Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

17 year old Norwegian in trouble after stealing wow accountFollow

#27 Dec 06 2006 at 5:49 AM Rating: Decent
**
637 posts
Quote:
It must be sad to get a real life mark on your criminal record for a "virtual"crime.


The kid was 17, I certainly hope this won't go on any sort of permanent record. That would be overkill; children are children BECAUSE they lack full responsibility for their actions.

He should, however, serve for a year or so in some kind of social service.

You can hardly speak of criminal intent in a child; at best a lack of proper understanding. And mind - it is not just the child who's at fault; it is society as a whole that has failed to educate him/her properly.

Hence the social service, this will hopefully show the child that actions like the one he/she did will cause people <real> trouble, and hopefully learn from it.

Edited, Dec 6th 2006 8:55am by Siaon
#28 Dec 06 2006 at 6:28 AM Rating: Good
Hopefuly he will get a permanent record, he is 17 not 12, doing 30 days now might be just what he needs.
#29 Dec 06 2006 at 7:08 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:

The kid was 17, I certainly hope this won't go on any sort of permanent record. That would be overkill; children are children BECAUSE they lack full responsibility for their actions.

He should, however, serve for a year or so in some kind of social service.

You can hardly speak of criminal intent in a child; at best a lack of proper understanding. And mind - it is not just the child who's at fault; it is society as a whole that has failed to educate him/her properly.

Hence the social service, this will hopefully show the child that actions like the one he/she did will cause people <real> trouble, and hopefully learn from it.


you my friend need to understand something. What the poster below you said he's 17 not 12. He also didnt steal a pack of gum either. what he stole is/was far more valuable. And he likely knew that....on top of it all, he attempted to sell it! What this criminal did was knowingly wrong, and intended to profit from it. A 12 year old wouldn't have that concept....but this 17 year old clearly did. and quite frankly, I hope they trow the book at him.
Secondly, you are clearly misguided if you actually believe that society should "raise children" perhaps his parents are partly to blame...but certainly not society. But in the end, the only one that ultimatly should be punished it the alleged perpetraiter. the other guilty parties (parents) will be punished by that fact alone.



Edited, Dec 6th 2006 10:14am by umbopo
#30 Dec 06 2006 at 7:39 AM Rating: Decent
**
640 posts
The fact that he tried to sell the account is a clear indication that he had full understanding that he took something of value. He knew exactly what he was doing, and it was criminal in every regard.
#31 Dec 06 2006 at 7:56 AM Rating: Decent
Well what can i say?

Do you feel sorry for the kid?

I sure as hell dont. Imagine you log on to your Character and you have spent about a year collecting nice gear and putting stuff in your bank. Along comes some Brat and loots your character in no time.... I would feel pissed!

As far as i understand yes the one who had his account stolen was pretty stupid. But come on seriously... Thats just too lame... its like saying that that old woman you robbed on the street shouldnt wear jewelry... Dont blame the Victim man. I think that kid should be punished and punished hard. We all spend a lot of time with WoW or at least i do. And not much can make my temper go ballistic, this story sure can though. Yeah... just had to vent some steam here
#32 Dec 06 2006 at 7:59 AM Rating: Default
32 posts
Can someone please define exactly what the crime is? I'm not saying what he did was okay, I'm simply having trouble defining the crime.

But stealing you account information he prevents you from accessing a character you don't own. He stole playtime you've payed for?
#33 Dec 06 2006 at 8:07 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:

Can someone please define exactly what the crime is? I'm not saying what he did was okay, I'm simply having trouble defining the crime.

But stealing you account information he prevents you from accessing a character you don't own. He stole playtime you've payed for?


Isn't it obvious? He stole an account...much like stealing someone credid card (account)...its theft.
"aquiring" someones account information, is not a crime. And in itself does not prevent someone from "accessing thier characters or playtime".
The act of changing someone elses account information without thier knowlege in order to them prevent them from accessing the account, and then selling it. Theft (depending on the value of the item) is a crime punishable in the USA of up to 5 years in jail (first offence).

Edited, Dec 6th 2006 11:26am by umbopo
#34 Dec 06 2006 at 8:09 AM Rating: Decent
**
640 posts
Quote:
Can someone please define exactly what the crime is? I'm not saying what he did was okay, I'm simply having trouble defining the crime.

But stealing you account information he prevents you from accessing a character you don't own. He stole playtime you've payed for?


