Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Keylog Attack ~How My Story Ended~Follow

#177 May 17 2007 at 11:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,806 posts
To clarify:

Quote:
I think there is an uncomplete story for that. Do you mean someone is claiming your friend is quiting and go check a website that has malware in it? Why would your friend be targeted for it? Just mere coincidence? Or indeed, someone may be abusing your friend account to begin with by hijacking your friend account and spread malware?

He is not quitting nor did he have any intent of it. Whoever hacked his password sent /tells to everyone on his LS's and I'm guessing everyone in Whitegate which read: "I'm quitting. Here: " and then was followed by a link to a .zip file. Like the OP, I think he had gotten the same /tell and downloaded the malware. Yeah, dumb. But what's done is done I guess.

Quote:
If indeed your friend account was hijacked, he had to at big chunk personal responsibiltty being hijacked. From a GM/STF POV, they can only see tells being sent in the game, but nothing else. There cannot proof who is controlling the account is your friend or not, but they do have evidence (chat log) that is beyond doubt that your friend account is used to spread malware/RMT info.

I believe his password was changed for him however he was unable to access his character at that point. He logged onto webchat and that was the conversation that ensued. That was not conducted via /tells, but I see your point about how a GM or CSrep would not necessarily know the difference. There's no doubt that he was hijacked, and as stated above, it wasn't the brightest move to download an unknown item, but I'm not sure it should be a bannable offense. He has since backed up his essentials and formatted his hard drive.

I'm not going to get into the "well he shouldn't have downloaded the file" debate. He did, it was stupid, but its done and cannot be undone regardless of "should have, could have, would have" or I guess in this case its "shouldn't have, couldn't have, wouldn't have."

Now I'll just continue to lurk and follow along with the OP's progress. I just wanted to convey that the OP is not the only one that this has happened to, and I hope every character that was wrongly banned can be reinstated and that valuable lessons were learned by all about downloading suspicious files.
#178 May 17 2007 at 11:21 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
If S.E. holds current credit card information to be the trump card for character ownership, then it seems like they bear some responsibility to safeguard that information somehow. A previous poster's suggestion that previous credit card info be required to change the current credit card seems like a good start. If the person wants to change the c.c. number but for some reason doesn't have it on hand, then there should be a waiting period where the account is suspended for a few days to ensure that the request is legitimate.


There are other information that SE can asked for as a secondary proof before billing information can be changed, but yes I am all for that.

The thing is... a lot of people do play on pre-paid credit (i.e. "web money", they are not even credit cards). It would probably be best some personal information is used instead of some billing information.

SE can do things reduce this from happening, but a big part (in fact the most important part) to prevent such things to happen is end user care of internet security. No one, SE, your ISP, your neighbor, even your dog, can do anything if you install things like Gator on your PC, and type your credit card info on a "Ebay account validation".
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#179 May 17 2007 at 11:30 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
He is not quitting nor did he have any intent of it. Whoever hacked his password sent /tells to everyone on his LS's and I'm guessing everyone in Whitegate which read: "I'm quitting. Here: " and then was followed by a link to a .zip file. Like the OP, I think he had gotten the same /tell and downloaded the malware. Yeah, dumb. But what's done is done I guess.


As a side track, this is clearly an orchestrated attempted to hack accounts, or to grief players in the game. In some ways, we should be glad OP and you had brought this up.

I really do not know who and why people would do this? I am starting to think that this is more a script kiddy doing. I think GS will do better farming then planning such an orchestrated attempted to hack accounts.

That script kiddy must be really enjoying the drama of this thread. This reminds me a long time ago, when SE servers are DDOSed for like a week after SE unleashed a round of banning of TOS violations...

Edited, May 17th 2007 3:35pm by scchan
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#180 May 17 2007 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
*
84 posts
scchan wrote:
Quote:
If S.E. holds current credit card information to be the trump card for character ownership, then it seems like they bear some responsibility to safeguard that information somehow. A previous poster's suggestion that previous credit card info be required to change the current credit card seems like a good start. If the person wants to change the c.c. number but for some reason doesn't have it on hand, then there should be a waiting period where the account is suspended for a few days to ensure that the request is legitimate.


There are other information that SE can asked for as a secondary proof before billing information can be changed, but yes I am all for that.

