Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Gardening Ban Criteria?Follow

#52 Jul 07 2009 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
**
617 posts
I think another admin editorial is in order here, if nothing else to help try to alert SE to the fact that their RMT banning procedures are seemingly catching innocent legit players in the crossfire.

As for everyone else, I would definitely advise against any gardening at the moment until this ruckus quiets down.
#53 Jul 07 2009 at 11:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
Avatar
****
6,268 posts
Tzarcastic wrote:
I spoke with a GM about this just now.

At first he asked me where I heard of these bans for gardening and NPC the goods. I told him Allakhazam.com

He seemed shocked by this and commented that gardening was part of the game and what you do with your harvest and what you grow is up to you.

He then asked me to wait while he checked on this. When he returned all he said was
"I wouldn't garden for a while"

Assuming POIDH, I think this might be the best advice from a GM ever.

If this is true, I can totally believe that a GM could get up, walk over to a supervisor, say 'Hey whats up with these gardening bans' and get a response of 'sh*tstorm', and give that quoted response back to the player with nothing better to do about it.

I would make a GM call from a gardening account just to get it flagged 'NOT RMT!' at this point, if that could help in any way.

I think RMTPwner v1.337 is turning Hal on us and deciding that if it just bans everyone there will be no more RMT at all.

Edit: Quotefail

Edited, Jul 7th 2009 12:42pm by Raelix
____________________________
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Airships on fire off the shoulder of Bahamut. I watched Scapula Beams glitter in the dark near the Three Mage Gate...

Nilatai wrote:
Vlorsutes wrote:
There's always...not trolling him?

You're new here, aren't you?
#54 Jul 07 2009 at 11:57 AM Rating: Excellent
wadus wrote:
What is your status Pikko? Have you also been smacked around by the banstick because of your Pikko Pots?


LMao Imagine if SE accidentally banned Pikko, she i'm sure has a red phone that runs straight into Sage Sundi's head she'd be back in an hour and so would most of the accidentally banned people.
#55 Jul 07 2009 at 12:10 PM Rating: Decent
23 posts
Final Post no duplicate. I will be posting this in the other Threads on the subject before i send it and wait at least sometime before i sumbit it to the BBB, Other people i may sign for in my complaint would be greatly appreciated

My Complaint:Many Loyal Customer's Final Fantasy XI account was banned due to "irregular RMT activity" that never occured

My Problem:Dear Square Enix,
Our Accounts on your game was banned because we were labeled as a Real Money Traders of some sort. I will testify that I as a loyal customer have never been part of said activity in your game. Many other fellow gamers have also been hit with this latest mass ban on July 3rd. From what the community can surmise is that it was multiple characters on their account that would send goods to their primary character so they could make IN-game gil(currency) for IN-game uses. Most of these individuals have contacted your costumer service and have been stone-walled because the issue has to deal with the STF which we can not contact to try to get this issue resolved.It seems to me that the higher number of bans they are pushing each month may be due to their search criterea increasing which leads to loyal non-RMTs being confused with RMTs. This will most likely lead to a loss in sales of both Final Fantasy XIV and Final Fantasy XI accounts if not resolved. Also you have no represenatives in the community that can assist us in getting this issue across so we are left to find our own means such as this letter.

Thank You for you time,
Stephen E. Peck

My Solution:I would like Square Enix to address the community of loyal gamers of this issue on their website, or at least e-mail those who have been banned for the before stated reason. Also prehaps a more human approach to the STF and their practices in finding Real Money Traders. Communication with the community of consumers needs to be opened.

Any suggestions to these would be appreciated since I am a Math Major(terrible at writing)
#56 Jul 07 2009 at 12:27 PM Rating: Decent
Had 4 accounts, 3 banned, all wildgrass, all npc'd. Gil transfered to main via bazaaring the next round of seeds for high prices. Bazaaring character account not banned, main account not banned, despite it having 14 mules doing the exact same thing that my other 48 were doing, AND having the same CC on them.

