and then "realized" that she was a lesbian. I argued that she was probably straight (since I don't know her) and then became interested in women.

The counter was that you don't change, you just realize your real sexuality. I countered that to say, if you were just "confused" before you "realized" your real sexuality, then how does anyone know that you're just not "confused" now?

The bottom line is that it was a 20 pager about how that can't happen and when Belkira posts an article on a person who claims that he has done the same thing, everyone is like, "eh, I guess it can happen".


You haven't yet realized that your perpetually obstinate attitude inspires obstinance in return? People read the douchey way that you advocate your points and are compelled to go at you.

At any rate, do you even know if its the same people between the two threads? Personally, I've always felt the way that I responded above. I know that I've never said otherwise.


I just took a glance at the 37 page thread (3 pages) and these were the ones making that argument: Deadgye, Coddy, CBD,Lady, Kalivha and Belkira.


I'm not seeing any correlation. You've got Belkira here, who seems skeptical. Kali, who didn't really address that issue, though did provide an anecdote that could explain a shifting opinion on it. And Coddy, who didn't talk about that.

Almalieque wrote:
As much as you like to believe otherwise, your claim about my attitude and approach is false.


Color me surprised.

Edited, Jun 21st 2011 1:19pm by Eske
#26 Jun 21 2011 at 11:17 AM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Back when someone told the story of a woman who was married with 4 children and then "realized" that she was a lesbian. I argued that she was probably straight (since I don't know her) and then became interested in women.

The counter was that you don't change, you just realize your real sexuality. I countered that to say, if you were just "confused" before you "realized" your real sexuality, then how does anyone know that you're just not "confused" now?

The bottom line is that it was a 20 pager about how that can't happen and when Belkira posts an article on a person who claims that he has done the same thing, everyone is like, "eh, I guess it can happen".


You haven't yet realized that your perpetually obstinate attitude inspires obstinance in return? People read the douchey way that you advocate your points and are compelled to go at you.

At any rate, do you even know if its the same people between the two threads? Personally, I've always felt the way that I responded above. I know that I've never said otherwise.


I just took a glance at the 37 page thread (3 pages) and these were the ones making that argument: Deadgye, Coddy, CBD,Lady, Kalivha and Belkira.

As much as you like to believe otherwise, your claim about my attitude and approach is false.


Cue 50-page debate about Alma's attitude.
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 42 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (42)