The thing is... a lot of people do play on pre-paid credit (i.e. "web money", they are not even credit cards). It would probably be best some personal information is used instead of some billing information.


That's understandable. Either some personal info could be used instead, or should SE make this change they can put out an announcement encouraging such users to keep their pre-paid credit information from the previous month handy. Should pre-paid credit players (or anyone else) misplace their info, well there are worse things in life than being denied FFXI for a few days.

Quote:
SE can do things reduce this from happening, but a big part (in fact the most important part) to prevent such things to happen is end user care of internet security. No one, SE, your ISP, your neighbor, even your dog, can do anything if you install things like Gator on your PC, and type your credit card info on a "Ebay account validation".


I agree wholeheartedly with that, and I did not intend for my post to cast all of the blame at SE's doorstep. My post was simply prompted by my surprise at how religiously SE treats current credit card info, yet how easily such info can be changed.
#181 May 17 2007 at 11:45 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
There's no doubt that he was hijacked, and as stated above, it wasn't the brightest move to download an unknown item, but I'm not sure it should be a bannable offense. He has since backed up his essentials and formatted his hard drive.


It is a TOS violation to spread RMT info in the game (like asking people to buy gil etc.) I bet the hijacker had probably sent out... hundreds of such tell out. Unfortunately , I think that would probably considered as a major TOS violation><

It may not be "bannable", but I think it would be naive to not to expect some action being taken on your friend account for that ><
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#182 May 17 2007 at 11:47 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,398 posts
1. No I have not posted yet.

2. I have read every post in the thread and have been following it since yesterday.

3. I think we can all agree that the blame game is not really serving a purpose.


I think we can also all agree that SE's policy about this needs some revision to protect the player base from this in the future. We can protect ourselves but there needs to be some safeguards against this sort of thing. This would also make it harder for people to steal accounts that someone foolishly shared thier contact info.

To the OP please keep us posted on the status of your account. I hope all is resolved and you get your character back. It sounds like you were a valued member of your server and it would be a loss to the FFXI community for you to lose everything. Best wishes from me for a positive resolution.
#183 May 17 2007 at 12:40 PM Rating: Default
**
313 posts
Daboder wrote:
alricflaim wrote:
RealGallow wrote:
Quote:
If you can't make it work with safe computing practices, such as limited user accounts, you need to go back and hit your programmers again untill they smarten up!


So noted.

*grabs a bat and heads off towards Microsoft HQ*



As much as I hate to admit, they are at least taking steps in the right direction finally. Any straight out of the box MS apps do work with my limited user account, and that's just by making them only use the my documents folder, which is in the user's home directory, the only place a limited user can make any changes. The big trouble is all the damned holes people keep finding. Lord there is a lot of them. Of course there are a lot of people looking for them, as breaking MS stuff means more targets. :)

Then again, I'd like to see how apple or some flavour of linux would fare if they were the top dog. I wonder how many holes in them would be found. It would be interesting to see. My bet is they would be almost as bad as Windows, but we're not likely to see for a long time, if ever.


I don't know about that. I won't say that they are un-hackable, but I feel thay are a bit more secure. Also more stable. I hate Windows with a passion, always have, and now with Vista I'm just pissed that I'm going to have to learn that crap. We're already being flooded with calls at work here from Vista users having issues with our programs running properly for them. 90% of them are because they need to run the program as administrator to get them to work.


*shrugs* I used to feel like you too, but I've been an IT admin for 5 years now, and have sort of mellowed on my opinion. MS might have some shady looking business practices, but they do seem to learn from their past mistakes. I have more problems with the novell servers here then I do with the windows clients, albeit we are just moving to XP now (we support yesterday's technology tommorow! ) or the metaframe server we have that's running server 2003. That's not even counting my home PCs or server.

I'm as pleased with vista as I can be with something that is newly released. They are finally using a Unix style of memory management, they are adding security practices to deter people from running as an admin (and as developers start developing vista software, MAYBE they'll grow a clue and not require admin access) and the new UI is pretty. Of course I'm glad I can turn the UI off, considering my video card has troubles with it. Even IE 7 seems to be improving (Firefox is still better for me!). Hopefully once SP1 comes out things will be shiny, stable and cleaned up.

At anyrate, we've derailed this train wreck long enough. I'd be happy to keep talking shop with you though. Perhaps another thread?
#184 May 17 2007 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
***
3,777 posts
I can see a simple and easy fix for S-E for this. Just like the banks use to add an extra level of security to their accounts when using online features.

