Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Authenticator app, not just iPhone anymoreFollow

#1 Jul 20 2009 at 5:01 PM Rating: Excellent
from WorldOfWarcraft.com News:
Quote:
The Battle.net Mobile Authenticator, an optional security tool to help prevent unauthorized Battle.net account access, is now available for a wide range of mobile phones and carriers in the United States and Europe. Previously available only for the Apple iPhone, the Battle.net Mobile Authenticator is a mobile application that generates a one-time password to use in addition to your regular account ID and password when logging in to a Battle.net account or any merged World of Warcraft accounts.

Visit mobile.blizzard.com to purchase the application for 99 cents, or to download Blizzard Entertainment ringtones for $1.50 each and wallpapers for 99 cents apiece. iPhone and iPod touch users can download the Battle.net Mobile Authenticator for free from the Apple App Store. For more information, visit www.battle.net/bma or check out the Battle.net Mobile Authenticator FAQ.


Edited, Jul 20th 2009 9:09pm by dadanox
#2 Jul 20 2009 at 5:31 PM Rating: Good
*
62 posts
It's a shame they aren't offering to the other two big phone providers; T-Mobile & Verizon. Hopefully we'll get them in a future date. (I'm a verizon customer)
#3 Jul 20 2009 at 6:24 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,590 posts
Yazumi wrote:
It's a shame they aren't offering to the other two big phone providers; T-Mobile & Verizon. Hopefully we'll get them in a future date. (I'm a verizon customer)


Yeah, T-Mobile here.

Still, it's a step in the right direction! Smiley: thumbsup
#4 Jul 20 2009 at 6:26 PM Rating: Good
I'm just wondering why this is for a price, and the iPhone one isn't.
#5 Jul 20 2009 at 6:44 PM Rating: Good
**
251 posts
Too bad their Blackberry App requires Version 4.2 of the OS. I have 4.5 and it wont let me install. Why release software that only works on a old version of the OS???
#6 Jul 20 2009 at 6:56 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
IDrownFish wrote:
I'm just wondering why this is for a price, and the iPhone one isn't.

Because obviously, if you don't have an iPhone, you fail.
#7 Jul 20 2009 at 7:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Overlord Theophany wrote:
IDrownFish wrote:
I'm just wondering why this is for a price, and the iPhone one isn't.

Because obviously, if you don't have an iPhone, you fail.


Did you steal my phone? Oh wait... it's here next to me. Yay! I don't fail!
#8 Jul 20 2009 at 7:23 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
They support the older Blackberry phones but not the newer ones?
#9 Jul 20 2009 at 7:26 PM Rating: Good
**
704 posts
This really sucks. I was looking forward to getting this on my G1 but I don't see it listed under HTC or T-Mobile. At $.99 I would probably just keep using my key chain anyway, but it would still be nice to have it available.
#10 Jul 20 2009 at 8:55 PM Rating: Excellent
**
701 posts
Well, as long as we're stroking our iPeens here, I'm an iPhone owner, too. Smiley: nod












Seriously, how did people manage to take dumps before the invention of solitaire games for phones/PDAs, etc.?
#11 Jul 20 2009 at 8:57 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,048 posts
Furlis the Shady wrote:
Seriously, how did people manage to take dumps before the invention of solitaire games for phones/PDAs, etc.?

I've been wondering that for a few days now, too.

Then I realized I had books.

And no, Noc, I didn't steal your phone. You may have left it here when you were doing your wenching, though. Smiley: grin

Edited, Jul 20th 2009 9:58pm by Theophany
#12 Jul 20 2009 at 9:02 PM Rating: Excellent
**
701 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
I've been wondering that for a few days now, too.


Solitaire Forever keeps me regular.

Quote:
Then I realized I had books.


Oh, yeah! I forgot about those after I got the Kindle reader app for the iPhone. Smiley: tongue

Quote:
And no, Noc, I didn't steal your phone. You may have left it here when you were doing your wenching, though. Smiley: grin


And he web browsed on it while he was in the can... Smiley: eek
#13 Jul 20 2009 at 9:11 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,590 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
Furlis the Shady wrote:
Seriously, how did people manage to take dumps before the invention of solitaire games for phones/PDAs, etc.?

I've been wondering that for a few days now, too.

Then I realized I had books.


Books suck. Smiley: frown

It probably doesn't help that I'm only willing to keep the crappiest of my books in the bathroom, though. Stuff that I don't mind potentially being dropped in the tub, and that won't keep me in there for hours, you know?

