Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I guess Verant/SOE can kiss my A*SFollow

#52 Jan 28 2004 at 8:48 PM Rating: Default
sbs wrote:
Quote:
Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the Special Olympics.

Even if you win you are still retarded.


Smiley: yippee

/Agree Patrician


*spelling

Edited, Wed Jan 28 17:12:35 2004 by sbs


since you decided to ignore me last week
sbs wrote:
/ignore Leiany
and this is MY thread (which means i don't own it but aprx. 25% are my posts INCLUDING the starting one) you agreed to something you know NOTHING about - VERY WELL DONE! *ROFL*

Otherwise your just a bigmouth who /ignores only to take it back next day.

choose wise *grin*
#53 Jan 28 2004 at 9:47 PM Rating: Good
****
5,372 posts
Observing you is fascinating, like a car crash.
#54 Jan 29 2004 at 4:03 AM Rating: Default
Patrician wrote:
Observing you is fascinating, like a car crash.
If you observe from inside one of the crashing cars -be my guest :)

PS: It begins really to make my day that everytime I prove something you guys react with some helpless babble.

Isn't there at least a dedicated female EQ-player out there who shows some class&quality in arguing?
#55 Jan 29 2004 at 4:19 AM Rating: Default
Patrician wrote:
....each class has a set of armour quests , which admittedly many people skip (because the armour is old and has been replaced by better gear from later expansions) unless they want to do them for role play reasons. The quests however are there. ......
Now THAT is a piece of valuable information! That seems to perfectly fill the gap betwen the "final task" of the GMs and the Epic. And that Rod of Insidious Glamor makes me drool already...I can't wait for them stunties to BEG my Elf buying their stuff *hehe*
/thanks patrician heartily

Quote:
In another thread of mine I was told over and over what a moneygrinding company SOE was and that i shouldn't expect anything but motivation by greed from them and their designers.

Patrician wrote:
....If you call that greed, fine. To me it is just good business....
did really I call something greed? *sigh*

Edited, Thu Jan 29 04:21:24 2004 by Leiany
#56 Jan 29 2004 at 6:31 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
***
3,166 posts
Quote:
PS: It begins really to make my day that everytime I prove something you guys react with some helpless babble.


I think I have yet to see you "prove" anything. You have a lot of opinions of varying qualities. You are fond of stating them and then going rabid on anyone who disagrees. Your ability to carry a rational argument is not evident by any of your performances on this board.

On this thread you have found another game with a different TS sytem than EQ. It is aimed at a different target audience. If it seems to suit you more than the EQ tradeskills then fine. It certainly "proves" nothing about the validity or otherwise of the EQ tradeskill system.

In fact as has already been said it doen't really sound like a tradeskill system at all but you'd have to play it to find out.



____________________________
Wherever I go - there I am.
#57 Jan 29 2004 at 6:56 AM Rating: Default
The "prove" was aimed at sbs /ignoring me and still reading my postand patricians reaction to that...but i have to admit its hard sometimes to track which answer targets on which sub-topic, thats why I'm notorious for quoting ;)

But on topic - even if there was no WoW (which also the EQ-addicts on this board will give a try) I'd still wish TS in EQ was different.

And if its widely accepted to rant about nerfed/didn't nerf classX/itemX/dropX on this board (and these rants all are about gain/loss of advantages NOT improvementsit should be allowed to critizise part of the system for lack of playability/excitement/fun-factor without being told to either get a job at SOE or torture myself for years with EQ-TS before I may dare to critize.

Now for the funny part:
2004
Leiany: EQ TS really pisses me off.
Majority: Play it as long as we do then you can rant. And why dont you move your moronic *** over to WoW?

2008
Leiany: EQ TS still pisses me off.
Majority: So why haven't you moved your moronic *** over to WoW 4 years ago then?

