Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Solid translation of JP /check msgFollow

#52 Jul 27 2004 at 4:53 PM Rating: Good
**
361 posts
I myself do not mind being checked. I can understand why the JP do not like being checked, but I really don't like their reason. Sure, it may be rude in their culture to stare, but that was not the intention of the person checking them. The person checking them simply wanted to see their gear, no offense should be taken. But so long as they are offended, I will ask first.

I remember when I played Everquest that some players did not like to be checked. I asked someone about it, and he said it was an old habit from when he was on a PVP server. Since they lost an item when PKed, it was an old habit not to let people check because people would check someone's gear, then PK them to get an item.

Edited, Tue Jul 27 17:54:57 2004 by Asmodiel
#53 Jul 27 2004 at 5:00 PM Rating: Decent
*
105 posts
Does SE do this kind of thing on purpose??

I don't mind being checked, but yes I might if the text read "<name> stares at you intnesely, watching your every move, glaring at you with malace" or whatever it translates to. If they wanted /check to say something like that, why do they translate it "<name> examines you" in the NA version?

Another thing, I've heard in the JP version of the game, language preference indicates "which languages do you SPEAK!!!" whereas in NA it says something like that "what party preference do you have." These mean 2 completely different things. Do I have a party preference? No. Any PT that gets good exp is fine with me. Do I speak Japanese? No. What's my setting? JE.

Is it really that hard to translate correctly (not word for word obviously, but translate with the same underlying meaning...)

#54 Jul 27 2004 at 5:04 PM Rating: Default
That is so gay, I has nothing to do with the wording whatsoever.

People check each other alot. And there is a damn filter for it.

The people that ***** at you are just the same as the north american trash on this game that do the exact same thing.

<name> examines you.

Examinednoob>> Hey next time ask before you check n00b.
>>Me Hey if you dont feel like seing that you are being examined, maybe you would like to check the filter that prevents you from seing the Privacy Lvl 1 examinations.
Examinednoob>> STFU n00b.

Its pretty much how you see it all the time.

So what explains this behavior.

Its simple.. JACK ***

They are everywhere, they see you all the time.

Get used to it Japanese, North American, and so on.

There will always be pricks in this game. No matter what it says. Its a BS excuse to try and make up.
#55 Jul 27 2004 at 5:05 PM Rating: Good
**
288 posts
Quote:
If tomorrow a large group of japanese players were to start playing only in level 1 armour, I can say for certain that a large group of NA players would be doing the same thing within hours. It's kind of sad, really.


In all due respect Japanese emulate Na in real life more than any NA ingame emulation can make up for.

80% of the youth there look like an NA mall threw up on them.

Whens the last time you went to a north american mall and said "wow, all the kids are wearing japanese clothing lines?"

umm never...

I've never once heard an Na youth singing or rapping in japanese walking down the street, but in japan you'll probably meet at least 10 people who swear they are Eminem and can rap just like him. They will show you too, just try to hold a straight face...









Edited, Tue Jul 27 18:15:12 2004 by Jowaa
#56 Jul 27 2004 at 5:10 PM Rating: Decent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
For why NA players don't like being checked sometimes:

I've given up on saying anything about this to other people ever since, between the boat ride from Selbina to Mhaura on out to Windurst, the SAME PERSON checked me at least 15 times. Around the third time, I proceeded to say "Dude, my equipment hasn't changed yet, stop checking me." My equipment KEEPS not changing, and he keeps checking at random intervals, because he's an idiot.

This was with Kwuisatti.

As Kanyashu, I just either /poke or /stare at whoever /checks me.

OT: When you're in a mostly-JP party (like I was a couple of days ago - man, I need more practice at being main healer :-/) and the party breaks up, correct behavior (as far as politeness goes) is to /bow to each of the remaining members, right? :->
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#57 Jul 27 2004 at 5:14 PM Rating: Decent
*
138 posts
Wonderful topic!!!!! At first I was mad that another post about checking a japanese player was posted. But I was wrong. Its fantastic to know why they get so mad! I know most Americans are rude, but I figured checking someone isn't rude! But now that I see the translation, it makes since. Thanks.
#58 Jul 27 2004 at 5:16 PM Rating: Good
**
361 posts
Whenever I talk to a JP or they are in my party, I always greet them with /bow and say my farewells with /bow. I know that is part of their culture, and bowing is a respect thing as well.
#59 Jul 27 2004 at 5:16 PM Rating: Decent
**
827 posts
Den, I think it's just a all-purpose /bow in the direction of the party. Could be wrong. ^^

I get annoyed at checks sometimes. Not because I'm wearing anything special, but it's because someone is either bot-hunting or being an anoying dweeb. I can't name the amount of times I get someone sitting behind me while I'm fishing, constantly checking me. Or, whenever I'm out as a melee job, I get incessant checks from people, for some reason. Is seeing a tarutaru playing a non-mage class that weird?