I got SE to give me a refund on the 3 accounts, since they charged on the 2nd and banned on the 3rd. I hope they unban me, then ban me again, just so I can keep getting refunds over and over. **** you SE, I will never play 14.


Worst part is that there is very little recourse for us, just call up and wait two weeks. If I lived near SE building I would be at their front door right now.
#57 Jul 07 2009 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
6 characters, my main and 5 mules on the same account.
All of my gardening mules are level 5 and my main has several 75s.
Two in Sandy, two in Windy, one in Bastok and my main travels around.
Three taru, three galka.
I sold all of my harvest results on the character which it was harvested, and rarely sent gil to my main unless it was an emergency.
All unique mule names.
BANNED
#58 Jul 07 2009 at 2:38 PM Rating: Excellent
*
80 posts
I just contacted POL or SE or whatever is is by phone.

The customer rep stated that the STF is an entity by itself. The POL/SE phone reps, the GMs and web chat folks have no contact with them and that they have no information on their ban criteria.

I also asked if I could speak to someone in the STF department and was told no.

He had no idea what would flag an account to be considered a ban.

Basically I'm going to hold off on gardening til this all blows over.


Considering it's been over 2 1/2 months and they still haven't resolved my token issue I have a bad feeling this whole mess is going to take a while to sort out >.<
#59 Jul 07 2009 at 4:46 PM Rating: Good
**
600 posts
This is all so sad :(

I used to garden with the max amount of characters on one account, all my mules had the same name except one letter at the end to differentiate, example: Missya, Missyb,Missyc etc. That was only so I could remember the names while muling over stuff easier.

I don't play XI anymore, but I really REALLY hope SE gets their act together on how they will do bannings/control rmt before XIV comes out.

#60 Jul 07 2009 at 5:03 PM Rating: Good
catwho the Mundane wrote:
It seems to be people who were gardening out of a closed system, using wildgrass seeds to grow more seeds and crystals to feed them. The result was a self perpetuating system of junk that could be NPC'd with nothing more than a few minutes of effort a day.

Square doesn't mind gardening on a small scale, or from characters that were gardening using external sources for materials (haven't heard of any people banned who were going after gold nuggets or lightning ore yet, since those sorts of things required external ingredients.)

I expect a nerf of a few gardening recipes in the next update.


i'd have to agree that it's probably this. they don't want people doing something that costs no gil beyond startup and minimal time, yet has the potential to create truckloads of new gil across a server every month. it's the same reason many peoples favorite NPC farming item prices got nerfed a while back. RMT were doing this, and in the STF(U) criteria, many non-gilsellers got caught up in it.
#61 Jul 07 2009 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
***
1,181 posts
Quote:
I think RMTPwner v1.337 is turning Hal on us and deciding that if it just bans everyone there will be no more RMT at all.


Winrar.


On topic, the general "rule" for the banned people appears to be 15-16 mules, many Lv1, all gardening (based on replies to this thread). The only exception appears to be Professor Lemmi. I hesitate to say "provided you don't have 15 or 16 mules, you'll be ok" because of this.
#62 Jul 07 2009 at 5:18 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,056 posts
I suspect a lot of us have more level 5 mules for the bonanza marble game. :D
It would just be my luck that for the first time ever I planted on all of my characters. Usually I don't plant on the ones that I am actively using for things besides storage.
#63 Jul 07 2009 at 11:55 PM Rating: Good
****
6,424 posts
IfritsFreylin wrote:
After reading of all the bannings of seemingly legit players for what appears to be merely gardening, I'm wondering if there is some similar criteria among those banned that SE used to determine who gets the axe and who doesn't.


Oh, the similarity is clear enough. RMT have started to garden with thousands of trial accounts, using the exact same methods the banned legit accounts are using.
We know that much.
But the automated RMT hunting software can't see the difference, because there IS no difference. It's all about low level characters doing the same easy gardening and probably selling to the same NPCs to boot.

If you walk like RMT, talk like RMT and garden like RMT, SE thinks you ARE RMT. They don't wait for the accounts to unload their gil on the market, obviously.