*ROFL*


Edited, Thu Jan 29 06:59:38 2004 by Leiany
#58 Jan 29 2004 at 7:03 AM Rating: Decent
well is it me or is every online blizzard game i hyave played and i played alot have a heck load of hackers cheating makeing chars the highest lvl and haveing so good of gear that u cant die will i think that they just trying to make there name good because most of there games i played are ment for hackers loomat diablo and warcraft my firends have so many hack tools for them its not funny what are they gonna try and do when the hackers come and start hacking the game to make it treable ino they make new oatchs but i have seen new tools that can work even with the new patchso i stick with eq cause at lest they trying harder with hackers the blizzard is.



ps. i no i spell bad
#59 Jan 29 2004 at 7:24 AM Rating: Default
Somehow I missed the point - grammatically spoken even LOTS of them! *LOL*
#60 Jan 29 2004 at 1:23 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
in real life ( yes i know eq is not real life) nobody is perfect at anything especially when learning so too never fail seems pointles to me no learning if you're perfect


"In real life" if I was making a sword and screwed up I can remelt the metal and try again, I wouldn't lose 5 pounds of steel into a black hole because I made a mistake. "In real life" if I tear a piece of cloth, I can use the cloth for a smaller section of what I'm sewing.

That was one of the few things DAoC got right, if you fail attempting to make something you may lose a piece or two of raw material, not the whole pile.
#61 Jan 29 2004 at 1:35 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Leiany wrote:

Shouldn't the "majority of this board" somehow agree over SOE on the long run?


Where in the world would you get that idea???
#62 Jan 29 2004 at 1:39 PM Rating: Default
Dunno, but I guess i had something figured out today.

It's that kind of "I love this b***h - I hate this b***h" relationship, right? ;)

Edited, Thu Jan 29 13:41:12 2004 by Leiany
#63 Jan 29 2004 at 6:53 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Well, it does look like the WoW TS system is going to be different then EQ's (seems obvious). What I find interesting is the way in which it's different. I also don't think you can compare the two straight across.

WoW TS system looks a heck of a lot like most of the gear quests in EQ. Let's see. I must have some pre-requirement (level and/or faction). I then must collect a set of specific quantities of hard to get components. I then "combine" them in a no-fail way and get an item back that's vaulable.

Sounds exactly like the Velious armor quests actually. And the newbie gear quests. And the class quests. And well... most of the quests in EQ that grant gear. Um... EQ has that already *and* a tradeskill system...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#64 Jan 29 2004 at 9:05 PM Rating: Default
...as my hubby and me had a bit too much wine at dine (pun intended) I'd rather say EQ has formidablegear quests and a trades-kill system *LOL*

good night....nighty night.... ;)
#65 Jan 30 2004 at 2:08 AM Rating: Decent
EQ tradeskills are horrible. They are a grind and serve very little purpose until the very high end game.

IMO tradeskills shouldnt be a grind, they should be interesting and ive played at least a couple of other MMOGs that have done this much better. The problem with these other games is that they got tradeskilling right and not much else. UO, AC2, DAoC, SWG, HZ, even FFXI do a much better job concerning tradeskills than EQ.

I like EQ, hell i should ive been playing it for 5 years now, but the tradeskills are not even close to what keeps people playing this game. If tradeskills are your main attraction to a MMOG your in the wrong place.

As far as WoW tradeskills are concerned i guess we will see, but a no fail combine method seems great to me. Its not just like any noob character will be able to make the best stuff off the bat. There will be level limits and skill limits in place and items that you need to skill up will be difficult to acquire which offsets the no-fail route IMO.

Also calling WoW "EQ for Dummies" is pretty funny considering thats exactly what present day EQ is compared to when it was released. This game has been dumbed down in so many ways and made so much easier that its hardly recognizable.

Btw grind!=challenge.
A challenge is doing something that is difficult, not doing 100 mindless/easy things in a row to gain a skillpoint. IMO its much more a challenging to go to a zone full of dangerous creatures and finding a drop that you can make an item with without fail, than it is to find 200 items in the bazaar and grinding out a few skillpoints and items that you will sell to a vendor.

