Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Interesting Little TidbitFollow

#177REDACTED, Posted: Mar 20 2014 at 5:40 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Provably false.
#178 Mar 20 2014 at 5:41 PM Rating: Default
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
If they struggle with 90000 as a subscription game, how would they handle numbers that League of Legends deals with daily?


Ha, I never even thought of this.

I'd really want P2P-only servers, too, if the game ever did go F2P.


What would P2P-only servers entail? I mean why would you continue to subscribe if it went F2P?

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 7:42pm by LucasNox
#179 Mar 20 2014 at 5:48 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Catwho wrote:
Something not discussed is the huge investment of infrastructure they would need if they went F2P with the intention of increasing the user base. If they struggle with 90000 as a subscription game, how would they handle numbers that League of Legends deals with daily?

Also, they have enough problems with rmt with accounts that must be bought and paid for. Imagine the spam if they could make infinite accounts for free....

The barrier to entry with a sub game ensures a slightly more mature player base, too. (In theory.) It filters out people who aren't willing to put their money where their mouths are.


I can't believe the number of spam messages I get every time I log in. I'd forgotten what it was like from FFXI. WoW never seemed to have RMT spammers from 1.0 to BC (didn't play after that), nor did some of the other French MMO's I played so it was weird getting spammed now that I've started XIV.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 5:49pm by baelnic
#180 Mar 20 2014 at 5:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
What would P2P-only servers entail? I mean why would you continue to subscribe if it went F2P?


Being able to shield myself from the F2P kiddies would maximize my chances of staying subscribed. One of the things I really enjoy about FFXIV (same with my time in XI) was playing alongside of a lot of other people my age.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 4:50pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#181 Mar 20 2014 at 5:49 PM Rating: Good
**
542 posts
Thayos wrote:
And Susanoh, nothing you bolded shows Yoshi-P as changing his stance. Even now, he obviously prefers the P2P method for ARR, but he's not against switching to a F2P model if that's ever in the best interest of the game.

His comment about other games not starting out as F2P is right on the money, too... but I don't see the connection between that statement and him being completely against F2P. He's just saying that other developers would prefer the P2P model, too, if their games could have sustained the needed population.


Did he ever say that switching to free to play could be in the best interests of SWTOR or Rift? From what I'm reading, he said that the developers were "forced" to make those games free to play, not by choice, as evidenced by the fact they they wanted to use a pay to play model instead of going free to play at the beginning. Considering that FFXIV: ARR is also a pay to play game, if I applied the logic that Yoshida applied to both SWTOR and Rift, the only reason that ARR should go free to play is if it's also "forced" to.
#182 Mar 20 2014 at 5:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Did he ever say that switching to free to play could be in the best interests of SWTOR or Rift?


Both of those games were pretty much dead in the water, and making those games free to play was the only remaining option for breathing life back into that infrastructure.

Now, if those games had gone F2P while they still had significant playerbases, THEN we'd have something to talk about.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 4:51pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#183 Mar 20 2014 at 5:59 PM Rating: Good
**
542 posts
Thayos wrote:
Both of those games were pretty much dead in the water, and making those games free to play was the only remaining option for breathing life back into that infrastructure.

Now, if those games had gone F2P while they still had significant playerbases, THEN we'd have something to talk about.


That doesn't change anything in regard to Yoshida's original comments.

Quote:
They didn’t go to free-to-play by choice, because if that was the case, they would have gone free-to-play at the beginning.


This logic outright states that a pay to play game would not go free to play by choice. Yoshida now says that he would consider making ARR, a game that started pay to play, into a free to play game, suggesting that it is by choice. This is contradictory.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 7:59pm by Susanoh
#184 Mar 20 2014 at 6:01 PM Rating: Decent
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
What would P2P-only servers entail? I mean why would you continue to subscribe if it went F2P?


Being able to shield myself from the F2P kiddies would maximize my chances of staying subscribed.


So basically you want a secret club?

