Quote:
if he was truly tryin to be racist dont you think the language woulda been a bit more harshe than negro, african american and black?
The point was that most people don't have this much trouble describing another person.
I didn't assume the main character was white, but for damn sure he wasn't black.
Most people I know don't identify themselves as Black African-American Negros, and certainly not as stupid ones, at that.
I don't know about the OP (the person writing, as opposed to the character).
He could be black. But I doubt it.
This isn't about choice of words per se, or censorship, or being politically correct. It's the question of whether what you say is reflective on what you think.
Again, the only time personal descriptions arise in that story is when he encounters the kids in the park. They can't just be thugs or bullies or whatever, they have to be black. I'm sorry, but it does suggest the author stereotypes this way in his mind.
It's easy to say it's just words on a message board, and fine, so they are.
But if those words reflect an attitude that I can't live in your neighborhood, or can't get a job with your company, or can't date your sister, then you need to examine why you choose to write what you write.
Quote:
Plus some of you have to lighten up on the racist /butthurt. I'm Irish, I hear jokes demeaning Irish all the time. Doesn't mean I have to take it personally...
And the OP, and people who tell demeaning jokes, don't have to take it personally when someone questions whether or not it's just a joke.
Not getting upset at a joke at your expense is one thing.
Letting a person remain a bigot is another.
Edited, May 3rd 2007 7:57pm by Turnerbrown