Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

In depth...Compare FFXI to WOW...Follow

#1 Jul 06 2004 at 2:57 AM Rating: Decent
*
75 posts
Ok Now that I said IN DEPTH!

Can the Beta Testers tell me since Im considering to get this game soon, and if I really really like it I will leave FFXI since im getting slowly to the higher lvl's and slowly becoming a pointless XP grinding situation...

There are Certain "rules" in FFXI which the one I hate the most is lvl'ing... since the moment you come to the world and you start your journey there are already pre-determined lvl areas where you can go to lvl up ( 12-20 Valkrum Dunes followed by 20-25 Quifim Island and so on and so forth ), now, most of us here are currently playing FFXI...or something like it. I dont like the fact that if you dont go to this Areas you are considered and called a n00b and put down and everything, there is no freedom to take your 6 man group to anywhere you want to, because if you explore... you get aggro'ed, and you die, you de-lvl and stuff.

So without further blah blah blah, the real question is... Can you explore in WOW and not have this pre-determined areas to lvl up, and please if you can, expand this examples or comparisons between the 2 of them, what FFXI has that WOW doesnt, or the other way around.

Or if you wanna point a specific way or manner that the one of them is better than the other one please let us know, ( I think im speaking for some of the guys here too ) because if your as me and your relatively high lvl FFXI character you know your guetting bored and your choices of things to do is getting very very limited.

Please answer and thanks for the info.
____________________________
------------------------------------
-= Please Rate my posts! =-
------------------------------------
-= Character Info =-
------------------------------------
-= Jehuty =-
- LinkShell = Dragon Warrior II
- Job = 56 DRG / 28 WAR Rank: 5
- Server = Remora
- Clothcraft Skill = 21 ( Recruit )

-= NM Record =-

- Leaping Lizzy = 1/4
- Valkrum Emperor = 1/3
- Hoo Juu the Torrent = 1/17
- Golden Bat = 1/5
#2 Jul 06 2004 at 5:51 AM Rating: Decent
*
94 posts
I feel your pain. While not a Beta tester I will most likely echo all the shortcomings of the FFXI genre. The good things about the game are beautiful graphics, lovely cutscenes, and well I can't think of a third one. I honestly dont think I have touched it in like 6 weeks. I have been playing Warcraft 3 custom maps. I will say the lack of solo potential has really ruined it for me.

R,
NachoAdept
____________________________
Seek to understand, then to be understood...
#3 Jul 06 2004 at 6:14 AM Rating: Default
Sage
**
469 posts
I hate you so much for making this post, Jehuty. So much.
____________________________
Jaef -- 60 Hunter -- Crushridge
Shiesty -- 60 Warrior -- Crushridge
#4 Jul 06 2004 at 7:33 PM Rating: Good
*
75 posts
what the hell Jaefo.... I ask a good question and I get rated down by you?.... not fair man.

I just wanna make it fair to EVERYONE who wants to know not just me.
____________________________
------------------------------------
-= Please Rate my posts! =-
------------------------------------
-= Character Info =-
------------------------------------
-= Jehuty =-
- LinkShell = Dragon Warrior II
- Job = 56 DRG / 28 WAR Rank: 5
- Server = Remora
- Clothcraft Skill = 21 ( Recruit )

-= NM Record =-

- Leaping Lizzy = 1/4
- Valkrum Emperor = 1/3
- Hoo Juu the Torrent = 1/17
- Golden Bat = 1/5
#5 Jul 06 2004 at 8:45 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,677 posts
Jaefo has been a little bit testy lately, don't mind him and try not to talk about FFXI.

There are generally accepted levels for areas. There are some people who won't accept you below a certain level for groups going into dungeons. But there is no hard-and-fast requirement. If anything, the game sets certain limits to you by not giving you some quests before a "reasonable" level, and not giving you experience for quests and creatures after you have surpassed their level considerably. I wouldn't call it constrictive though, as it is plenty easy to run around and explore. Just don't expect to go into the Blasted Lands or the Burning Steppes at level 1 and survive. (or 30 for that matter.)
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#6 Jul 07 2004 at 7:11 AM Rating: Good
*
75 posts
See that's interesting right there.... like in sandororia they can give you quests if your lvl 1, and DIE on the Smash the orcish scouts at lvl 5 or so...

But whatever I mean Im not saying FFXI is better than WOW, or WOW is better than FFXI.

