·Theme
| Page | Subject | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQ Item | lodi vs CotW | Oct 14 2003 7:25pm | Decent |
| Preview: | I think I would rather have this back as oppose to a lodi. Mainly because of HP's and mana every bit of hp's count, although the extra 15 raw ac and ... | ||
| EQ Quest | No pet? YES PET! | Jun 27 2003 11:10am | Decent |
| Preview: | Everyone says don't summon pet. I tried it this way at first and was going through mana way to fast, I am not a twink so I don't have jbb all that goo ... | ||
| EQ Monster | Dropped a GBS | Jun 06 2002 10:55pm | Default |
| Preview: | During a gm event(not halloween) was running to halas, and this guy agroed me. I was lvl 45 or so he conned light blue to me, he resisted 3 or 4 of m ... | ||
| Type | Subject | By: | Posted: | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| News Posting | Toughest mob in Disease Plane | Anonymous | Oct 24th, 2002 | Default |
| Hehehe if the Disease Plane is like a body and like a mouth does that mean there will be.................................... Bob's Tounge hits you for 100,000 damage and uses siliva to digest you as u turn to a pile of liquid for 10,000! 8P | ||||
| EQ Item | a rust covered model | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Excellent |
| This ulak was drop by a rust covered model tonight in the Plane of Innovation. Conned dark blue to me at 53. I was fortunate to get this due to NBG. A serious upgrade for this kitty beastlord. | ||||
| EQ Item | OMG | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Default |
| level 10!? well, i know what im doing soon! hehe, man alive, 2 hard to get up resistances, and, yes AND, Spell Haste 2my goodness, im going there now. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: omg i want these | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Good |
| I think he meant "young" as in level... | ||||
| EQ Item | please link | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Default |
| Please link a site where quest is described in full. I can't seem to find it on this site. Ogre bashed me in the head once and suffering some brain damage). Help much appreciated. Niaden Necro 52nd Circle Torv | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: please link | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Excellent |
| http://eqtraders.com/quests/potc_intro.htm | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: its real | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Default |
| I looked for irn or anything with this, you simply missed the o? Fists of Iron? Edited, Thu Oct 24 09:37:41 2002 | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Make it no drop | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Good |
| Perhaps making new items no-drop for say 3 months then later dropable could limit farming in the short term and allow people who want to get these items access to them. | ||||
| News Posting | Get a freaking life | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Excellent |
| 1) Whatever, no way to verify it one way or the other. 2) Posting Anonomously protects your from any accountability whatsoever for the things you say. In your case, this is a major benefit. You seem to think that the GMs do not have a knowledge base, and therefor should be required to attail | ||||
| EQ Item | FUNGUS HAMMER | REDACTED | Oct 24th, 2002 | Excellent |
| kinda like a fungus hammer with stats.... cool. im thinking about going to get one. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Ranger? | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Excellent |
| There are a few reasons why this is also Ranger-usable. If you look, you'll see that these four classes can use 2HS. They are the *only* four classes that can use it. Also, given the new Ranger PoP AA (Punishing Blade, I think) that grants the possibility of a triple attack with two-handers, it's | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Ranger? | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Excellent |
| I totally have to agree that it is a novelty to see that a ranger has finally getting the chance to show off its full potential with a weapon like this but i don't see it happening all that often seeing as pallys and sk are definetly taking a lead in that MT position, i don't think they will ever re | ||||
| News Posting | EQ | Anonymous | Nov 6th, 2002 | Sub-Default |
| The majority of you are in denial. A symptom of addiction. Biased or not, EQ is addictive. I've experienced this, and not one of the players I know or have known are free from EQ addiction. It's also alot easier for younger(high-school age) players to live with/deny the addiction, having (for the | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Ick | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Default |
| Would have to agree with this assesment. Great stats on the item, but the thought of it is rather disgusting. But, I would still use it =) | ||||
| EQ Item | PoD = Ick | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Default |
| Seriously, do you expect ANYTHING from the Plane of Disease to smell like flowers? What gets me is all the items that drop here with CHA bonuses. Just be glad that EQ is not a full-sensory experience. If it were, NO ONE would EVER go to POD. I mean, come on...the zone in? ewww | ||||
| EQ Item | Drops from Mr. Hanky | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Default |
| Mr. Hanky the Christmas Poo? (not helpful, sorry, but I couldn't resist) | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Ranger? | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Decent |
| Enfiniti, It actually makes more sense for Rangers to get a high damage two-handed weapon than Sks/Pals. The only exception are one-handed weapons. You may not realize this at level 49, but Rangers are an offensive melee class. This means that in high level encounters, they are supposed to h | ||||
| EQ Item | ummm, is this a weapon? | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Decent |
| I just have to ask, this thing goes in your primary melee slot, but I dont see damage or delay listed? Is this a hammer that you can't attack with? Corakis Swiftfist 22 Iskar Monk Kanaellars 16 Dark Elf Cleric Lanys | ||||
| EQ Item | Not a weapon | REDACTED | Nov 6th, 2002 | Decent |
| It's a focus item basically. Just happens to look like a hammer. Very nice focus though. Do healing spells count as "beneficial" as per the Enhancement Haste spell description? Or does this mean just Buffs? | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Ranger? | REDACTED | Nov 7th, 2002 | Decent |
| Honestly, though I don't disagree with rangers being able to use this weapon, I must disagree with some of your logic regarding Paladins and Shadowknights... In my experience, Knights (paladins and shadowknights) are defensive tanks. We are meant to deal rather considerable damage to an enemy, bu | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Finally! | REDACTED | Nov 7th, 2002 | Default |
| only the parsing will tell, however for the shadowknights and paladins who can't dual weild, I dont think damage will be as hampered as you think. Long ago 2hs and 2hb were shunned by many as being inferior in damage output to one handers, the high delay damage bonus was created specificaly to | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: omg | REDACTED | Nov 7th, 2002 | Default |
| actually , maybe the site hasnt updated it yet, but the effection is not affliction efficiency 3 (which would work 60 and under) but it is affliction effiency *4* (working 65 and under) | ||||
| News Posting | sorry | Anonymous | Nov 7th, 2002 | Default |
| The farce sorry but you a moron. Who the hell takes their cats for a walk? | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Ranger? | REDACTED | Nov 7th, 2002 | Default |
| good aruguments all around, all im gonna say is that its been my experience that most rangers that would be in a possition to actually obtain this weapon normally just like to bow kite, and usually have their am3 skill, unless they happen to be in a tanking role in a small exp group i dont really se | ||||
| News Posting | Does anyone remember him ? | REDACTED | Nov 7th, 2002 | Decent |
Contact: Private Message
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC