Webjunky wrote:
GL getting a proper response I say. This is something Allegory has avoided in the past. Not trying to {Provoke} Allegory... just saying is all.
Oh I see you hitting you provoke macro; the combat log never lies.
In the past people would often say that because of higher tiers at 60 that twinks were ok. I usually just respong with "one does no justify or 'unjustify' (word?) the other." This was becaus eI didn't want to get involved in two totally separate arguements about the situation at 60 and at lower levels simultaneously. I'm only one person.
I'll respond to Jord's question now.
Quote:
To Allegory - Please differentiate a L19/29 twink and a L60 in higher tier gear? Is it game-breakingly bad for a L19 or 29 to seek to improve their character but if a 60 does it that's ok? Fighting twinks is EXACTLY the same as fighting uphill @ 60 against better geared opponents. You have to depend more on strategy and crowd control and AVOID fighting them head on or you lose.
There are several key differences. The two which I feel are most improtant are as follows.
1. Raiding is an end in itself. People raid for fun, it is content bliizard designed for players to experience. Gear is a result of that raiding, and people are going to take their best gear into pvp. Twinking however is a means to an end. One does not simply obtain twink gear because it is cool to look at it or they somehow enjoy farming for it, htey do it specifically intending to obtain a significant advantage in pvp. That is why I say the best instance blues are perfectly fine for a pvp alt but enchants aren't. Because instancing is content in itself.
That justifies the disparity at 60 and not in twink situations. I'm not saying that all raiders specifically with the intention of only enjoying the raid and without really thinking about getting better pvp gear. I am saying that the whole aspect of raiding itself factors at least partly into the decision of a player. Someone may raid and never pvp. No one will ever twink out an alt (one they aren't planning on simply leveling) without intending to do BG with it.
Since Webjunky loves analogies I'll provide one. There's two guys, guy a and guy b. Their parents were not very creative due to lack of art in our schools. Guy A challenges guy B to a race. In one situation guy B likes to play basketball a lot and is consequently a very good runner, he wins easily. Here something he enjoys helped him in something else (raiding helping someone in pvp). In another situation guy b trains specifically for the race and wins easily. In the second scenario he was only cared about beating his friend and had no reason to train other than to become better.
I can't blame someone who raids for going into PvP with great gear. They did something fun and simply ended up with it, now there are doing something else fun. But twinks you can't argue even in the slightest that they "accidentally" end up with good gear. Twinks make a very direct decision to gain a serious advantage in pvp.
2. The second way 60s and twinks differ. High tier armor more or less keeps the game the same as it was before. Classes still function the same way, they still have the same relationships with each other. Twinks mutilate the game. My problem with twinks has never been the unfairness, but the way they change the game into soemthing that isn't WoW, soemthing I didn't sign up to play. Twink classes don't work the same way in relation to each other as other classes do. A twink rogue versus a twink mage is a very different battle than a rogue versus a mage. Even a twink rogue versus a twink rogue is different than rogue versus rogue.
I'm willing to continue this discussion if Jordster, Webjunky, or anyone else should care to, but I feel that the differences between twinks and 60 tier armor is not within the scope of the validity of premades.