Im just saying now that I've played it for a while and WOW being the next "big" MMORPG...because EQ is going to suck balls IMHO...
____________________________
------------------------------------
-= Please Rate my posts! =-
------------------------------------
-= Character Info =-
------------------------------------
-= Jehuty =-
- LinkShell = Dragon Warrior II
- Job = 56 DRG / 28 WAR Rank: 5
- Server = Remora
- Clothcraft Skill = 21 ( Recruit )

-= NM Record =-

- Leaping Lizzy = 1/4
- Valkrum Emperor = 1/3
- Hoo Juu the Torrent = 1/17
- Golden Bat = 1/5
#7 Jul 07 2004 at 7:58 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
**
469 posts
Quote:
what the hell Jaefo.... I ask a good question and I get rated down by you?.... not fair man.

I'm just a horrible person on the inside. Oh, and this.
____________________________
Jaef -- 60 Hunter -- Crushridge
Shiesty -- 60 Warrior -- Crushridge
#8 Jul 08 2004 at 2:51 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
87 posts
I play, or at least used to...., play FFXI, and i grant you, some things abut it are great, but it gets old extremely fast, and it's really really hard to advance the story line until you're like, level 40 or 50, and even then it's still not goin anywhere till you hit the level cap (75), level 30 you get stuck and everything stops, there's no soloing in that game, gold is so friken hard to get, in short, it's not worth your time
#9 Jul 09 2004 at 10:27 PM Rating: Decent
29 posts
Well in my opinion, the reason that FFXI has specific areas to level up in is because japan had the game for a year or two before us. This means they have played the game and found the best possible areas to level up in. The best mobs to kill for the best exp. Im sure you could level up somewhere else but it probably wouldnt level you as fast, and you might die a bit more.
#10 Jul 13 2004 at 12:10 PM Rating: Decent
11 posts
Heh, Jehuty... where in Vegas you live? I go to Palo HS...
#11 Jul 13 2004 at 1:55 PM Rating: Good
*
206 posts
i went to eldorado. my school kicks your schools butt at everything...

Edited, Tue Jul 13 14:58:09 2004 by Alekan
____________________________
It's just that your train of thought is a bit psychotic
-highRfrequenC
#12 Jul 14 2004 at 12:58 PM Rating: Decent
*
75 posts
hey!!

I didnt grew up in vegas... Im only here for college.

art institute of Las vegas.

I-215 and Green Valley.

E-mail me if you guys want to hang out or if you play FFXI or something. You guys can show me around.

see ya!

jehutynightwalker@hotmail.com
____________________________
------------------------------------
-= Please Rate my posts! =-
------------------------------------
-= Character Info =-
------------------------------------
-= Jehuty =-
- LinkShell = Dragon Warrior II
- Job = 56 DRG / 28 WAR Rank: 5
- Server = Remora
- Clothcraft Skill = 21 ( Recruit )

-= NM Record =-

- Leaping Lizzy = 1/4
- Valkrum Emperor = 1/3
- Hoo Juu the Torrent = 1/17
- Golden Bat = 1/5
#13 Jul 14 2004 at 2:18 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
469 posts
Jehuty wrote:
I didnt grew up in vegas... Im only here for college.

art institute of Las vegas.
Art institute eh? I could've sworn you were going to grammar college..
____________________________
Jaef -- 60 Hunter -- Crushridge
Shiesty -- 60 Warrior -- Crushridge
#14 Jul 19 2004 at 7:14 PM Rating: Decent
3 posts
Well, I'm sure this has been answered a ton of times, so I'll just do a quick comparrison.

FFXI is all about xp grinding and grouping.
WoW is all about questing. I am almost level 20 with my Tauren Warrior and never once grouped for xp. Just been doing quests and sometimes soloing for xp.

FFXI tends to look very dry. Lots of deserts and beaches.
WoW is very lush and beautiful. Best looking scenery in any game that I've ever seen.

WoW is just all around better from what I've seen, and considering this is just the beta, the release is going to be magnificent.
#15 Jul 22 2004 at 3:05 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,207 posts
>There are Certain "rules" in FFXI which the one I hate the most is lvl'ing... since the moment you come to the world and you start your journey there are already pre-determined lvl areas where you can go to lvl up

That's not really true.

