Don't ask, don't tell, don't persueFollow

For clarification, I do not believe that your sexuality, regardless of what it is, is a physical trait because there is nothing physical about it. The only other category that I can think of is a personal trait. If you want to classify it in another category, then go for it, but it isn't a physical trait.

See, that's what you call "consistency". Your mind and body are two different "systems". Your body will be excited by anything, it's your mind that make distinctions. Therefore, your arousal during sex does not make you a particular sexual orientation. HOWEVER, if you make a constant effort to engage in those activities, then that's a pretty good indication of your sexual orientation. That doesn't occur until your MIND becomes part of that equation. Therefore, it can not possibly be a physical trait if it's based on a mental acceptance.

See, what people on this forum do is jump ships to whatever supports their argument. Belkira mentioned that the ~philia comes in when the person becomes physical with the children. However, she also argued that the sodomy laws in the military aren't contradictory by repealing DADT because your sexual orientation isn't defined by your sexual actions and not everyone is having sex. That would imply that you aren't "gay" or "straight" until you have sex. Complete contradiction.



Only if you're a close-minded ignoramus who lacks the aptitude to know when you're approaching a more perspicacious person.

Since these are both equally repulsive, could you pick two other females, please?[:barf:]

No, I'm completely turned off.

Why do I get the feeling Alma didn't even read that one, simple paragraph I quoted? Maybe he read the first two words, and the last sentence? Because that's "how you speed read"?

That's what he said.

Trololol.


Edit: Damn it!

Edited, Jan 27th 2012 9:14am by Nilatai

What's with his fascination with Rosie O'Donnel?

Show tunes and Koosh balls. He and Varus should start a fan club.

Ahh, so now you want us to play semantics on what is considered attractive with your use of quotation marks, subtly (possibly even subconsciously) implying you find O'Donnel visually pleasing. Interesting ...

The goal was to compare an "attractive" woman with an "unattractive" woman. I was asked to find a more pleasing woman, so the woman that I changed to would denote the pleasing woman. So, if you were to analyze what was said in context with common sense, then you would realize that your analysis is incorrect.

I used quotes because I don't like calling people "ugly" or "unattractive" because I know it's all in the eyes of the beholder. Just like Bijou doesn't find Kim Kardashian attractive, there's millions of men who disagree. Check any top 100 hot woman chart that includes U.S women and she's probably in there.

Whatever gets you off... Don't worry, that doesn't mean you're gay.

Giggle, now you've moved on to transference.

Wasn't one of your recent arguments that it was funny how when you had the same discussions the people around you all agreed with you? Jus' sayin'.

Ahaha. You screen people so they don't challenge you too much!

Maybe you should reread what I said?

I find intelligent people with varying beliefs... You can't get any more challenging. My BN S2 is by far one of the most overall smart people that I've met in awhile. I learned a lot from just short discussions. He took over my role as the "Math guy". Unlike me, he actually remembers everything that he done in college, because he does problems for fun. That gave me motivation to get back in it.



Read above.. Nice try. Your point of view doesn't make you smart or dumb, it's your logic and rationale for supporting it. The reality is, most people just support stuff without actually researching anything.