Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Vote for Bush!!Follow

#127 Sep 14 2004 at 9:41 PM Rating: Decent
sorry didn't know thats what u meant. lol thx


on another note

Quote:
There are reasonable things you can give up in the name of security. The "essential liberties" that Ben was talking about were things like legal representation and recourse, and due process, and the like.



actually if i recall there were american citizens accused of being enemy combatants that were held 2 yeards without trial or legal representation. I'm not talking about foreingers caught fighting im talkinga bout United states citizens who are guaranteed constitutional protections.
#128 Sep 14 2004 at 10:07 PM Rating: Decent
**
661 posts
Not so funny. About those arrest with no good reason at all, here is something to check out:


The Patriot Act.

Quote:

The new version would also lift the judicial oversight on intelligence and wire tappings, it would give the FBI unrestricted access to personal files, e-mail accounts and so on, and it also will revoke the citizenship of disfavored political parties.


¬_¬
#129 Sep 14 2004 at 10:45 PM Rating: Default
republicans arent fascists. I take responsobility for my own actions and think for my own damned self. Conservatives are even against me.
#130 Sep 14 2004 at 11:03 PM Rating: Default
Everyone hates you mostly just because you're an idiot who idolizes Hitler; frankly, that's an awesome thing to be able to accuratley say. You might want to put that on your resume someday, perhaps after you drop out of middle school and are looking for a job with where you can be promoted to asking "Would you like fries with that?"

Your grammar and spelling are the worst I've ever seen outside of this thread (frankly, PieMan's is only slightly better, although it's best that you two are the ones mainly ******** at each other; the rest of us can just ignore whatever drivel you're posting behind the nearly-incomprehensible mispellings, random punctuation usage and sheer, mindless idiocy). For that matter, your political definitions are best defined as simply retarded, rather than other, less charitible terms that might be applied to it.

Liberals push reform, progression, and change within the system. Radicals push change from outside the existing political system. Conservatives promote keeping things the same. Reactionaries promote turning affairs back to how they were before. Ghana isn't a conservative; he's a reactionary, although while the state of affairs that he promotes has never really existed in the United States (or, for that matter, most places except Germany between, say, 1936-1945, although there are other examples) to call him a radical, while technicially accurate, fails to capture the meaning of the political definition. To summarize;

Radicals would be the commie pinkos, while Reactionaries would be the hicks ******** their sisters and lynching blacks. Do try to keep these two groups distinct.

Quote:

Hate is a big word there, I dont truely hate anyone unless they take it to a personal level and humiliate the living hell out of me or hit a spot that really bothers me. Kind of hard to say that millions of people did that unless your an Afghani pointing fingures at Russians who supported the invasion of Afghanistan. I do see Jews for what they are and hate their behaviors. Since I am a Jew, I know what to be a Jew means, and dont say white conservative because the majority of Jews are some type of a democrat. Does this not give me the right to hate Jews? I know what a Jew is, I've seen my families Jew friends and my family. I just dislike with a passion :-)


Ah, so you belong to the infamous Self-Hating Jew sect?

For the record, quite a few of the Neoconservatives who serve as Dubya's advisors are Jewish, although no one will argue that they aren't a dominantly Democratic voting block.

Just for posterity;

Quote:
In a wierd way we all idolize Hitler whether we admit it or not. Being that we all want everyone to just conform in some kind of a way so you can live your ideal life. Hitler just killed Jews to pursue his idea of a utopia just as you push your p.c. on Americans. What do you know of Hitler? He was more a sucsess then you are, I would love to see you kill 6 million Jews, dictate a nation and squash Europe and Eurasia like a grape.


To quote Godwin's Law, as soon as you accuse the other side of being Hitler and/or ****'s, you lose whatever discussion you were involved in. Saying that you also idolize Hitler is, I'll admit, a new one for me.

Edited, Wed Sep 15 00:08:36 2004 by RPZip
#131 Sep 14 2004 at 11:43 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
I find it disturbing, to say the least, that, once again, you complain of liberals "taking away your freedoms" and then state that it's okay for you to do the very same thing to others. Oh, wait, I forgot, you're not advocating taking away their freedoms. Just their lives.