1-10 gives you all the just outside area zones (E/W ronofure, E/W saruburta, N/S gustaberg) plus a few lowbie dungeons, particularly if you group but

10-20 the most popular is the dunes, but a lot of people lvl in the plateau, highlands, the shakarmi maze, and the canyon as well.

20-25 qufim essentially rules king, but even here people lvl outside or in the tower.

25-30 kazham is the most popular, but I've also been out in battilia downs and the other jeuno surrounding areas.

30-40 is quite varied with use of crawlers nest, garliage citidel, and altep desert and a bit of the yhoator jungle.

40-50 is crawlers nest, garliage, quicksands.

50-60 is mostly kufkal, but also cape terrigan, boyhoda tree and the valley of sorrows plus a variety of places where people hunt coffer keys.

60-65 is more valley, the cape, and boyhoda, but also mosaic cavern.

Really, throughout the whole game there are options, and many popular options too. Only really 20-25 is so overwhelmingly popular that no others are seriously used.
____________________________
Seterra (Server Odin) (retired)
Main: RDM 75 (5/5 AF2), WHM 75
Subs: BLM 40, NIN 37, SMN 37, DRK 37, THF 37,
WAR 37, BRD 40, BLU 41
Other: MNK 17, RNG 5
ZM13, CoP 8-2
#16 Jul 23 2004 at 8:09 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
149 posts
Strangly enough most Japanese players don't follow the typical path early. They find a good spot, go there and stay there for a long time.

The reason why I think many NA have their typical "circuit" is because groups churn so much. They can't afford to spend an hour getting a well balanced group together, trecking out into the middle of nowhere (especially since most people don't know those areas) and then as soon as they get there have someone say "Sorry guys I have to go".

Personally I still like FFXI. Most of the quests are simple, and usually for money or gear. Would be nice if the newbie ones gave exp. I like being able to change my job. Leveling up some jobs to low levels for their special abilities. Like Black Mage for Warp (like EQ gate spell) or White Mage for Sneak and Invisible which are essential for creeping around dungeons doing quests solo. I also switch jobs when I have less time and hunting at lower levels tends to be less time intensive.
#17 Jul 24 2004 at 8:42 PM Rating: Decent
*
237 posts
One thing that sets WoW and EQ II apart from FFXI, is that the initial release will be in North America. It was hard for most NA's, especially those who waited for the PS2 release, to play catch up the whole time to a sea of japanese ubers. It was just really discouraging for the most part because a lot is in their favor. The NM's spawn timers were all set my JP players, not to mention having like a year and a half head start. It was this that made me realise im going to WoW.

There was nothing wrong with FFXI. Beautiful graphics. The AH was a great idea, the ability to switch your job whenever you want. Which actually kind of makes sense. Because if a reformed thief wanted to become a noble paladin, he could do it. Regardless, WoW will be a nice change. FFXI was good times though.
____________________________
-=Kengo=-
Sarmatian Knights
56 Priest of Lothar
Dragonscale Leatherworking 300, Skinning 300
-=Pantheon=-
37 Hunter of Lothar
Skinning/Herbalism
#18 Jul 28 2004 at 9:07 AM Rating: Decent
**
367 posts
Has anyone ever thought that in Blizzard's attempt to provide a solo experience, that they will sacrifice something very important in the process. Some people do not like having to be in group for XP. I personally enjoy this aspect of FFXI, o me finding a great party is the most fun aspect of any great online game. Now if Blizzard allows solo ability, people are going to solo much more often, this will make the party oriented side of the game less developed, or slower to develope for the simple reason in that it doesnt have to to develope. This is very dangerous. People have to analyze why they play these games and what keeps them playing. Anything that you get too much of will get extremely boring at times. I just cant imagine a MMORPG where everyone is questing all the time solo and in small parties. In FFXI questing gets so boring so fast. WoW will be a different game and a fun game at that, but I have a feeling that people might end up complaining in the end because WoW lacks some of the qualities that they originally disliked in FFXI. I also really dislike the combat in WoW, anyone else feel this way?
____________________________
Ranger 74 Ninja 37
Just beat Kirin Wooot^^
Need Seiryu Kote
#19 Jul 28 2004 at 11:26 AM Rating: Decent
****
6,677 posts
I can't speak for FFXI, but I like that the combat in WoW is a little more active than other MMORPGs. And while I like being IN a good party, I hate looking for them. Maybe you get a thrill out of typing /who 50 warrior and sending cold tells to round out your instance group, but doing that irritates me almost as much as sitting in a city auctioning things in the trade channel. There's downtime, and then there's wasted time. Now that I've actually been able to play a game that doesn't have EQ-esque waiting periods that I had grown used to, I'm able to appreciate how much time I squandered beyond simply participating in EQ activities.

