Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Allegory takes a little trip (was forum=28)Follow

#77 Jul 08 2010 at 5:31 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
gbaji wrote:
Exactly how many statistics and "facts" have been quoted in this thread stating that smoking 2-3 bowls of pot a day is completely harmless and will have no lasting impact on your life? Zero, right?

Zero, yes. Luckily that wasn't my point or else you might have something there.

gbaji wrote:
My point is that there are no such statistics, but many people do claim that there are, or at least pretend that there are. As Eske properly pointed out, it's mostly an excuse, but I'm pretty sure if more people treated pot a bit more cautiously as a drug, there would be fewer people falling into "stonerville".

No such statistics, huh? I don't know about "no lasting impact" whatsoever, but certainly not the mental impairment you're implying. A quick Google search turns up dozens of studies, plenty of which support the idea that long-term, consistent marijuana usage is not significantly more harmful to your mental or physical health than ordinary drinking or smoking - i.e., smoking marijuana every day will not turn you into a some mindless zombie.

gbaji wrote:
Something which is fun when you're in your teens isn't quite so fun or cute when you get into your late 30s. In fact, I'd argue that there's not much uglier in this world than an aging stoner. Maybe aging heroic addicts, but that's a rarer and special case.

Some of those aging cigarette smokers ain't too hot to look at, either. If we legislated on that basis though, we'd have to kick you Californians out of the Union.
#78 Jul 08 2010 at 5:45 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:


If you smoke high quantities of pot on a daily basis you're bound to @#%^ yourself over just like drinking yourself into a coma on a daily basis @#%^s up your body.
.


Nah. Ingested properly pot has zero negative physical side effects. Alcohol, on the other hand, will kill you.

What a stupid fUcking thread on this stupid fUcking board with the usual stupid fUcking suspects. It's bogus to ask for statistics proving pot isn't harmful. FUcking prove it is. How about some statistics that show it's harmful beyond the legal ramifications?

You won't find any reliable ones, because it's just not true.

No, but gbaji's vast base of anecdotal information should be enough for anyone...
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#79 Jul 08 2010 at 10:28 PM Rating: Good
The heavy intake of any burned plant material into one's lungs over a significant period of time isn't good for you, there's no disputing it. The problem with finding out *just* how harmful is difficult as pot smokers tend to also smoke cigarettes. However, I've known very few people who smoke as much pot as they smoke cigarettes.

I smoke both. I smoke a pack of cigarettes every two-three days & about an 1/8th of pot a week (that'd be about 60 cigarettes a week to 4-5 joints). I smoke after work (I'm an overnight vampire, so that's at about 8-9am) which also happens to be before bed. I honestly don't drink all that much, on a good night I might drink a 6 pack nowadays & if I've smoked I tend to drink even less (as pot enhances the effect of alcohol).

Am I healthier than an alcoholic? My liver is, but doubt my lungs are. Am I healthier than just a person who smokes cigarettes?

Well, actually, I may be, as the THC in pot has anti-carcinogenic properties. And while you might call me stupid for smoking cigarettes, the nicotine actually makes me smarter.

In conclusion, children; everything in moderation.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#80 Jul 08 2010 at 10:38 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Eh, everyone's gotta have a useless vice. I'm willing to bet that most people who peg drugs as "useless" watch at least several hours of television a week, if not per day.
#81 Jul 08 2010 at 11:51 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Well, actually, I may be, as the THC in pot has anti-carcinogenic properties. And while you might call me stupid for smoking cigarettes, the nicotine actually makes me smarter.

E-cigarettes - as much or as little nicotine as you want, none of the burning plant crap.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#82 Jul 09 2010 at 5:26 AM Rating: Default
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
So, yes I can play this game of denying the obvious stated on this thread, but the reality is some people think it's "cool" to experiment and try drugs, legal or not, which is stupid.



I don't care whether it's cool or not. I do drugs because I enjoy it. I mostly just smoke pot and listen to records. It doesn't hurt my relationships with anyone because everyone I know does it, has done it, or is ok with people smoking marijuana even if they don't. I did coke for a while, but that wasn't out of curiosity as much as being in a place in my life where I was trying to destroy myself, and I made some bad decisions.

