Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I am completely baffled by the Karma System HELP!Follow

#27 May 05 2004 at 11:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
aceofwilds wrote:

That mods purposefully tank someone's rating for no reason is just...crazy to me. You're supposed to be the mods, the examples to follow.


The mods haven't done it. It's some users who have decided to take matters into their own hands, and call for a karma hit on someone.

aceofwilds wrote:

I don't know if new user's ratings start at 0 or 3.00, but I've noticed that mine has been dead on 3.00 for awhile now.

3.0, which is just fine

aceofwilds wrote:

I'm much more interested in the actual game than posting messages here, so I could care less what it's at. It's the corruption and the silliness of this whole karma subject that bothers me. All I did was create a thread while I was at work to share some laughs; and I find out someone's actually lowered my rating because people were rating me well.

Yep, and it doesn't make much sense. Don't worry about it though, as long as you don't drop below the default filter, and you really don't worry about the karma, it doesn't really matter. If people are rating you past the default filter for stuff that is completely non objectionable, then it's a problem, and you should let us know.

aceofwilds wrote:

Thanks to all for their support though, and good luck with this whole karma thing...I hope you can teach the mods what it actually means.

Not sure what you mean by that?
____________________________
Do what now?
#28 May 05 2004 at 11:34 PM Rating: Decent
It's the email that did it. I saved it as a .txt straight out of Outlook.

I'm not doing any editing on that post.
#29 May 05 2004 at 11:40 PM Rating: Decent
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
aceofwilds wrote:

That mods purposefully tank someone's rating for no reason is just...crazy to me. You're supposed to be the mods, the examples to follow.


The mods haven't done it. It's some users who have decided to take matters into their own hands, and call for a karma hit on someone.

aceofwilds wrote:

I don't know if new user's ratings start at 0 or 3.00, but I've noticed that mine has been dead on 3.00 for awhile now.

3.0, which is just fine

aceofwilds wrote:

I'm much more interested in the actual game than posting messages here, so I could care less what it's at. It's the corruption and the silliness of this whole karma subject that bothers me. All I did was create a thread while I was at work to share some laughs; and I find out someone's actually lowered my rating because people were rating me well.

Yep, and it doesn't make much sense. Don't worry about it though, as long as you don't drop below the default filter, and you really don't worry about the karma, it doesn't really matter. If people are rating you past the default filter for stuff that is completely non objectionable, then it's a problem, and you should let us know.

aceofwilds wrote:

Thanks to all for their support though, and good luck with this whole karma thing...I hope you can teach the mods what it actually means.

Not sure what you mean by that?


If you work here, I'd sure like to hear what you plan to do about abusive users like this LadyofDarkness person, who is apparently heading up some kind of little "gang" on your forum that wants to control who's rating goes where. If you're comfortable having some little "evil clique" that runs your forum for you, that's one thing, and I'd sure like to know so I can find another place to hang out. I live in America, so I don't tolerate a bunch of facist pricks who think they're the master race.
#30 May 05 2004 at 11:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Don't worry, they can't actually do too much harm. It's mainly Lady rating people down, and just one person won't hurt if enough people rate up.
____________________________
Do what now?
#31 May 05 2004 at 11:44 PM Rating: Decent
Danalog the Vengeful Programmer wrote:
Don't worry, they can't actually do too much harm. It's mainly Lady rating people down, and just one person won't hurt if enough people rate up.


No, it isn't harmless. I've moderated a forum before, and I can tell you that if you allow users to behave like mods, they'll believe that they are, and so will everyone else. Here you have someone who has clearly and purposefully been abusing your forum, and you're letting them continue to post here. Rules have no meaning if there is no consequence for breaking them.
#32 May 05 2004 at 11:44 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,674 posts
Meabh the Charming wrote:
and I'll admit that I was one of the people who rated you as "decent" rather than "excellent".


Meabh, the big problem with what happened was not only were people trying to "check" his rating, but it was in such an extreme way. Like I said, one of his posts was just about to get filtered because people were throwing out "Awfuls", apparently, as though if they didn't, he'd become a Guru.

What sort of respectable, and rational person with rating capability goes to the extreme of tossing out "Awful" just to try and keep in check someone's karma rating?

I actually took the time and did the math, off the top of my head on what the first few posts were rated when I made the comment, before people began to rate some of the posts up to counter this ...

4.06
2.28
1.66
3.00
3.00
3.00

... that averages a 2.83333333 ... you get the idea.