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 8:02pm by LucasNox
#185 Mar 20 2014 at 6:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
This logic outright states that a pay to play game would not go free to play by choice. Yoshida now says that he would consider making ARR, a game that started pay to play, into a free to play game, suggesting that it is by choice. This is contradictory.


No, it doesn't.

He's saying if those developers really had wanted to make F2P games, they would have made F2P games from the get-go. That's all he's saying... we shouldn't put words into his mouth.
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#186 Mar 20 2014 at 6:25 PM Rating: Good
**
542 posts
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
This logic outright states that a pay to play game would not go free to play by choice. Yoshida now says that he would consider making ARR, a game that started pay to play, into a free to play game, suggesting that it is by choice. This is contradictory.


No, it doesn't.

He's saying if those developers really had wanted to make F2P games, they would have made F2P games from the get-go. That's all he's saying... we shouldn't put words into his mouth.


How is that not a sugar coated version of the exact same thing? Those developers didn't want to make free to play games (in your words), so they didn't go free to play by choice (in the words of this translation), they did it because they were "forced" (also from the translation) into it.

If you don't see a stark contrast in attitude toward free to play between now and then, then I don't really know what to say other than that we could not possibly disagree more. When it's "other companies" being talked about we see "forced," "not by choice," "ask around since it went free to play and no one's really playing it." (Despite the fact that the game actually got more players after going free to play) When it's FFXIV we see things like "could be a positive change" and "based on user's needs." You don't even have to pull direct quotes, read the entire articles and there's a very clear difference in attitude. Aside from pulling the wool over your eyes, I don't see how it can even be possible to not see a difference in attitude between last year and this year.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 8:26pm by Susanoh
#187 Mar 20 2014 at 6:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
How is that not a sugar coated version of the exact same thing?


Statement 1: "I'm completely against free-to-play games."

Statement 2: "Those developers preferred P2P models over F2P models for their games, because they initially launched their games as P2P"

Now, you can disagree with that logic if you'd like... but Statement 1 is in no way connected with Statement 2.

Yoshi-P has always said he prefers P2P for ARR, and he's never hesitated to explain why. However, he's never said he's against F2P games. This interview quoted in this thread isn't even the first time he's said he'd be willing to consider F2P for ARR's future.

In other words, absolutely nothing has changed.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 5:59pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#188 Mar 20 2014 at 7:14 PM Rating: Good
**
542 posts
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
How is that not a sugar coated version of the exact same thing?


Statement 1: "I'm completely against free-to-play games."

Statement 2: "Those developers preferred P2P models over F2P models for their games, because they initially launched their games as P2P"

Now, you can disagree with that logic if you'd like... but Statement 1 is in no way connected with Statement 2.

Yoshi-P has always said he prefers P2P for ARR, and he's never hesitated to explain why. However, he's never said he's against F2P games. This interview quoted in this thread isn't even the first time he's said he'd be willing to consider F2P for ARR's future.

In other words, absolutely nothing has changed.


Now who's putting words in whose mouth? Smiley: lol My actual comment "This logic outright states that a pay to play game would not go free to play by choice" which I think is a heck of a lot closer to both Yoshida's statement and your statement 2 than your proposed statement 1 is.

But regardless, this isn't exactly going anywhere. You're probably not going to see any difference between Yoshi's attitude no matter what is said here, and you're certainly not going to convince me that "No one's really playing it, forced to go free to play, not by choice" Yoshi portrays the same attitude toward free to play as "Based on user's needs, could be a positive change" Yoshi, so I'll just go ahead and say that I strongly disagree with your interpretation of this information.
#189 Mar 20 2014 at 7:22 PM Rating: Default
All I'm saying is this. Yoshida used to be very anti-F2P. In one interview he apparently was seen laughing/snorting and saying "We'll never have to think about THAT." Yet now he's saying it's not off the table.

Just curious... did he not realize that for a P2P game to be successful you need people to stay subscribed? Something tells me he didn't think this whole thing through.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 9:23pm by LucasNox
#190 Mar 20 2014 at 7:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Now who's putting words in whose mouth?


You're putting words into Yoshi-P's mouth, and apparently, you don't think you are. That's what I'm showing, plain as day.

