Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Don't yell at yer toilet.Follow

#1 Oct 19 2007 at 11:05 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,261 posts
Or this might be you.
#2 Oct 19 2007 at 11:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
My toilet > that toilet. Smiley: nod
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#3 Oct 19 2007 at 11:07 AM Rating: Good
****
5,550 posts
One of the few lawyers I agree with wrote:
"You can't prosecute somebody for swearing at a cop or a toilet,"
#4 Oct 19 2007 at 11:16 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,760 posts
Quote:
SCRANTON, Pennsylvania (AP) -- Talk about a potty mouth.



Ba-dum-bum!
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#5 Oct 19 2007 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good
That's pure awesome and win. I love the last line
Quote:
"You can't prosecute somebody for swearing at a cop or a toilet,"


O RLY?
#6 Oct 19 2007 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good
Pffff if that ***** swore at my toilet I'd totally call the police.
#7 Oct 19 2007 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
tarubstchef wrote:
Quote:
One of the few lawyers I agree with wrote:
"You can't prosecute somebody for swearing at a cop or a toilet,"


He wasn't citied for swearing at a cop or a toilet. As long as someone in ear shot finds it offensive and is willing to file a complaint and follow up on it, that said person can be citied for there “obscene” remarks.


Edit: An expample:

Say I come up to a group people that are loitering around a business. I am simply going to tell them to be on there way when one of them starts off with the cursing and insults directed towards me. As an officer I can not do anything in regards to him making those statements to me.

Now say another stranger is walking by us while he is spewing curses at me. They stop and inform me that they are offended by those remarks. Well, then I can turn around I now cite him.


Edited, Oct 19th 2007 3:24pm by Kyoshindi
#8 Oct 19 2007 at 11:20 AM Rating: Good
Kyoshindi wrote:
tarubstchef wrote:
Quote:
One of the few lawyers I agree with wrote:
"You can't prosecute somebody for swearing at a cop or a toilet,"

He wasn't citied for swearing at a cop or a toilet. As long as someone in ear shot finds it offensive and is willing to file a complaint and follow up on it, that said person can be citied for there “obscene” remarks.

Which is just bloody retarded when you are inside your own house, and you actually have a reason to be pissed off.
#9 Oct 19 2007 at 11:28 AM Rating: Decent
See, if you'd just keep your profanity to a whisper...
#10 Oct 19 2007 at 11:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Which is just bloody retarded when you are inside your own house, and you actually have a reason to be pissed off.



Which speaks loads about the **** neighbor that called it in.
#11 Oct 19 2007 at 11:31 AM Rating: Decent
Prettier Than You
*****
12,975 posts
Quote:
Dawn Herb could face up to 90 days in jail and a fine of up to $300.
They can't be fUcking serious.
____________________________
Did you lose faith?
Yes, I lost faith in the powers that be.
But in doing so I came across the will to disagree.
And I gave up. Yes, I gave up, and then I gave in.
But I take responsibility for every single sin. ♪ ♫


Thank god I stopped playing MMOs.
#12 Oct 19 2007 at 11:32 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
StubsOnAsura the Wise wrote:
See, if you'd just keep your profanity to a whisper...

What if you happen to be moving stuff around in your own house, and you accidentally drop, say, a 36-inch TV on your foot? I think it would be next to impossible for me to keep it to a whisper.
#13 Oct 19 2007 at 11:32 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Dawn Herb


Interesting name, though!
#14 Oct 19 2007 at 11:33 AM Rating: Decent
Daboder da Basher wrote:
StubsOnAsura the Wise wrote:
See, if you'd just keep your profanity to a whisper...

What if you happen to be moving stuff around in your own house, and you accidentally drop, say, a 36-inch TV on your foot? I think it would be next to impossible for me to keep it to a whisper.


You mean you can't restrain yourself in moments of severe pain, frustration, or anguish??!