Please. Anyone. Someone tell me how that is "right" or "justified?"

If anyone feels they would like to go back and find some archived pages from pre-rating up of several posts in that thread to help Ace out, feel free to do so.

Anyway ... I just really don't see the point behind why that happened. If you have a bone to pick about the karma system, pick it with the administrators and the people who made the karma system. Don't go and make examples of what you will do to "enforce" this system by swooping in and rating down someone for having a great, informative, or funny first post.

Believe me, you'll do a lot better by going to the source and making a case and giving ways to fix the system, compared to just abusing the system and saying you're doing it for the sake of keeping things "balanced."

Edit: Jeez, I take my time making this post, and now it's some half dozen below the one I was quoting. I'm pretty slow tonight, aren't I? :-(

Edit #2: Hello, my name is "Verbose," and I am an Edit-aholic. -_- I just want to add ... I know everyone says "Don't worry about karma," "It's not a big deal" ... however, whether it is important or not, using an integrated part of a forum is still a responsibility. Important or not, people usually do care about their karma.

Edited, Thu May 6 00:52:06 2004 by ResidentLune
#33 May 05 2004 at 11:51 PM Rating: Good
***
2,880 posts
Lady I'm not interested in the karma war going on. I don't care. To this moment the only thing I know of that karma affects is the color of my name...which I couldn't care less about.

It was that I was being slammed out of the blue, and the fact that the thread was destroyed that bothers me.

And as for this:

Quote:
Do keep in mind though, that I do read everything posted in my journal, and since it has no affect on ratings to Nuke in a journal, I will nuke indiscriminately, and that there, I can see your IP.


Lady: I was as kind as possible in the post I put in your Journal, the entire post was saying "please stop posting political issues in the joke thread I started". Go ahead and nuke the post...I was trying to take the discussion offline and directly to you since you seemed to have a problem with me...I'm not sure how that possibly upsets you. To be clear: I have no interest in your rating, I haven't rated you once.

Please let me give you a piece of advice though: Don't threaten me by saying you know my IP. It's easily discoverable information so I'm in no way scared/threatened by you, even if you knew how to do something with it I wouldn't recommend it as it's from my machine at my work. And I don't think you wanna be tryin to ***** with the machines at my work ^_^.
#34 May 05 2004 at 11:54 PM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
ResidentLune, please look at Lady's post. You'll see that we have been discussing the karma system with the admins for awhile now. It's still going on, and they're just as frustrated with the way things are turning out as we are. Yes, I acted rashly and I'm the first to admit it. I publicly apologized to Ace as I felt it the right thing to do. I don't think the admins are to blame for the situation, nor do I think Lady is either. Are the ratings down fair? No. They've been done, however, and sometimes with good intentions. We're all caught up in the karma problem and right now, the best thing we could do is stop rating people before thinking seriously about why we want to rate them up or down. And, yes, I'm at the top of the list of people who need to do this.

Thank you, Ace, for being understanding about the predicament. I look forward to your next post here. ^_^

/M
#35 May 05 2004 at 11:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Meabh the Charming wrote:
ResidentLune, please look at Lady's post. You'll see that we have been discussing the karma system with the admins for awhile now. It's still going on, and they're just as frustrated with the way things are turning out as we are. Yes, I acted rashly and I'm the first to admit it. I publicly apologized to Ace as I felt it the right thing to do. I don't think the admins are to blame for the situation, nor do I think Lady is either. Are the ratings down fair? No. They've been done, however, and sometimes with good intentions. We're all caught up in the karma problem and right now, the best thing we could do is stop rating people before thinking seriously about why we want to rate them up or down. And, yes, I'm at the top of the list of people who need to do this.

Thank you, Ace, for being understanding about the predicament. I look forward to your next post here. ^_^

/M


You don't think that you people are to blame for maliciously attacking a new member here, for no other reason than for the fact that people ENJOYED his post? I don't know where you people are from, but you're all sick. You're a bunch of *****, and if there was any sense of order on this forum, you'd have been banned as soon as you admitted to taking part in this action.
#36 May 06 2004 at 12:00 AM Rating: Decent
aceofwilds wrote:

I haven't submitted any ratings yet positive or negative. Not even against "Lady" who seems hell bent on being my nemesis.

That's not the case at all, and like I stated above, I wrote my first comment poorly.

I hope you stay. The post was great and I'm sorry I derailed it during the "karma discussion". That was meant to be a simple hijack, but it went on a little too long and people stopped coming back.