And the grouping aspect is not missing; it's just not omnipresent. Whether or not it's as well "developed" I'm not sure. I tried playing an alt for a bit, and I was never quite sure exactly what I was supposed to do for roles when I was grouped with different class combinations. I think that's just a player familiarity thing though, because I generally know what I need to do on my main character.
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#20 Jul 28 2004 at 1:19 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
195 posts
i play both so i will try to contrast and compare. if you are incapable of social interaction then ffxi is not for you. as far as i can tell, you can solo all you want in WoW or party. i got the WoW beta about the same time i became much more involved in my LS and joined a static (a month ago) so when i got my beta key i downloaded the game and didnt even bother to create a character for a week. when things slowed down in ffxi, i created an undead warrior and played him for 1-3 hours a night for two weeks (he's level 13 now with rune copper armor that i mostly crafted myself). i like WoW alot. there is no xp grind. most of your xp comes from doing quests. the only problem for me is that the quests have started to become a little tedious (only level 13 warrior though...). alot of your abilities rely on something called skill points (crafting, weapon proficiencies, some job abilities). these are earned exclusively through killing stuff (roughly every 4-5 things you kill gives you a skill point). to unlock apprentice level blacksmithing requires 10 skill points, i believe. to unlock a proficiency with two handed swords cost 30 skill points (a collosal waste so far in my opinion...). i've unlocked 5-6 crafting skills and have levelled them to the apprentice level cap (skill 75). to continue levelling my skill in any of these crafts to 150 (journeyman?) will require 50 skill points. lesson learned from this: spend skill points wisely and, probably, on just one craft. this is totally different from ffxi where massive time and $$ must be spent levelling a crafting skill. all of my materials for crafting were dropped by creatures or harvested/mined.

those are just a couple big things i've noticed in playing both. the graphics for ffxi are way better than WoW (maybe because i only have the beta version). basically it boils down to different strokes for different folks. i find that i am playing ffxi way way more still because i'm in a cool LS and a good static but WoW is a nice change of pace every once in a while.
#21 Aug 04 2004 at 4:36 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
428 posts
FFXI has its downfalls, such as forced grouping and incredibly tight economic conditions and a huge discrimination barrier between japanese players and NA players. However, it is geographically the most balanced world i've ever played in, and considering i've been playing 3d mmorpg's since Meridian 59, (Meridian 59 - UO - EQ - DAoC - SWG - PlanetSide - FFXI) i'd have to say that's a feat.

DAoC had the best balance prior to FFXI, yet the game was geared toward hardcore gamers, and so much so that even semi-hardcore gamers (more than 3 hours a day) were falling behind the herd of hardcores. FFXI's world is so symmetrical its astounding. The graphics are incredible. anything from icy moutains to damp caves to lush jungles to dry beaches, FFXI had it all, except a way around the grind. FFXI cut out nearly any possible way of 'beating' the grind. They force players to group to gain any kind of experience, unless they are a ninja, redmage, or beastmaster. Certainly not good. However, unless WoW intends to implement so much content that it makes players ignore the hideous graphic limitations of WoW, i'm afraid WoW is doomed to have a subscriber base of warcraft cultists and leave alot of people unhappy at the way it turned out. I have scanned through over 150 screenshots only to be unimpressed with what i was expecting to be my next MMORPG. 3D models appear lacking in detail. The skins (textures) look incredible, however the models they are mapped to look awful. Beasts have fixed snarls on their faces...player's feet look so squashed they look like they got run over by a run-away merchant cart...chainmail looks stretched on some models, so much so that in some screenshots you could easily slide an axe in the hole of a single link. These are the screenshots that are supposed to sell me on the game? bah. WoW appears to be only marginally better than playing Warcraft 3 zoomed way in on one character. Not my idea of ground breaking, or lush graphics. If you beta players can post links to screenshots that you think look impressive, i'll be happy to review them, and post more impressive shots of FFXI.

i whole heartedly agree that graphics don't make the game, but they can certainly break a game. And WoW doesn't seem to be bubbling with story-line based content. It has plenty of mini story content with its quest experience system. It does however allow solo play, and that in itself says more than FFXI's combat system. I am torn, but i suppose unless i see vast improvements in either FFXI or WoW, i'll be looking forward to Middle Earth Online.
#22 Aug 06 2004 at 4:37 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
151 posts
I don't normally post on any of the Allakhazam forums, although I read them on a daily basis. I joined the beta at phase 3, so I haven't been playing it long. That being said, I do not understand the people posting their opinions or bashing the game who have never played it.

