Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Keylog Attack ~How My Story Ended~Follow

#252 May 21 2007 at 11:05 AM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
Erawyn wrote:
When the @#%^ did I say "POL's security was breached?" I said it was lacking terribly, which is entirely different. All any moron has to do is get a hold of a member ID and password, and everything is in plain view. All your credit card information can be accessed if you know those two things. there is no security question or any other preventative measures.

Same can be said for anything else. It has nothing to do with POL's security or lack thereof. I log into my bank account online too. If I downloaded a keylogger, and thusly transmitted my login information for my bank account to this thief, he would be able to access my bank account as well. Same with other online games, and other online sites that require you to enter a username and password to log on.

Also, since you're such the genius, apparantly, on website/MMORPG security, what changes would you make. How would you rather have us log in. Maybe SE should supply everyone with thumbprint readers, and blood and urine analyzers, and a retina scan just to be able to play the damned game. Would that be enough security for you? How would you rather "hide" this information that apparantly is in such plain view. If you can see the holes in their security, you should be able to tell me what you would do to cover them. While you're at it, tell SE so they can implement them immediately, because regardless of what some of you think, I know Square-Enix IS concerned about thier security, and would immediately remedy any flaws you were able to find. Security is a big thing for any company, and something that isn't taken for granted. Thing is, they already know about all this keylogger, stolen account stuff. Do you think they're stupid? They know what's going on, and I'm sure they've reviewed their security time and time again. If they noticed a problem, I'm sure they would address it. I honestly don't think they've noticed a problem. But apparantly, Erawyn, you know so much more about their security than their programmers do because you can see all these flaws in their security. Why don't you write a letter and tell them about these security risks. Maybe you'll get a big fat reward? Or maybe They'll realize you're just another whiney little complainer like everyone else who thinks they understand how SE's security should work, but really haven't even the slightest clue about what safegaurds they've put in place, and why. *****, *****, *****, all you want people. Bottom line is SE/POL knows more about what's going on here than any of you do, and I'm sure they know how to handle their asses. They employ people strictly for matters like these.
#253 May 21 2007 at 11:50 AM Rating: Good
****
4,148 posts
Daboder wrote:
Same can be said for anything else. It has nothing to do with POL's security or lack thereof. I log into my bank account online too. If I downloaded a keylogger, and thusly transmitted my login information for my bank account to this thief, he would be able to access my bank account as well. Same with other online games, and other online sites that require you to enter a username and password to log on.


At least if you are the victim of a keylogger attack with your bank they will re-instate the account to you and also reverse whatever damage came because of it.

They have a long list of checks and balances to use to determine if it really is yours or not in case something like this happens.

What SE will tell you is that "we are looking into it" which is PR for "Whatever, lol, we still get paid either way, now hurry up I have lunch break coming up in a few minutes".
#254 May 21 2007 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
At least if you are the victim of a keylogger attack with your bank they will re-instate the account to you and also reverse whatever damage came because of it.

They have a long list of checks and balances to use to determine if it really is yours or not in case something like this happens.

What SE will tell you is that "we are looking into it" which is PR for "Whatever, lol, we still get paid either way, now hurry up I have lunch break coming up in a few minutes".



The bank can potentially lose a lot of money in identify theft of bank account information.

But in SE case, it is quite different. First, it is stated in TOS that the end user are responsible for the account security and it is also a violation to buy/sell account (that will assume a transfer of account log in to another person). Secondly, SE can only lose 12 bucks per month for doing that. Yes, I hate to say this, but 12 bucks is literally 1 (may be 2, but I assume SE don't pay their employees like McDonalds) hour of salary. So from a money perspective, it is also nonsensical to do that; that same 1-2 hour can be used to deal with more useful problems in the game (like supporting other players, deal with RMT, make new content) then someone that may have violated TOS and ignorance of internet security.
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#255 May 21 2007 at 12:26 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,400 posts
Daboder, do you work for SE? Because you sound like you do, or you sound like you think you should.

I'm sure SE is concered with THEIR security. After all if THEY are the ones who are breached they are ******* But if the MEMBERS are breached, then SE turns around and says "Oh well, your loss." You go ahead and change your CC info and password and call up POL and give them the old information. Come back and tell us what they said. They keep no records of past history, and if they do, the schmucks you talk to don't have access to it. Add that to the fact that there's not even something as simple as a security question, to which you don't type in the answer too often and will probably get overlooked on a keylogger if you get rid of it quickly, is outrageous.

You want suggestions? head on over to the Feedback forum and check out what I posted. This forum isn't the place to offer suggestions as to what SE should do. Allakhazam already has a forum in place for that.

