saevellakshmi wrote:
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=260&mid=133017600034022142#4 Quote:
Outside of Abyssea, nominally /SAM:
OAT GS = Ragnarok > Apoc > Umiliati (Penitence +4) > WSDmg/TPBonus GS > Borealis = 2-4 GS = OAT Scythe > 2-4 Scythe > WSDmg/TPbonus Scythes > Gram/Jingang = Caladbolg lv90 > Redemption lv90 = Wroth/Twilight
That's right, that measly "Trial Weapon" is actually equal to a Rag and is one of
the top end weapons for DRK, and it's much the same for DRG and sorta the same for SAM.
Quote:
I would if I were putting them together.
That's the difference between me, you and af, I actually being forced to build voidwatch runs to get things done for LS members. One of our members parses every run and posts them for us to see, that's how I know who's worth inviting again and who's not. It's also how I know that "R/M/E onry!!" is complete BS, seen too many fail DDs that happen to possess one of those and too many good DD's that didn't. Now I just ask them what their main weapon is and what their x-hit is, and depending on how they answer is whether their any good or not.
This is what I keep talking about, people who do the /sh "R/M/E DD ONRY" shouts rarely know the proper order for each of those jobs weapons.
As for
I clicked the link and this is what I saw:
"Outside of Abyssea, nominally /SAM"
Wait, is he even talking about VW? As far as I know /WAR is common trend, only a few stubborn player still insists that /SAM is superior.
Then this:
"Ragnarok doesn't exist. Those parses you see are your imagination. You are probably still better off with an Apoc for self-sustain and utility. It's still pretty nuts though mostly because of Resolution. "
I don't play DRK, and my DRK is only lv1, so all my knowledge about DRK came from my DRK friends. But I've played with enough DRK friends to know that they will probably stop reading it here when we're all talking about Dragon zerg, while that post clearly isn't.
I'm not entirely convinced with Cala 90 falling behind 2~4 scythes either, due to stronger WS(resolution v.s entropy), wings spam in VW, and open with 300 TP ODD. But again, my DRK lv1, so math plz. When he make the weapon ranking, did he put in the factor of opening with 300 TP ODD? Did he factoring the lack of acc/attack on dragon/Ig-A?Did he also considered the fact that when you're at capped haste+regain, your WS animation will lock you up and any extra swing will cause TP over flow?
And same for DRG? Mythic PA is the best PA, Relic being 2nd, this is vastly approved by player base. Why do you keep overvaluing trial weapon over and over again and devalue R/E/M?
If you love to quote other player's POV, I can quote other player's POV too.
http://www.ffxiah.com/forum/topic/30127/chauve-sauris-comparisons/
Quote:
By Odin.Skeero 2012-04-18 14:09:47
99 Gungnir easily outdoes 0at. In any situation. 95 Gungnir its pretty close, but if you arent a serious dragoon just stick with oat. Anything other than Ryun>Gungnir>Oat is a waste of time.
http://www.ffxiah.com/forum/topic/28303/kantonotachi-vs-masamune-the-great-debate/2/
Quote:
By Cerberus.Taint 2012-01-25 09:28:39
99Masa >= 99Amano > 95 Masa > 90 Masa > 95 Amano > 85 Masa > 90 Amano > TP bonus
Btw, he didn't include Mythic GK on the list, which is considered No.1 on the list and beats everything else due to AM3.
http://www.ffxiah.com/forum/topic/29285/apocalypse-or-ragnarok/2/
Quote:
By Bahamut.Serj 2012-03-09 17:14:25
I haven't played with OAT gs aside from comparing it to Calad in the spreadsheet but I think Taint or someone put 95 Rag > 99 OAT iirc.
By Fenrir.Nightfyre 2012-03-13 00:36:27
I can't see Ragnarok being a fad unless one of the weapons/weaponskills or DRK itself sees a significant change. Such logic would dictate that Ukonvasara and to a lesser extent Verethragna are also fad weapons, yet that is clearly not the case.
I also can't see how you arrived at your conclusion regarding current weapon choice. Ragnarok displays a significant advantage over OAT, if you're going to burn time and gil on a greatsword to go along with Apoc it might as well be the one that's 20% ahead instead of 2% ahead (if that; if Apoc can spam Entropy it can actually pull ahead of OAT even without defensive considerations).
Did some testing on 99 Rag's critrate and 2.5x damage procrate on the test server. The critrate bonus is 14% and the 2.5x damage procrate appears unchanged from the bonus on the 95 weapons, which is odd since I seem to recall SE saying that they would increase the procrate.
Another discussion I had with a friend of mine when I made Nyzul static, he was using an OAT, and was working on Rag at that time, and he isn't the kind of player that will use inferior weapon for showing off for important events like Nyzul.
Quote:
Also need to get Ragnarok to 95 soon, it is only 85 now. I am sure that will up our kill speed a bit. Also, OAT might not be the best weapon in Nyzul due to the following reason:
A mob with 100 HP for example, I WS once for 60, and TP for another 20, there is 20 left and I am at 100% tp again. If I WS at that point it is waste of TP cuz it would be overkill. However, if I use Ragnarok and WS for 70 and TP for another 30 (with ODD and critical), I waste no TP.
I can find more quote if that's still not enough to "prove" R/E/M is the best.
Honestly though, the entire time you just insist that pt lead thinks R/E/M beating trial weapon is just because pt lead worshiping R/E/M blindly. And kept devalue R/E/M over and over. If anyone tries to argue that R/E/M's advantage other trial weapons doesn't have, you just walk away and pretend you didn't see it, even when majority of player base is telling you, that R/E/M weapon is still the best, you just kept insisting that trial weapon is just as good or better. If anyone dare to argue against it, you accuse them for not doing homework about the job and blindly worship legendary tier weapons, or not knowing the proper order for weapons.
Or you just love to pull of parse you did beating other R/E owners.
I had a couple of friends who joined bad dragon PUG, and their parse shows that BLU or NIN parsing 3rd without COR BRD buff and winning other 2h DDs. So should I consider BLU and NIN superior DD to 2h DD then? Should I not make 6~7 2h DD or MNK in pt a requirement for dragon? Should I just try to beat dragon everytime with 6~7 BLU and NINs instead of 6~7 WAR MNK SAM DRK? Hey, it's possible to beat dragon with 6~7 good BLU and NIN too! But any pt lead wants to build most optimal pt isn't gonna do that.
Just because your parse shows you beating R/E/M, doesn't R/E/M isn't the best. Just because you met many bad DD with R/E/M, still doesn't mean R/E/M isn't the best. Just because pt lead look for R/E/M, doesn't mean they're ignorant about proper order as well. In most optimal situations, pt lead should try to find good DDs with R/E/M, then good trial weapon DD if they can't find good R/E/M. There's really nothing wrong to put R/E/M as a requirement if pt lead ever care about having most optimal result. Yes you can argue that trial weapons get the job done and still able to win, but when entire ally wants fast and efficient run with killing time and chance to wipe as low as possible, it's nothing wrong to shoot for most optimal setup/weapons as long as that pt lead can get ppl. And individual difference is another story. If you can outparse other R/E/M owner with trial weapon, good for you. But so far I haven't seen any. I've invited 2 good OAT DRK to dragon before, they still fall behind Rag.
Yes, I agree that there are ****** R/E/M owners, and pt lead should pay attention to who can do dmg who can't in pt, and fix that individual differences to avoid wipe. But I don't agree with inviting R/E/M only=fail pt, nor being elitist *******, nor not doing homework about weapons. There are some Rag owners I invited before didn't perform as expected sometimes too, next time I either make them come WAR(WAR with Rag 2hr is just too strong that the advantage it had easily made up the lack of skill) or play other jobs. And I certainly don't agree that inviting R/E/M only is being an elitist ******* when entire ally expected to have a fast and smooth run. R/E/M only mentality is just the expectation of entire ally to shoot for most optimal result, and also the fact that R/E just has advantage over trial weapons that somewhat fixed skill difference.