Meabh is a regular in our exiled group as well, and comes here about as often as me. She stumbled across our OMG!!! thread at 10 posts, with a karma rating of 3.00, right after a person with the screen name "RafikiMonkey" started positive karma-bombing us throughout the whole thread.

I wrote:
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=10&mid=1080248365399491325
Read the entire thing, even if it takes you a week. The origin of this entire issue can be found there, and there are around 15-20 times when the subject of ratings comes up. I'd suggest against giving this thread a rating, since it has been Nuked twice already, and even an awful rating brings it up.

Or for the short, (but not nearly as descriptive), version:
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=10&mid=1080248365399491325&page=8#1082484759553427325


When you've got a thread with 3000 posts in it, and everyone's getting rate hikes, it annoys a lot of the people who worked their asses off posting guides and useful information to get their precious titles. I worked hard to become a Sage, but Rafiki just made it look like a sham.

The point is, we all took a lot of criticism over this, and it's left quite a few of us bitter, and trying not to let things get out of hand again.

I apologize for the guinea pig thing as Lune called it, but I do think that the reason was fair enough to those of us that have taken crap from this forum.

Don't leave because of that though.

If you want to see the other side of this fiasco, (and I was frustrated there for a while), click on User's Journal above.
#37 May 06 2004 at 12:00 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,674 posts
Meabh the Charming wrote:
ResidentLune, please look at Lady's post. You'll see that we have been discussing the karma system with the admins for awhile now. It's still going on, and they're just as frustrated with the way things are turning out as we are. Yes, I acted rashly and I'm the first to admit it. I publicly apologized to Ace as I felt it the right thing to do. I don't think the admins are to blame for the situation, nor do I think Lady is either. Are the ratings down fair? No. They've been done, however, and sometimes with good intentions. We're all caught up in the karma problem and right now, the best thing we could do is stop rating people before thinking seriously about why we want to rate them up or down. And, yes, I'm at the top of the list of people who need to do this.


I'm not saying you are not. I never implied that you are not debating the system, trying to work kinks out, or anything. Nor did I say that you did not apologize. My point was, simply, please do not do things like what happened in the other thread just to keep things "in check." People who would do things such as that make karma victims out of innocent people all for the sake of a colored name that goes atop your average score.

Yes, you are talking about the system. Yes, that is very admirable, and kudos to everyone who is putting the time and effort in to trying to talk about it and figure ways out to make it better. No one is taking away from that. My only point was that what happened went to far, and I felt bad because had no one said anything, he could possibly be even lower than the starting point.

That's all. I'm not trying to rub salt in the wound. The point of those numbers were to show, exactly, what could have happened and to make it a more sharp point as to why it is a bad idea.
#38 May 06 2004 at 12:04 AM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
...

All banning is done at the discretion of the admins. From the looks of the Asylum, they're pretty cool and understanding people. ^_^

Besides, this is just a forum.
/shrug

Smiley: bowdownAdministrators
#39 May 06 2004 at 12:04 AM Rating: Default
Okay, okay. Things are moving fast here.

Ace took some time to write his even as I was writing mine. Just read the crap I posted, and read what I wrote and you'll see why so many of the older posters are bitter.

That goes for you too Asako. I read through each of those while researching them, and I know you can too.
#40 May 06 2004 at 12:06 AM Rating: Decent
LadyOfHolyDarkness, Eater of Souls wrote:
aceofwilds wrote:

I haven't submitted any ratings yet positive or negative. Not even against "Lady" who seems hell bent on being my nemesis.

That's not the case at all, and like I stated above, I wrote my first comment poorly.

I hope you stay. The post was great and I'm sorry I derailed it during the "karma discussion". That was meant to be a simple hijack, but it went on a little too long and people stopped coming back.

Meabh is a regular in our exiled group as well, and comes here about as often as me. She stumbled across our OMG!!! thread at 10 posts, with a karma rating of 3.00, right after a person with the screen name "RafikiMonkey" started positive karma-bombing us throughout the whole thread.

I wrote:
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=10&mid=1080248365399491325
Read the entire thing, even if it takes you a week. The origin of this entire issue can be found there, and there are around 15-20 times when the subject of ratings comes up. I'd suggest against giving this thread a rating, since it has been Nuked twice already, and even an awful rating brings it up.

Or for the short, (but not nearly as descriptive), version:
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=10&mid=1080248365399491325&page=8#1082484759553427325


When you've got a thread with 3000 posts in it, and everyone's getting rate hikes, it annoys a lot of the people who worked their asses off posting guides and useful information to get their precious titles. I worked hard to become a Sage, but Rafiki just made it look like a sham.