90 days in jail for you, Mr. 180 if I can hear you.
#15 Oct 19 2007 at 11:36 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
StubsOnAsura the Wise wrote:

You mean you can't restrain yourself in moments of severe pain, frustration, or anguish??!

90 days in jail for you, Mr. 180 if I can hear you.



I guess I'll just have to make sure my next-door neighbor isn't a cop then.
#16 Oct 19 2007 at 11:36 AM Rating: Good
***
2,164 posts
Kyoshindi wrote:
Which speaks loads about the **** neighbor that called it in.


He was a cop. Nuff said.
#17 Oct 19 2007 at 11:47 AM Rating: Good
Well that makes more since then. In that case I’m sure there was plenty of **** going on between the two neighbors to begin with and he decided to call in a favor and won the neighborly dispute between the two.
#18 Oct 19 2007 at 11:54 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
Cops > the law
#19 Oct 19 2007 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
dear lord.
#20 Oct 19 2007 at 12:23 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Cops > the law


Not really, he just knew the law better than your average joe. I'm sure if this guy had known about some scarce law like this he would have done something similar. Then again this guy can just be a major ******* *** hole


Penal and traffic codes are dry and boring as hell. I still recommend to everyone to pick up a copy of their states codes and brush up a little. You'd be surprised how handy that knowledge can be for you.

Knowing, after all, is half the battle. Smiley: grin
#21 Oct 19 2007 at 12:39 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,618 posts
In the Navy I can be punished for cursing

Basicly this means I cant call my Chief a fucktard, if he gets easily offended.


http://usmilitary.about.com/od/punitivearticles/a/mcm117.htm



Article 117 wrote:
Text.

“Any person subject to this chapter who uses provoking or reproachful words or gestures towards any other person subject to this chapter shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Elements.

(1) That the accused wrongfully used words or gestures toward a certain person;

(2) That the words or gestures used were provoking or reproachful; and

(3) That the person toward whom the words or gestures were used was a person subject to the code.

Explanation.

(1) In general. As used in this article, “provoking” and “reproachful” describe those words or gestures which are used in the presence of the person to whom they are directed and which a reasonable person would expect to induce a breach of the peace under the circumstances.
Sponsored Links

These words and gestures do not include reprimands, censures, re-proofs and the like which may properly be administered in the interests of training, efficiency, or discipline in the armed forces.

(2) Knowledge. It is not necessary that the accused have knowledge that the person toward whom the words or gestures are directed is a person subject to the code.




UCMJ wrote:
Article 116 --Riot or breach of peace

Article 117 --Provoking speeches or gestures

Article 118 --Murder


Right between murder and starting a riot.
#22 Oct 19 2007 at 12:44 PM Rating: Good
Then again, the army owns the army, your next door neighbor doesn't own your house, or your toilet for that matter.

And I'd have trouble seeing this seen as anything above a mild noise complaint. Why would you ever spend jail time for that?

Well unless you cursed at your toilet all the time.
#23 Oct 19 2007 at 1:05 PM Rating: Good
Blacktuesday wrote:
And I'd have trouble seeing this seen as anything above a mild noise complaint. Why would you ever spend jail time for that?


The way they reported it is a little misleading. There is a set maximum amount of jail time and/or fine attached to ever charge. The time and fine very with the degrees of the offense (misdemeanor/felony). Even your simplest offense has up to a certain amount of jail time attached to it, however short it is.

It's up to the judge to decide if he wants to tag no jail time or the maximum amount allowed. He can simply fine the individual if there is an "and/or" attached to the code. The media likes to state what the maximum (throw the book at them) jail time and fine is in almost every case.

Again, let me reiterate the fact that you can spend jail time for every penal and traffic offense on the books. However, the judge will almost always tag you with just the fine and not even the maximum allowed amount at that.

It's always made to sound worse than what it is.



I am now off to go watch
    30 Days of Night
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 239 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (239)