Oh, and getting /tells while /anon when I'm near a newbie zone (and checks) on the logic of "you're anon, you MUST be a WHM, *** RAIZE MI FRINDZ PLZ"
#60 Jul 27 2004 at 5:23 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Let me start simply. This is an online world. There isn't "actually" any staring. Despite the huge amounts of anime we take in on a daily basis, japanese people are just as mature and realistic as we are. They are not cute, naive bunnies who are sensitive to the slightest penetration (oh the irony of using sexual connotations). Japanese players should be expected to have the intelligence to realize that "staring" has nothing to do with what /check is about, regardless of the in game text. I want to see what they have equiped. I bet if it were possible without filling up the screen with too much information, square would have allowed everyone's equipment to always be public. There are several good reason to know what someone has equipped, and furthermore there are several perfectly innocent reasons to check people you run by. "Staring" is entirely out of the issue, and is a pitiful excuse to make.


I agree with that Altoru said. The text shown on one's screen has absolutely nothing to do with the actual action of "checking." For example, am I staring at someone or am I examining someone (in the sense that a doctor examines a patient) when use a command that pulls up a screen that just shows their equipment, because that is all the /check function does.

If it is indeed that issue that people are taking offense at the text, then Square really did a bad job on this tiny aspect of the game. If anything, Square should make it as mundane as possible and perhaps use something like, "[Name] invokes the /check command on you."
#61 Jul 27 2004 at 5:39 PM Rating: Default
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
pomposity the Mundane wrote:
Den, I think it's just a all-purpose /bow in the direction of the party. Could be wrong. ^^

Can't hurt to be over-polite when you're obviously NA. They may have high-level friends, after all. :->
Quote:

I get annoyed at checks sometimes. Not because I'm wearing anything special, but it's because someone is either bot-hunting or being an anoying dweeb. I can't name the amount of times I get someone sitting behind me while I'm fishing, constantly checking me. Or, whenever I'm out as a melee job, I get incessant checks from people, for some reason. Is seeing a tarutaru playing a non-mage class that weird?

Oh, and getting /tells while /anon when I'm near a newbie zone (and checks) on the logic of "you're anon, you MUST be a WHM, *** RAIZE MI FRINDZ PLZ"

Haven't seen THAT kind of tell yet. I don't go anon much right now (made it a habit from 1-8, then stopped doing it for a while, and I'll probably pick it back up around 20).

I would like to state that the last line of my search comment is typically:

<Valkurm Dunes> = <everybody> <death>

and I'll probably be updating it to read Qufim instead post-20. :-)
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#62 Jul 27 2004 at 5:53 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Posit: You're walking down the street. You see someone with a jacket, t-shirt, etc. that looks really cool! Do you...

a) Run over, yank the back of the collar to you, and read the label, then walk away as if nothing happened...

or

b) Ask the person, politely, where they got the article of clothing?


Yep, I agree with Pomposity and use this analogy all the time.

Another thing that I don't understand is: Would you prefer someone staring at you, or someone checking you? I prefer staring. When I think cheking, I think:

Randomplay opens up your bag and starts going throught it.

So I think us NA's should be more touchy about it. Hmmmm.
#63 Sep 13 2004 at 7:40 PM Rating: Good
well, this certainly makes me want to ask before i check in the future. thank you for this information.
#64 Sep 13 2004 at 11:32 PM Rating: Good
***
1,368 posts
Whoah- you resurrected my month plus old post! Way to go man... a whole new generation will be exposed to the nostalgic flame war of yesterday...ah, memories. I just posted this because people needed to know and all of the flaming started naturally. If you ever forget about the opinions expressed here then write a thread about the JP /check msg and its etiquette and you will see all of these opinions come right back out!
#65 Sep 14 2004 at 12:08 AM Rating: Decent
37 posts
I once saw a comment box on a Mithra in Bastok that said"
"If I wanted to be examined, I'd go to a gynocologist."