I could post reasons why the game is fun, addicting, and the graphics aren't "limited." But, what's the point. After I post this ten more people that have never played the beta are going to say negative things about the game that just aren't true.

Anyway, much thanks to the testers that posted here before I was in the beta. The information you provided was a joy to read.




____________________________
"Ahh, and it begins, promises not met to rush the game out...." -Stabbed

"It's the standard Blizzard operating procedure; make something suck, then make a talent to make it suck less." -Gigashadow
#23 Aug 06 2004 at 11:09 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,677 posts
Well, I'll give it a try, and anyone that reads this forum knows I have played the beta.

The graphics in WoW don't bother me. I don't understand why everyone gets so uppity about graphics all the time. In my humble opinion, 9/10 of today's games weren't half the game Combat for the old Atari was...y'know, the one where you and a friend moved two tanks around to shoot at each other, or one giant plane against three little planes, or invisible tanks. That was the era when games were made to be fun, not to be a bunch of visually spectacular but ultimately disappointing crap.

And I don't think there's really anything to complain about with them, unless you want to nitpick. Maybe the creatures only have one fixed expression, but what do you want? The programmers are not going to work in algorithms for 18 different sets of unique facial movement. The beasts do actually bite when they attack. Players feet are flat? How many people sit and stare at their character's feet and think, "gee, this would be so much more satisfying a game if only the CG artists had used 57 polygons on my feet instead of 56."

There's more story-line content than you realize - ask anyone who's played in the human lands about the Defias and the "missing diplomat." Many of the quests are more than just mini-missions; they have a fully-explained series of objectives that are interrelated which other quests in the area, such as the plight of Jitters in Raven Hill, Sven camping out on the river banks of Duskwood, the worgen in the zone, and the missing priestess from Ashenvale. I'd like to see MORE of this, yes, but to say it isn't there would be lying too.


[quote]I have scanned through over 150 screenshots only to be unimpressed with what i was expecting to be my next MMORPG./quote]

I find it sickening that you even think you can make this kind of decision from *screenshots* -- and not regarding the interface, or some of the actual aspects of the game in the pictures, but just minor trifles regarding the art. Not one bit of your commentary except the argument that the storyline was lacking has anything to do with the actual gameplay. I personally put a lot of stock in the music in video games, something many people ignore or turn off, but I don't let it pick my games for me. If I did, I wouldn't have been playing Everquest for 3 years straight. Yes, graphics can make or break a game, but art isn't going to break WoW.
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#24 Aug 08 2004 at 9:29 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
100 posts
I will say one thing about FFXI...

At lvl 58, my party was still fighting crabs. The exactly similar looking crabs that I defeated as a lvl 4 Bard.. No matter how impressive that crab looks, I get tired of it... I don't care if the the models of WoW look "terrible" (which I don't think), as long as I don't fight the same one at lvl 4->58, I'm happy.
#25 Aug 09 2004 at 4:20 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
428 posts
i'll put it this way...if FFXI and WOW were on beta at the same time, there'd be no comparison. FFXI's repetitive monster schema wouldn't be evident because players wouldn't see it so blatently just quite yet. but like many others have said, its hard to compare games that are still under development. that being said, a general guideline of how things are going to look, feel, and play out is being laid out every day of further development, and if you don't agree with that, you're being rediculous. I agree that FFXI's graphics, although stunning, get monotonous in regards to monster selections...but again, that why i said i'm looking forward to either a drastic change in either WoW's course of development, or FFXI's updates development.

