Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Racist, funny or who cares?Follow

#827 Apr 11 2011 at 11:40 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Wow, I'm glad I'm not reading this thread. You'd think that with THIS many posts, there's actually be some drama in here.
This thread is about as pointless and boring as they get. It's really just some people using Alma to farm posts.


Heh... Okay,

4391....
#828 Apr 12 2011 at 11:10 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
It takes two to tango, and there are also far less graceful dances that require, two, three, or more. What shall we call this one?
#829 Apr 12 2011 at 11:15 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Kachi wrote:
It takes two to tango, and there are also far less graceful dances that require, two, three, or more. What shall we call this one?
The Hucklebuck.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#830 Apr 12 2011 at 1:18 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,565 posts
Alma i see you are at 4392 posts. I heard 4400 is a nice round number to stop at.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#831 Apr 12 2011 at 2:38 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Alma i see you are at 4392 posts. I heard 4400 is a nice round number to stop at.


Correction: 4394 posts...

Stop for what occasion?

I recall asking you to expound on a statement that you made on the "No-Fly Zone" thread...
#832 Apr 12 2011 at 7:59 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,565 posts
Its been expounded champ and you didn't reply to it, so um...crisis averted? Also....
You Wrote wrote:

Seriously people.. 3900 is a nice round number to stop at


I figured 4400 was just as nice a round number.

edit relevant link is relevant.

http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=4&mid=1292714560124432388&page=7&howmany=50#msg1293509370233822182

and considering your edit at 2:51 we will just use Joph's initial reply at 1:30 to support thats what you said (because I don't recall your family event being involved at the time when we were laughing at you)

http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=4&mid=1292714560124432388&page=7&howmany=50#msg1293517662317336282

Edited, Apr 12th 2011 10:03pm by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#833 Apr 12 2011 at 8:05 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Quote:
Its been expounded champ and you didn't reply to it, so um...crisis averted? Also....


Well, I'll go back and reread it.


rdmcandie wrote:

Almalieque out of context wrote:

Seriously people.. 3900 is a nice round number to stop at


I figured 4400 was just as nice a round number.


As I asked, for what occasion? There was a specific occasion for why 3900 was a "nice round number to stop at", which you conveniently left out. So what is the occasion for 4400 or are you just making up some random number? Oh, wait, you already answered that question. Ok, that's nice to know that you have no logic behind your statement.
#834 Apr 12 2011 at 8:07 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Alma i see you are at 4392 posts. I heard 4400 is a nice round number to stop at.
Nice try, but as long as people keep responding to him, he's going to keep posting.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#835 Apr 12 2011 at 8:08 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,565 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
Alma i see you are at 4392 posts. I heard 4400 is a nice round number to stop at.
Nice try, but as long as people keep responding to him, he's going to keep posting.


Just trying to get him 5 more so he can stop at a round number is all.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#836 Apr 12 2011 at 8:16 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
Alma i see you are at 4392 posts. I heard 4400 is a nice round number to stop at.
Nice try, but as long as people keep responding to him, he's going to keep posting.


Just trying to get him 5 more so he can stop at a round number is all.


I heard 1,000,000 is a much better round number to "stop at" for whatever imaginary occasion that you created.

Edited, Apr 13th 2011 1:50pm by Almalieque
#837 Apr 21 2011 at 4:30 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Are we really going to let this thread die with only 3 pages left till 20? I'm sure there's something else we can talk about....
#838 Apr 21 2011 at 6:53 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
I'll once again reiterate what a ****** you are. I mean, really, "Why is 4400 a good number to stop at?" Because, deutschebag, you're a blight on these boards and no one would be sad to see you stop posting. You fail at basic reading comprehension and you have a naivete that is astounding for an adult man. You can't just add more words and say "No one understands me because they don't read my entire post!!!" It's the other way around. No one reads your posts in their entirety because they fail to understand your ******* point two paragraphs into seven. Face it, the majority of people on this board disagree with you because there are fundamental flaws in your rationality, just like varus. You seem to acknowledge and accept the existence of trolls, yet you apparently don't know what that even means. If I see someone trying to troll me, I ignore them. The fact that you reply to every single post Ugly makes just shows what ripe troll bait you are. People with the intelligence to comprehend emotion over a text medium usually don't let themselves get trolled. But, as it's been reiterated numerous times, you just have a functional failing somewhere in your brain that causes people to bang their heads against the wall, and opens up a door for them to feel sublimely superior to someone else with very little effort at all.
#839 Apr 21 2011 at 7:22 AM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
Guenny wrote:
I'll once again reiterate what a ****** you are. I mean, really, "Why is 4400 a good number to stop at?" Because, deutschebag, you're a blight on these boards and no one would be sad to see you stop posting. You fail at basic reading comprehension and you have a naivete that is astounding for an adult man. You can't just add more words and say "No one understands me because they don't read my entire post!!!" It's the other way around. No one reads your posts in their entirety because they fail to understand your @#%^ing point two paragraphs into seven. Face it, the majority of people on this board disagree with you because there are fundamental flaws in your rationality, just like varus. You seem to acknowledge and accept the existence of trolls, yet you apparently don't know what that even means. If I see someone trying to troll me, I ignore them. The fact that you reply to every single post Ugly makes just shows what ripe troll bait you are. People with the intelligence to comprehend emotion over a text medium usually don't let themselves get trolled. But, as it's been reiterated numerous times, you just have a functional failing somewhere in your brain that causes people to bang their heads against the wall, and opens up a door for them to feel sublimely superior to someone else with very little effort at all.