Most people who do drugs, don't do it because they think it's cool, they do it because they enjoy it. You have no knowledge of the subject though, so it's fine that you're wrong.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#83 Jul 09 2010 at 7:24 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Driftwood wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
So, yes I can play this game of denying the obvious stated on this thread, but the reality is some people think it's "cool" to experiment and try drugs, legal or not, which is stupid.


I don't care whether it's cool or not. I do drugs because I enjoy it. I mostly just smoke pot and listen to records. It doesn't hurt my relationships with anyone because everyone I know does it, has done it, or is ok with people smoking marijuana even if they don't. I did coke for a while, but that wasn't out of curiosity as much as being in a place in my life where I was trying to destroy myself, and I made some bad decisions.

Most people who do drugs, don't do it because they think it's cool, they do it because they enjoy it. You have no knowledge of the subject though, so it's fine that you're wrong.



Some != Most

So it's ok that you're wrong...


Edited, Jul 9th 2010 3:24pm by Almalieque
#84Almalieque, Posted: Jul 09 2010 at 7:30 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Sorry for the possible double post, couldn't understand this response at first...
#85 Jul 09 2010 at 7:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I've never understood what's meant by gateway drug, unless you mean beer, which makes everything seem like a great idea.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#86 Jul 09 2010 at 7:38 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Tailmon wrote:
I grew up in the 60's and have seen it all. Strangely, all I ever did was drink beer. Drugs never appealed to me. Nor did I need to escape reality. I've watched many of my friends do them and seen the results of it. How many of you went to a Grateful dead concert durring the peak times of the group? They passed around dishes, frisbees full of drugs at them. When you watch a Co-worker go off the deep end at work from years of LSD use you shiver at what can lay dormant for years after giving up drugs. It can be a ticking time bomb waiting to go off. Believe me having to hold down a ranting guy that has spiders crawling on him in the middle of your shift is eye opening. You can glamorize it enjoy them. Smoke your pot. Remember that its huring you in some way. I know it's your life. But, I think your all fools for doing it.
nuf said!
Beer is a reality-altering drug. If abused the alcohol collects in your liver leading to alcohol poisoning. If alcohol is consumed at a rate faster than the body can metabolize it will lead to an alcohol overdose. An alcohol overdose can be fatal. In fact, more people die from alcohol overdosing than any other drug.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#87 Jul 09 2010 at 8:09 AM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
I just love all folks like Alma get all bent out of shape over anyone using drugs that are "Illegal" like in this tread.

There is a huge difference between taking a mind altering substance responsibly and causing harm to self or others.

Most drugs base on organic compounds have been used through out history for religious purposes. Nothing is wrong in seeking a way to expand ones mind when you know what your doing.

The problem is when you start to do any substance to self medicate.

I'm one of the lucky few, who while knowing I suffer from a mental illness (depression) never tried to self medicate with drugs or alcohol.

I was a social pot smoker in my teens to early twenties, and stop when I had children who I felt were far more important then getting high at a party with friends. I also at the same time stopped drinking more then one beer or glass of wine before their bedtime. These days I may have an occasional stout or ale with a meal, but nothing more. I can no longer drink wine due to sulfites. Hard liquor and my stomach don't get along much but for a drop of gin in my tonic water, just enough for the taste.

These days I meditate to expand my mind, but if I knew and trusted a train shaman, I would love to try mushrooms or other natural ways to experience more. They would have to have good knowledge of what medications are not safe to take.

The one thing, I learn is aways be honest with anyone about your health and any drugs you are currently taking.

I no long do sweats, due to the drugs I take for various illnesses. I loved being able to do sweats for a few years before my blood pressure went up. Darn right now I can't even handle the heat way we been having, so hide during the day in the one room I am able to keep cool in.

Don't expect to me respond to any of your posts for a few days. I only got online this morning due to insomnia.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#88 Jul 09 2010 at 1:48 PM Rating: Default
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
ome != Most

So it's ok that you're wrong.


Your argument is still flawed. You're just scared to try anything that might be "different". Open your mind, expand your horizons, discover the new and exciting. One cannot argue against the use of drugs(well, most psychedelic and smokeable drugs, it's pretty easy for anyone to argue against the use of, say, heroin or meth) without trying them. You're just regurgitating what you've heard in the news, at school, from over-protective conservative and neoliberal parents, and the police.

Think for yourself, sir.