I try to belittle people out of their rights. Big difference, liberals push their way through the legal system to revoke your rights. I wouldnt kill anyone with out a very very very very good reason. Political views arent something I feel you should kill for unless its something as serious as say... a war that cant be avoided. Did I say I was pro war on terror? Im neutral on this one though. Could care less what happens, not my buisness. But I do agree with democrats, it is for oil. I dont care though. They got suddam out of power why cant you just hug bush for that?


Quote:
Before you criticize me please go see how much of a racists ghanna is



Ive tried to explain this before, P.C. benefits all minorities but whites. Where the hells my slice of pie? Besides, why the hell does it matter if Im rascist? I have that right to be. But I would never support a lynching of anyone because they are not white. Thats silly and wrong. I don't hate anyone because of their skin color. I respect them just as they deserve. I respect everyone a little. Even you Pieman! One thing I don't respect is your views though, keep them, just don't keep em' in America. I just see them as anti-american, and thats what I really want to break through. I don't want my personal preferences of blacks, jews, hispanics to get too detailed in this little quarell we had here. Maybe if I were a little more careful with my wording my point would be alot stronger. If you get the point then don't speak down upon me. Agree or Disagree and see how it complies to American values.

Anyways, w/e. I'm not in the mood to argue bout this atm. Ill get back to ya all in 20.


#132 Sep 14 2004 at 11:49 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Radicals would be the commie pinkos, while Reactionaries would be the hicks ******** their sisters and lynching blacks. Do try to keep these two groups distinct.



True.

But, the infamous self hating jew I don't consider to be a jew. I consider jew a label, a behavioral pattern label. Although turning on your own people is of jew behavior. On second thought, theyre just as big jews. My bad, I am a Jew in that perspective.
#133 Sep 15 2004 at 12:05 AM Rating: Default
Whites aren't a minority in America, but suit yourself.

Quote:
Maybe if I were a little more careful with my wording my point would be alot stronger.


Perhaps, although I think if you made them any clearer and people actually read your posts rather than just skimming them you'd be in real trouble. Things to avoid if you'd like to look like less of a moron next time;

- Comparing a movement to try and protect people, rightly or wrongly (to some extend I will agree that it goes overboard- but not always, and nor is it a bad idea) to the systematic eradication of millions of Jews in Europe and the forced removal of many others.
- Admiring said removal, or at least publicially saying that you admire said removal. If you're going to be a Neo-****, you'd be better off doing so in private. Saying that you admire Hitler in a debate is the equivilent of blowing all of limbs off with a shotgun before an Iron Man competition.
-Avoid things like this (random skimming turned up this and many other examples);
Quote:
You don't think there is a good reason to be rascist ever, but if I were better at wording I could become the next Hitler and kill damned millions if I had to... What are you trying to do, make me look like the bad guy here because my views differ from you.


A clear argument against any kind of government-funded education system if I ever saw one. By the way, before you accuse me of misquoting you the elipsis (...) indicates a break in the text; I took out a line in between the two, although it hardly helped your case.
-Making arguments that sound like they came from a fifth-grader at best. "Well... they, like, got Saddam (Side note; while this is rendered from two different languages, Saddam Hussein is much closer to the actual language than Suddam. Back to your regurally scheduled beating) out of Iraq and stuff and like that was good. And stuff."
#134 Sep 15 2004 at 12:49 AM Rating: Decent
I find it really hippocritical that you talk of american values yet your are clearly a racist
#135 Sep 15 2004 at 12:51 AM Rating: Default
hah, thanks for your reply. ill be sure to remember some of that, slur my grammar as you will though. but dont use it against my political views. Just for the record Im not a neo-****. I wouldnt support hitler. I just dont like the cause. Dislike of jews is different from being a ****. Plenty of people hate Jews. Arabs, Jesse Jackson lol, EURO, Jesus, anyone who does not like the press, and you could dig deep into history to see that jews have always faced discrimination from everyone. They just are hated. I dont bring my hatred of jews to the public much unless you draw it out of me. Or if you cant take the pizza and the oven jokes. If I ever call anyone a Jew its because they act like one, or I cant think of another word in place of Jew as an adjective or noun to describe.
#136 Sep 15 2004 at 12:57 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Jesus


Ok now your insulting my religion and all of christianity as well.


