Nilatai wrote:
What's your point? I'm not disabled because I can walk? Or, what?
As what I already said, you can't be disabled if you're abled. In order for you to be considered "disabled", then something that should be "able" isn't.
Nilatai wrote:
Homosexuality is a fetish?
You just love making stuff up, you racist. I put "fetish" in quotes for a lack of better words. If I were to consider homosexuality as a "fetish", then I would consider heterosexuality as equally as a "fetish".
Give it up. You have no argument. You're just accusing me of being a bigot.
Nilatai wrote:
I also don't think that forcing people to pay money to people who weren't slaves because their ancestors owned slaves is fair.
So, you're a racist. Got it.
Nilatai wrote:
Then you don't understand what "mating season" means. I've not changed my point from what I said to Ugly to now. Smiley: rolleyes
Once again, I'm focusing on concept. I don't care what word you use. I'm referencing to the time when people mate. Yes, you did change your point.
Nilatai wrote:
No dear boy, I used race to show you how your babble about what's normal can be used to justify racism. Your opposition to SSM is pure bigotry. It does not affect you in the slightest, yet you're opposed to it on grounds that it's not normal, so I gave you a for instance about white being normal and black not being so. I don't believe that at all, I was just using your own logic against you.
Also, for the second time, saying something is "biological normal" doesn't make any f*cking sense.
Except you didn't show anything. Using the concept that I'm arguing for normality, you or no one has yet provided any equivalent example using race. This is primarily that it's impossible.
Also, concept, concept, concept. If the words "biological normal" doesn't make sense to you, then replace them with whatever makes you feel better. At the end of the day, your organs will work a certain way regardless of how any person defines it.