And I didn't mention this in my feeback post, but if SE made monthly game cards, people could purchase them and not have to worry about their CC info possibly being stolen if they were hacked.

The OP was stupid, yes I agree with that. He shouldn'thave went to some random link someone he didn't know sent him. That is beyond stupid. But the fact of the matter is SE turns around and says "Oh well, your loss. See you next month with a new character!" is ridiculous.
#256 May 21 2007 at 12:30 PM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
Levish wrote:
Daboder wrote:
Same can be said for anything else. It has nothing to do with POL's security or lack thereof. I log into my bank account online too. If I downloaded a keylogger, and thusly transmitted my login information for my bank account to this thief, he would be able to access my bank account as well. Same with other online games, and other online sites that require you to enter a username and password to log on.


At least if you are the victim of a keylogger attack with your bank they will re-instate the account to you and also reverse whatever damage came because of it.

They have a long list of checks and balances to use to determine if it really is yours or not in case something like this happens.

What SE will tell you is that "we are looking into it" which is PR for "Whatever, lol, we still get paid either way, now hurry up I have lunch break coming up in a few minutes".


This may be true, but you OWN what's in your bank account. In FFXI you DO NOT own your character, or any items that are collected. They are SE's property as outlined in the TOS agreed to every time you log in to the site. If they were to pursue every situation like this, they would be expending resources to validate the claims, which they shouldn't have to provided each OP covered their own asses. They should not have to expend their resources to correct a mistake someone else made. How is that fair? Not to mention, by the time they are even able to verify the validity of it, the thief would probably already have the character cleaned out. Also, if SE bends on this, you don't think there would be a rise in scams by people claiming they were victim's of keyloggers, when actually they just used another computer to log in and sell off their own stuff because they new SE would just re-instate their character anyway? This is why they aren't doing anything for the guy. Maybe at some point they will, but they need to stand firm on this for good reason. It's not a matter of SE being a buncha ***** that don't want to help anyone as you all make it seem. They aren't doing this because they just don't care about their players. If anything, the rise in other MMORPG's, among other things, has caused people to move away from FFXI, so I'm sure SE is not going to try to do anything to push users away. They care more than you know, but they aren't re-instating this guy's account because of what he did. He compromised his own security, and you people seem to think that SE needs to take care of it. It would be a bad, bad move on their part to just give him his account back.
#257 May 21 2007 at 12:34 PM Rating: Default
****
4,400 posts
Quote:
He compromised his own security, and you people seem to think that SE needs to take care of it. It would be a bad, bad move on their part to just give him his account back.


I'll remember your retarded logic the next time someone leaves their leased Jag running in the ghetto and someone steals it, then they cry to the insurance company about it.
#258 May 21 2007 at 12:50 PM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
Erawyn wrote:
Add that to the fact that there's not even something as simple as a security question, to which you don't type in the answer too often and will probably get overlooked on a keylogger if you get rid of it quickly, is outrageous


Is this the only online game that you're ever played? How many other games do you know that have a security question? Actually, how many websites do you even know of that have a security question besides major financial institutions? There aren't many. Plus as stated before, that can still be grabbed with a keylogger just as easy as a username and password. It's redundant. Just another little thing some websites use to make people feel all warm and cozy that their information is being protected. It doesn't do jack crap. As stated before, multiple times, this being yet another one, the only way this would be beneficial is if your had your username/password/security question answer in a text format somewhere and would copy & paste them into the fields. This protection is again, only as good as the user ability to do it. As far as I'm concerned logging in takes too long already, I don't want to add steps. I'm smart enough not to download keylogger's and give up my account information. It's not my fault others aren't. Use your head a little bit, I know it might hurt some, but the pain will go away. ANYTHING SE does to the log in,ANY questions that need to be answered, ANY actions that you are required to perform to log in to POL, can be duplicated by ANYONE else if you give them the information to do so, which is exactly what the OP did in this case, even if it wasn't willingly. Get it through your damn heads!
#259 May 21 2007 at 12:52 PM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
Erawyn wrote:
Quote:
He compromised his own security, and you people seem to think that SE needs to take care of it. It would be a bad, bad move on their part to just give him his account back.


I'll remember your retarded logic the next time someone leaves their leased Jag running in the ghetto and someone steals it, then they cry to the insurance company about it.
And that is relevant how?

Apples and oranges buddy.
#260 May 21 2007 at 1:08 PM Rating: Default
***
1,988 posts
Quote:
ANY actions that you are required to perform to log in to POL, can be duplicated by ANYONE else if you give them the information to do so, which is exactly what the OP did in this case, even if it wasn't willingly. Get it through your damn heads!