Look, we cannot blame translation because WE are the translation. Whatever is written in the Japanese version is original. Why would they create a phrase that is offensive to their own culture? I think the main issue is just privacy of level. Most high levels are anon because they don't want to be flooded with "Help me get my subjob itemz!!12342" /tells. When you /check, you are bypassing that initial privacy and making an assumption based on their gear.

And as far as turning on your filter to avoid seeing it...the point is they don't want to be checked in the first place. The filter does not stop the /checks, it just keeps you from seeing them...totally beside the point.

Personally, I don't mind being checked. I'm an 18rng/nin right now and I'm damn proud of my equipment. If you want to hit /c and stare at it for awhile, go ahead. No loss on my part.
#66 Sep 14 2004 at 1:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
358 posts
maybe im wrong, but if someone has a bazzar up you have to check them right?

also, i personally am still a new player, I like seeing new and exotic equipment and weapons because well it looks cool. Do I do it over and over and over again? nope I just check them once and i leave it at that.

Also I agree, if the japanesse players get upset because of the translation of /check should SE change it in a patch?

regardless of which, thats just my thoughts on it
#67 Jan 20 2005 at 8:30 PM Rating: Default
*
211 posts
Quote:
Regardless of whether it should be offensive, some people just don't want their equipment/level/job to be known for whatever reason. If you /check someone, and they change their equipment, STOP CHECKING THEM!! :p It's the same as someone asking you not to use a particular word around them, or not to /poke them. If they don't like it, don't do it again. I'm getting more and more flak lately for the language I speak, and you're not helping.


X^D When ever some one changes theyre equip when i check em, i recheck them cause i wasnt done looking at their equip. To me, thats just as rude me checking them. lol
#68 Jan 20 2005 at 8:51 PM Rating: Default
i check **** and when they change gear i spam check on them until they give up
#69 Jan 21 2005 at 12:30 AM Rating: Good
**
907 posts

Recently I get checked a lot... more than usual.

Why?

It's because I'm wearing Savage Separates (Mithra RSE Body) and Republic Subligar as a Monk (can't afford a Jujistu Gi yet).

My Mithra is showing a lot of skin.

Annnnd there we go, an explanation for at least 50% of the reason behind checks.

So yeah... take that as you will. Personally I don't mind the checks. Most of the time I just ignore it. Sometimes I'll respond with a /shocked or something. But to me it's not offensive, even if in my case, it's mostly based on a sexual oriented standpoint.

But this whole "getting offended" thing is silly, so silly to the point that I stopped checking my party member's equipment because I'm afraid they might get mad, when as a WHM, it's pretty important to know if my tank can take the hits or not.

{/sigh}
#70 Jan 21 2005 at 12:55 AM Rating: Decent
**
379 posts
It comes down to having a bit of respect to other peoples cultures.

It doesn't matter if it makes no sense to you. Don't claim that they should change and stuff your opinion onto them, respect their decision. There is no "correct" way for it, it all comes down to perspective. If JP players don't like being checked then just ask them before hand, god forbid you spend the extra effort.

Edited, Fri Jan 21 00:59:13 2005 by TakaharuSan
#71 Jan 21 2005 at 1:19 AM Rating: Decent
**
528 posts
I don't have anything to say regarding the NA/JP topic, but there is one thing that bothers me:

<Name> examines you. <Name> then proceeds to turn their back on you, so they can stare as long as they want without you knowing how long.

Then, less than 20 seconds later, after I haven't changed any gear,

<Name> examines you.

My response is always, "Isn't once enough? I haven't changed any of my equipment..."

I don't mind being checked; it's when people abuse the function that it starts to bother me.
#72 Jan 21 2005 at 2:48 AM Rating: Decent
**
628 posts
I was wondering how the heck this topic came back around again and then realized . The last few posters do know that this thread was started months ago right :P Like pretty much most the posts are from september or later . Why bring back the thread 3 months later lol let it die already.
#73 Jan 21 2005 at 2:59 AM Rating: Decent
Compared to how this topic was recieved the last few times it was brought up here, I can see we have made some good progress.

To the OP, thank you for bringing some objective information to the scenario. It's always difficult to have a clear discussion about something when the facts aren't laid out in front of you. At least now we have a pretty clear understanding of what is seen on a JP terminal.

It really says a lot about a person when they find out their actions can be deemed offensive by someone, and their response is, "I don't care, they can do <something> differently if they don't like it."

"I don't care if they don't like to be /checked. If they don't like it, they can turn on their filters."