Ask a series of three questions of which the answer ius supplied by the user and save them to the PoL servers. For example.


What is your mother's maiden name:

What is the name of your favorite Pet:

What city were you born in:

etc etc. Typically a person selects a series of three questions, choosing one out of a list of 4 possible to choose from in each and answers it. They then are shown the answers and confirm them and they are saved to the online server.

Whenever the user wants to change the information attatched to the account, such as home address or billing or password the bank asks the user to verify these 3 questions. If they cannot verify them and keep trying the account is locked and requires a customer call to the bank's service reps to reopen the online transactions.


Why can't s-e do this? This would be 100% keylogger/hacker fool proof because it adds a level of scurity to the system that ONLY the creater of the account knows. Sure a keylogger or virus can hack information stored on the client side, such as passwords and account ID's, but they cannot hack the server side information which would be the answers to the three questions. And they certainly cannot hack the users brain. So with this safeguard in place even with the current info a hacker is unable to alter data because they don't know the answers to the security questions.

Why is this so hard to implement? Why does s-e give such a lame *** response to the situation? I don't know. But I think its a very easy fix, and one that has been in place for a very long time. Banks and websites use it all the time, why can't s-e?


Edited, May 17th 2007 4:54pm by Melphina
____________________________
[ffxisig]56619[/ffxisig]

There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
#185 May 17 2007 at 1:18 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
Mistress Melphina wrote:
I can see a simple and easy fix for S-E for this. Just like the banks use to add an extra level of security to their accounts when using online features.

Ask a series of three questions of which the answer ius supplied by the user and save them to the PoL servers.
I thought this would be a good idea about a page ago, but didn't mention it cuz I was too busy getting hammered for stupidly thinking someone should be held accountable for their own actions. It is a very good idea though, but,

Mistress Melphina wrote:
Why can't s-e do this? This would be 100% keylogger/hacker fool proof because it adds a level of scurity to the system that ONLY the creater of the account knows. Sure a keylogger or virus can hack information stored on the client side, such as passwords and account ID's, but they cannot hack the server side information which would be the answers to the three questions. And they certainly cannot hack the users brain. So with this safeguard in place even with the current info a hacker is unable to alter data because they don't know the answers to the security questions.


Not true. If you understand how a keylogger works, you'll know that any input to the keyboard is being logged, even the answers which are typed into answers those 3 questions. It's a good added measure, but nowhere near 100%. Now a good idea would be to have these answers and login ID and password in a text document somewhere that you could copy and paste into the field, thus not requiring any keyboard input, although that can be annoying, but hey, if you wanna stay protected...

Edited, May 17th 2007 4:19pm by Daboder
#186 May 17 2007 at 1:44 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,901 posts
Daboder wrote:

Now a good idea would be to have these answers and login ID and password in a text document somewhere that you could copy and paste into the field, thus not requiring any keyboard input, although that can be annoying, but hey, if you wanna stay protected...


It's a good thought, but it's not going to add any security because it's trivial to monitor the clipboard content (the container of copy/paste data) in addition to keyboard input.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#188 May 17 2007 at 3:15 PM Rating: Decent
WTF is wrong with you people. The poor guy lost years of invested time into that character. Yes it may have happened because of his actions and has nothing to do with SE but its extremely easy to prove the orignal purchaser and for them to not even care and return it back to the original owner only contradicts the ToS that you so happily quote to try and sound intellegent. Its BB that they do nothing.This does not happen in WoW so i cant see how SE who has alot less subscribers that i assume they would like to hold onto just says o well be more carefull next time.
#189 May 17 2007 at 3:33 PM Rating: Default
Thief's Knife
*****
15,054 posts
ImmT wrote:
I have a feeling SE is going to get reamed over this, and hopefully will be forced to make some changes to it's lolcustomer service and lolTOS.


Or possibly somthing like this:

"We regret to inform our players that as a result of a recent court case we are forced to suspend FFXI in North America. We apoligize for any inconveniance this may cause"

SE might be petulant bastards and just stop supporting the game rather than be forced to fix their crappy illegal policy on identity theft.
____________________________
Final Fantasy XI 12-14-11 Update wrote:
Adjust the resolution of menus.
The main screen resolution for "FINAL FANTASY XI" is dependent on the "Overlay Graphics Resolution" setting.
If the Overlay Graphics Resolution is set higher than the Menu Resolution, menus will be automatically resized.


