EQ Item |
RE: =) |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Yeah, I could have used these on my ex-wife in the Mall. |
EQ Item |
RE: =) |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
OOPS...sorry |
EQ Quest |
RE: Baking |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
The eggs are trivial at a skill of 46 in Baking. Trivial meaning, I have to assume, that your chance of success is trivial, judging by my 4 FAILURES in 6 ATTEMPTS. Thank heaven there aren't 13 other players in the same zone at the same time looking for the same rare drop off the same triggered spa |
EQ Quest |
RE: Well... |
Anonymous |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
I have hailed every guard on both ends of the south bridge & haven't found this quest yet. What is the name of the NPC & exactly where is he or she? Thanks for any help..... |
EQ Item |
RE: Items |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
I went back and rated it good, because it is a good post. However, it wasn't necessary to call the druid that provided him with one of the items a farmer. All the quest items are droppable. Taken with the large number of items to be found and the difficulty of obtaining the particular items for i |
EQ Item |
RE: Mwa ha ha ha |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Not exactly trying to win any popularity contests are you wiseguy? |
EQ Item |
RE: Mwa ha ha ha |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
I may be a little biased, but I would agree that clerics come first, obvously not on this item tho. After that I would prolly put necro's as high if not higher on the line as chanters. Reasoning for this is, although a rather inefficient use of mana in some situations, necro's are usually just man |
EQ Item |
RE: MOHO |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Any toon that wields a weapon in melee should have a haste item - plain and simple. Why you would want to exclude certain classes from increasing their damage when you will be fighting along side them is beyond comprehension. Granted I would probably get all the Warriors and Melee classes outfitte |
EQ Item |
Wha Wha Wha? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Bah, You could slap 100 Int these puppies any it wouldn't make them any better. What a load of shmegma. I...guess...I...MIGHT...take these over my gatorscale, but there are better upgrades I can think of. |
EQ Item |
RE: why not |
Anhari |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Because the effect is summon companion (pet)
Druids do not have pets (yes, you can charm, but not summon pet)
All classes listed either have a pet, a warder, or a familiar. |
EQ Item |
RE: what Level? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Good |
|
The FBSS itself was listed as Triggered haste for a long while on this site - mistakes happen and are corrected eventually.
That said - if it IS triggered it's an absolute must-have item. I highly doubt that, though. Triggered haste items tend to have charges, like the item from Najena (name esca |
EQ Item |
nice for pets |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Being that these are non lore I think they might be pretty nice as pet weapons. If it is a simple quest, it could be worth it to stock up on a few to give to a skellie pet before vampire hunting. |
EQ Item |
thank you Beaon |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Well i read all of the posts about this so far and a couple of people still keep asking about whether to get crushed or chipped. PLEASE read beaons post called newB's it is very useful. If you still don't get it by reading beaon's post, that explains everything u need to know about the black marbles |
EQ Item |
1h Blunt Alternative to Bone Handled Scimitar |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Both dropped in the Grey, both +8 WIS, similar stats. Just a useless observation |
EQ Item |
Cloak |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
The effect on this cloak is the Camouflage? This is kind of like the Elder Spiritualit's Helm, only this is the lesser spell given to druids at low level. I cant believe they wouldnt make this with Superior Camouflage....but oh well. |
EQ Item |
yes Druids get pets |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Give it up hun, Druids get pets .. YES the kind you summon, where have you been? (level 55 druid spell) |
EQ Quest |
Am I too young??? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
I take it a lvl 39 Warrior would not be tough enough for this quest????
Oglethorpe Vengefulblade
39 Warrior Vazaelle
Mandate of Honor |
EQ Item |
RE: MOHO |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
And furthermore...ANY epic equipped rogue should NOT be rolling for CoF anyway since the haste DOES NOT stack with ragebringer. I dont know if the rogues who won CoF that night have their epic, but I can assure you I would be adamant against an epic rogue rolling for CoF... and please note my sig... |
EQ Item |
RE: hurrrrruuuuh? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Just curious why you think you would have to be 50+ to get it? Granted, I have not yet been there, but the this zone is not blocked like the planes. Anyone could walk in and loot an item (with proper escort).
The hole is a good example of a VERY tough, high level encounter area where a level 1 |
News Posting |
P4 vs Athlon |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Why go with the Intel chip when AMD's Athlon totally outperforms the P4? Or is it that Intel users are really suffering with game play?
I am running a 1.2Ghz thunderbird, 384mb ram and a Radeon card and it SCREAMS with all quality options/chars enabled.
If Intel users did their homework, they |
EQ Item |
RE: all three |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
im sorry to burst your bubble bud but if you look at this item and others you will notice there is no dmg on them by holding all 3 you might have +13% to dodge but you wont be doing much dodging on account that you arent using wepons to get any aggro |
EQ Item |
new sword |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
These are selling on my server for peanuts, surprisingly at that if you consider the stats and compatability on this amazing blade. The +5 magic mod does make it 21/29 in sorts, but the +5 damage extra is first passed through the mobs MR resists, so if the mob is highly magic resistant, the 5 extra |
EQ Item |
RE: hurrrrruuuuh? |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
I looted the Dark Assassin Chestplate last week, and it still says Recommended level of 50 (I'm level 59 Rogue). So no hidden proc or effect that I can tell on these items.
Chestplate was AC: 27, Str: +10, Dex +10, Sta +10, HP +15, Weight 7.5
Same classes/races as other items, also no drop.
|
EQ Item |
Interesting |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Definitely not a great druid or cleric weapon either. Only advantage it has over the standard Dark Ember / CGS combo is +10 sv magic and the 2% div mod. You'd be losing str, sta and wis. I guess if you really needed to up your MR it would be useful...
Edited, Fri Dec 21 13:37:16 2001 |
EQ Item |
RE: hmmm |
REDACTED |
Dec 21st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Ha Ha! I bet you wish with these gloves ENC could summon a necro pet....I highly doubt that will ever happen. The pets/class combo's are made with the spell lines and buff spells in mind. Have you ever noticed that casters with buffs usually get weaker pets, and those with no (or only 1) pet buff |