Jesus would never hate anybody so dont start speaking out of your *** again. I would think a conservative would be a little more knowledgebal about the teachins of Jesus Christ.
#137 Sep 15 2004 at 1:05 AM Rating: Default
That was a joke. I'll say what I want.
#138 Sep 15 2004 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
Remember big sistah Dark is watching, keep it clean and refrain from racism here.
____________________________

#139 Sep 15 2004 at 1:50 PM Rating: Default
Shall I bring my views to the asylum?
#140 Sep 15 2004 at 1:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
That would probably be best at this time.
____________________________

#141REDACTED, Posted: Sep 15 2004 at 1:53 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Cool beans! Ha ha. Btw, love your icon thing. Monster inc ftw!
#142 Sep 15 2004 at 1:56 PM Rating: Default
I apologize for this mess. By no means did i intend to create a massive hate thread.

Smiley: sly

Well any way Vote for Bush!




Edited, Wed Sep 15 15:01:43 2004 by AzrielDuordden
#143REDACTED, Posted: Sep 15 2004 at 1:59 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Apology excepted ha ha.
#144 Sep 15 2004 at 2:40 PM Rating: Decent
Geeze! Please step back and look at the bigger picture people. Admittedly there is NO good candidate for prez this year, but can't you see what Bush is doing? I honor and respect every member of our military for they are doing there jobs and serving their country. Giving up their lives for us. But why we are in these countrys to begin with is the fundamental question. Oil. That is what all the BS comes down to. Why so many American's are blind to this fact when it is smacking them right in the face, is something I cannot understand. Do you think our goverment cares about Afganastan? All Bush cares about is getting his stupid pipeline working so his family (Mobil Oil) can rake in the benefits. Why did we go to Iraq? Oil. Or maybe it was just because every person walking into the El Rasshid hotel was forced to walk across his fathers face (a huge insult) and it pissed him off, and the oil. He made it his mission to succed where daddy failed. Why aren't we in Sudan right now when no one has needed us more? No stinking oil. That's why. Are sanctions going to fix Sudan? No way in hell. Look at our history people ... we never learn.

PS.. Seeing a comment about Hitler like that, and your general comments regarding Jews, on the day of my New Year, really makes me sick. You are a truly ignorant person.


Edited, Wed Sep 15 15:45:11 2004 by Shulamite

Edited, Wed Sep 15 15:49:12 2004 by Shulamite
#145 Sep 15 2004 at 2:43 PM Rating: Default
Thank you again karma trolls
#146 Sep 15 2004 at 3:01 PM Rating: Decent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Quote:
Ive tried to explain this before, P.C. benefits all minorities but whites.

Whites are minorities?


#147 Sep 16 2004 at 6:33 PM Rating: Default
**
791 posts
Quote:
Here we have yet another fine example of the depth of understanding of the average republican voter.


Yes, but isn't it odd how every debate between a knowledgable republican and a knowledgeable democrat ends up with the liberal dodging questions, and giving falty information?
#148 Sep 16 2004 at 6:40 PM Rating: Default
Seloan wrote:
Quote:
Here we have yet another fine example of the depth of understanding of the average republican voter.


Yes, but isn't it odd how every debate between a knowledgable republican and a knowledgeable democrat ends up with the conservative dodging the truth, and giving blockheaded misinformation?


Fixed.
#149 Sep 16 2004 at 6:51 PM Rating: Default
**
791 posts
Quote:
As a republican you need to realize that your anti- gay, anti-black, anti- woman messages ARE biggotry and be prepared to be called a biggot.


HAHA republicans are anti-black,anti-woman, and anti-gay???
Well to be honest..I don't know why the hell you say that we are anti-black...and for the gay thing...we don't support gay marriages, that doesn't mean that we are anti-gay. It simply means that we read the bible occasionaly and know that marriage is a holy thing, while being gay is not. For "anti-woman" it's more like "anti-abortion", which you consider a bad thing, but we don't. It is sickening, to me, that you would not allow a baby to be born. Especially if it was done by puncturing(sp?) its skull following birth. I know that our government was mostly based on Hammurabi, not on religion. But as Americans we are religous, and it seems to be working well for us, in that we are the most successful nation, perhaps ever.

So next time you accuse us of being anti-anything...remember that if we are, you must be anti-religion.