The point is, we all took a lot of criticism over this, and it's left quite a few of us bitter, and trying not to let things get out of hand again.

I apologize for the guinea pig thing as Lune called it, but I do think that the reason was fair enough to those of us that have taken crap from this forum.

Don't leave because of that though.

If you want to see the other side of this fiasco, (and I was frustrated there for a while), click on User's Journal above.


So that's your excuse for hijacking the forum and passing judgement on who "deserves" to be a sage? How can you claim to even care about helping out this forum when all you've done is turn it into an object for your own self-edification? You think that you're some kind of Internet vigilante charged with protecting the forum from...what? New users? Respecting people who aren't you? Grow up, turn off your computer, and get some perspective before you try to interact with human beings again.
#41 May 06 2004 at 12:06 AM Rating: Default
Meabh the Charming wrote:
...

All banning is done at the discretion of the admins. From the looks of the Asylum, they're pretty cool and understanding people. ^_^

Well, considering that they call people, and admins for that matter, ******* and get away with it, even if the admin posts in the thread later, I'd say yeah.
#42 May 06 2004 at 12:07 AM Rating: Default
Meabh the Charming wrote:
...

All banning is done at the discretion of the admins. From the looks of the Asylum, they're pretty cool and understanding people. ^_^

Smiley: bowdownAdministrators


Which separates them from you quite nicely.
#43 May 06 2004 at 12:07 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,674 posts
... Asako. Calm down, alright? Your attitude -- and the use of the word "****" (God knows we've had enough of that word in the Uberlink thread) -- isn't really helping keep this thread keep any sort of rationality to it.
#44 May 06 2004 at 12:10 AM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
Wow. I make a mistake and suddenly I'm evil? Hmm.

w00t! Evil party with Ace as the guest of honor! Smiley: cookies for everyone!
/twirls a sound maker


Sorry, but I think the Smiley: monkey ran off with the cake. ^_^;
#45 May 06 2004 at 12:11 AM Rating: Default
ResidentLune wrote:
... Asako. Calm down, alright? Your attitude -- and the use of the word "****" (God knows we've had enough of that word in the Uberlink thread) -- isn't really helping keep this thread keep any sort of rationality to it.


You're right. Fascist is much more specific to what I'm talking about.

Quote:

fas·cism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fshzm)
n.

1. often Fascism
a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.


Oppressive, dictatorial control is exactly what you and your cronies are currently trying to exert over this forum, and you have no right to do so. If you want to rule with an iron fist, buy your own server, make your own forum, and lord over it all you want.
#46 May 06 2004 at 12:12 AM Rating: Decent
It could be worse.

I'll post it, though I doubt Asako will take the time to read it before spouting a comeback.

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/ubbnew/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=018062
#47 May 06 2004 at 12:13 AM Rating: Default
Yes, I know it's unrelated.
#48 May 06 2004 at 12:14 AM Rating: Decent
Meabh the Charming wrote:
Wow. I make a mistake and suddenly I'm evil? Hmm.

w00t! Evil party with Ace as the guest of honor! Smiley: cookies for everyone!
/twirls a sound maker


Sorry, but I think the Smiley: monkey ran off with the cake. ^_^;


You didn't make a mistake. A mistake is something that was accidental...you obviously did what you did quite purposefully. If anything, you could argue that you regret it, but regret is meaningless. Murderers often have remorse, but it doesn't make them any less guilty. And to bring back an unpopular analogy, *****, regardless of if they were simply 'following orders', still went on trial.
#49 May 06 2004 at 12:14 AM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
Well, this place has certainly started heating up! I think now is perhaps the best time for me to make a grand exit...

Ace, darrrrliiing, I look forward to your new posts and promise not to touch the rating button for a week! Muah!
/blows an air kiss and waves goodbye

Smiley: laugh
#50 May 06 2004 at 12:18 AM Rating: Decent
**
881 posts
WHOA. Stop the levity.

WTF. Comparing a bad judgement call in a freaking online forum that has nothing to do with real life to murder?!?!

Smiley: rolleyes

That's it, y'all, I've done my best to correct my mistake and lighten this thread up a bit. Goodnight!
#51 May 06 2004 at 12:18 AM Rating: Decent
*
55 posts
Wow...Lady...glad I never got everquest...

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 143 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (143)