You said so yourself... his statement is just "sugarcoating" his true feelings of being anti-F2P.

There's just one problem... he's not anti-F2P!

In fact, this isn't even the first time he said he'd consider F2P for FFXIV. Smiley: lol

Quote:
In one interview he apparently was seen laughing/snorting and saying "We'll never have to think about THAT."


Smiley: dubious

Lucas, you're not even trying anymore. Why not make a post about how you once saw Yoshi upon the back of a unicorn?

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 6:33pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#191 Mar 20 2014 at 7:40 PM Rating: Decent
**
542 posts
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
Now who's putting words in whose mouth?


You're putting words into Yoshi-P's mouth, and apparently, you don't think you are. That's what I'm showing, plain as day.

You said so yourself... his statement is just "sugarcoating" his true feelings of being anti-F2P.


No, I said that your comments were just sugarcoating his comments by saying the exact same thing using different words. I never said anything about Yoshi sugarcoating anything. I've quoted the translations directly multiple times, they speak for themselves.
#192 Mar 20 2014 at 7:42 PM Rating: Default
I will say this Thayos. Susanoh is right that he/she is only posting direct translations. You are the one summarizing them in a way which speaks to your preferred narrative. Just saying

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 9:42pm by LucasNox
#193 Mar 20 2014 at 7:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
No, I said that your comments were just sugarcoating his comments by saying the exact same thing using different words. I never said anything about Yoshi sugarcoating anything. I've quoted the translations directly multiple times, they speak for themselves.


I believe I am guilty of a misunderstanding... I thought you were saying Yoshi-P was sugarcoating, not me. My apologies!

That said, I strongly disagree that I'm sugarcoating anything.

Read his translations that you posted, but just read them for what they are. Nowhere does he say he's anti-F2P. He's talking about why he prefers P2P for ARR, and he's explaining his reasoning.

Also, I can't emphasize this enough... THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME YOSHI HAS EXPRESSED AN OPENNESS OF ARR BEING F2P IN THE FUTURE.

The fact he's brought this up before (months ago) absolutely destroys any notion that he's anti-F2P.

EDIT: A quick google search turned up this article from a little more than a month ago. Do your own research, and you'll find several other interviews in which he says the same thing. http://www.gamerevolution.com/features/final-fantasy-xiv-arr-interview-with-producer-naoki-yoshida-we-could-consider-freetoplay-but-never-paytowin

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 6:50pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#194 Mar 20 2014 at 7:56 PM Rating: Good
**
542 posts
Thayos wrote:
Read his translations that you posted, but just read them for what they are. Nowhere does he say he's anti-F2P. He's talking about why he prefers P2P for ARR, and he's explaining his reasoning.


That's what I did. I apparently just came to a vastly different conclusion than you did when I read them. In that quote, the paragraph, the entire interview, I never got the vibe that pay to play games going free to play was anything but negative when I read it last year, and reading over it again, I still just don't see it.

I can't comment on the other interview you're talking about where he's open to FTP, as I haven't seen it. I only know that the Yoshida in the interview from June of last year and the Yoshida who just got interviewed recently, to me, sound vastly different regarding pay to play games switching to free to play.
#195 Mar 20 2014 at 8:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
I can't comment on the other interview you're talking about where he's open to FTP, as I haven't seen it


I provided a link.
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#196 Mar 20 2014 at 8:09 PM Rating: Good
**
542 posts
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
I can't comment on the other interview you're talking about where he's open to FTP, as I haven't seen it


I provided a link.


I hadn't seen your edit before. Just read it. I will say it definitely looks as though his attitude from that interview definitely shows that he was open to it before this most recent interview that seems to have gotten a lot more attention. It still carries a much different tone than the interview from June of last year, IMHO.
#197 Mar 20 2014 at 8:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Here's the link to the big interview from last June: http://venturebeat.com/2013/06/17/final-fantasy-online-director-defends-monthly-subscriptions-in-the-golden-age-of-free-to-play-exclusive/

In this interview, he covers pretty much the same ground he covers in this newest interview. This includes talking about games that launched as P2P, but then had to switch to F2P in order to stay alive.

