Ambrya wrote:
Overlord Theophany wrote:
Meh, it's just like carrying on a conversation in the car.
Jury is still out on that one. Study results aren't entirely conclusive, but seem to fall more heavily on the side of showing that a conversation on a hands-free cell-phone actually is more dangerous than a conversation with a passenger in the vehicle.
One study goes so far as to show that traffic became a part of the conversation with an actual passenger, resulting in both passenger and driver backing off the intensity of the conversation when the demands of driving increased. Such responsiveness to traffic doesn't exist on the other end of a cell phone.
No, the jury really isn't still out on that.
Studies can be both good and bad; while I like the evidence that people use to back up their point, it's just that; evidence that's come at in such a way that someone is trying to prove something.
You honestly think that every research study its going to be done ethically and there's not going to be any fudging of the numbers at all?
Talking on the phone is quite similar to having a conversation; in fact, it is a conversation.
Traffic being a part of the conversation shouldn't matter if you have a modicum of intellect in your body.
Then again, I've seen some of the most horrifically awful drivers ever on a daily basis, living in Seattle. It has to do with the huge amounts of asian and women drivers out here. (Don't get me started on the rant about the trifecta--old asian women drivers...)
It really honestly has to do with how well you multi-task and how intelligent you are. I could make a case that having someone in a car with you is actually more distracting than talking on the phone.
In reality, it boils down to how smart you are about driving. I can hold a conversation on the phone because I'm a very good driver, to the point where I'm bored if I'm not talking to someone or listening to music, or doing something other than driving.