withsilverwings wrote:
Lasker wrote:
NOT THAT *&^*ing website again.
im just using this to up my post count
wtf is wrong with it?
do you not believe it?
I'm not an SE basher; I believe that SE execs are at LEAST as unhappy about this as we are. We want to play, they want a service that will attract paying customers--which means they want a service that works. None of us are getting what we want at the moment.
But, no, I don't believe that site. They are attempting to paint a picture of the internet by determining the connectivity of selected backbone routers. Not a bad idea, really, although they do not, IMHO, look at enough routers. The problem is that their figures are utterly bogus. The router they're looking at for Japan (*one* router, to profile *all* of Japan) is 100% percent down, always. Always. Therefore their profile shows that, according to them, Japan has been completely offline for months. The truth, of course, is that they are either a) not getting correct figures for the router or b) are out-of-date and looking at a router no longer in service. In either case, the figures are bogus. Japan has, obviously, NOT been completely offline for months. Several other Asian routers they use to compile their figures show a similar profile. It's not an intentional deception. It's simply that their data is inadequate, out-of-date, and flat-out wrong.