Quick Question.

Would requireing info that is not used or typed in (address, phone number etc) That is only entered at account creation used as a Verification for password changeing be a good security measure against accout stealing? This would not save stupid people who allow thier password and ID to get stolen from loseing all their gil and gear and possiably the person deleeing thier character, but at the least they might still be able to keep thier character.
#261 May 21 2007 at 1:27 PM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
DancerRonin wrote:
Quote:
ANY actions that you are required to perform to log in to POL, can be duplicated by ANYONE else if you give them the information to do so, which is exactly what the OP did in this case, even if it wasn't willingly. Get it through your damn heads!


Quick Question.

Would requireing info that is not used or typed in (address, phone number etc) That is only entered at account creation used as a Verification for password changeing be a good security measure against accout stealing? This would not save stupid people who allow thier password and ID to get stolen from loseing all their gil and gear and possiably the person deleeing thier character, but at the least they might still be able to keep thier character.


That's true. But no matter what, the 'thief' would be able to log in with your character whenever he wanted. So he logs in, and cleans you out. You retain your character, but who's to stop him from logging in again as soon as you've recieved more goods and just taking them all over again. That is of course, unless you were smart enough to download spysweeper or something and then remove the keylogger, but this would still require the user to actively protect his computer. But yeah, at least you'd be able to retain your character.
#262 May 21 2007 at 1:31 PM Rating: Default
***
1,988 posts
Quote:
That's true. But no matter what, the 'thief' would be able to log in with your character whenever he wanted. So he logs in, and cleans you out. You retain your character, but who's to stop him from logging in again as soon as you've recieved more goods and just taking them all over again. That is of course, unless you were smart enough to download spysweeper or something and then remove the keylogger, but this would still require the user to actively protect his computer. But yeah, at least you'd be able to retain your character.


Thanks thats the kind of solution I was looking for. It's a fact of life that most people have this mentality of invincability........until they are the victim of a crime.

I had a similar thing happen to me. Came home one night, plopped down the couch and forgot to lock the door. Got robbed at gunpoint when teh gun man just walked into my home. The door is always locked no matter what now.

Basicly I think SE should impliment something like above because I guarantee after a person loses all of their stuff they will take thier comp security more seriously and at the same time SE will not have to worry about questions of not stepping in to return accounts.
#263 May 21 2007 at 1:39 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
There is still a question if someone would pretend to have their character stolen, which no way... SE can tell at all. You cannot assume someone is asking a character restoration because it being stolen as being good motivated.

I guarantee you, the moment SE let restoration of account theft goes too easily, it will open the flood gates. Heh, I bet GSs can take advantage of that too.

Even when banks tackle identify theft, they demand a LOT of your personal information to proof you are the real person who claim that, but not so Jack Doe who is trying to start a hoax.

Be careful what you ask for internet security and procedures to counter it. Well... One thing I will definetly say is that no sane and smart company or individual will do things that compromise their own network.

Edited, May 21st 2007 5:41pm by scchan
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#264 May 21 2007 at 9:26 PM Rating: Decent
**
724 posts
How does this thread have 6 pages? oh right, Alla.

Quote:
This is all I can hope for~ Call me a @#%^ing idiot for even checking the file, that's pretty much how I feel. However immediately after checking the file, I knew what it was, but all the traps where in place, and their was nothing I could do. This was a hell of a plan, and it worked~


Brilliant? hardly.
#265 May 22 2007 at 5:34 AM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
It has 6 pages because it turned into a discussion about whether or not SE/POL should be held responsible for this, or whether or not they need to change their security or the procedure of loging in. It really shouldn't have lasted more than a few pages. Basically, scchan made it very clear why it's not their responsibility/fault.
#266 May 22 2007 at 5:44 AM Rating: Decent
*
106 posts
responsibility goes to SE to get this fixed. nuff said, nothing more to see here.
#267 May 22 2007 at 5:54 AM Rating: Default
Yeah, because SE is to be held responsible for people loading unknown files off the Internet.

'tards.
#268 May 22 2007 at 5:54 AM Rating: Decent
Daboder wrote:
It has 6 pages because it turned into a discussion about whether or not SE/POL should be held responsible for this, or whether or not they need to change their security or the procedure of loging in. It really shouldn't have lasted more than a few pages. Basically, scchan made it very clear why it's not their responsibility/fault.


No, scchan did not. And this thread is 6 pages because people like you and him are too stubborn to concede that SE's reaction to this type of event is ridiculous.

I have already answered this argument here. In that post, I clearly identify the following:

1. SE's policy is very clear. They are not legally bound to do anything.
2. SE's policy is stupid for reasons clearly outlined in the other post.

#269 May 22 2007 at 6:12 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
1) Reinstating accounts easily can be easily taken advantage off by people who buy/sell accounts.

2) If too much resources are spent to investigate account hacking, less resources for developing new content or supporting players that are really having issues in the game (like bugs in the game, dealing with botters and RMT).

Answer point 1 and 2 first before further argument. If you one of those people to expect get stuff without paying the cost, you forfeit the right to answer.

3) Most important: If you want a good online experience with any internet things, use common sense and learn computer security 101 first before doing anything else. If not, you are just looking for trouble. This argument should not have started to begin with if people just use a little bit of their head. Arguing whose responsibility is a complete foolish, because this argument should not have occurred to begin with. People got identify theft over the internet, are nothing but wasting their own time trying to deal with the consequences when it is so easy to prevent.
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#270REDACTED, Posted: May 22 2007 at 6:27 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) POL security is fine because:
#271 May 22 2007 at 6:31 AM Rating: Default
***
3,261 posts
StubsOnAsura wrote:


No, scchan did not. And this thread is 6 pages because people like you and him are too stubborn to concede that SE's reaction to this type of event is ridiculous.

I have already answered this argument here. In that post, I clearly identify the following:

1. SE's policy is very clear. They are not legally bound to do anything.
2. SE's policy is stupid for reasons clearly outlined in the other post.


You can think their policy is stupid all you want, you're entitlted to your opinion. I and scchan are both thinking/speaking logically. As a company they have to have policies like this to protect themselves. If you don't like it, STFU&GTFO, because they aren't going to change that policy for you or anyone. Go play any other online game and see what is in their TOS. It will all be along the same lines. SE is not your momma and they are not gonna kiss your boo-boo's. If you F-up, that's your problem. Don't F-up and there will be no need for these stupid arguements.

As for me being too stubborn to concede, you really are full of yourself. It's not about being stubborn. That statement has the implication that I'm holding my ground against my better judgement, which is not the case. Any business needs to have these safeguards, it's not about whether or not they care about their customers. What should their reaction be?? "Oh here ya go Hiro, you tried downloading a program from someone you didn't know because you thought it was a way to get cheap gil, and got your account stolen, but we'll just give it back to you, and, oh what the heck, here's another million gil to go play with." Is that the type of reaction you'd expect to see? I don't know what planet you've grown up on, but here on earth, it's a cruel, cruel place. Things don't always go the way you want them to, or think they should. You keep coming back to the same stupid point saying that SE needs to do something different. Why should they take it in the *** that Hiro did something stupid????

I've already sent Hiro a PM saying that I really hope they do something for him. It sucks, I know it does, but as sschan stated, if they roll over for this one, it will open the floodgates. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

Edited, May 22nd 2007 9:50am by Daboder
#272 May 22 2007 at 6:36 AM Rating: Decent
scchan wrote:
1) Reinstating accounts easily can be easily taken advantage off by people who buy/sell accounts.


As I said in my argument:

"it would then be incredibly easy for SE to simply reset the password, disable the account, or take a number of other corrective actions."

Your argument is not solid, because either extreme end of the situation results in the malicious person(s) being able to manipulate the system. Are you trying to say that you would rather the crooks be able to steal without fear of consequence than have one or two individuals take advantage of a system designed to prevent such theft? (and by theft here, I mean theft of time and effort and reputation)

At least if an individual were to try to take advantage of the latter, it would more likely than not be caught after the first few attempts, whereas the current system allows continuous and unrestricted grief.

scchan wrote:
2) If too much resources are spent to investigate account hacking, less resources for developing new content or supporting players that are really having issues in the game (like bugs in the game, dealing with botters and RMT).


I'm sorry, but what the hell do you think the customer relations team is for? While I agree that every single incident cannot be addressed as if the world were crashing down upon the player, certain incidents imply widespread malicious activity and warrant further investigation, rather than a mere shrug of the shoulder. It would take a team of no more than 1-2 customer relations employees and MAYBE 1 developer to fully investigate this issue and determine a) the scope of the problem and b) the best course of action.

scchan wrote:
Answer point 1 and 2 first before further argument. If you one of those people to expect get stuff without paying the cost, you forfeit the right to answer.


