·Theme
| Page | Subject | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQ Item | vendors | Nov 06 2004 12:17am | Decent |
| Preview: | Abysmal Sea Viliani I´Xvoyt loc : -200 +200 +100 52 pp | ||
| EQ Item | Graphic? | Apr 28 2003 2:04am | Decent |
| Preview: | Does this one have the same purple chain graphic look or maybe none? | ||
| EQ Monster | Is there any use for the loot? | Apr 25 2003 5:18am | Decent |
| Preview: | Is there any use for the loot of this mobs (beside selling of course).....maybe for Alchemy? | ||
| Type | Subject | By: | Posted: | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQ Item | wont effect bard | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Default |
| mana part of song wont effect a bard but hps it will. still awesome lute instant cast time is very nice i think. Singdarra eversong | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: OMG | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Default |
| Thats just verant that's lazy. All items should have req and rec lvl if its required. Take rewamp CT items. They first had rec lvl only. And all could use it. Then they changed it to req lvl but still only said rec. After a while most of those items got its real stamp. | ||||
| EQ Item | On Skill Modifying Items | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| Does anybody know whether or not Skill Modifying items _actually_ raise the skill they Modify or not. If so, an item with <<Specialize: Alteration + 3%>> might very well push a level 65 character over the previously set "maximum" statistics for this charm. | ||||
| EQ Item | unfair | Aleahna | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| I am 32 Druid, and have had this for awhile. I already have the spell, and it totally sucks that I cant access the spell via the earring! Not fair Verant to make us wait for the effect when we have the spell! | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: New use | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Default |
| i got one of these (I don't know if it is left or right side) from stalkers in PoN. Also got some other words. | ||||
| EQ Item | also drops from | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| Dark elf pillager in gunthak | ||||
| EQ Item | Odd that they let Beastlords use this one | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Default |
| Hmmm, I think they put the Beastlord class on this one by mistake, considering they have no skill with one hand slash. Otherwise, it looks like a fairly decent weapon for the ones who can use it. Fast, decent damage and extra STR and HPs are always useful to a Melee class [:smile:] | ||||
| EQ Item | Lucky find | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| Sat down on the Ravenclaw to hunt for the Deepwater Emblem for my L48 cleric. Got extremely lucky and the captain spawned on the next cycle. My specializations aren't quite completely maxxed as I reset them a month ago. 50 in the minor specializations and 170 in the major specialization yielded | ||||
| EQ Item | Is this the same? | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| Is this the same parchment used in spell research? | ||||
| EQ Item | Quest | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| FOund the guy too. He is indifferent but the guard next to him is not perma-rooted, and he came charging for me, wood elf ranger. I talked to the quest giver and he sends you to talk to Eriod Haerod, whoever and whereever she is, giving you a symbol of brotherhood. Hacing seen the charm I can t | ||||
| EQ Item | ???? | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| why would they name it the veil of the "Warlord" if it is a caster veil??? | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ???? | REDACTED | Mar 17th, 2003 | Decent |
| I believe it is because it drops off the warlord in the mines :P | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ???? | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Default |
| Makes sense to me | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: wow | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Decent |
| Rangers, rogues, monks would pick this one for str dex agi. Those are melee classes. They need those stats. And another thing: Allakhazam REALLY don't need another flamer, please go away! | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ???? | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Decent |
| Still, the guys got a point. They wouldn't call it the "Mask of the Arcanist" and make it a melees only mask, would they? I really hate they way they name things alot. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Lucky find | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Decent |
| Does anybody own this charm who has got all his specialization skills maxxed? If this would result in a Spell Haste III effect, this would be the hell of an item to have... Cthulhukin, Troll Shaman of the 56th season, Rodcet Nife | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ???? | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Default |
| Um you haven't been around long. Yeah they would make a mask of the arcane and make it melee only usable. Most items are named after the mob that drops it, not for the class that uses it. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Lucky find | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Good |
| I was playing 59 Druid and 45 Cleric at the time, and checked the item with both characters. Max stats for the 59 Druid are +4 WIS/INT, +9 HP/MA/MR, and no focus effect. This will probably change with level and/or AA points. 6 pairs of Oxidized legs, and two weeks later... Capt. "Omfgstar | ||||
| EQ Item | Bank. | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Decent |
| There is a guy called Pergan Darkcloud right in the bank building in Jagged Pine that sells cheese.. =) | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Odd that they let Beastlords use this one | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Decent |
| Unfortunately, at the level recommended to get this on Alla (which, admittedly, is not always accurate), this weapon is quite poor. It's useless for a Bard, the damage is sub-par for a Rogue/Ranger at this level, and the taunt would be very low (the DoT is barely worth mentioning, and there's no DD | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ???? | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Default |
| Why can't the warlord be a sorceror or something? Who says he has to be a muscle laden barbarian warrior? Warlord just implies that he leads a huge army or something, not that he's necessarily a warrior. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ???? | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Sub-Default |
| /agree | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Belt | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Decent |
| Just to verify. All melee classes can use this belt. I had one drop last night off of Xi Xaui. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ???? | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Default |
| not to flame ya pr get into a fight over it but in the 50-65 range a durration of that the warrior class is changed to a warlord so in sticking with name gamming they have a point and it would be that muscle laden barbarian or even that short burly dorf that most people like as a warrior | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Yep | REDACTED | Mar 18th, 2003 | Negative |
| To reach Behemoth at least one person needs a Factory flag to open the door for the rest of the raid. | ||||
Contact: Private Message
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC