Cleric or EnchanterFollow

In general which class has it easier finding groups between a Cleric and an Enchanter?
Also which class is most useful to groups between the 2?

Chanters will not find grouping easy untill lvl 16 when they get haste / slow and breeze making them a usefull addition, however they will never be as required as clerics. they are more fun to play though but get used to dying thats what chanters excel at.
You will have a cleric to rez you in the group so it will be ok.

I sort of disagree, many classes can fill the roll of healer, but I would argue that an enchanter makes all the casting players better in a group(with clarity/KEI). I hate grouping without a enchanter. However, if we have a Druid or Shaman healing they can do a good job of it, especially with clarity, or KEI. SO I say provided you have another priest class, enchanters add just as much to a group. I usually let the enchanter do all the slowing too, then my shaman concentrates on healing and melee debuffing. Seems to be just as viable as having a Cleric with no clarity/KEI. So in the end, I would pick whatever you like the best, both classes wil find groups easily. I always take a chanter if we don't already have one, and I think you will find that most people are the same. Another good point with clarity/KEI is your hybrid tanks never run out of mana and thus there is no downtime in your chain pulling.

I was gonna get out my soapbox and start spewing class propoganda, but I'll just answer the question instead.

I don't know about clerics, but I average about ten to fifteen minutes to get a good group.

If you told me to make up my ideal group and you said I could have either a cleric or an enchanter, I'd take the enchanter hands down.

Chanter, Pally, Druid, BL, Mage, Wizzy =).

** Please note that I am obviously biased, but I tried to be objective.