It's rather disturbing, really. It doesn't represent a huge leap in logic to also assume that the people who say that are also the people that are most inclined to rant about "JP PT ONLY" in search comments, or the JP WHM who ran by them when they were dead and didn't stop to raise them.

You reap what you sow. If you are of the attitude that other people should make adjustments to accomodate your offensive whims, eventually it will come back to you.

To be honest, I think a lot of the tension between JP and NA has died down recently. The whole culture shock seems to be wearing off after just over a year since FFXI went mainstream in North America (Christmas of 2003). I think the majority of the population has reached a conclusion based on their experiences with one another. You'll find NAs and JPs who are willing to cooperate and work together. I believe they represent the majority.

Then you will find JPs that want nothing to do with NAs, and NAs who feel the same way. Their justifications for it are their own, and both sides display prejudices that really have no benefit in any community.

The key, I think, is to consider whether our own individual actions difuse, maintain, or escalate a negative situation. Every time a JP goes out of their way to be helpful or kind to an NA player, they help to diffuse tensions. Any time an NA goes out of there way to do the same (including respecting the customs and expectations the JP developed before the game reach North American shores), they also help to difuse the situation.

When JP go about their business doing what they normally do, they neither difuse nor escalate the situation, it remains the same. When NA players who don't know any better /check people without asking, I would assume by now that most JP are used to it. In my eyes, it's not acceptable to /check someone without asking if you know it's not socially accepted, but in this case, it's not such a major violation that ignorance can't be used as a justification.

It's when JPs are blatantly rude to NAs, and vice-versa, that the situation escalates. NAs spamming emotes in Jeuno, /checking people multiple times over the course of just a few minutes, or just being obnoxious in general, the tensions escalate.

So if we know what can make the situation improve or deteriorate, what benefit is accrued to us by doing things that we know can make them worse?

I was on the airship the other day, and happened to notice someone standing next to me in amazing gear. I send them a /tell using the translator to ask if I could check them ({Excuse me...} {/check} OK?). They agreed, and I checked them. Kirin's Osode, Seiryu's Kote, Optical Hat, Fenrir Earring, Francisca, Kreigsbeil (sp)...the works. He was a fellow RNG, and if there was a better piece of armor etc. he could have had in any of his gear slots, nobody knows about it yet.

I can definately see where people are coming from when they say it's neat to check the gear of someone who has some really cool stuff. There's no disputing that. It's one thing to hear about it, another thing to read about it, but somehow there's something entirely different about seeing it on someone in the game. I think the only thing that would be better would be having all of that stuff myself ^^ (along with the level I could use it :P)

The question remains though, would it be worth embarassing myself and making myself look rude and thoughtless for the sake of examining someone's gear. Even more so when it's so simple to ask first and potentially head off any misunderstandings?

It's like the cheesy cliche, "If you're not a part of the solution, you're a part of the problem."

Sometimes, I almost wish that their weren't laws preventing parents from beating some courtesy into their children from time to time as needed. You know, like in the movies where the portly mother chases the dopey son around the house wacking him over the head with a broom because he's too stupid to realize that he's rude?

Maybe it's just a youth thing. I can remember when I was of that age where I figured that if it wasn't something that could get me arrested, there was no reason for me to not do it. Maybe asking some of the rude NA players to grow up would be unfair and unrealistic (regardless of what their real age is). Perhaps the best we can hope for is that these thoughts and social expectations are something they remember later on when being the "rebel without a clue" loses it's luster and they start to wonder why they're having a hard time getting through life.

I guess we can hope that everyone will eventually reach a point where the wisdom they cast aside as stupid when they were younger actually has practical applications when their success later requires on the cooperation of others.

All told though, I would have to say that I have a much more difficult time practicing tolerance for the clueless NA folk who run around like it's their right to offend anyone for any reason than I do trying to relate to people who have a different culture and a totally different language from my own.
#76 Jan 21 2005 at 3:47 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
It really says a lot about a person when they find out their actions can be deemed offensive by someone, and their response is, "I don't care, they can do <something> differently if they don't like it."


It also says a lot about someone who would seek to change their actions because of the remote possibility that it might offend someone. If a player has a real issue with something commonplace, specifically in a situation where they fully know there is no ill intent, the rest of society is not obligated to change so as not to offend that one individual. It's a personal flaw in that person's character, and the majority should not have to bend to his will. The problem lies not in those who do the checking but in those who are actually offended by it.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 269 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (269)