This is probably the most intelligent (if not accidental) counter argument I've heard so far. I know I absolutely would not be opposed to a "research fee" being applied in this situation. This fee could go as high as $100.00-$200.00 and still be reasonable I think. It would act as a deterrent for those attempting to fraud the system, and would also allow SE to recoup at least some of the expense of having to investigate the issue. Additionally, it would be the icing on the cake in convincing the victim to be more cautious in the future.

scchan wrote:
3) Most important: If you want a good online experience with any internet things, use common sense and learn computer security 101 first before doing anything else. If not, you are just looking for trouble. This argument should not have started to begin with if people just use a little bit of their head. Arguing whose responsibility is a complete foolish, because this argument should not have occurred to begin with. People got identify theft over the internet, are nothing but wasting their own time trying to deal with the consequences when it is so easy to prevent.


Very true, but do you expect perfection out of every thing in life? If so, you're in for a long road of many terrible disappointments. IMO, it is ludicrous for you, SE, or anyone else to expect that 100% of its customers excercise 100% caution in any and all online endeavors, and there has to be some allowance for stupid mistakes in any event. If 98% of the customers never have any problems, are we (or SE) to deny assistance to the 2% who @#%^ up strictly on the basis of the "You were too stupid to listen" principal? I think not...

Edited, May 22nd 2007 9:39am by StubsOnAsura
#273 May 22 2007 at 6:38 AM Rating: Decent
And Daboder, shut your god damn mouth already. At least Scchan tries to present counter arguments... all you do is throw insults and continue being pretentious. Do you have any idea how stupid you're making yourself look?
#274 May 22 2007 at 6:50 AM Rating: Good
**
504 posts
GM[Dave] ridiculed people who accidentally throw their Bomb Cores, saying it was their fault they were stupid. Reading his essay, I thought "This man is going to be very bitter if he ever tosses his Bomb Core." This thread reminds me of that.

I agree that it's silly to download an unknown file. In the OP's case, curiosity got the better of him, and he decided to take a look and just see what the file was. He thought that if he did not run the .exe file that his system wouldn't be hacked. Unfortunately, he was wrong.

I don't think he was stupid. I think he was morbidly curious, and ignorant of the technical issues (at least, as ignorant as I was before reading this thread). Even if he was a complete idiot, though, and downloaded and ran an .exe file, I'd still feel sorry for him. He's been playing for years, and has put a lot of work into his char.

I'd feel terrible if my account got hacked and I lost my char, no matter whose fault it was. At least I have friends who would offer support.
#275 May 22 2007 at 6:57 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
If 98% of the customers never have any problems, are we (or SE) to deny assistance to the 2% who @#%^ up strictly on the basis of the "You were too stupid to listen" principal? I think not...


The thing is I have a strong gut feeling that is a lot more than 2% of the people who are "being stupid" over the internet. I was raised in a "No Pain No Gain" "Failure is the mother of success" philosophy; if you fooked up, you suck it up and try again.

I receive tens of spam everyday. Of course I delete them all, but the fact spammers continue send them, it means there are enough idiots out there click the links of spams. While your ISP, SE, IRC networks, or whatever takes efforts make counter measures against identify theft, DDOS, spammers, it really takes very minimal manpower and computing cost (run a script or a program) to do things like the OP seen or send spam or lanuch a DDOS attack. But it takes a heck lot more (say 10-20x, an arbitrary number) people, time and money to take counter measures against them. Yes, it sucks to be denied for help to recover the account, but a lot of SE decision against helping has a lot of money and network security sense behind it. It would be nice if people like OP get helped, but really... it is a difficult issue.

There is another thread started today that a similar hoax is now attacking LS websites, and guess what... People got tricked. Sometimes you just do not know what are in those people head. And it seems for that case, it is a former/current FFXI player who started that hoax. People really need to "get a life" (like get a job, go to school, or even go traveling for vacation or got watch a pro-sports game), instead being a person have nothing better to do but to harasses people over the internet. It should be shameful to have nothing to do in RL; you are just wasting your own time.

Quote:

I don't think he was stupid. I think he was morbidly curious, and ignorant of the technical issues (at least, as ignorant as I was before reading this thread).


"Untutored courage is useless in the face of educated bullets" is a quote from famous US general G Patton. Being curious is one thing, but there is a difference being smart and curious, and putting a finger into flames to see if it is hot.

Edited, May 22nd 2007 11:00am by scchan
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#276 May 22 2007 at 7:02 AM Rating: Default
scchan wrote:
Quote:
If 98% of the customers never have any problems, are we (or SE) to deny assistance to the 2% who @#%^ up strictly on the basis of the "You were too stupid to listen" principal? I think not...


Way to scroll to the bottom of the post and only read the last part...

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 49 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (49)