There are many things that EQ does right compared to other MMOGs but tradeskills are not one of them.
#66 Jan 30 2004 at 3:24 AM Rating: Decent
[quote][/quote]"In real life" if I was making a sword and screwed up I can remelt the metal and try again, I wouldn't lose 5 pounds of steel into a black hole because I made a mistake. "In real life" if I tear a piece of cloth, I can use the cloth for a smaller section of what I'm sewing.

That was one of the few things DAoC got right, if you fail attempting to make something you may lose a piece or two of raw material, not the whole pile.




a valid point and totally true but my point was that it shouldnt work every time no matter what and yes in real life you could reuse what got messed up but in eq if you never lost parts on a fail then a skill level one person could get the stuff for a 250 trivial and keep trying until he eventual made it
only having to get the ingredients once
again that seems way too easy
#67 Jan 30 2004 at 3:40 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
There will be level limits and skill limits in place and items that you need to skill up will be difficult to acquire which offsets the no-fail route IMO
If there's skill limits, then you're still going to have to grind up your skill on lesser items. If the items are difficult to aquire, you're still going to have to grind and camp to get the junk you need to skill up so you'll eventually be able to make the item you actually want.

Most tradeskill items, at least for mundane things, should be vendor bought in my opinion. I find it silly that you can't buy pelts at vendors in EQ as a standard part of their inventory, but you can buy an infinite amount of gold bars. I find it a little ironic that in one breath Leiany laughs that cloth armor is mob dropped because 'we must be too stupid to know how to make it' or complains that you have to farm silks for thread, but then lauds a system where you have to chase down mobs for rare steel drops to make a sword in the next. I suppose the WoW people are too stupid to open a mine and get their own metal ore?

In my opinion, stuff like pelts, ores, precious metals and gems (up to a point), thread, baking supplies, arrow shafts, etc should be available in infinite quantites. You shouldn't have to adventure to be able to make a mundane sword, shield, backpack or necklace. To make magical or exceptional equipment should involve adventuring and finding the rare crystals, dragon scales, giant sea urchin blood or whatever. You should have a chance of failing a combine but, depending on what it was, get some materials returned. Failing a steel breastplate should return some ore, failing a backpack might return some leather and failing a magical dagger may ruin everything since the spoiled crystal alloyed steel is unusable. And it makes perfect sense that you would have to make a lot of shields and greaves before you have the skill to make a magical helm. In short, I'd never say the EQ system is perfect, but it's really no worse than the WoW system you propose.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#68 Jan 30 2004 at 5:56 AM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
I find it a little ironic that in one breath Leiany laughs that cloth armor is mob dropped because 'we must be too stupid to know how to make it'.
which is still ridiculous, isn't it?
Jophiel wrote:
or complains that you have to farm silks for thread,.
that is nothing but a LIE - I never said that, neither directly nor indirectly. I was complaining that skilling up involves endless farming.
Please don't lie again.
Jophiel wrote:
but then lauds a system where you have to chase down mobs for rare steel drops to make a sword in the next. I suppose the WoW people are too stupid to open a mine and get their own metal ore?.
OK, you post without reading the whole thread, thats excusable. But you didn't even read the OPENING post I guess - at least you didn't look at the link otherwise you'd noticed:
"As a weaponsmith, you maintain a stock of iron ore and grinding stones (needed to polish and sharpen the weapon to a fine razor's edge). You take a quick trip to the forge to smelt the iron ore and coal into steel bars."Hell - there are even SCREENSHOTS showing that!
So it's EQ where you are too dumb for extracting our own ore - in WoW youhave to!

Better research next time please.....


Edited, Fri Jan 30 06:00:20 2004 by Leiany
#69 Jan 30 2004 at 10:07 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
which is still ridiculous, isn't it?
Eh. Casters can make raw silk. Melees can make tattered. I don't see a need for crafted cloth armor, but sure. But seeing as how you complained that tattered was worthless, what would be the point of including cloth with less AC for the same skill levels? NPC vendors already sell cloth armor anyway, so it's not like it's lost technology to the rank and file of Norrath; there's just no point in making it over what's already available to start tailoring on.