____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#89 Jul 09 2010 at 1:52 PM Rating: Good
****
5,159 posts
Grandfather Driftwood wrote:
One cannot argue against the use of drugs(well, most psychedelic and smokeable drugs, it's pretty easy for anyone to argue against the use of, say, heroin or meth) without trying them.

While I disagree with Alma here, this statement is as idiotic as most of the things he's said.
#90 Jul 09 2010 at 2:25 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Grandfather Driftwood wrote:
One cannot argue against the use of drugs(well, most psychedelic and smokeable drugs


They'd certainly pair nicely with your avatar, at least.
#91 Jul 09 2010 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
It's funny when people rail against meth as the evil of evils when you can get it prescribed.
#92 Jul 09 2010 at 8:30 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
ElneClare wrote:
I just love all folks like Alma get all bent out of shape over anyone using drugs that are "Illegal" like in this tread.

There is a huge difference between taking a mind altering substance responsibly and causing harm to self or others.

Most drugs base on organic compounds have been used through out history for religious purposes. Nothing is wrong in seeking a way to expand ones mind when you know what your doing.

The problem is when you start to do any substance to self medicate.


For the record, the fact that it is legal or illegal doesn't change my opinion. Just because glue is legal, doesn't mean it's smart to sniff glue. I simply stated the legality as ammunition for the potential reason why it's illegal in order to combat the thought that it's all political or social. Part of it maybe political and/or social, but you also can't deny the health factor. In either case of harm or no harm, the concept of purposely not being in the right state of mind is at question.

Driftwood wrote:
Your argument is still flawed. You're just scared to try anything that might be "different". Open your mind, expand your horizons, discover the new and exciting. One cannot argue against the use of drugs(well, most psychedelic and smokeable drugs, it's pretty easy for anyone to argue against the use of, say, heroin or meth) without trying them. You're just regurgitating what you've heard in the news, at school, from over-protective conservative and neoliberal parents, and the police.

Think for yourself, sir.


You can't possibly label the refusal of trying drugs as "afraid of trying something new and being closed minded". You're actually being close minded to have that opinion given all of the things in life that people can experience to give them their own personal rush. To think certain substances are the only way is quite silly....

You are failing to understand the concept of being in the "right state of mind" or being sober. I surely can argue against drug usage without experiencing them because my argument is about sobriety.

I see drunkards all of the time acting foolishly or behaving in an alternate behavior. I simply do not want to experience that. I like to know exactly what I'm doing. Being deprived of sleep can alter your bodily functions in similar ways of certain substances. I've experienced that at a low level, so I obviously do not want to experience that at an amplified level.

So, this has nothing to do with being "scared", its all about being smart.

Just because it feels, tastes, smells, sounds or looks good, doesn't mean it's good for you..

Majivo wrote:
While I disagree with Alma here, this statement is as idiotic as most of the things he's said.


You know, its fairly ok to agree with me, you're not going to be "uncool". Besides, you didn't answer my last question to you.
#93 Jul 09 2010 at 8:38 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
You know, its fairly ok to agree with me, you're not going to be "uncool". Besides, you didn't answer my last question to you.


That's untrue, I'm afraid; if he agrees with you he will be very, very uncool.
#94 Jul 09 2010 at 8:51 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
sweetums wrote:
It's funny when people rail against meth as the evil of evils when you can get it prescribed.


If you can get Meth prescribed, then there is a control measure in place which supports what I said about control measures and what EleneClare said about the problem being in self medication.

If all drugs were prescribed and were followed by their said prescription, there wouldn't be a drug problem. The reality is, that isn't the case.
#95 Jul 09 2010 at 8:54 PM Rating: Good
Almalieque wrote:

If all drugs were prescribed and were followed by their said prescription, there wouldn't be a drug problem. The reality is, that isn't the case.


Oh totally, because doctors are just infallible.
#96 Jul 09 2010 at 9:14 PM Rating: Good
****
5,159 posts
Almalieque wrote:
You know, its fairly ok to agree with me, you're not going to be "uncool". Besides, you didn't answer my last question to you.

I disagree with you on most things because you're a moron. If I cared about being uncool, I wouldn't post in the Asylum where I'm as likely to be ripped to shreds as ignored. There's no social pressures behind everyone treating you like an idiot; you genuinely act like one.

