Quote:
Then once the band actually has enough juice with the record companies to actually make the music they want to make, and their sound changes, everyone calls them sell outs.
Erm, people usually call a band/artist a sell-out when they go from a less marketable sound to a more commercial sound (presumably to sell more albums). Not when they start as the pop flavor of the week and then start writing experimental music with insightful lyrics and no commercial appeal or whatever. Your definition makes no sense: You sell out to
make money by broadening your fan base to the rank-and-file (at least in the eyes of your original base), not to lose money by intentionally writing albums no one from either fan base will want to listen to.
Really, I don't know jack about Metallica and rap, but in my example I would be willing to bet that Ms. Phair has made more off her latest "sell out" album than at least any two of her three previous albums combined. So your theory is that she wrote a bunch of earlier stuff with limited appeal to most markets for three albums just so she could scrimp and save enough pennies to realize her dream of producing an album bland enough that it gets constant airplay on the local "Adult Rock from the 80's 90's and Today" music station? The broad's a frickin' martyr
Quote:
Whether the fanbase is capable of accepting this or wailing like a bunch of prepubescent girls is really not a matter of any concern to me.
Which explains why you came into a pretty harmless and trivial thread to cry like a little girl yourself about people calling artists "sell outs".
Quote:
If you like the album, buy it. If not, don't
Brilliant. But that doesn't preclude anyone from having an opinion on the artist or their work which the poster found not worth buying.