My current read is, I think, about a sentient computer that grows herself a body so she can have sex with a "handsome warrior-pilot". The author uses her own speshul made-up word for '*****', but balls are still balls. Lamesauce.Smiley: disappointed
#14 Jul 20 2009 at 10:59 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
*sigh* And now I'm having one of those rare moments when I regret not having a cell phone. Would be nice if there were an app for the regular Ipod, not just the Ipod touch.
#15 Jul 20 2009 at 11:09 PM Rating: Decent
*****
13,048 posts
Ambrya wrote:
*sigh* And now I'm having one of those rare moments when I regret not having a cell phone. Would be nice if there were an app for the regular Ipod, not just the Ipod touch.

You...don't have a cell phone?

I know 15 years ago that wouldn't have shocked anyone, but hell, everyone I know except my grandmother has one.
#16 Jul 20 2009 at 11:18 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,157 posts
My grandmother DOES have one, and she's in her 80's. My Uncle, who is afraid of a cordless housephone and automatic car transmissions, has a cell phone. . . . I seriously thought it was assumed that a person had a cell phone. I can't imagine driving without one.
#17 Jul 20 2009 at 11:18 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,829 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
Ambrya wrote:
*sigh* And now I'm having one of those rare moments when I regret not having a cell phone. Would be nice if there were an app for the regular Ipod, not just the Ipod touch.

You...don't have a cell phone?

I know 15 years ago that wouldn't have shocked anyone, but hell, everyone I know except my grandmother has one.


I hate the @#%^ers. With a passion. But we'll save my rants on the fact that people can't seem to go anywhere without a dumbass phone growing out of their ear for another day.

I had one for a while "in case of emergency" but eventually realized that the chances of getting stranded on the side of the road someplace where I could not find someone with a phone reasonably quickly weren't great enough to justify the $30/month and the fact that it was seeing use MAYBE once or twice a week for other purposes. Half the time I forgot the darn thing at home (I don't carry a purse--if it's too large to fit in my pockets, I don't need it, and once I had my keys and wallet in the pockets, the phone got bulky.) So when it came time to tighten our belts financially, that $30/month was sacrificed in order to preserve my WoW and Netflix subscriptions, which afford me considerably more sanity-saving value than the phone ever did.

A girl's gotta have her priorities. *shrug*

We've given consideration to getting a pre-paid unit "in case of emergency" now that I have a kid in the car with me whenever I go anywhere, but the initial cash outlay is significantly higher for those, and the cost of the minutes is nothing short of highway robbery.

My grandmother, however, has one.



Edited, Jul 21st 2009 12:22am by Ambrya
#18 Jul 20 2009 at 11:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
I can't imagine driving without one



Quote:
Is having a cell phone pressed to your ear while behind the wheel the equivalent of driving while intoxicated? According to a study by University of Utah psychologists, the answer is, unfortunately, yes.

"Just like you put yourself and other people at risk when you drive drunk, you put yourself and others at risk when you use a cell phone and drive," writes David Strayer, a psychology professor and the study's lead author. "The level of impairment is very similar."

The study, published in the June 29 issue of Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, found that drivers talking on cell phones, either handheld or hands-free, are more likely to crash because they are distracted by conversation.

Using a driving simulator under four different conditions: with no distractions, using a handheld cell phone, talking on a hands-free cell phone, and while intoxicated to the 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level, 40 participants followed a simulated pace car that braked intermittently.

Researchers found that the drivers on cell phones drove more slowly, braked more slowly and were more likely to crash. In fact, the three participants who collided into the pace car were chatting away. None of the drunken drivers crashed.

"This study does not mean people should start driving drunk," said co-author Frank Drews. "It means that driving while talking on a cell phone is as bad as or maybe worse than driving drunk, which is completely unacceptable and cannot be tolerated by society."


Site

Quote:
New research shows that people have greater difficultly maintaining a fixed speed, or keeping their car safe in a single lane when performing tasks that simulated conversing on a mobile phone, than if they were driving without the distraction. Contrary to expectation, the speaking and listening were equally distracting. The research was conducted at the University of Illinois and will be published in the next edition of Applied Cognitive Psychology.

Almost 100 students took experiments in which they drove virtual cars. While driving they had to provide answers about the layout of buildings on their campus, or check that statements made by others about relative positions of building were correct. The researchers monitored various aspects of their driving performance while they performed these tasks.

They showed that both speaking and listening had detrimental effects on driving. Participants were poorer at maintaining a stable speed, or keeping a constant distance between themselves and other traffic than when only driving. Paradoxically, there was some indication that when drivers had to speak while driving, their lane control increased even though speed control decreased.

Before this research the expectation was that speaking would be more detrimental than listening, because speaking is often thought to be a more complex task. "Unexpectedly we found that speaking and listening had very similar detrimental effects," says lead author Tate Kubose, a postdoctoral fellow working in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois. "These results challenge the widespread presumption that production is harder than comprehension, and the expectation that talking while driving is necessarily more disruptive than listening," says Dr Kubose.

These results support the growing body of data suggesting that it is the cognitive task of conversing via phone, in addition to the physical task of handling the equipment, that impedes a person's ability to drive safely.