I thought of it first:

http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=10&mid=130073657654872218#20
#190 May 17 2007 at 3:42 PM Rating: Decent
Thief's Knife
*****
15,054 posts
Hamunaptra wrote:


SE is not a US based company and their servers are not in the US so I will wager a guess that US law applies no more to them then does it to the case involving the pornography.



If FFXI was only sold over the internet and shipped to the US from japan direct to customers that might hold. But FFXI is sold in the US and SE must abide by US law when dealing with it's customers here or they aren't allowed to do business in this country.
____________________________
Final Fantasy XI 12-14-11 Update wrote:
Adjust the resolution of menus.
The main screen resolution for "FINAL FANTASY XI" is dependent on the "Overlay Graphics Resolution" setting.
If the Overlay Graphics Resolution is set higher than the Menu Resolution, menus will be automatically resized.


I thought of it first:

http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=10&mid=130073657654872218#20
#191 May 17 2007 at 3:43 PM Rating: Excellent
**
280 posts
This post saddens me. My heart goes out to the OP.

And, I'm scared. I have other FFXI users that access the
game from my PC... what if they infect my computer? I don't
have any high level characters but I have worked hard for what I
have.

Yes, I run a virus scan and a firewall. But is that enough?

Also, I'd like to re-address the privacy issues. What information
was available to this individual that hacked the account?
Do we need to worry about our identity being stolen also?

I think we need a response from SE about this issues and the protection
of our privacy. I think we should demand it.

Surely there are many questions about this account that only the OP
could answer. SE should investigate this further.

SE, I'm waiting for your response. It will decide my future with a game
I love dearly.




#192 May 17 2007 at 3:49 PM Rating: Good
Thief's Knife
*****
15,054 posts
Bacchusthegreat wrote:
Quote:
4.1 Ownership and Rights.
SEI (and, to the extent applicable, its licensors) owns and shall retain all right, title and interest in and to the PlayOnline Service, the Software and all Documentation, and will be the sole owner of any and all data you generate through your use of the PlayOnline Service, and you receive only limited rights to access and use PlayOnline Service, the Software and all Documentation, as set forth in any applicable license agreement. SEI shall reserve its rights in its sole discretion to delete, alter, or transfer any and all data at any time without notice to User. Further, SEI (and, to the extent applicable, its licensors) owns and shall retain all right, title and interest in and to any ideas, opinions, comments, or suggestions that you submit to SEI, its affiliates, its agents, or its representatives in any form or format (including, but not limited to, e-mail, telephone, facsimile, regular mail, and chat room discussions) and in any context in which it is apparent that SEI may use such ideas, opinion, comments, or suggestions to improve the PlayOnline Service or any other product or service offered by SEI to its customers. Further, SEI shall have the right to assign and/or delegate in its sole discretion its rights and obligations under this Agreement in whole or in part to third party at any time without notice to Users. PLAYONLINE, THE SOFTWARE AND THE DOCUMENTATION ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES AND FOREIGN COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK LAWS, AND INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, AND ARE THE SUBJECT OF TRADE SECRETS.UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOFTWARE IS SUBJECT TO CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES.


SE makes it clear, at no point do you own your account, you pretty much rent it, they own it. You can not, as such, have it "stolen" from you. Ya, ya I know some of you will say, but what if you rent a car, it's still theft. Ya it is, but from the car rental agency. SE never really had it stolen from them, just a transfer of renters. You can complain about theft all you want, and talk about lawsuits against them, but they are smart in one thing, the writing of the agreements that you agree to every time you log on.

Quote:
3.2 Indemnification.
You agree to indemnify, defend and hold SEI harmless from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, expenses, attorney and other legal fees and costs arising from your commission of any acts or activities prohibited by this Article 3.


Can't sue em either.

They may have horrible customer relations, but they have smart lawyers.


Edited, May 17th 2007 1:12pm by Bacchusthegreat


Just because SE writes up an abusive clause and you agree to it doesn't mean it would actually hold up in court.