Before going too far though, he says this:

Quote:
Again, we’re not saying that one is better than the other, that free-to-play is better than subscription or subscription is better than free-to-play.


He later talks about SWTOR, and how even though it's F2P, people don't really play it... I know Lucas would have big issues with this, but I don't think he's speaking literally about the number of player accounts... I believe he's talking about regular, daily logins, like the kind of stable playerbase games like FFXI enjoyed for so many years. It's that kind of playerbase (in my opinion) that makes MMO worlds come alive. That seems to be what Yoshi-P sees as the biggest positive in making ARR a P2P game... going for more of a stable playerbase rather than a larger, less-predictable playerbase.

However, nearly a year ago, he made it clear he's not against F2P.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 7:19pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#198 Mar 20 2014 at 8:26 PM Rating: Excellent
And here's another article from more than a year ago:

http://massively.joystiq.com/2013/02/21/massively-exclusive-a-dinner-with-final-fantasy-xivs-naoki-yos/

In this article, the writer largely paraphrases his discussion with Yoshi-P

Quote:
On that note, is FFXIV going to possibly head to free-to-play? It all depends on what happens when the relaunch takes place, but it's certainly not the first plan. Yoshida definitely feels that the subscription model is the better option, at least initially. "Every game wants to be a subscription game," he argues.


In the same article, Yoshi-P praises Guild Wars 2 for how it implemented the B2P model.

So, yeah... he's never been anti-F2P. Quite the opposite. He seems to be a student of the industry (hence why he based the mechanics of FFXIV on the norms of the MMO genre) and he wants to do whatever will make his game most successful. Right now, he feels the best option is P2P, but he's clearly open to other options (if those options are better).
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#199 Mar 20 2014 at 8:36 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,175 posts
Thayos wrote:
Filth, had you read one more paragraph, you would have found the answer you were looking for.


I didn't ask any questions.

FF games used to set themselves apart from other games in the same genre, almost to the point you'd think FF was in it's own. Their roots to me are mixing interesting gameplay mechanics with great storytelling, music and art direction to create an experience for players. I understand that it's hard to capture that in MMOs, but they still found a way to bring that to players with XI.

XIV doesn't even seem to be trying to make it's way back to it's roots. Seems like they're going further away from them to me which is why I made the comment.

Catwho wrote:
The barrier to entry with a sub game ensures a slightly more mature player base, too. (In theory.) It filters out people who aren't willing to put their money where their mouths are.

The majority of the buying power in this country isn't old enough to wield a credit card. Just sayin...

Thayos wrote:
Being able to shield myself from the F2P kiddies would maximize my chances of staying subscribed.

Wanting to be segregated from people based solely on their method of payment. Congratulations on being the proud recipient of the 'most ignorant **** I've read all day' award.
____________________________
Rinsui wrote:
Only hips + boobs all day and hips + boobs all over my icecream

HaibaneRenmei wrote:
30 bucks is almost free

cocodojo wrote:
Its personal preference and all, but yes we need to educate WoW players that this is OUR game, these are Characters and not Toons. Time to beat that into them one at a time.
#200 Mar 20 2014 at 8:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Wanting to be segregated from people based solely on their method of payment. Congratulations on being the proud recipient of the 'most ignorant sh*t I've read all day' award.


Actually, I'd prefer to be segregated based on age (which doesn't always indicate maturity, but it's a start). I'd also like to play on a server with a more stable, like-minded population.

And if you really believe I'm the most deserving of your award, then I suggest you give this thread another read. Smiley: wink



Edited, Mar 20th 2014 7:42pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#201 Mar 20 2014 at 8:50 PM Rating: Default
I'm beginning to think that you might be ageist, Thayos. Do you just refuse to go shopping at the mall because some of us ignorant brats are going to be in your breathing space?

Oh, I'm so sorry that I'll be potentially occupying the same data space as you.

Seriously ignorant and offensive.

Edited, Mar 20th 2014 10:50pm by LucasNox
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 164 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (164)