Site 2
#19 Jul 20 2009 at 11:49 PM Rating: Excellent
**
701 posts
Lady isyris wrote:
Books suck. Smiley: frown


I think I just died a little bit there. Smiley: oyvey


Quote:
My current read is, I think, about a sentient computer that grows herself a body so she can have sex with a "handsome warrior-pilot". The author uses her own speshul made-up word for '*****', but balls are still balls. Lamesauce.Smiley: disappointed


That one does sound pretty awful, but there are plenty of good books out there. Why don't you try a nice used book store? They're like orphanages for poor, lonely little books.








Ok, I know I'll regret this, but I gotta know the special weenie word now...
#20 Jul 21 2009 at 12:04 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,590 posts
Quote:
Quote:
My current read is, I think, about a sentient computer that grows herself a body so she can have sex with a "handsome warrior-pilot". The author uses her own speshul made-up word for '*****', but balls are still balls. Lamesauce.Smiley: disappointed


That one does sound pretty awful, but there are plenty of good books out there. Why don't you try a nice used book store? They're like orphanages for poor, lonely little books.


This one's from Goodwill. :D

Quote:

Ok, I know I'll regret this, but I gotta know the special weenie word now...


kk, here's an excerpt for you:

Part of him throbbed with guilt for holding back his unusual thought patterns. And part of him--just throbbed. Despite the suit that prevented his desire from showing, he ached, his balls tingled, and his tavis zinged with intoxicated, unruly desperation.

She also refers to a ****** as a synthari (italics hers, of course).

Edited, Jul 21st 2009 1:08am by isyris
#21 Jul 21 2009 at 12:09 AM Rating: Excellent
**
701 posts
Thanks, Isyris. I almost passed out laughing at that. I'm glad you didn't pay full cover price for that book! Smiley: tongue
#22 Jul 21 2009 at 1:06 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,590 posts
Furlis the Shady wrote:
Thanks, Isyris. I almost passed out laughing at that. I'm glad you didn't pay full cover price for that book! Smiley: tongue


Oh, I never do, not since I grew up and stopped buying the new Redwall book each year. xD

Except this one time...it was one of the worst mistakes I have made.

Nowhere on the cover or inside did it say that it was the second book in a sequel series, which probably would have been enough for me to avoid it. But I didn't know, and it sounded like a fun read--surprise marriage, setup for a pick-a-bride gimmick, two people who hate/love each other stuck together for a set amount of time, that sort of thing.

Things I hated about that book:

1. There was a magical talking sword named Kitty.

2. The promised strong female protagonist turns out to be a weak, whiny shrew who insists that she is a capable warrior but her future daughter must never even know what a sword is, oh, I'm so scared, hold me....

3. Unsexy sex scenes. As in, not just bland, but a total turnoff. Of course, it's all sparkles and flowers once the hero finds her nipples and it becomes blarghtastic in a whole different direction.

4. Related to #3: Pretty damn sure the author is a virgin. For one thing, she's clearly convinced that men will die of terrible, terrible pain if not satisfied once aroused, and makes a huge deal of how self-sacrificing the hero is being when he doesn't immediately have sex with the heroine. 0.o

5. Everything else I haven't mentioned here. No, wait, that scene at the beginning where a noblewoman offered to let the hero test-drive either of her two daughters so long as he'd just marry one was pretty funny.

I should go make a why-can't-I-find-good-books thread in the TV/Books/etc forum but I know the answer would probably be "because you're trying to get into romance and it's never good". Smiley: tongue

That one's at the very bottom of my pile of books in the bathroom, btw.

Edited, Jul 21st 2009 2:08am by isyris
#23 Jul 21 2009 at 1:23 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,588 posts
Did someone discover the black bar rollover feature? You know, when you mouseover, it still says ******. Smiley: lol
#24 Jul 21 2009 at 1:30 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,590 posts
Professor Turicus wrote:
Did someone discover the black bar rollover feature? You know, when you mouseover, it still says ******. Smiley: lol


This isn't the OOT, we can be civilized here. Smiley: tongue

Besides, I figured if I made the word ****** visible in a post then no one would be able to resist finding out what the, err, speshul word was, and really who wants to be subjected to the horror that is a synthari?

I'm actually having a lot of fun with this book, I'm crossing out all of the made up words and replacing them with "tentacle monster".
#25 Jul 21 2009 at 1:36 AM Rating: Excellent
***
2,588 posts
Lady isyris wrote:
synthari

It sounds like some half human, half synthetic space race, not like a bodypart. I imagine them to look a bit like Borg. Prepare to be ***-imilated! Pretty stupid. Smiley: lol
#26 Jul 21 2009 at 3:39 AM Rating: Decent
Could the charge for the app for a phone, be in relation to WAP fees?
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 23 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (23)