After reading this, I just wanted to say thank you for your nice post in my failed ash Wednesday joke thread :)

OT: not racist, nor funny. If anything it is sexist, but not racist
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#840Almalieque, Posted: Apr 21 2011 at 11:40 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) And the fish bites......
#841 Apr 21 2011 at 12:11 PM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Hahaha. Oh Alma, I'll let you win, because it's like playing tug-of-war with my Shih Tzu - no way his brute strength will overpower me, but just placing the idea of a "win" in his head sure makes him feel good.

The German comment was more than enough for a good laugh. God, you're such a deutschebag.
#842 Apr 21 2011 at 12:33 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Guenny wrote:
Hahaha. Oh Alma, I'll let you win, because it's like playing tug-of-war with my Shih Tzu - no way his brute strength will overpower me, but just placing the idea of a "win" in his head sure makes him feel good.

The German comment was more than enough for a good laugh. God, you're such a deutschebag.


Well, you didn't last too long.... but whatever makes you feel better..
#843 Apr 21 2011 at 4:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
In a nut shell.

Abstract wrote:
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.


____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#844 Apr 21 2011 at 5:40 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Samira wrote:
In a nut shell.

Abstract wrote:
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.




Exactly.. Couldn't have said it better myself... Thanks for the tid-bit.
#845 Apr 21 2011 at 8:01 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Exactly.. Couldn't have said it better myself... Thanks for the tid-bit.

It's about you, numb-nuts. ******* christ.
#846 Apr 21 2011 at 8:22 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Exactly.. Couldn't have said it better myself... Thanks for the tid-bit.

It's about you, numb-nuts. @#%^ing christ.


Really? I didn't notice.. You're such a tool.. I was merely pointing out the fact that it could easily go either way and the simple fact that you insist it's "about me" is exactly what the abstract is in reference to.

and you call me stupid.....
#847 Apr 21 2011 at 8:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Samira wrote:
In a nut shell.

Abstract wrote:
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.




Exactly.. Couldn't have said it better myself... Thanks for the tid-bit.


You honestly thought Sam was talking about everyone else in the entire world and not you? Well, and others like you.

Holy hell.
#848 Apr 21 2011 at 8:50 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Assassin Nadenu wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Samira wrote:
In a nut shell.

Abstract wrote:
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.




Exactly.. Couldn't have said it better myself... Thanks for the tid-bit.


You honestly thought Sam was talking about everyone else in the entire world and not you? Well, and others like you.

Holy hell.


Read above... Not you too...

Let's think about this for a second.. Not a single person has "sided" with me yet, ever. So WTF would Samira (who has already insulted me ) come and blast everyone else? Really? Really?

And you call me stupid ....
#849 Apr 21 2011 at 11:27 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Alma is not actually always retarded. He just has a ridiculously bad ratio of argumentativeness to legitimate insight, which makes it not worth drawing attention to the rare occasion that he makes a fair point.

I wouldn't want to see him go, personally, but then I thrive on the conflict.
#850 Apr 22 2011 at 2:59 AM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
In a nut shell.

Abstract wrote:
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.


Some of us, of course, are just that good.

^
<
#851 Apr 22 2011 at 3:51 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Kachi wrote:
Alma is not actually always retarded.
Neither is gbaji. Difference being, gbaji's reasoning can be followed, Alma's is always abstract at best and all over the place most often.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 238 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (238)