Also, about the reference to the fun-factor of old atari games that didn't depend on graphics...i agree, but i'll strive to make the point that if games are made with simplicity, less complaints are going to be made. There's only so many things that can be unique about burglar, or tank blasting, or tank arenas. therefore, the floodgates of reality aren't open for the massive deluge of suggestions and complaints of players about certain aspects of how a certain system was implemented. for example, how many ways can you interface a system that shows two tanks blasting at each other? with complexity comes a more in-depth level of fun just because of so many either unknown factors, or just the sheer number of factors working against your success. I haven't thrown WoW out the window in my thinking, i just have serious doubts as to whether the game will meet the majority of MMORPG players' needs over the course of time. That based on graphics, quest and story lines, playability and ease of 'max'ing a character, and end game content. Before you bark, let me reiterate a third time that i'm aware content is still being laid out daily, but in the same manner, things are becoming more concrete daily as well. I look forward to seeing what kind of a product Blizzard puts out, and how the success of said product plays out against MMO titans. Dragon Empires, EQ2, FFXI, and the beginnings of Middle Earth Online.

/emote blows smoke off typing fingers.
#26 Aug 09 2004 at 6:46 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
151 posts
WoW is in phase three of the beta, with four phases scheduled. That said, if your looking for a "drastic change in WoW's development" it isn't going to happen. Reading your comments Ninaru, about the "graphics, quests, and story lines, playability and ease of 'max'ing a character" I assume you are playing the beta and have already attained level fifty with multiple characters. The only way you could possibly know about the gameplay is to have played to game.

In response to everyone who is bashing the game based on ease of leveling, go to the official beta forums and read some of Blizzard's responses. They have already said they know leveling is easy in the beta. How are testers supposed to test higher end content in the game if they can't reach those levels in a time shortened beta?

As far as end game content, noone knows. It's not in the game now and all we know is what Blizzard has said will be there.

By the way, FFXI's repetative monster schema not being noticed early? Your wrong. Start in Windy, go outside and kill rabbits, mandys, and Gobs. Then advance to the canyon and fight more rabbits, mandys, and gobs with different names. And after that, you can head to Bubu and guess what? Fight some more rabbits, mandys, and gobs.

For everyone looking for opinions on gameplay, I suggest a visit to the official beta site. There you can read biased and unbiased opinions about everything in and about the beta thus far, written by people actually playing the game.

Just because your mother's, friend's, cousin's, nephew plays the beta and told you about it; that doesn't make you a tester.

Lastly, as always, thanks to the rest of the testers for the taking time out from playing to post here.

Morgue
lvl 24 human warrior
beta server
____________________________
"Ahh, and it begins, promises not met to rush the game out...." -Stabbed

"It's the standard Blizzard operating procedure; make something suck, then make a talent to make it suck less." -Gigashadow
#27 Aug 10 2004 at 1:39 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
428 posts
right, well obviously i'm a moron, and i have no experience with up and coming games. As previously stated, I've sampled every popular MMORPG with the exception of CoH. I have a pretty good feel for those games which are going to be dead ends, which are going to be great, and those which could be great. both FFXI and WoW could be great...unfortunately FFXI has been released for some time, and flexibility there is minimal since they have income based on the changes they make. WoW has an opportunity to achieve greatness by listening to posters. Stumpy, you can shut it, unless you're willing to provide experience that warrants claiming WoW's beta is any better than other MMORPG's beta experiences. in such a case, i'm open to reading about it. As previously stated, I would certainly buy WoW if i felt it was going to be a balanced, enticing, fun experience, and even without all that, i'll probably still buy the retail and test it out for a few months.
#28 Aug 10 2004 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,677 posts
just curious...what's your preview take on EQ2, nin? I don't have experience playing the game yet to argue with you, but it might help me understand your perspective.
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#29 Aug 10 2004 at 5:08 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
151 posts
Ninaru, I'm not going to argue with you. Maybe you can read what I posted again and quote where I said the WoW beta was better than any other MMORPG's beta experience.

The title of the thread is compare FFXI to WoW. If your are not participating in the beta you can't make an educated comparison. That's not an opinion, it's a fact.

The defensive posturing makes no sense to me. I didn't "bash" your post. I simply stated you must be playing the beta, otherwise you wouldn't know anything about gameplay.

Lastly, I also am intersted in EQ2's development. From what I have read (which may not be true) the alpha stage of the beta only has developers and their family and friends in it.

