EQ Class |
RE: Mages = Useless... |
REDACTED |
Oct 7th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Well i play a wizard and a mage but my wizard is much harder to play but much easier to get into groups cause i can evac and blast very hard. Although my mage is much more fun to play solo , because its a a minor wizard and a tank all in one, I do admit we are useless in a group and i dont deny it b |
EQ Class |
RE: Just an Idea |
REDACTED |
Oct 7th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Personnaly i think this is just another way to nerf mages, it doesnt help us enough to fight solo any better at higher lvls. Sorry but this is a horrible idea
|
EQ Class |
RE: 35 |
REDACTED |
Oct 7th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Two letters OT , its a great place to solo and get kick butt exp , you can solo anything blue with a water or earth and almost 3/4 your mana hehe. I takes a bit to med up but well worth getting out of hell lvl
|
EQ Class |
STUFF |
Anonymous |
Oct 7th, 2001 |
Default |
|
HELLO... if anyone could spare some armor for my new warrior that im making i would greatly appreciate it im in Kunark,field of bone.My old warrior's name is jabazi and my server is the seventh hammers contact me plz either on this website or send me a tell in the game!!!!
HE IS A |
EQ Class |
RE: Need Help for Hunting |
REDACTED |
Oct 7th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Excellent....only thing is that if you're fighting in the Karanas...a shorter run to the bank would be through the Gorge of King Xorbb to Misty. Then one zone over in Kithicor forest (advisable to go in the day at your age), there is a ranger trainer in the middle of zone.....Follow the path towards |
EQ Class |
Armor |
REDACTED |
Oct 7th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Rapshar, a lvl 19 iksar warrior, at the moment is wearing mostly banded (gorget, sleeves, shoulder, chest, pants, and boots) and 2 orc fang earings, 2 silver amber rings, a burynai face, turtle shell helm, bracer of scavenging, iksar scaled gloves, cab scale bracer/cloak, and a purity belt. I have f |
EQ Class |
Do they really suck? |
Anonymous |
Oct 7th, 2001 |
Default |
|
After playing a SK to 41 and a Warrior to 37 I've realised something.For me Warriors are not as fun as Hybrids. I like the spells,But the problem is no one wants to group with a hybrid.I've wanted to try a ranger but high lvl RL friend of mine say don't bother cause they're AC sucks, don't fool you |
EQ Class |
where should i hunt |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
i am really confused about where i should be hunting right now at lvl 30 up until 40. do u have any recomendations that would be helpful ythx
|
EQ Class |
where to hunt at my level |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
hey my name is razorjack on the rallos-zek server. currently im a level 18 dwarf warrior. im in lake of ill omen. the exp is great but loot is crappy well except for ther goblin bracers. anyways i have a 2hand slasher im using called the runic carver. what weapon should i have i wanna duel weild and |
EQ Class |
Unloved Mages? |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
I started playing this game with a human (big mistake!) mage and absolutely loved it....till I hit 24. At that point I found myself broke without any good gear in NK camping that half elf bard at the wiz spires. So I decided to make an erudite mage and now I'm almost to 18, love the new stats, and |
EQ Class |
my questions |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
I have a level 16 Mage and I love it so far i've read all of these posts and i'm starting to think that I should make another char but I like the Mage too much to just quit. I also made him Human and everybody says Humans make a crappy Mage but I think mine is good. So I am really confused on what t |
EQ Class |
RE: Unloved Mages? |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
In my opinion, the Erudite makes a more suitable Magician. The Erudins Base Stats for Intelligence is the highest availabe, and since Magicians are INT based casters then you made a great choice.
The more INT you have, the more Mana pool you have and all casters know, more mana = More power.
A M |
EQ Class |
RE: Unloved Mages? |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Ty! I think all I needed was a little pep talk. I have read a lot on mages now and I'm determined to get mine into the higher ranks. One thing I am going to have to learn is chain casting, sounds like that needs to be second nature for it to work safely. I just didn't want to loose the option of |
EQ Class |
RE: my questions |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Well, in my opinion, humans don't make the best Mage -- but that's not to say there bad either. They just have the lowest starting stats and don't get night vision. These are both easily fixed with all the gear you can outfit em up with and once you get int to 200 I don't think it wouldn't matter |
EQ Class |
RE: Unloved Mages? |
REDACTED |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
I'm sorry to say it but you will find grouping less and less post 50. At this stage of the game you can literally spend hours lfg and not get one. As of right now we are a non esential part of any group. Groups are constantly looking for a cleric, chanter, shaman, and 3 mele's. As for the summons we |
EQ Class |
*sigh* |
REDACTED |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Ok since its Rangers and Sks having it out there ill give you a new target. ME!! Pallies can beat you all... Muhahahahahahaha :P
Amath
47 Paladin
20 ranger
25 Monk
Ps. I dont think rangers or sks suck i think you play your class to its Str and your weaknesses dont matter to much. *shr |
EQ Class |
SKs |
REDACTED |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Kildiar you rot!
Please grow up and take your bad self elsewhere we are weary of your 15 yr old mind.......leave us!! you really do sit in front on these things and eat chips all day dont you!!
Makrus
lvl 20
Zeb Server
|
EQ Class |
RE: To Kildiar |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Vallon Zek, eh? I know I'll be 'bout 20 levels lower than you, but lv 60 is max lv and one day, one day I'll chatch up with you... I'll meet ya in a year or so, Kildiar :) (Unless you regret your insults on the rangers and wants to cry for mercy...) You haven't seen the last of me, Kildiar...
Tir |
EQ Class |
Future mages please read |
Anonymous |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
While looking here I see a trend of posts that involve "Mages = useless", and so forth. I didn’t see any from about a year or so ago, but here lately I have seen a lot of people that are feeling this way, myself included. I also have to agree that the mage class is useless post 50 and will e |
EQ Class |
RE: Dual Wielding |
REDACTED |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Put your best weapon in primary, because you always swing with that, only sometimes with offhand.
The exception is if you have two weapons with similar ratios, put the faster one in primary, because you get a bonus on primary hand starting at level 30.
For example, berserker sword 12/36 and wr |
EQ Class |
RE: where should i hunt |
REDACTED |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
I took my warrior from 32nd to 38th within the space of 2 weeks, playing probably an hour or two each day on average in Iceclad. Cougars are blue and at 32nd lvl they would give about 1/2 a blue per.
The Warrior I was playing is slightly twinked, mind you. He had a regen BP and a Wurmie, so |
EQ Class |
The Warrior Race |
REDACTED |
Oct 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Well there are lots of ways to determine which kind of warrior you would like
Faction...some warriors are liked in certain places..and in not someplaces.....Ogres do not have good faction with many people..but have better stats....Barbarians are good because thier str, agi, stam, and dex is good, i |
EQ Class |
RE: also large bronze |
Anonymous |
Oct 9th, 2001 |
Default |
|
thanks do u think my lvl. 32 clr. could SOLO ne of these ogre guards? or whould i have to duo wit my friend?
|
EQ Class |
RE: WIZARD CRAP |
REDACTED |
Oct 9th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
LOL 320pp for a wurmy, and the rods are no drop bud.. plus the toughest one is in LGUK, what else do i need to say lol your an idiot |
EQ Class |
RE: aye |
REDACTED |
Oct 9th, 2001 |
Excellent |
|
Two words: NO LIFE! |