It isn't misleading in the least, in fact its how pet jobs have always worked. Any bst, smn, or pup can tell you that we count our pets damage as our own, but the hate is split.
How about I do not like the wording then? Will that work better for you?
What is this "high damage with low agro" sh*t too? What does that even mean? If we preform a 3k weapon skill we do not have any less chance of pulling hate (discounting enmity gear or merits) than someone else who does the same.
I'm sorry, but if you don't see how this isn't rude/troll bate, then there's no amount of explaining or logic that can help you. You clearly are smart enough to understand that the point and choose to ignore it and make a rude comment that makes you seem right even though you clearly know you aren't.
Never said it was not rude in fact I am openly saying me being rude does not automatically make me a troll. Someone not being nice should not automatically have people sounding the troll alarm. It annoys me because it is used as a ward for anything people do not want to see, hear, read, answer questions to, and so on.
and make a rude comment that makes you seem right even though you clearly know you aren't.
Brush up on what a troll actually is please.
I use firefox, so that comes out as a script block, nice try though
If I wanted to get into trolling I pull the why are you not using Firefox since you have trouble spelling card.
Anyone know how often a PUP one of the the only people DDing on something that matters to worry about enmity or make it even worth mentioning?
Quote and bold for emphasis. You use firefox and clearly it misses things as well, double 'the' and missing an 'is'. So just another example of the pot calling the kettle black.
Well at least you know you are rude too, right? Right..? Well that is good enough for me anyway.
Actually i go /war more now and /nin and /dnc less, but i have a full time whm alt to cure myself with, and I would rather do more dmg then evade 1-2 attacks extra. As for the rest, I am not sure why you would want hate over a warrior... do warriors blow up and kill the alliance if they get hate or something? News to me. Personally I don't care who has hate, as long as its not my pet. Then top it off, there is plenty of reason why the split enmity is and always will be important, but if you are stuck in abyssea it becomes really hard to see. Try some t3 or t4 voidwatch mobs. Back in the day there were plenty of mobs where it was useful.
Hah, you know. Try not bringing along your WHM alt (oh, I love this new trend...) and saying that please.
Yeah warriors clearly drink nitroglycerine and explode killing everyone if they are beat up. That was exactly the point I was making, and I am glad you understood that.
'Oh, it is important, you just can't see it in abyssea here try this, and...' Does just saying to try something mean anything?
I haven't seen one example, or anything that resembles ample support. I've seen a reference to lol-abyssea and 3 minute fights.
My semi-wall of text you are referring to provides more support than anything you have thrown out so far Mr. Real PUP.
Where to start. What calculations? Lets not be all self proud and gloating, when in fact, you have provided zero forms of calculable data. However, you have supplied ample amounts of opinions based on zero data.
My mistake for using the word calculations, I apologize. I honestly just take what is said, think about it, think about my collective experiences on PUP, think about what I know about this game (and I mean know, CE capping so hate goes back and forth in abyssea (you know, most of the game atm) not some bullsh*t use of the word), run scenarios in my head, taking what I want to say and thinking of the many exceptions and situations where it does not apply, and so on. While they are not truly calculations and it is easy for myself to be incorrect. I still side with my opinion that "split" (can we just say separate, that is all it really is) hate will never make or break this job.
You come off very similar to rog. A typical internet bully who tries to be rude, then QQ about people calling you a troll even though your right and have backed it up. Thing is, rog was right some of the time. You were just rude in every post you've made. If you want to argue any more lets take it to PM because frankly you aren't adding anything to camwin's thread other then flame bating.
I can never be as good as Rog.
Being rude, offensive, or lacking tact makes you a bully now? Man this keeps getting better and better. I must be a bully because someone did not like being talked to in a certain way.
I would not "QQ" about being a troll if it was merited. If you want to actually watch me troll I can do that for you. Unfortunately since you use troll so liberally to blanket my actions you would never know the difference. I never even have to troll, people get up in arms when I am just being myself. Most of my trolling comes from stupid threads such as drama threads (STOLE MAH GLAVOID111, DONT DO STUFF WITH DAT PLAYAH, etc), and this is not one of those.
So we have incorrect usage or understanding of the word troll, a ridiculous assertion that I am sitting here trying to intimidate people, and the "take it to PM" card after providing a large post that I apparently am not supposed to respond to. Such is a really annoying and sad (yet effective) tool of making yourself look better and me worse. Unfortunately if you really cared about it you would have made a short post requesting such.
Since I am being intimated out of this thread(BELENOS U R A BULLY!!!) hopefully I can just duck out of this thread. Since saying such and such an action is not true trolling or contesting that I am a bully like Rog by someone who is no better than I is just QQing I effectively have no leg to stand on.
Nice work, and I mean that.