I estimate somewhere between 50-100 players are rolled up with the RMT, but any legit player being banned over this is one to many.

So what to do about it? Petitions don't work. They never worked. Cancelling accounts until they fix it? SE won't even notice it. Harassing SEI agents is not going to help either.
The only thing that works is volume. People need to make GM calls, send emails to the STF, post on message boards. And please... none of that annoying hate crap we've seen in some other threads, that's counter-productive.
#64 Jul 08 2009 at 1:29 AM Rating: Good
*
92 posts
I'll just give the info on the banned account....

Number of mules.. 16
City all Sandy.
All lvl 1 all rank 1.
Race mixed with sizes and faces.
Names...in Latin for the Seven Deadly Sins and the Heavenly Virtues. With the 8th ones as well. Even had what each name meant in bazzar.

I never sold the harvest results on the mules. I traded to a 75 with max fame and rank 10, only gil the mules had on them was gil from selling the fire crystals and greens.

Every now and then I would send greens for chocobo digging to a friend that would pay me for the greens. I'd have him send the gil to my bank mule which is on my main account.

But seems like some ppl on Pandy seem to think Latin names are rmtish...
Got a few tells of "Go away rmt" I answered back "I'm not rmt...wiki up the name is you wish." Then just before I logged off the char got another tell from the same person..."Oh that's clever." Luxuria = Lust btw...

Only thing I did d-box or trade off in gil from the mules was the crystal sells...which was a max of 3-30k depending on how many crystals or gyshal greens the mule got...


~edit~

Also forgot to add all of the mules only had 100 gil each on them, and the banned account is on my token as well.

Edited, Jul 8th 2009 5:31am by SephirothOwaXIII
#65 Jul 08 2009 at 4:12 AM Rating: Decent
legit players are not using the same method as rmt, rmt are using a security hole in ffxi's network code to repeatedly harvest the same plants in open-mog without having to empty the pots.
#66 Jul 08 2009 at 5:10 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,209 posts
Raelix wrote:
I think RMTPwner v1.337 is turning Hal on us and deciding that if it just bans everyone there will be no more RMT at all.
The only wining move is not to play.
#67 Jul 08 2009 at 7:52 AM Rating: Good
**
727 posts
DsComputer wrote:


i'd have to agree that it's probably this. they don't want people doing something that costs no gil beyond startup and minimal time, yet has the potential to create truckloads of new gil across a server every month. it's the same reason many peoples favorite NPC farming item prices got nerfed a while back. RMT were doing this, and in the STF(U) criteria, many non-gilsellers got caught up in it.


Obviously you have never gardened Wildgrass seeds. When I was using all mules available on my account (now only use 7) I would pay about 57k for seeds for all mules, add in about 15k for crystals (when I didn't just farm them) and you have around 70k. A GOOD harvest would net me about 300k. So, we have a profit of about 230k per week. I DON'T call that Truckloads of gil. Since I only use 7 mules now I make about 100-140k gil per week. That's not even a pickup load.

As I've said before, its enough for consumables. RR items, food, tools, meds, etc. That's all.
#68REDACTED, Posted: Jul 08 2009 at 8:07 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) you can thank the new logon password devices for this, I warned that this woudl happen.
#69 Jul 08 2009 at 8:32 AM Rating: Good
***
3,432 posts
Did any account get banned where there was an active 'main' character?

The vast majority of people that are reporting banned accounts seem to be 16 level 1 mules. With a few being 15 level 1 mules and 1 'inactive' main. All sending gil, or the gardening results back to another account.

My guess is there was some criteria of '16 characters doing nothing but gardening & NPCing the results that only send the profits to another account.' The 'legit' players that got caught in the crossfire were people that turned out to be doing exactly what the RMTs were doing (and were therefore indistinguishable). Since we know that SE is bad at telling who owns any given account this isn't a surprise.