The fact that said account can be sold on an internet auction site is proof that it is something of value. It's pretty clear cut as far as I'm concerned.
#35 Dec 06 2006 at 8:10 AM Rating: Decent
**
637 posts
I know he was 17. That's still a child to me. You should be allowed to make small mistakes as a child - it's only a minor transgression.

I for one am not at all who I was at the age of 17. Putting something like that on someone's record will have a severe impact on the rest of his life. A completely unwarranted one.

Are we not a better society than that?
#36 Dec 06 2006 at 8:39 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Putting something like that on someone's record will have a severe impact on the rest of his life. A completely unwarranted one.

Excuse me? Unwarrented how?

I should hope that internet fraud gets put on his record (or anything meaning that this person is not to be trusted with a computer). That way, he won't be able to find a job in any IT field, and most corporate desk jobs.

Works for me, one less thief in the workplace to worry about. Don't worry, there are plenty of other, non computer-related jobs he can try to steal in.
#37 Dec 06 2006 at 8:43 AM Rating: Decent
27 posts
Crime is "1. an action or an instance of negligence that is deemed injurious to the public welfare or morals or to the interests of the state and that is legally prohibited."

Theft is "1. the act of stealing; the wrongful taking and carrying away of the personal goods or property of another; larceny."

Fraud is "1. deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage."

And the the person in question commited all of these acts.
#38 Dec 06 2006 at 8:46 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:

I know he was 17. That's still a child to me. You should be allowed to make small mistakes as a child - it's only a minor transgression.

I for one am not at all who I was at the age of 17. Putting something like that on someone's record will have a severe impact on the rest of his life. A completely unwarranted one.

Are we not a better society than that?


It’s unfortunate that you believe that this was a “small mistake”, in all honesty it was a biggie.

Answer this for me:
At what age do you call a crime what it is? A crime!
When a 6 year old takes a toy out of a store?
When a classmate steals the lunch money from another classmate?
When a 17 year old steals an account (any type of account) in order to make a profit?
When a 17 year old commits murder?

All of these instances are essentially crimes…However with the exception of the 6 year old. None are completely forgivable. The 6 year old is still young enough to be taught what he/she did was wrong, providing the parents intervene. When parents do not intervene…you get people like the 17 year old in this story.

I’ll say it again…this is not a social problem, it’s a problem with how people are raised. And quite frankly he should be punished and most certainly have a mark on his permanent record…now if you know anything about permanent records, none are. Personally if “society” as you put it, did in fact punish crimes like this…the chance of seeing it happen again drops considerably. The more severe the consequences, the less likely someone will attempt to commit a crime.
#39 Dec 06 2006 at 8:48 AM Rating: Decent
32 posts
umbopo wrote:
Isn't it obvious? He stole an account...much like stealing someone credid card (account)...its theft.
"aquiring" someones account information, is not a crime. And in itself does not prevent someone from "accessing thier characters or playtime".
The act of changing someone elses account information without thier knowlege in order to them prevent them from accessing the account, and then selling it. Theft (depending on the value of the item) is a crime punishable in the USA of up to 5 years in jail (first offence).


Well I got off my lazy *** (not literally) and looked around about theft. The theft here is apparently that he stole something and thereby prevented the person from being able to use it. Just like you are saying. I wonder how they are going to assign value to the account. Amount of money payed for it so far? The value you might be able to sell it for?
#40 Dec 06 2006 at 8:54 AM Rating: Decent
32 posts
Siaon wrote:
I know he was 17. That's still a child to me. You should be allowed to make small mistakes as a child - it's only a minor transgression.

I for one am not at all who I was at the age of 17. Putting something like that on someone's record will have a severe impact on the rest of his life. A completely unwarranted one.

Are we not a better society than that?


This is not exactly the same as if he stole something from a store by impulse. At 17 you do have a grasp of the law, in some countries you are allowed to drive at that age and are responsible for your actions when you drive.

Setting up a website with the intent of this theft, shows a lot of thought went behind it. He had time to think it over. There is no impulse action that might just give him a bit of excuse, not much though. He knew what he was doing. He might not have know how serious what he was doing was, but he knew it was a crime. I can't see it as possible that he should not have known.

Edited, Dec 6th 2006 5:58pm by Nezadur
#41 Dec 06 2006 at 8:54 AM Rating: Decent
27 posts
Sell value or purchase value (wow cost+all monthly fees) whatever is higher would be my guess.