____________________________
"Ahh, and it begins, promises not met to rush the game out...." -Stabbed

"It's the standard Blizzard operating procedure; make something suck, then make a talent to make it suck less." -Gigashadow
#30 Aug 11 2004 at 11:47 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
428 posts
Azuarc wrote:
just curious...what's your preview take on EQ2, nin? I don't have experience playing the game yet to argue with you, but it might help me understand your perspective.

unfortunately, all i've been able to do with EQ2 is read. the alpha is very closed, and only 3 or 4 companies have been given preview accounts. From what i can tell, abso-freakin-lutely stunning graphics. the original Everquest had, in my opinion (and often stated in reviews), a very robust questing system, long term playability and balance. One of the downsides was dealing with Verant, and the magic system, which aparently has improved drastically since the release of EQ. as for EQ2, they plan to run it along side of EQ. The storyline will have nothing to do with EQ, so atleast that's good that they are trying to be original. EQ2 developers and team leads have stated that the game is being engineered to target more casual players, with much less reward for hard core gamers.

Let me stop there and note that I don't consider myself a hard core gamer, but i don't know that i'd classify myself as a casual player either. I have some basic MMORPG experience that seems to make it easier to adapt to each new mmo i try. I play usually 2-3 hours per day, but i have a few days a week that i can play more than that.

EQ2 is being designed to cater to the casual player. to take a quote from EQ2's team lead, "..We want to be able to take someone that has never experienced an MMO, and immerse them in a world that is still comprehendable. [more babbling]...Many new commers try out mmo's and get disappointed at how the pros take over the game, making it hard for the new players to experience the game the way it was intended to be. That's what we're aiming for with Everquest 2, and we think it will spell success for us." In short, they are going to make sure that higher level players don't have ultimate power in determining the course of the game, or they will make it so that attaining high level is fairly easy (a less visible grind, which also sends new players away), so that more quests and options are left open. in my opinion, the grind is a kind of necessary evil. you must have it to make the game engaging, make it seem like you are striving for something. Ever play a non-mmorpg with all the cheats enabled and you just skate right through the game, destroying all in your path and obtaining the uber items/abilities, only to see them used a handful of times before it becomes boring? I have fear that this is how a game without the grind could be. Is that what EQ2 is going to turn into? WAY too early to tell yet. The game isn't out of initial development (WoW is out of initial development and has moved to closed beta). I'll keep my eye on EQ2, just like i am for WoW, but chances are, EQ2 won't be right for me. thus far, Meridian 59, DAoC, and FFXI are MMORPGs that have really grabbed my attention for either introducing elements that were ahead of their time (Meridian 59), for sheer fun and long term playability (DAoC), or for incredible balance, an impressive economy setup (run almost entirely by players), and storyline (FFXI). I'll try out other games for a few months, and really the only one that has slipped by me is City of Heros, and only because it just seemed way too corny for my tastes. I'm a picky MMORPG player, and i have a right to be when i have so many options. If more news comes out later about EQ2, set up a post where i'll be sure to see it, and i'll give you an updated response. ^^

StumpyWSF wrote:
Ninaru, I'm not going to argue with you. Maybe you can read what I posted again and quote where I said the WoW beta was better than any other MMORPG's beta experience.

I'm glad you realize the futitlity in arguing over the internet, but which beta experiences are you comparing this to? and for the record, Shadowbane and SWG were the most disappointing beta experiences...even thought that after 6 or 8 months of patching the retail of SWG, it succeeding in providing a good niche for those that like to be immersed in a star wars world, not necessarily the best MMORPG....but i'm looking forward to seeing what the space expansion adds in terms of depth.

StumpyWSF wrote:
The title of the thread is compare FFXI to WoW. If your are not participating in the beta you can't make an educated comparison. That's not an opinion, it's a fact.

The defensive posturing makes no sense to me. I didn't "bash" your post. I simply stated you must be playing the beta, otherwise you wouldn't know anything about gameplay.

ah yes, to my main point. I personally do not have a beta account. For this reason, i didn't include it into my experiences so far with beta because people would say "how about you get yourself a beta account before you bash it". However, my roommate does, and i'll often play on his character to get a feel for how the development is progressing. I think that even this experience gives me some taste of how gameplay works, a sample of the questing system, the economics...even though beta economics are always FAR different from retail economics. I will admit that's less than stellar experience, but its far better than just reading about it, which you assumed i was doing...

StumpyWSF wrote:
...I suggest a visit to the official beta site. There you can read biased and unbiased opinions about everything in and about the beta thus far, written by people actually playing the game.

Just because your mother's, friend's, cousin's, nephew plays the beta and told you about it; that doesn't make you a tester.

if that wasn't trying to bash me, then you sure fooled me.