W/ regard to 'it's not hurting anyone'. SE has always frowned on anything that just produces gil without contributing materials or final products to the player based economy (which is actually a good position). The main reason that any activity which produces lots of gil without contributing usable products to the economy is that it's inflationary, and only benefits the people doing it, at the cost of everyone else that's 'playing nice.'
#70 Jul 08 2009 at 8:44 AM Rating: Good
xbobbobx wrote:
you can thank the new logon password devices for this, I warned that this woudl happen.

with this new way to log on, I knew they would hack their rmt investigation crew to save money and put in ways to automated it or just ignore it all together.

and it is happening, and will continue to happen and get worse.

and people thought the tokens were because SE cared lol.


The tokens are actually a good idea no matter how you look at it. I think it prevents the hackings to happen in the first place which IMO is better than having a lot of SE employees investigating each case and see which ones are hackings and which ones are not. Also removing said people from this process makes them available resources to do other stuff at SE. The RMT investigation crew can (and did) move into another source of income for the RMTers and acted accordingly. (this is all speculation on my part but its logical to me)

I'm sorry but the token has made me not fear input my information and I've seen a lot less "I've been hacked" topics (if any) lately.
#71 Jul 08 2009 at 8:47 AM Rating: Excellent
****
7,451 posts
xbobbobx wrote:
you can thank the new logon password devices for this, I warned that this woudl happen.

with this new way to log on, I knew they would hack their rmt investigation crew to save money and put in ways to automated it or just ignore it all together.

and it is happening, and will continue to happen and get worse.

and people thought the tokens were because SE cared lol.


Dude, take a blue pill. The real world is obviously too much for you to comprehend. Just go back to sleep and be a battery for our mechanic overlords for a while.
#72 Jul 08 2009 at 9:41 AM Rating: Good
kskerns wrote:
/sigh. What would be nice is more active PR from SE saying "we banned some people, this is why, we are getting numerous reports of innocent people getting banned and have set up an exclusive customer service flow to resolve the issue for these players."

I would think that a scripted system would catch some people it didn't mean to, so they should have prepared for the inevitible backwash of people who were wrongfully (or feel they were wrongfully) LM-17'd.

edit - because I am inexplicably bothered by misspelling "banned" as "baned".


If the past months have been any indication, SE is a monolithic organisation that should have been extinct long ago if not for its design team up to speed in designing some of the best game series of the past decade.

Edit: Formatting

Edited, Jul 10th 2009 2:06am by Ryuukage
#73 Jul 08 2009 at 9:56 AM Rating: Good
16 posts
Quote:
Did any account get banned where there was an active 'main' character?

Yes. The friend of mine that was banned had 3 level 75 jobs and was a very active officer in an endgame linkshell, making events literally 6 nights a week. When the LM-17 hit she was literally booted out of Dynamis - San d'Oria.
#74 Jul 08 2009 at 10:00 AM Rating: Default
***
3,432 posts
Quote:
Yes. The friend of mine that was banned had 3 level 75 jobs and was a very active officer in an endgame linkshell, making events literally 6 nights a week. When the LM-17 hit she was literally booted out of Dynamis - San d'Oria.


Not to be too much of a cynic, but 'active officer in an endgame linkshell' kinda raises flags for that person also running things like 3rd party programs. Do you know that the person in question was banned for gardening mules, or banned b/c they were using 3rd party programs?

Just b/c they got banned at the same time doesn't mean they were banned for the same reason.
#75 Jul 08 2009 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
tordall wrote:


Not to be too much of a cynic, but 'active officer in an endgame linkshell' kinda raises flags for that person also running things like 3rd party programs.
No it doesn't, stop jumping to conclusions.
#76 Jul 08 2009 at 11:51 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
Dude, take a blue pill. The real world is obviously too much for you to comprehend. Just go back to sleep and be a battery for our mechanic overlords for a while.


why? because I am right? Just keep waiting, things like this will continue, you will also see soon when peoples accounts get hacked how SE turns a blind eye if they have not purchased the token.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 71 All times are in CST
Nanako, Anonymous Guests (70)