My point about the silks was your gripe about endless farming of greens. It was, however, poorly written and sounded like you were complaining about silks coming exclusively from spiders given the second half of the sentance. Mea cupla.

Quote:
So it's EQ where you are too dumb for extracting our own ore
Huh? You buy ore off the merchants. They have lots. I'll admit that there are people who feel differently and love resource collection, but I don't play EQ in hopes of a game of SimMiner.

Like I said above, I feel NPC vendors should carry infinite amounts of the stuff. After all, they're supposed to be the townsfolk and common tradespeople who go out and farm (in an agricultural sense), mine, cut down lumber, weave cloth, tan leather, etc. Infinite quantities may be unrealistic, but it prevents things like in FFXI where people cockblock others by camping the vendors and buying up all limited items the moment they 'spawn'.

Edited, Fri Jan 30 10:11:08 2004 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#70 Jan 30 2004 at 11:09 AM Rating: Default
Endless quantities of basic things are sure a must for Vendors.

But Iliked for instance the quest where you had to give the Vendor unrefined ore to make him stock high quality ore for you to buy at last :)
#71 Jan 30 2004 at 11:21 AM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
there's just no point in making it over what's already available to start tailoring on.
thats true for cloth, but there are also 3 Vondor sold bows which have no similar recipe and they buy/sell in a complete different pricing scheme as the hand-made bows.

Same goes for Vendor-sold Arrows and that mysterious "Leather Armor" pieces that are only Vendor sold, they don't even drop and of course have slo a different buy/sell rate than the handmade stuff of abvout the same AC

More examples? How about that save-adding Elven Cake (forgot the name) you can buy in Kelethin. No recipe for that either, a greater secret than the Misty Thicket Picnic.

There are simply 4 economies in EQ: vendor-sold, player-made, player-quested and mob-dropped. Unfortunatly they don't work together they just overlap with disatrous concequences sometimes (10p for an Ornate Blood Sword which adds to stats? Just Throw away the 4(!) molds you need for your blacksmithed Long Sword *lol*)


Edited, Fri Jan 30 11:24:40 2004 by Leiany
#72 Jan 30 2004 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I won't even get into the buy/sell rates at NPC merchants. Obviously they're not based on any sort of reality since there's no way for them to accurately follow a player based economy. Weapons_Merchant_02 in Freeport isn't going to say "Crap! People are selling Zrathxil forged cutlasses for 10pp! I better lower my Axe prices from 15pp to 6pp!" NPC merchants primarily serve for "flavor" in town (i.e. Boomba the Big), to dispense stock stuff (rations, peridots, bags, etc) and to give out plat for "worthless" things like rat whiskers and beetle legs that drop in lieu of money. I suppose they also provide a quick way to dump equipment for cash though PC prices are nearly always better (with some exceptions -- the only thing that keeps some Kunark armor pieces priced at 400pp+ is because merchants will give 398pp for them).

Anyway, you can already make Shaded Rockhopper Hide armor which is essentially fancy leather with a Trivial in the 30's. After that, you can make studded leather, reinforced leather, etc.

You seem to think that if an item is sold, it should be able to be player fabricated. I disagree, so long as there's something close enough. No, you can't make an "Arrow", but you can make Class 1 Field tipped wooden arrows for less money and with a low trivial. Why would you want to make an "Arrow" under those circumstances? Why would you want to craft a "Hunting Bow" instead of a rough hickory hemp stringed bow? You can't make "Steel Plate", but fine steel is higher quality anyway and comes directly after banded and ornate chain. I mean, they could have added a "Steel Plate" set in between and bumped up the fine steel trivial rates, but that doesn't serve any real useful function except to force people to create even more armor variants, which you complain are all useless anyway given available mob drops.