StumpyWSF wrote:
Lastly, I also am intersted in EQ2's development. From what I have read (which may not be true) the alpha stage of the beta only has developers and their family and friends in it.

you're correct. EQ2 is in the early alpha stages, and is still in initial development. I would assume that as they near a closed beta, more and more companies will be given 'review' accounts so that they can write up glossy reviews about the beauty of the game...which actually i really like, even about games like CoH, the glossy reviews are what sell me more than anything else to a game, they should be handing out free copies of the articles at retail stores to get you to buy the game if you ask me.

anyway, EQ2 is quite a ways behind WoW in terms of development. I think WoW is at a level where speculation can start to happen, and that EQ2 is really too early to tell....but i speculate anyway.


#31 Aug 12 2004 at 8:58 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,124 posts
Ive played ffxi since November and on july I completely diched it. I started to hate the feel of the game, i felt weak all the time even though i was a lv 55 dark knight, I could not solo, i Had to party all the time and "bully" 1 mob.
Thats what ffxi is all about "Bully" the mob, Even beast master has to charm a mob and then engage it after his mob dies and the enemy is weak and frail.

Graficly ffxi is quite impressive, butr like everyone else said you fight the smae mob with different names. not even wep variations and only the rare color variation.

While grouping is fun and pulling skillchains and all plus magic burst, it only works in a good group and to get a good group take time, to much time. Playing with gimped players will assure you a good lv down.

Crafting is tedious, yet i did craft cooking to 65 and leather craft to 45, Only to be asked by ls mate and freind for free gear and food.

FFxi to me is just a avarage mmo, popular under the ff franchise yet its basic.

I decided to take a break from ffxi and downloaded the daoc free trail. Even as a druid (healer) i could solo effectivly, but what i loved was grouping and actually fighting MORE THAN 1 ENEMY AT A TIME. This made me fell stronger and was actually more fun even though this games older than ffxi.

If WOW is going to put in linked mobs and the ability to smite more than one mob at a time is enough to take me in. I just cannot stand a game where i must be forced to group just to kill 1 enemy at a time.
____________________________
Zanon
War Council Of the Kharma Trolls
http://www.equivocate.net/kt/forum/index.php?
#32 Aug 14 2004 at 1:41 PM Rating: Decent
**
280 posts
I've played Dark Ages, Evercrack, Galaxies, Lineage, and a friend has let me sit at his comp to play the WoW beta. Of all of the mmorpgs I've played, FFXI is the funnest for me. For the first time I actually see more than just "added damage and healing" when I group up. The game promotes teamwork and allows you to actually see your strength grow exponentially when you team up with other players. Doing a Distortion chain into a freeze burst, the rdm keeping everyone refreshed that needs it, while sub-healing, bursting off of chains, and then debuffing, the whm keeping everyone in PT alive and basically being the heart of the pt, the tank and subtanks keeping the hate on them instead of on the mages and at the same time managing the skillchains and positioning the mob in case of spawns or AOE. That sure is alot to do, every fight, for things to get stale. But then again these are things that a good PT will do, not just any PT.

The hours can slide away into nothing in FFXI, until I suddenly look up and think "Man, I should really get to bed". A few hours later I finally log out and crawl into the bedroom of my crappy little apartment. If the hours slide away in WoW, doesn't xp start going to crap? Isn't there a hard-coded limit to how much fun you can have? Just doesn't make sense to me.
____________________________
"Courageous, unbothered, mocking, and violent- these are the things Wisdom wants us to be, and Wisdom is a woman who only loves a warrior"

profile war/nin - http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/profile.xml?59438

profile war/thf - http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/profile.xml?49551
#33 Aug 14 2004 at 2:30 PM Rating: Decent
**
300 posts
i cant believe there is someone who enjoys ffxi this much...i can say that a lot of what you said about pts is true, but, getting a pt can take ungodly amounts of waiting/lfg time. Its not worth the 30min of pt havin fun if you have to wait 5 hours to get a good pt. And i'll argue that to no end.
#34 Aug 14 2004 at 8:57 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
469 posts
Yolondo wrote:
i cant believe there is someone who enjoys ffxi this much
Hey, someone's gotta be paying their bills.
____________________________
Jaef -- 60 Hunter -- Crushridge
Shiesty -- 60 Warrior -- Crushridge
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 52 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (52)