Even if he is convicted and gets a mark on his record it would be his juvinile (sp?) record wich would be sealed, if norway operates the general way. And when he goes to job interviews he would not have to tell them about his past infractions.
#42 Dec 06 2006 at 9:25 AM Rating: Decent
He will be treated as an adult and his sentence will be as an adult. Most likely a fine. And maybe some money to the person that owns the account.
#43 Dec 06 2006 at 9:33 AM Rating: Decent
**
640 posts
A quick scan of E-bay shows lvl 60 accounts to be valued at about $500 each.

IMO that means he stole something worth around $500. Enough for jail time? probably not. Enough to get a criminal record? yea.
#44 Dec 06 2006 at 9:54 AM Rating: Default
**
637 posts
Just because someone is trying to sell it for $500,- doesn't mean it's worth that (or that it will sell). In fact it's illegal to sell Blizzard's digital assets at all, so it doesn't have a real-world value.

And seriously, if you treat your children like that - where is this world going. If you punish a child like that for doing something silly, something children are known to do - driving drunk, smashing things etc. etc. - what kind of insane punishments do you have for someone that stole a pair of shoes?

I admit I like to see this world better than it is; but perhaps that's the only way to make it a better place than it is. To give a youth a criminal record for a minor offense - the theft of a game - a permanent record? He will have to tag 'yes' every time an employer asks whether he has been in contact with the police.

This is completely unwarranted - I don't know how to convince you otherwise. We need to teach our children, and teaching isn't done with negative reinforcement.

Isn't there anyone that stands with me on this issue? :/

Edit: Age is a very poor indication of mental matureness. Simply demanding someone to be at a certain cognitive level doesn't mean he/she is able to attain it. You guys are severely judgemental about a person you don't even know.

But even if he was at a reasonable cognitive level for that age, for all intents and purposes he should still be treated (and trialed) as the child he is. Do not his actions alone prove he is one?

And for those that wonder: No, I've never been in contact with the police, and have no criminal record or anything of that kind.

Edited, Dec 6th 2006 1:16pm by Siaon
#45 Dec 06 2006 at 10:03 AM Rating: Decent
**
640 posts
Quote:
Just because someone is trying to sell it for $500,- doesn't mean it's worth that (or that it will sell). In fact it's illegal to sell Blizzard's digital assets at all, so it doesn't have a real-world value.

And seriously, if you treat your children like that - where is this world going. If you punish a child like that for doing something silly, something children are known to do - driving drunk, smashing things etc. etc. - what kind of insane punishments do you have for someone that stole a pair of shoes?

I admit I like to see this world better than it is; but perhaps that's the only way to make it a better place than it is. To give a youth a criminal record for a minor offense - the theft of a game - a permanent record? He will have to tag 'yes' every time an employer asks whether he has been in contact with the police.

This is completely unwarranted - I don't know how to convince you otherwise. We need to teach our children, and teaching isn't done with negative reinforcement.

Isn't there anyone that stands with me on this issue? :/

Edit: Age is a very poor indication of mental matureness. Simply demanding someone to be at a certain cognitive level doesn't mean he/she is able to attain it. You guys are severely judgemental about a person you don't even know.

But even if he was at a reasonable cognitive level for that age, for all intents and purposes he should still be treated (and trialed) as the child he is. Do not his actions alone prove he is one?
Here's an idea while you're teaching children... teach them that there are real life consequences to your actions.


As for his actions alone standing as proof that he's just a child...that line of logic suggests that anyone that commits a crime is too immature to realize what he's doing. That's absurd.


Edited, Dec 6th 2006 1:06pm by Grollog
#46 Dec 06 2006 at 10:14 AM Rating: Decent
I haven't read through all the posts, but I say good for the police to step in.

If you were to gain access to anyone else account no matter what it was for, WoW, e-mail, etc. when you are not given permission by the owner, I would class that as "hacking" and thus, it should be illegal.

I'm not sure what you would truly class that as though? Identity theft seems a bit extreme since it's not like they were impersonating them. I could see it being theft if they changed the password so the owner couldn't access it. I think mainly it's intrusion into the owner's personal information, which they should make a new law for just internet related things like this.

All in all though, with the actual situation here, the owner was dumb enough to do what he did and should have his account banned for breaking the rules and the person who tried to steal his account should be charged with something.
#47 Dec 06 2006 at 10:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
637 posts
That line of logic was confined to individuals that aren't considered adults. As in, below 21.