As to your question, I made that comment because you were talking about gateway drugs and started listing meth and heroin as though they were in that group. They can't be gateway drugs when they're pretty much the end of the path.
#97 Jul 09 2010 at 10:08 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
BT wrote:
Oh totally, because doctors are just infallible.


I stated that there wouldn't be a drug problem, not a magical solution for perfection.

Majivo wrote:
I disagree with you on most things because you're a moron.


What exactly do you disagree with? I'm willing to bet that you only disagree on a few things and agree or don't disagree with the rest.

Majivo wrote:
As to your question, I made that comment because you were talking about gateway drugs and started listing meth and heroin as though they were in that group. They can't be gateway drugs when they're pretty much the end of the path.


That's what I thought you meant. I don't ever recall doing that, if I did that was obviously a mistake.
#98 Jul 09 2010 at 10:46 PM Rating: Good
Almalieque wrote:
BT wrote:
Oh totally, because doctors are just infallible.


I stated that there wouldn't be a drug problem, not a magical solution for perfection.


Yeah, I realize what you said, ******. It's just so incredibly fUcking stupid, is all.

You see, doctors aren't really God. They make mistakes, they are susceptible to greed, they are human. Some of them are just plain old scum, like any other subset of people. I can't believe I even need to explain this to a so-called adult.


Jesus, you're so incredibly fUcking autistic, I cannot continue to degrade myself by communicating with you. You're like a less clever, cooler version of Ash.

#99 Jul 09 2010 at 10:57 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Almalieque wrote:
BT wrote:
Oh totally, because doctors are just infallible.


I stated that there wouldn't be a drug problem, not a magical solution for perfection.

Actually, that's also false since many prescription drugs are dangerous, over-prescribed (pushed) or both.

Hell. I like to smoke pot (though I've been clean for a year) and I also occasionally pop a vicodin with a shot of whiskey. Might not be strictly safe but, "occasionally" being once every other month or so, I'm no House.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#100 Jul 09 2010 at 11:06 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Majivo wrote:
I disagree with you on most things because you're a moron.


What exactly do you disagree with? I'm willing to bet that you only disagree on a few things and agree or don't disagree with the rest.

Almost everything. What little I do agree with you on, I find myself wishing we disagreed because your style is so damn self-assuring. You're like a gbaji who doesn't care about politics. I'm not going to enumerate all the things we disagree on, but I believe this link should cover the majority of it.
#101 Jul 10 2010 at 7:56 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
BT wrote:

Yeah, I realize what you said, ******. It's just so incredibly ******* stupid, is all.

You see, doctors aren't really God. They make mistakes, they are susceptible to greed, they are human. Some of them are just plain old scum, like any other subset of people. I can't believe I even need to explain this to a so-called adult.


Jesus, you're so incredibly ******* autistic, I cannot continue to degrade myself by communicating with you. You're like a less clever, cooler version of Ash.


I will reply to your message with your own reply

Yeah, I realize what you said, ******. It's just so incredibly ******* stupid, is all.

The percentage of errors from doctor prescriptions will not cause a "drug problem" relevant to our current drug problem and only a complete idiot would think so.

Debalic wrote:
Actually, that's also false since many prescription drugs are dangerous, over-prescribed (pushed) or both.


Prescription drugs simply being dangerous isn't the problem if it is prescribed and used correctly.

As stated above, the percentage of over-prescribed drugs that happen in the world would not create a drug problem relevantly speaking to our current drug problem....

If you really need for me to break it down for you, I will.

Majivo wrote:
Almost everything. What little I do agree with you on, I find myself wishing we disagreed because your style is so damn self-assuring. You're like a gbaji who doesn't care about politics. I'm not going to enumerate all the things we disagree on, but I believe this link should cover the majority of it.


You didn't answer the question. What exactly do you disagree with particularly in this thread. My point I'm trying to show you is that you probably can't list anything. You're just calling me a moron because that's what everyone else is doing and there is no substance to back it up.

So, if you truly disagree with "everything", lets start by listing things in this thread.

I speak "self-assuring" because I tend to only argue about what I'm sure about. If I don't know, I will say that I'm not sure. If I'm wrong, I will admit that I'm wrong. Unlike the most of you, I realize that being wrong is a part of being right and a part of reality.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 178 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (178)