EQ Item |
RE: Rumor. |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Decent |
|
6 months before your post ;) |
EQ Quest |
RE: Nice |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Decent |
|
In a perfect world, all quest write ups would be this good. |
EQ Item |
Might be real |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Good |
|
If it was a fake, I am sure someone could have come up with a better effect than what was listed...
Fury of the Chosen:
Decrease Stamina Loss by 1 (L1)
Increase Strength by 15 (L1)
Increase Armor Class (AC) by 6 (L1)
Increase Dexterity by 20 (L1)
Duration : 18 seconds
Still, without a d |
EQ Item |
Bar fight |
Darknyss |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Excellent |
|
I guess it's like a big bar room brawl... you beat on em with a mug, start tossing some chairs, and start making mobs toss beer bottles at you and you keep em to drink =) |
EQ Item |
Neato |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Decent |
|
It's like the Embalmer's Skinning Knife that summons band-aids while fighting, I would think. Nothing like a cold one in the middle of a battle, I always say.
Sneakster of Fennin |
EQ Item |
RE: bards and agro |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
LAFF! sorry i couldnt resist. there is no way in hell u could out damage a 60 rogue. People dont call monks and rogues damage dealers for no reason. I would still have trouble thinking a bard outdamaged an sk pally or ranger. sks can dot for .. what .. 1152 damage ... and say u did out damage a rog |
EQ Item |
RE: Rumor. |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
hehe caught me too 8) |
News Posting |
RE: ....... |
Anonymous |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
1. Newbies is not a synonym for child. You can have a 50 year old newbie.
2. EQ is not the cause for your F's. It is your inability to keep control of yourself. You didn't have to be there for a raid. A "guys i would like to but i gotta study" is accepted as a reason not to partici |
EQ Item |
Not lore |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Decent |
|
Its not lore! ;) Dual Wielded Drunkenness =p |
EQ Item |
Drops from |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Excellent |
|
Arch Lich Rhag'Zadune |
EQ Item |
RE: Sweet Twink |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
Except for the fact that it's untwinkable |
EQ Quest |
LMAO |
Anonymous |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
Heads up!!! this isnt just to get your newb weapon back. at lvl 50 any sk may use the faction gained with sk/necro's in cab. east to do the quest for the greenmist sword. if you havent seen the greenmist sword i suggest you go look it up. it is hands down one of the best 1hs sk swords in the game. a |
EQ Item |
Looks great |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
I've had mine a while and it looks great on vah shir with the /dopropertinting on. The ac helps a lot and fully buffed I break the 1000 ac mark now. With full ToV on I can tank almost as well as rangers. (the last bit was a joke)
Anyhow, whoever said that Beastlords don't get attacked, you obviou |
EQ Item |
RE: General |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
Doesn't yet work for me at lvl 42. Does anyone know when it works? |
EQ Item |
SK/Pal item |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
No self respecting dual wielder would ever equip a shield during combat. So basically, this is an SK/Pal item.
Too bad they didn't add Int/Wis casters to the class list or make it BACK usable as well as SECONDARY. If they had, this item might actually have been desirable. |
EQ Item |
RE: Sweet Twink |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Decent |
|
I am not sure why you are saying 'untwinkable', it is neither lore or nodrop. If the stats are to be believed it is only magic and would be a great twink item.
McKenzie Schott
52 Paladin
Mymuzaak McKenzie
29 Bard
Deborakay Schott
30 Cleric
Edited, Thu Apr 25 23:09:35 2002 |
EQ Item |
All this arguement about the Alteration... |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Decent |
|
Is stupid.
All skills max out at 255. No bonus item can take you above that limit.
So who gains the most OVERALL benefit from this Mask?
Shadowknight.
(And I don't even play one!) |
EQ Item |
RE: Sweet Twink |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Good |
|
To be more specific...
This item is twinkable, as any low level character could obtain and equip the weapon. However, a low level character would not *want* to equip this weapon. It has a recommended level of 51. The further you are *below* the recommended level on an item, the worse the stats |
EQ Item |
RE: Might be real |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Excellent |
|
If you look a little closer, that effect is pretty awesome... because the 18 second delay never comes into play. The effect on the item is (Worn)! You get the effects simply by equipping the ring. This makes some sense, as the listed effect adjusts stats that are not adjusted by the ring directly |
EQ Class |
RE: Wood Elf or Human |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Excellent |
|
At level 30 or so rangers get night vision, so that is not a problem, but go half-elf or woodelf so human rangers can remain rare =)
Skulreaver Swiftblade
55 Outrider
Crimson Legacy
Dualwielder Extrordinaire
<Human Ranger> |
EQ Item |
Lguk |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Decent |
|
May as well go to Lower Guk or spend 700pp for Adamantite Epolets |
EQ Class |
haste |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Default |
|
Is this correct?
Haste item of 40% haste.
Weapon ratio 16damage 29 delay.
The Haste drops the delay by 40%, -
29 x .4(haste) = 11.6 (reduced delay)
29 - 11.6 = 17.4 ..Delay with haste.
So, is this the correct formula? Just guessing.
Please respond. |
EQ Item |
omg |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Sub-Default |
|
damn, this really sucks then...
- Jick |
EQ Item |
WHAT, NO CLERICS |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Excellent |
|
I being of sound mind and only half drunk herby log a official comlaint on behalf of most holy men. Who shall i dare say, need a stiff drink after tending to the needs of our comrads in their quest for glory.For a healer such as i not to be able to qwench the thirst of my battle hardened freinds dur |
News Posting |
U buy, It work, U responsible |
REDACTED |
Apr 26th, 2002 |
Excellent |
|
When you buy a product, and it functions as it should, anything that you do as a result of the product you have brought into your home, car, etc.. is your responisbility. Like the McDonald's case. Should the cup have had a defective bottom, and the coffee fall out as a result, then the case would ha |