Quote:
Fixed.
- obviously you just don't follow politics...watch a debate, they WILL NOT answer a question. I reccomend you listen to Hannity on the radio..he might "Fix" you.


Edited, Thu Sep 16 19:55:16 2004 by Seloan
#150 Sep 16 2004 at 7:38 PM Rating: Good
What happened to punk rock? What happened to chasing girls and doing drugs?

Kids these days are frigging reading the Bible and listening to Hannity....

I guess their rebellion will come later...

Should be interesting.
#151 Sep 16 2004 at 7:43 PM Rating: Default
Seloan wrote:
But as Americans we are religous.


Speak for yourself. There are millions of Americans who are not religious. There is a separation of church and state for a reason. Personally I would consider myself to be spiritual, although in many ways I find religion loathsome. It is an institution historically based around money and power. The people who go to church nowadays (and I know this because I was Christian for a majority of my life), rarely use it as a time of true fellowship. It is a gossip circle. People who carry on conversations with other people simply because they share similar beliefs and it makes them feel comfortable. There is the same amount of fellowship to be found in the members of the Nets basketball team conversing with one another.

Additionally, I find that people not involved in the Christian church to be far more moral and accepting of other people than those who follow religion. The church represses people so they naturally react in the opposite direction. That is why most of us probably knew the "hypocritical religous girl/guy" in high school that was more promiscuous than everyone else. I'm not going to get into the validity of Mormonism, but they generally have many of the same precepts of morality that Christians do, i.e., don't lie, don't steal, don't kill, etc. The population of Utah is roughly 70% Mormon, yet Salt Lake City has one of the highest crime rates in the country. Guess which state has the highest reincarceration rate in the USA? Utah. Surprising? Not really.

People who go to church need direction in their life. They cannot find it on their own, so they ask for help from someone else. I am not saying their isn't a God, or that I don't believe in Jesus, but I am saying that someone in South America who doesn't devote himself to Christianity is going to some ficticious place called Hell. Where exactly do you draw the line for people who go there? If they have asked for Jesus' forgiveness and made him their personal savior? How about the person who is raised in a family practicing Hinduism, are they simply screwed? Even if they are told about Jesus, and they understandably don't alter their life because some missionary suggested it. Do they go to Hell?

I do not believe that an all-loving and compassionate being - traits Christians largely believe God has - would ever send anyone to a place called Hell.

Most people who call themselves Christians who I have known are just as "sinful" as I am - they just have a self-imposed sugar coating of righteousness.

I find it disgusting how most Christians bastardize Jesus' words and beliefs, choosing to judge other people and warp what I believe he truly stood for. What makes me even more disgusted is how a majority of these religious people vote for Bush. Simply amazing. I don't know how you people could find a guy who better represents the opposite of what religion could be.

Seloan wrote:
We don't support gay marriages, that doesn't mean that we are anti-gay. It simply means that we read the bible occasionaly and know that marriage is a holy thing, while being gay is not.


Being gay is not a holy thing huh? It is just as holy as being heterosexual if you want to go into that territory. If you went out of your way to actually do some research beyond what your pastor and the Bible tells you, you would learn about how genetics effects sexual preference. BEING GAY IS NOT A CHOICE. That being said, how can you blame someone for something that they were born with? It is like saying that someone with good eyesight is holy, but someone with poor eyesight is a sinner, and should be discriminated against.

I'll ask you a simple question. Are seagulls capable of sinning?
I assume you answered no, if not, we can have a separate debate about that one. Now, how is it that there are plenty of gay seagulls? Is it a choice? How about the hundreds of other species of animals out there that practice homosexuality? Is it simply there preference? Hmmm. Let me tell you something. Because of people like you, many of the young gay people in our society are very ashamed of who they are. Because of people like you, they are afraid to be honest, and afraid to BE WHO THEY ARE. Very Sad.

Seloan wrote:
It is sickening, to me, that you would not allow a baby to be born.


And it is sickening to me how you would let a baby be born to a crack ***** who was raped, and forced to raise a kid in some 3'rd world L.A. apartment, living off of breadsticks. Boy that kid is gonna have a great life. Get real - there is no such thing as "black and white" morality.

Seloan wrote:
So next time you accuse us of being anti-anything...remember that if we are, you must be anti-religion.


Damn right I'm anti-religion, and proud to have seen the light.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 169 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (169)