It takes some time before an individual reaches a cognitive level that can be considered mature enough to take full responsibility for their actions.

He definitely needs to be set straight, but it should be social service (for a long time), and be shown 'the light'.

It becomes a different matter if he's a repeated offender though, but that is not the case.
#48 Dec 06 2006 at 10:16 AM Rating: Decent
Well the law in Norway states that if you are over 15 you can stand trial for your actions. Hell in one year he will be allowed to vote,get a drivers license. He will be able to buy cigarettes and beer. He has been allowed to have sex with someone else then his right/left hand for a year. He is not a kid.
#49 Dec 06 2006 at 10:32 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Just because someone is trying to sell it for $500,- doesn't mean it's worth that (or that it will sell). In fact it's illegal to sell Blizzard's digital assets at all, so it doesn't have a real-world value.

Real world value? Of corse it does.
$49.00 to buy the game
$12.00 per Mo. @ 12 Mo $144.00
Playing this game for a single year is an investment of about $193.00. That is the real world invested value of ANY 1 year old world of Warcraft account.


Quote:
And seriously, if you treat your children like that - where is this world going. If you punish a child like that for doing something silly, something children are known to do - driving drunk, smashing things etc. etc. - what kind of insane punishments do you have for someone that stole a pair of shoes?

So you believe stealing something valued over $500.00 (estimated) is silly? For someone who stole a pair of shoes I'd give them the punishment appropriate for the value of the item stolen. Which will include a "mark on their record". Stealing is a crime no matter how you look at it. If a 17 year old "child" stole your car. Stripped it down and started to sell the parts in Ebay you"d have no problem with it? You wouldn't want that "child" punished?

If a "child" grows up to believe that stealing is only bad if you get caught…then what has he really learned? How to become more clever is all.


Quote:
I admit I like to see this world better than it is; but perhaps that's the only way to make it a better place than it is. To give a youth a criminal record for a minor offense - the theft of a game - a permanent record? He will have to tag 'yes' every time an employer asks whether he has been in contact with the police.

"Minor offence" is in the eye of the beholder. He may be a minor, but what he did is serious, if his parents didn't teach him right from wrong, then shame on them too.

Quote:
This is completely unwarranted - I don't know how to convince you otherwise. We need to teach our children, and teaching isn't done with negative reinforcement.

I agree with 1/4 of that statement "We need to teach our children"..., right from wrong, by all means necessary. Not all children learn the same way.

Quote:

Isn't there anyone that stands with me on this issue? :/

Doesn't really look like it.

Quote:
Edit: Age is a very poor indication of mental matureness. Simply demanding someone to be at a certain cognitive level doesn't mean he/she is able to attain it. You guys are severely judgemental about a person you don't even know.

But even if he was at a reasonable cognitive level for that age, for all intents and purposes he should still be treated (and trialed) as the child he is. Do not his actions alone prove he is one?

I agree age is a poor indicator of maturity. However this person was 17 when he committed the crime. And for all we know he may have turned 18 a couple days later. His cognitive level is clearly higher than you give him credit for. He clearly planned this action from start to finish. He new exactly what he was planning on doing.
Am I judgmental? Perhaps, but I also know right from wrong even my 7 year old daughter knows better. As for his actions proving he is a child? Absolutely NOT! In fact, quite the opposite.
#50 Dec 06 2006 at 10:34 AM Rating: Default
**
637 posts
Oh well, fortunately for Norway I'll be migrating there soon, and I'll get them some better laws.

Also, just because the law 'entitles' you to certain 'priveledges' does by no means mean you're ready for them.

And perhaps you need to read up on teenage pregnancies.

Maybe I'm too deep into these things, they are after all in my professional field. I think I'll stop contributing to this thread. It will just make me feel bad.

I reckon most of you are kids yourselves; perhaps you will understand when you have children of your own. Or perhaps this is your true opinion; maybe I'm too naive <sighs>
#51 Dec 06 2006 at 10:22 PM Rating: Decent
Siaon, this is not the right place for discussing these things, there is an out of topic forum for those kinds of issues, and IF the post has high quality, and IF the gods are feeling giddy today, you might even get away with posting it in the Asylum.
The Asylum regulars hate outsiders, so you might be rated into subdefault, but they WILL argue the issue because religious/political/ethical/legal discussions are what they live on (that and the blood of maidens with a twist of lemon).

Now, if you do decide to debate this over at the Asylum, please give us a link to your post, so that those who are interested might see it.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 168 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (168)