EQ Item |
RE: Bah |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
You're right...sabres do have a point. Its not designed to be used tho. A sabre is a very unbalanced weapon and is heavier at the tip than the hilt. It is designed to be used from horseback and primarily as a slashing weapon. The weight at the end is to allow it to carry thru the victim with out eff |
EQ Item |
Ok VI has a sick mind |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
According to all the new ToV items VI wants to see ToV farmed by guilds so to speak as cruel revenge for dragons and there left claws having a higher IQ than them
42nd Hum Ranger
Norrath Fellowship
Quell server |
EQ Item |
OMG |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Ok this is a first VI put 0 weight on an item and hasnt put monk as a class for it hehe. I am not flaming it and nor do I care that its not a monk usable item although MANY monks will flame claiming this should be "MONK ONLY" due to the weight alone
42nd Hum Ranger
Norrath Fellowship
Quell Serv |
EQ Item |
....hmm.. |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
/sigh i see people whining cuz warriors dont have the best ac .. and cuz hybrid classes can beat us warriors in duels.. and do more dmg.. know what i say? WHO GIVES A CRAP?!? ITS A GAME!! PLAY IT!! DONT LIVE IT!! =)
45th WAR DWF
veeshan
innoruuks hidden ones |
EQ Item |
RE: OMG |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Good |
|
Its plate, simple as that. And I really don't think "many" monks will flame, just one or two.
Weight is a pretty incidental attribute of armor, save, of course, to monks. But just because it has no weight doesn't mean its designed for monks, just as if it has charisma doesn't mean its designed |
EQ Item |
This IS good for a rogue you "n00b" |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Rillsong, this is a good weapon for offhand rogue, because 1) it will not proc enough to make that big of a dif. for the agro management and 2) it will ad to the damage nicely when it does proc and just the dmg/dly alone is nice....
And I play a 50+ rogue so don't tell me crap how rogues manage the |
EQ Item |
RE: Bah |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Not trying to be that mentioned flamer (Heaven forbid! Bloody flamers...), but sabres aren't necessarily so unbalanced. Sabres are something of a halfway weapon between the rapier and cutlass, not as heavy and short as the cutlass, not as straight and pointy as the rapier. So, there are some sabres |
EQ Item |
RE: HOLY MONKEY! |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Actually, weapon procs had their aggro factor reduced to almost nil a couple of patches ago. So proc away. |
EQ Item |
Crown of the Kromzek Kings |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
This may be part of the rumored VI's plan to help Monks be less of the all/all tank that they currently are. There was some talk about this after the Twin Cities Fan-thing. Some things I read made me believe that they were aware the monk specific itmes never seemed to stack up to the more all/all ge |
EQ Item |
RE: Ok VI has a sick mind |
Anonymous |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
just FYI...this is no-drop...can't really farm no-drop |
EQ Item |
RE: Why not Paladins? |
Anonymous |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Angel...there are maybe 3-4 one-handed piercing weapons that Paladins can use, and they are all under lvl 20 (or so). That's because Paladins were never meant to be piercers....the addition of the lance-style two-handed piercers is quite nice...and I think very RP'able (love making up words), but w |
EQ Item |
RE: Why not Paladins? |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Yknow, they did make a lot of 1 handed weapons for the paladin and the shadowknight that are very good,as a kind of reward for not getting dual wield. Paladins dont really strike me as the spear type for the most part anyway. |
EQ Item |
warriors |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Who says warriors aren't the masters of combat? In any huge raid, they are the main tanks. Period. No other class can take the punishment and keep the agro such as they. And so what if these leggings are a step up from warrior velious quests? There is a level range for everything, including kael leg |
EQ Item |
RE: Hold on a second... |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Sub-Default |
|
Yup, it is the same Thunderstone. All that hullabaloo about the Beastmaster in Luclin...Beastmaster is just VI's little codename for the Pokemon Master! The uber pet class. Though, you thought buying spell components for stuff like Summon Corpse was bad...think about buying Pokeballs! And watch out |
EQ Item |
RE: Why not Paladins? |
Anonymous |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
they are though nice try, just as much as warriors or shadow knights should be anyway |
EQ Item |
OMFG.... 14dmg 24dly AND 500dmg DOT AND 10%target slow? |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
I think all of you have it wrong.
After the group find this baby on the mobs body... there is only 1 person this should go to.
Not any rogue/warrior/bard/shadowknight in particular, but the one with the highest dex and the one who has a weapon worse than this (which is quite alot of weapons!).
No |
EQ Item |
shaman? |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
AAARGH...why is it that shaman's weapon of choice has lately pointed to piercing types like our epic...but, when a truly awsome spear/trident comes along we are forgotten about? Not saying that shamans are tanks ... but we do malee from time to time. a piercer like this would be a nice option |
EQ Item |
RE: ?? |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Man the equipment list from ToV is just insane. Not just the stats on the items, but the number of them... there seems to be a never-ending supply of new increasingly-uber items from this place. |
EQ Item |
Random uncommon drop |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
This is a random uncommon drop throughout the zone. I've seen two, in three trips to Sebilis. One dropped off a frog near necro camp, the other at disco 1. They will be wielded by the frog if he has it, and don't worry, it won't be fine steel :-).
The rate at which Sebilis is camped currently |
EQ Item |
This + Myrlokar's Dagger |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Hmmm, a rogue puts this in his offhand and the Myrlokar's in primary. Even with the nerf which totally destroyed the incredible uberness of it, now it is only crazy uber, by cutting out the AC, making it 11/17 and cutting the proc to 1/4 the damage for those of you who didn't know, a rogue would d |
EQ Item |
RE: Its official |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Good |
|
Hehe. Okay, if you want to talk balance - take a quick look around for the top end weapons monks can use. Now, take a quick look at the absolute top end weapons that warriors can use.
Warriors potentially outdamage monks, which is something they were never supposed to do. *shrug* That's a bigger |
EQ Item |
RE: ?? |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Good |
|
There's a lot. You have 15 bosses in ToV North (The 11 pet dragons of vulak, Dagarn, Vulak, Eashen, and Ikatiar), named drakes that drop a number of random items, and then the 3 dragons in West ToV. All the North ToV dragons have huge loot tables - you can see a pretty big variety of items. |
EQ Item |
RE: Ok VI has a sick mind |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Sure you can. You just keep giving stuff to guildies that don't have it yet. Sure you can't sell it, but once you are uber you don't need cash for anything except the following...
1) Food & Water (not always even)
2) Hate Stones
3) Sky Stones
4) Tradeskills
Delvekion Ebonstar
Revenant, lv |
EQ Item |
RE: Why not Paladins? |
Anonymous |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Spears and impaling type weapons are definately not very Paladin like. If anyone was to ever think of a Paladin as being in character, he/she would be wielding either a large two handed blade or a lighter 1 handed sword with a shield. Other possible weapons for a Paladin would be a ball and chain, |
EQ Item |
rogues |
REDACTED |
Jul 12th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Rogues should be able to wear this, flame if you will but they can wear plate type armors. =P |