No nude patch for 1.11 -sniff-Follow

Nuff said.

As a European, I have to say that coming from a country that created Baywatch I find all of this anti-nudity in games highly amusing.

I don't beleive that such a thread would have gotten this far out of hand had it been European based, a few laughs and that would be that.

Incidentally, the internet wouldn't have become the powerful organism it is today had it not been fueled by **** in its onset, so I rather think that something as sophisticated as WoW utilising the best that a modern internet and its associated hardware can deliver has sort of an obligation to be modded to accept its heritage!

lol

Edited, Jun 21st 2006 at 12:50pm EDT by xyriach

When I **********, I do it while thinking of Mazra.
Problem is, I don't know what he looks like...so I imagine the avatar he used to have with the smiley face saying, "Kill yourself" hovering over my head...
Oh yeah.
Oh.
Ah.

-T.

Hmm... http://wow.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=21&mid=111937308319435331&page=13
That thread owned all.

The only people outraged are trolls like you, the rest of us are just pointing out that on the sad-scale, real **** is atleast a few notches above WoW Night Elf pixel-bewbs. No one said "ZOMG YOU SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED TO DO THAT!" just stating out opinions.

So hentai isn't real **** then?

hahaha, the way you put it just made me laugh :P

Anyway, everyones points aside, and back on topic (for those of us low enough for this mod): I tried manually replacing the textures in the MPQ file but get a funny error there as well, one german guy claims that he got it to work with 1.11, this is how: http://www.game-ed.de/html/modules.php?name=Nacktpatches&d_op=viewdownload&cid=79 Use that and let me know how it turns out.

BTW plenty of other skinners out there doing more than just nude mods, none of their stuff works now either =/

You better book an appointment with Dr. Phil straight away pal :P

Smidiocracy?

I like how people are trying to attack those laughing at their pathetic nude patches as having some irrational disdain for nudity. Nothing wrong with nudity, everything wrong with pixelated nudity.

Or are you going to try to pass off your dancing, and horribly disfigured, NE as "igh art?"

I disagree. I'll admit my art background is limited, but I believe I have enough familiarity to make an educated statement. Most "high art" is really nudity for the same of nudity.

I think those who argue otherwise are following an innate desire to idealise.

For the love of....

Art throughout the ages has been obsessed with the human form for several reasons, cheif of these being that it is one thing that all people share. We all have an interest in the human form because we all have one.

Others would include our predispostion to be sexually engaged by attractive forms and our biological drive to find them.

Humans, like any animal, are preprogrammed to reproduce, we don't have any choice in the matter its in there. So we naturally strive for what we interprate to be our idealism of beauty.

This, in civilised society has turned itself into more than admiration and desire and into something infinately more complex. For a start, we are constantly shown images of women that simply could not exisit. A list celebs have said time and again that after a publisher has finished with their photos that they hardly recognise themselves, meaning that those we hold on the highest pedistals of attraction simply do not exisit.

In WoW, the characters (certainly humans and elves) have been given some of the more desirable traits of human sexuality in an effort I would presume to make thme more attractive to players (or programmers). As a result, you would expect there to be some people out there who would see beyond the fact that they are looking at characters composed of binary and light and see something they desire.

This is no more strange or freakish than finding someone intensely likeable because we've read the words they type or felt some kind of connection with them aross the internet.

If you read this and agree then a connection has been made, if you read this and disagree then a connection has been made, if you read this and feel nothing then a connection has still been made because you've read it.

I would venture that people who have nudity mods and find elves attractive are simply doing what the majority of guys do which is focus on the outter layer of someone they find attractive. They've probably run into or chatted with a player of the opposite sex and felt a desire which has translated itself into a desire for the character, not the person behind it.

As such, a sexual desire because of this is no more strange than people calling sexlines, buying posters or atually falling in love with real people who can quite often be more ficticous than anything you will encounter in WoW and often more dangerous.

(Rant ends....)

There are socially unacceptable sexual niches and they are socially unaaceptable for a reason.

Xyriach I unofrtunately know too many of the things I should not; one of which happens to come in handy here. You see the arguement you make is one that could be made for any fetish, but pelase try to defend some of the more grotesque ones to me. Please research the term "vore" and then see how your arguement holds up.

You only accept it as a valid contetion because you see nothing wrong with this desire.




I'm going to be terse though. These people jsut want to look at nekkid people. There are better places they could be doing it and we really don't want to hear them talk about it.

My literary teachers say there's two levels to shakespeare. There's the entertainment (Witches, Sex, Violence!) and then there's teh art. To be honest all I see is entertainment.

The Taming of the Shrew is a comedy just like Robot Chicen. Except that Robot Chicken is funnier at this point in time.

Romeo and Juliet is overly simplistic, the characters' conflicts are bland. It's on par with the movie A Walk to Remember (originally as book just as bad), and I think the most recent movie of the book Prirde and Prejudice is better than the play.

Macbeth is alrighty.



I know I didn't go into much depth about why I don't like shakespeare, but I don't feel like writing and essay and trying to force my ideas into words.

Let's just say I believe that there's a "scholar niche" where the acedemic types find a story to their liking and embelish it's greatness just like there's a romantic niche with those poorly written love stories or a drama niche with those sloppy soap operas. I don't it's any different other than the appearance of nobility.

Andy Warhol... beter take two.