Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Bored Druid Thread: The Next GenerationFollow

#4652 Mar 17 2014 at 11:31 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Mazra wrote:
I don't get how Girl-Boy and Boy-Girl can be two different combinations if the order of the genders doesn't matter. How is one apple and one pear not the same as one pear and one apple?
Assuming 1st-2nd child it does make a difference and girl-boy is also eliminated since the first child was a boy.

Either way you end up with 50%.
#4653 Mar 17 2014 at 11:37 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
If its a logic question, then it's asking how many combinations are there, and of those how many are just boy, so the 1-2 2-1 combinations still count making the answer 1/3.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#4654 Mar 17 2014 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Apparently, if you know the name of the first child, it becomes a 50% probability.

I don't even... I need to stop watching these TEDx Talks about magic and math.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#4655 Mar 17 2014 at 11:40 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I'm inclined to say the answer is 50%, period. For one, the question isn't asking what the probability of them having a boy and a girl is, it's asking what the probability that their next child is a girl is.

But even more than that, the probability of getting a boy and a girl isn't conditional on the first selection specifically because the first selection has a probability of 1.

The probability of getting a boy and a girl is still 2/4 when you don't know what the first will be.

Whoever is teaching that to you sounds confused to me. I'm not a statistics genius by any long shot, but this just sounds really glaringly wrong.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#4656 Mar 17 2014 at 11:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
If its a logic question, then it's asking how many combinations are there, and of those how many are just boy, so the 1-2 2-1 combinations still count making the answer 1/3.
Context and wording is so annoying in these things. Smiley: glare

I don't miss these questions. Smiley: lol
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#4657 Mar 17 2014 at 11:48 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Do you have a link? Assuming birth results are independent then it's the overall chance of having a girl, which is likely slightly higher than 50%, as I think girls are slightly more common.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#4658 Mar 17 2014 at 11:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
I thought it was the other way around? But with boys having less overall survivability in the long term?

Also, interesting numbers.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#4659 Mar 17 2014 at 12:15 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
I don't miss these questions. Smiley: lol
All I learned in logic class was that the real answer was irrelevant, just to word things to make the answer you want right become correct. In other words, logic is *********

All my hate.

Edited, Mar 17th 2014 2:16pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#4660 Mar 17 2014 at 12:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
That sounds like my Philosophy classes. Any conclusion can be made to appear sound by a skilled debtor, regardless of how dumb the starting position is.

I like to think it prepared me for life in the asylum.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#4661 Mar 17 2014 at 12:45 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
I thought it was the other way around? But with boys having less overall survivability in the long term?

Also, interesting numbers.

ah, could be. I just know there are slightly more females in the US.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#4662 Mar 17 2014 at 1:20 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Do you have a link?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_or_Girl_paradox

I think. And apparently I was right. ******* math.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#4663 Mar 17 2014 at 1:46 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
So my understanding is that .5 or 1/3 are both correct depending on how you read the sentence, so it's not a paradox.

If you know the first child is a boy, the probability of the first child being a boy is 1, so the only statistical variable here is what the probability of the second child being a boy is. That's the only variable that matters.

When you switch that "child 1 is a boy" to "at least one child is a boy," you're heavily changing the game. Because now you have two variables, not one. The conditions you have to meet are now different.

So, not a paradox. And it comes down to whether you have statistical certainty on your data points.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#4664 Mar 17 2014 at 2:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I just know there are slightly more females in the US.
Not a terrible problem to have.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#4665 Mar 17 2014 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
But I don't see how it can ever be 1/3.

Assuming the phrasing "At least one child is a boy", you're only left with two possible combinations:

Boy and a girl
Boy and a boy

1/2 chance.

I know that you're supposed to list the entire amount of combinations:

Boy and a boy
Girl and a girl
Boy and a girl
Girl and a boy

And then you strike the ones that don't match the data. One is a boy, so the "Girl and a girl" combination is removed. Voila, three combinations remain of which one is the outcome. 1/3 chance.

The "Boy and a girl" vs "Girl and a boy" thing just makes zero sense to me. They're the same combination, just shifted around. 4+2 = 2+4. The order doesn't matter, does it? I get that they're two combinations, but I don't get how they, logically, count as two different combinations when they're identical.

Edited, Mar 17th 2014 10:15pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#4666 Mar 17 2014 at 2:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Mazra wrote:
The "Boy and a girl" vs "Girl and a boy" thing just makes zero sense to me. They're the same combination, just shifted around. 4+2 = 2+4. The order doesn't matter, does it? I get that they're two combinations, but I don't get how they, logically, count as two different combinations when they're identical.
Maybe think of it this way, because there's two different ways for the combination to happen there's a greater likelihood of having a household with one of each.

So like after 2 kids 1/4 of households have boy+boy, 1/2 have boy & girl, 1/4 have girl+girl.

Or something like that?

Also tangentially relevant, genetic risk factors for math anxiety. Smiley: nod

Edited, Mar 17th 2014 1:49pm by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#4667 Mar 17 2014 at 4:07 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Well, ****, I knew I should've gone with Danish instead.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#4668 Mar 17 2014 at 4:29 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
It helps if you think of the order as important, 1st child boy, 2nd child girl is different from 1st child girl, 2nd child boy.


Also, I bought some new shoes:
Screenshot


Given that these are the only high tops I've found that I like and are under €400 I figured I might as well get them since I'm not saving up for a €750 pair of sneakers no matter how much I like them.
#4669 Mar 17 2014 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
That reminds me; I need new shoes. The ones I have now are beginning to tear my socks apart.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#4670 Mar 17 2014 at 6:12 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
How do you live with just a single pair of shoes? These are pair #7 for me and there's a few more on my wishlist.
#4671 Mar 17 2014 at 6:35 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Mazra wrote:
The "Boy and a girl" vs "Girl and a boy" thing just makes zero sense to me. They're the same combination, just shifted around. 4+2 = 2+4. The order doesn't matter, does it? I get that they're two combinations, but I don't get how they, logically, count as two different combinations when they're identical.

They're not identical, as they illustrate different scenarios. You can draw paths.

Path 1 - Boy -Girl
Path 2 - Boy - Boy
Path 3 - Girl - Girl
Path 4 - Girl - Boy


Those are four unique paths, each have a probability of 25% given independant probabilities of 50% boy and girl per birth. Of those scenarios, three of them have at least one boy, but only one has two boys, hence the 1/3.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#4672 Mar 17 2014 at 6:43 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
If you consider boy - girl to be the same as girl - boy, then it has a 50% probability

25% 2 boys
25% 2 girls
50% 1 boy 1 girl

At that point assuming you have one boy, then the math still works, because the boy/girl combinations are more probably than the 2 boy combination.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#4673 Mar 17 2014 at 6:46 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
400 euros seems like a horrifyingly high amount to pay for shoes.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#4674 Mar 17 2014 at 6:53 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Mazra wrote:
Well, sh*t, I knew I should've gone with Danish instead.
I prefer eclairs.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#4675 Mar 17 2014 at 7:02 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
400 euros seems like a horrifyingly high amount to pay for shoes.

Depens on what sort of shoe you're buying. Sneakers then yeah it is but for high end fashion it's more or less to be expected because handmade, limited production etc.

For high quality dress boots or shoes you're starting at around €200 or so and if you look at custom made shoes then that €400 is probably in need of another zero.

The pfoblem woth the sneakers for me is that you don't find the models I like outside of the fancy designer brands. Even sneakers like Rick Owens Geobaskets don't have a cheaper alternative (and they're €750ish). Other more out there designs like say Damir Doma Falco's are never going to be found for less than the €600+ pricetag they have unless they go on sale which is fairly unlikely.
#4676 Mar 17 2014 at 11:33 PM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Seriously, @#%^ snow. I'm done with it. DONE.

Also, happy St. Patrick's Day. Someone else posting in this thread has to be Irish. Smiley: lol


slainte

headed out to the bar shortly here, work tomorrow be damned
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 11 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (11)