Edited, May 17th 2007 7:51pm by Lobivopis
____________________________
Final Fantasy XI 12-14-11 Update wrote:
Adjust the resolution of menus.
The main screen resolution for "FINAL FANTASY XI" is dependent on the "Overlay Graphics Resolution" setting.
If the Overlay Graphics Resolution is set higher than the Menu Resolution, menus will be automatically resized.


I thought of it first:

http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=10&mid=130073657654872218#20
#193REDACTED, Posted: May 17 2007 at 4:34 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I read this whole thread and although I can understand how disapointed someone would be about losing their account, it is stupid to beat around the bush and blame other people when it is the original account holders fault, end of story.
#194 May 17 2007 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,988 posts
Violetfireball who's sock are you exactly?

Further I refer you to a simple quote.

The greatest evil in life is when good men do nothing.


The system you are advocateing where we just turn a blind eye to thieves we can stop is idiotic. I'm very happy you are in charge of nothing.
#195REDACTED, Posted: May 17 2007 at 4:55 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) It's simple, no one can still your account if you do not allow them to. He allowed them to when he opened something unknown, it doesn't get much clearer then that.
#196 May 17 2007 at 4:56 PM Rating: Good
**
373 posts
Quote:
I read this whole thread and although I can understand how disapointed someone would be about losing their account, it is stupid to beat around the bush and blame other people when it is the original account holders fault, end of story.

When you signed up for the game you also agreed to another peice of the terms of service stating that Account protection is YOUR responsibilty, not SEI's.
The second you forgot common sense and opened something unknown to you, was the second you pretty much said that the account really wasn't that important to you. Anyone in their right mind knows, even outside of games, to not open unknown links or E-mails. If you didn't know that, then you really have no business even playing anything or touching a computer.

I think people are sadly forgetting that it's just a game. Life does go on further then a game. If you fail to protect your account, you pay a price, blaming a company that already stated that account protection is YOUR responsibilty is just being plain cowardly for not taken responsibility for your own actions.

Oh, and the whole argument about ethics and morals. It is not a companys job to go out of it's way to please a customer. Sadly American companies are ok with doing everything in their power to help a customer, even if it is clear the customer is the idiot that messed up. Luckly japanesse companies realize that people need to use common sense and if they fail to do so, that is their own problem. The people at SE are just upholding their polices, which is their job, if they failed to do so, they would be out of a job. So stop bashing customer service just because you aren't getting exactly what you want.



Wow what a ******* Moron. Do us all a favor and go jump off a bridge you troll
#197 May 17 2007 at 5:01 PM Rating: Good
**
373 posts
Quote:
It's simple, no one can still your account if you do not allow them to. He allowed them to when he opened something unknown, it doesn't get much clearer then that.


So its ok for people to prey on the old and simple minded because they werent smart enough to catch the Scam artist tactic is that what your suggesting? who's Sock are you anyway?
#198 May 17 2007 at 5:09 PM Rating: Good
***
1,988 posts
Quote:
It's simple, no one can still your account if you do not allow them to. He allowed them to when he opened something unknown, it doesn't get much clearer then that.


NEWSFLASH: Social Darwanism is so last century.

I reiterate my happiness that you are in charge of nothing.
#199 May 17 2007 at 6:23 PM Rating: Decent
**
503 posts
Normally, I would suggest a week long boycott...

SE's customer service is an F at the BBB (as has already been noted).

The only way to get them to see a problem is to SHOW them there's a problem.

If they were to suddenly see the amount of people drop off for a significant point of time, and everyone were to call up with complaints as to how they are being handled, we might see some action.

Sadly, boycotts will never happen though as there'd be a large group of @%%@ who would just see this as an opportunity to camp a NM.

I do think, though, that everyone should contact SE with their complaints in this matter. I have.
#200REDACTED, Posted: May 17 2007 at 7:21 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I would have stopped when I seen "Mrrabbitradar" period. You honestly did not think it was a video or pics, let's get real here.
#201 May 17 2007 at 8:16 PM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
Rhinox wrote:
Quote:
It's simple, no one can still your account if you do not allow them to. He allowed them to when he opened something unknown, it doesn't get much clearer then that.


So its ok for people to prey on the old and simple minded because they werent smart enough to catch the Scam artist tactic is that what your suggesting? who's Sock are you anyway?

No ones saying it's OK, but go after the perp, not SE. All they do is host the game.

That's like getting into an accident with another car and blaming the city cuz you were driving on their roads. Christ people.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 69 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (69)