Page | Subject | Date | Score |
---|---|---|---|
EQ Item | RE: Why the DoT? | Mar 14 2004 10:34pm | Good |
Preview: | The dot on the weapon isn't really an issue as far as mez is concerned,if your using it on a Boss Type Mob then your not typically going to be mezzing ... | ||
EQ Item | Drops | Mar 01 2004 5:46pm | Excellent |
Preview: | Drops in the Summoner Ring,it requires a raid to do. | ||
EQ Zone (Bestiary) | RE: HOT mobs | Feb 20 2003 11:26am | Decent |
Preview: | Aye Bards can Lull them I think at lvl 62? or so ,as well you can pull them single with proximity if you are lucky..what we always did when first brea ... |
Type | Subject | By: | Posted: | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
EQ Item | RE: Dual wielding | REDACTED | Feb 14th, 2002 | Decent |
These are awesome ranger weapons for dual-wielding, the low delay is great for keeping my ranger alive while kicking major <bum bum>*edit. Plus what looks better with a centi ls than another centi ls!? | ||||
EQ Monster | RE: Faction hit | Anonymous | Jan 4th, 2002 | Default |
Not necisarily a petitionalble thing. I can think of at least one other NPC that you get a faction hit for hailing. | ||||
EQ Item | not so disappointing | REDACTED | Dec 16th, 2002 | Decent |
The whole point of this item is so that hybrids are given access to items with ID4 without having to worry about a pure caster bitching and moaning about it. Kinidyen | ||||
EQ Monster | RE: # Paladins = ownage? | REDACTED | May 19th, 2003 | Negative |
Friend of mine told me 6 or 7 peeps with Remove Greater Curse were required for IV. Of course, that was a from a not entirely 65 guild with tons of AA... Merely an example. |