The Steel Sword/Ornate Blood Sword argument is more one of mudflation than a flaw in tradeskills. On the other hand, no one is forcing you to make longswords. Hell, they're not even a normal skillpath. If you're saying that low end tradeskills aren't especially valuable, I'd agree (less making components for high end tradeskills -- threads, padding, etc). But that's an issue about rate of mob drops, plat sinks, server age, etc.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#73 Jan 30 2004 at 12:28 PM Rating: Excellent
My first inclination was to suggest that perhaps a good hard shagging, but rather than assume you are able to come up with the cash necessary, I will go a different route.

39 years on this earth to me indicates that you might at least have one or two cases of human interaction under your belt. Maybe I am wrong, but I would think that in those you would have learned that there are some things one doesn’t do in a conversation where one wants constructive input.

Don’t act like a complete f*ckwit.
Don’t instinctively snipe at every response.

Those two things alone would greatly improve the responses you receive.

Your posts here remind me of a dog who’s been beaten one to many times. Now every time master comes your way you **** yourself and lay down. As a whole we may very well be below your superior intellectual level. It’s not likely, but it could happen. If it’s true, having realized it, you may want look elsewhere for your advice. If, however, as I presume, you are truly a retarded mongoloid with a touch of schizophrenia mixed in, You should know that we can probably outlast you. Just my two cents, really. Ignore them if you like. Or respond as to the depths of my lack of comprehension. That appears to be your strong suit, even though you have missed the point of damn near every post here.

Good day.
#74 Jan 30 2004 at 2:43 PM Rating: Default
Well...at least you are sober today I assume from that elegant and nearly typo-free sentences you constructed. *lol*

How you are gonna outlast me if you show up every 2 days (with only 1 of it being sober at best) and then rant in an unoriginal retarded way as if you were getting badly paid for doing so?

Some posts in the last 48 hours made me snarl, some made me laugh...yours just make me *yawn*

But if you got really nothing better to do than trying to get my attention with quotes from the C-movies you seem to collect - be my guest :)))
#75 Jan 30 2004 at 10:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Well...at least you are sober today I assume from that elegant and nearly typo-free sentences you constructed. *lol*

Assume nothing. I can construct better sentences blind drunk and face down in a gutter than you could being ghostwritten by a winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature.
Quote:
How you are gonna outlast me if you show up every 2 days (with only 1 of it being sober at best)...

It's not difficult. My experience with your contributions indicate that the latest of your posts is as complete a set of your thoughts as the entire collection. Superflous and banal at best. Any more than that and I would be wasting my talent. Today happens to be your lucky day though, as I am bored and retorts for you serve as good a diversion as the round file for balled up paper.
Quote:
...and then rant in an unoriginal retarded way as if you were getting badly paid for doing so?

That's hardly the case, sunshine. I am a most original ******, if one ever existed. And I do it for free. Consider this my community service, or charity work as it were. Donating my time to take care of you is reward enough in itself.
Quote:
Some posts in the last 48 hours made me snarl, some made me laugh...yours just make me *yawn*

Were I as outmatched as you I might do the same. It's tiring work reading so high above your intellectual level. In this I can't really offer my sympathy, as I know not how it feels, but I can feel bad for you, so I will.
Quote:
But if you got really nothing better to do than trying to get my attention with quotes from the C-movies you seem to collect - be my guest :)))

Sorry dear. Much to your disappointment, I'm sure, you are getting original material. That being the case you are sure to find yourself continuously behind. Again, not a circumstance I am familiar with, but feel free to share how awful it feels to be trapped like a second-rate hack in the back of the pack.

Edited, Fri Jan 30 23:02:44 2004 by MoebiusLord
#76 Jan 31 2004 at 4:11 AM Rating: Default
As i don't belive you can stay sober over a period of more than 6 hours you probably write all this mindless babble in the rare hours you can get a grip on the KB in advance - and that's why they all are out of context and uninteresting.

Sorry that you don't get enough of my attention for more than these few lines - while you sacrificed 2 or 3 of your precious and rare sober hours to put a whole page together - you just don't deserve more...
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 50 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (50)